Tag Archives: Colonization

Blog 4: Colonization of Sudan vs. American

The colonial history of Sudan began with the Turk-Egyptian rule. The ruling lasted from 1820 until about 1885. This began when Muhammad Ali arranged for two military expeditions, one to the south and the other into the western section of Sudan. The main motivation for invasion was an attempt to obtain black men for his army and to find gold. From the start, the government was already set up for failure. Those in charge were terrible in public communication whether it be delivering speech, or simply reaching out to potential followers. Wherever they went, no one showed interest in associating with them and ultimately just wanted the armies to leave. A rebellion against the government by religious leader Mohamed Ahmed El Mahdi took place in 1881, for both religious and political reasons. His triumph was successful, although he passed away shortly following his reign a year later.

After the Turk-Egyptian ruling, the British-Egyptian Rule took place when General Kitchener invaded Sudan from 1896 to 1898. The British are one of the original reasons for the current Southern and Northern Sudan separation, from when they began requiring a passport to travel between the two countries and setting a ban on the slave trade. From 1951-1953, the British and Egyptians finally evacuated Sudan. Unfortunately, in November of 1955, Sudan redeclared total independence from southern Sudan, initiating a Civil War between the north and south.

During the colonial time period of America, Europeans were arriving in America to become wealthier and spread their influences across the world. The Spanish arrived first among the Europeans. Colonies began to establish amongst the northeast, contracting approximately 2 million colonists by 1770. Towards the end of the colonial American era, most profit was arriving through food products, stores amongst the ships, rum, and slaves. A common misunderstanding is the origin of these slaves during the colonial period. A majority were coming from the Caribbean, not Africa.

(The post would not let me upload pictures so I will attach the websites I found the pictures off of that I would have liked to use, sorry!)

Colonial Sudan:
http://southernsudan.prm.ox.ac.uk/images/midsize/1998.204.11.20_O.jpg

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mb176fDtbe1rqkjy0o2_1280.gif

Colonial America:

http://my-ecoach.com/online/resources/6767/colonists.jpg

 

 

Background and thoughts Algeria’s colonization by France and colonization in the US

french algeria

What do Algeria, the United States, Canada, Haiti, South Africa, Brazil and almost any country you can think of have in common? All of these nations were at one point places of colonial rule by foreign powers. More specifically, Algeria and the United States were both controlled at one time by European countries. And in fact, both were colonized by the French at certain points, though, the United States would later be unanimously controlled by Great Britain.

As in colonization of any area, the country of power who comes in and encroaches upon a land in some way. Imperialism is no coincidence, and is a vicious, unfair vehicle for the controlling nation to extract some kind of resource tactical or material out of occupying a land.

In the case of Algeria, the French sought out to establish a tactical foothold, as well as a colony for entrepreneurs to exploit. Here in America, when the French were here, they established fur trading posts in Detroit and established a major port in New Orleans. In New England there was much timber trade by the British. And in the South Tobacco was a big cash crop for Great Britain.

In Both America and Algeria, the economies were propped up by the use of slavery. Although the difference here, is that the French enslaved the Algerians, while the British transplanted people from East Africa and brought them to an unfamiliar land. Both are gross travesties. And, even after their abolitions, created major dividing lines, between whites and native, darker skinned people. The outsiders, as in all imperialist situations, were seen as the people in the right, in charge, to be looked up to. After all, they inflicted violence upon the natives if they didn’t.

In the first half of the 1800s there were many pirate attacks on European shifts along the Mediterranean. Much of North Africa offered safe havens for these pirates.

The land which now constitutes Algeria was a part of the Ottoman Empire in the 1830s. The United States were also controlled by other countries before the English established the thirteen colonies, such as, the French, the Spanish and the Dutch.

In France, Napoleon had been out of power for some time, the Bourbon Restoration was going on. It was a time of conservatism and in general, the nation needed to prove it was strong again.

France’s ruler of the time, Charles X, used a petty disagreement between a French consul and an Ottoman leader, as a springboard to invade Algeria. And so they did. In what was supposed to be a civilized overtaking, women were raped, goods were stolen, people were arrested for arbitrary reasons, and people were killed for no good reason.

The French installed many of their own rulers. Over their occupation, the French changed power multiple times. For a brief period, Algeria was actually considered part of the nation of France. They moved in many citizens, some who were entrepreneurs looking to buy land, and some who were peasants and sought to live cheaper and start anew in Algeria.

Much like America, beyond perhaps a few figurehead local leaders, Algerians had no representation, and were being mistreated by French authorities. AND much like in America, as when the British controlled and when the United States won its independence, genocide occurred. Many Berbers in Algeria were killed in order to deal with insurrection or unwillingness to move out of land, much like the United States killed off many Indians.

Abd al Qadir emerged as a fighter of the people, and sought to create an independent Algerian state. He fought a Guerilla war, much like we fought in some of the mountains and valleys of New England, and the Indians fought against our forces.

He established a government in the areas not yet occupied by the French.  It provided military resources, collected taxes and had a focus on education. But in 1836, after a defeat to French forces, they allowed him to have territory they referred to as the Moslem State. Yet, three years later, they attacked and overtook territory that was supposed to belong to al Qadir’s state.

Fighting ensued back and forth until 1843. At this time the French had one third of its whole army stationed in Algeria.

Algeria would not gain independence from France until 1962. The United States can at least say that we’ve had a few centuries of independence. This enabled us to figure out what works and doesn’t work, it allowed us to fight for human rights for different minority groups (something that is still going on), and it enabled us time and infrastructure to take advantage of multiple periods of progress, development and modernization.

While Algeria is now independent, they still are not as stable as the United States. For a country to have only been independent for less than a hundred years, they have not had ample time to work out domestic issues and develop all of its potential socially and economically. They are still beholden to some foreign influence, and are considered a developing nation. Perhaps, had the French not been so ruthless in their control of Algeria, or never invaded, who knows how different things could have been.

Though it is important to note that there was never a nationalist move to make Algeria a nation of its own until French control. While the French killed many people and acted in no part in the interests of the Algerian people, in a way, their colonization, helped the Algerians come together and helped solidify their cultural identity.

sources:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/algeria.htm

http://www.cairn.info/zen.php?ID_ARTICLE=CEA_195_0805

http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/algeria-colonization-and-independence

British colonization of the US and Uganda

The terms, colonization, is originally derived from the latin ‘colere’ signifying to ‘ to inhabit, cultivate, protect’ another group of humans, thus to colonize would naturally signify to guard another people.

As a matter of fact, only a few countries in early and modern history such as Japan, Thailand, Iran, Liberia and Korea amongst a dozen have never been fully colonized at any point in their history.

_67358642_jamestown_painting

The Great United States, “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave” was once under the rule of other nations. Having begun in 1492 with a Spanish expedition, directed by Christopher Columbus, the colonization of the Americas lasted until late 1700’s. During that time frame, European, more specifically British settlers made several attempts to colonize the Eastern coast of the “New World” we now know as the US.

 As the United States gained their freedom from the hands of the Europeans, many countries across the globe were experiencing the same fate post Slave Trade. In 1884-1886, the “scramble for Africa”, or the ‘”conquest of Africa” emerged as the timeframe where European settlers truly established themselves as strict colonists within the African continent. Within the space of 20 years, 90 percent of Africa became occupied.

imgres-1

20101008_RhodesAfrica

At the time, the Kingdom of Buganda was one of the major political structures in the area we now know as Uganda. Although the presence of Arab traders seeking ivory and slaves had been in the region prior to the Europeans, notably the British invasion, it was not until 1888 that the English reluctantly considered East Africa and more specifically thus the Bugandan region as a colonial interest.

In 1894 The Brtish government declared a protectorate over Bugandan, separating numerous ethnic groups, especially the Bantu in the south from the Acholi and Langi in the North. In 1895, it associates Kenya forming the East Africa Protectorate.

congo white woman acting a fool

WWII became a turning point for the invisibility of the European colonists. As Britain dwelled in bankruptcy, African nationalism emerged and the Ugandan population straightened in political power. Having exposed many civilians through military travels abroad, young educated Ugandans and the Bugandan kingdom hunted for the freedom of their people.

In 1962, Uganda was granted autonomy. Ugandan politician Milton Obote, founder of the Uganda’s People Congress, becomes prime Minister and negotiates the official terms of the Constitution when the nation becomes fully independent in October 1962.

Both The United States and Uganda have experienced England take control of their land, labour and livelihood.

However past evidence shows that the level of severity and inhumane actions against Ugandans were absolutely dispicable.

In a recent article from the Guardian, it was shown that “thousands of documents detailing some of the most shameful acts and crimes committed during the final years of the British empire were systematically destroyed to prevent them falling into the hands of post-independence governments.”

imgres-2

 The notes included multiple genocides, purges and other abominable acts against the colonized societies, including Uganda. It was believed the genocide of Bunyoro reduced a 2.5 million population to a mere 150,000 Ugandan.

Even though colonization is no longer, England unquestionably left an indelible mark on it’s colonies.

The United States became the single most ruthless nation to participate in the human slave trade, leading to decades and generations of imported black slaves. It was only in the middle of the 20th century, with the Civil Rights Movement, that racial equality emerged.

images

As for Uganda, Britain turned into its’ “motherland”. From the English language and customs to their clothing and culture, Ugandans were brainwashed with the idea of a utopian British lifestyle. Moreover, It’s swift euphoric moment of independence only marked the beginning of a long chain of civil wars. British powered warlords such as Idi Amin, led the country into a full decade of absolute terror and a significant economic downfall.

images-2

Hatred between the North and the South ethnic groups instilled during the British Protectorate’s “divide and rule” technique, promoted conflict amongst ethnic violence. Forceful religious association, singularly Christianity had to be practiced during colonization, resulted into a major spiritual belief.

Although obvious mass exploitations for Uganda’s resources has ceased, it is not unfathomable that an underground “New Scramble for Africa” can be detected through fake foundations, tax havens, money laundering from foreign banks, multi national companies, food systems and more. From 1970 an estimated 845 billion dollars has been “lost”. In the words of George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

images-1

Sources:

http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/European_colonization_of_the_Americas.html

http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/plaintexthistories.asp?historyid=ad22

http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/PlainTextHistories.asp?gtrack=pthc&ParagraphID=oqm#oqm

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/apr/18/britain-destroyed-records-colonial-crimes

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/uganda/7139493/Ugandans-sue-Britain-over-colonial-era-crimes.html

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-22362831

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw12KGSj53k

The Might of European Colonization

European power has truly impacted the world. It is amazing to contemplate the might and dominance Europe has imposed on the globe for centuries through colonization. Growing up, one of the many ways my father would explain the difference between brawn and brains was to use the analogy of tiny Britain and its prior influence and colonization of many great nations. Today, I am still amazed that a small country such as Britain was able to control many great nations such as Africa, the Americas, and Asia. As strange as it seems, European colonization and imperialism has shaped the world and its history.  African and American colonization are huge examples of the influence and might of European colonization.

Imperialism-612x300.jpg

The histories of Modern Africa and the United States of America/the Americas have the shared experience of colonization and imperialism from European nations Such as Spain, Portugal, France, and Britain and other prominent European nations. Both Continents shared similarities of exploitation by a hungry and greedy Europe. After the first few waves of explorations to the Americas, Spain became envied by its other European brothers because of the riches it received from exploration and colonization of large Native American populations such as the Incas and the Aztecs. This inspired the settlement and colonization of English men into America with the first settlement of Jamestown in Virginia 1607. The Englishmen sailed to America in hopes of finding riches and gold but would grow disappointed after months and years of exploitation of the land. They would soon realize that there was no gold in the land they settled in. This lust for gold and riches is exactly what lead European nations to seek and exploit African lands leaving only two nations to not be colonized; Ethiopia and Liberia.

euro1

Both Continents experienced the dominance and imperialism of Europe. However, it seems as through present Africa has still not recovered from the colonization and imperialism that Europe imposed. I often wonder what has caused Africa to be so behind in economical and agricultural development. Time, slavery,  cultural exploitation,and land exploitation have played a huge role in the present day development and standing of Africa. Although America experienced European colonization and imperialism, it has had many centuries to grow and develop into a super power. Africa on the other hand is young and has not had as much time to develop into the nation that it has the potential to be. But why is that? Africa is known to have immense riches even more than America but it is still experiencing growing pains. This is because Slavery and land exploitation for riches has had an instrumental impact on Africa. Due to slavery and slave trade, Africa lost many of its population that were necessary to reproduce and thrive, and to take care and protect their land. This affected many African nations because many great potential leaders were lost.

euro

Furthermore, African land and culture were exploited. In the quest for riches and the abundant resources, colonization of Africa lead to subjugated lands from over mining and even stealing from African chiefs. The country Ghana, formerly known as the Gold Cost experienced a lot of cultural exploitation and robbery from European leaders who would steal the gold and prized jewels from many chiefs and leaders of villages. Today many Ghanaian villages are under a lot of poverty because of lost riches from colonization that occurred years ago. I find this very shocking because this occurred years ago but people are still experiencing the short hand that colonization has dealt them.

European Colonization has affected the whole world. However, Africa of present still suffers from past imperialism that was imposed on her. It will defiantly take time for Africa to recover from the effects European Imperialism has had on the continent. Although it is presently behind the rest of the world, Africa continues to grow and develop economically and politically. I truly believe that with time Africa has the potential to be a very prominent and powerful nation with its immense wealth.

History Repeats Itself

Take two countries like Africa and the United States and most people would use the word similar to compare the two, but you can’t judge a book by its cover. As different as these countries are now, they were both colonized very similarly by the Europeans. This is just another example of how where nature and nurture both play a factor, nurture takes over as the dominant factor.

The European Colonies of Africa

The Europeans have a tendency to think they can intrude on other people’s land and take over. The African’s and European’s had quite a confusing time with each other. Through treaties and other agreements, the African’s thought they were making allies, but the Europeans thought that the African’s were signing their life over to them. The African’s soon realized this and did what anybody would do, they resisted. African leaders tried to order military rebellions but they were no match for Europe’s well-developed military. The African military was not the biggest or most professional army out there, so they relied mostly on Guerrilla Warfare. The African countries fought hard but could not hold on to their precious land. The technology of the African weapons was very basic, they used things such as bows, arrows, spears, and swords. While the technology of the European weapons was very up to date, they had the latest rifles, machine guns, artillery, and pretty much any of the newest technology at the time.  There was just not much chance for the Africans. By the 1900’s most of Africa lost the battle to the Europeans and was colonized by the powers of Europe. Every European power wanted a piece of this new African territory and this created what is known as “The Scramble for Africa”. These countries were so serious about getting as much of Africa as possible that the word “Imperialism” started getting tossed around a lot. This colonization should sound familiar to you if you know anything about the colonization of the United States.

The United States colonization is so similar to this that it is scary. There are some differences like the fact that the British actually used force to move the Indians first and then also tried to use force to control the American colonies after. The British used force just like the other European powers did in Africa. There was also war between world powers because everyone wanted a piece of America just like “The Scramble for Africa”. The colonies of America had a small army so they too had to use Guerilla warfare. The technology difference in weapons between Britain and the colonies was not quite as big of a difference as the one between Europe and Africa, but it was still enough to give the Americans a disadvantage. The colonization of Africa and America are so similar and not many people even think to look that far into it because they see how different these countries are today.

Slavery in America

Imperialism and slavery are to me very similar terms. Imperialism is virtually the act of making a group of people into slaves. No imperialism is not as severe as slavery but it has the same basic principles. The definition of imperialism is “a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force” according to dictionary.com, and the definition of enslave is “cause (someone) to lose their freedom of choice or action, usually by force”. These two definitions are very similar. If you look at the first part of the definitions, a country extending its power is like exerting its dominance, usually a loss of someone else’s freedom also comes with a country extending its power. The second part of each definition refers to the act of force being used to obtain what someone wants. I think that slavery and imperialism are both horrible things. Slavery often comes with more severe treatment of the victim but not in all cases and sometimes the victims of imperialism are often treated very poorly. I think that slavery and imperialism go hand in hand and are both awful things, but unfortunately they are both a part of our history.

– Austin Groff

Colonization and Slavery

AFR110- Blog Post #4- History or Colonization

In the 1600s, Great Britain began in Jamestown, Virginia with their colonization of America.  The British colonization of the Americas caused disturbance through military force, cultural manipulation and the introduction of diseases. The indigenous civilizations, even with their fast and furious warrior class, was no match for the colonial-style warfare of the British. However, trade remained an important part of the relationship between the natives and the British. The Americas remained colonized by the British until the American Revolutionary War, which ended in 1783.

Similarly to the Americas, the Europeans interest in Africa began in the late 18th century. Christian missionaries helped to spread Christianity and formal colonial conquest. Great Britain abolished the slave trade, but the transition from slave trade to commerce trade was not smooth for Africans. The Europeans thrived and their influence increased. By the 1900s, only Liberia and Ethiopia were not colonized. France and Britain colonized most of Africa. But Germany, Portugal, Belgium, Spain, and Italy also participated in the colonization.

In the 19th century, the Europeans developed a great interest in Cameroon. The coastal region of feared that the more interior regions would start direct trading with the Europeans, which would weaken the coast’s power intermediary status. The chiefs of the coastal regions wanted to strike a deal with the British. But Britain’s delay to send a representative to compromise with Cameroon forced the chiefs to turn to Germany instead. Despite the diversity of the ethnic groups with distinct cultures, histories, and governments, and traditions, Germany colonized present-day Cameroon as Kamerun. Germany’s intent was to build the colony’s infrastructure and combine its rule by expanding into the interior and taking control of tribal strongholds. Germany’s plan was falling into place, until their defeat in World War 1 stopped any plans Germany may have had for the colony. Germany had to surrender its oversea colonies. France assumed control of 80% of the colony, while Britain gained the remainder. French and British rule of Cameroon lasted until after World War 2.

By definition is a system under which people are treated as property. Slaves can be bought, sold, and traded. Slaves can be held from the time of their capture, purchase or birth.  Slaves are deprived of the right to leave, option to work, and/or deprived compensation. Slavery is wrong, no matter who is being enslaved. Nobody deserves to be taken as collateral. The treatment of enslaved people was horrendous. No person has the authority to dictate another person’s action. Africans were enslaved and used throughout centuries. Africans should have never relied on slavery as a form of commerce. A person has never, and will never have equal value to any tangible goods. Colonization is like enslaving an entire area. Colonization settles a group and establishes political control over it. Europeans, and others who colonized, believed that they were more powerful therefore gaining the right to take possession of any area. Forcing the native civilizations of an area to merge takes away from the culture and uniqueness of the region. Individuals lose their identity from being colonized. Using violence, guns, and other weapons as a way to intimidate civilizations to comply with rules of colonization is unfair. Everybody has a decision on how to live their life, having that decision stripped from you due to colonization is not right. Even when nations thought they were helping, they left regions in a poor state; often in poverty, famine, and war. The Scramble for Africa should have never taken place. Whether the colonizing country was peaceful or violent, no country should be granted the right to seize and restrict a region. Europeans crippled the rich native African civilizations for their own political and economic gain. No matter the reason, no intelligence, knowledge, or technology permits one country to be able to overtake another.

Colonization: A Sad Comparison

Many have heard the phrase “in 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue” in reference to the discovery of North America and subsequent colonization. It seems like an innocent child’s rhyme, recited to foster memorization of our country’s history. Sadly however, the process of colonization of the Americas by European countries is anything but innocent. Not only did European countries colonize America, they also had a heavy hand in the colonization of Africa. Two beautiful countries with amazing potential, savagely ruled because of greed and a thirst for power. Slavery also was a huge factor with founders exploiting both Native Americans and Africans and the negative effects are still being dealt with in today’s society with inequality being a continuous fight.

The three g’s that governed the exploration and later colonization of the Americas I believe also had an affect on what was happening in Africa though with slight variance. They are: God, Glory and Gold. Religion played a huge role in that the European countries believed (wanted to believe) that what they were doing in these parts of the world was governed and blessed by God. God would have wanted them to bring life and love and Jesus to these poor heathens who probably have never even heard of the bible. Countless actions were excused on behalf of bringing the Christian faith to these “naïve” people of the world. Now I am a Christian myself and this greatly saddens me because at its core, these explorers and conquerors of the land were committing acts that fostered inequality in the name of religion.

During the time of colonization in the Americas the second g “Glory” was quite important to those countries investing in the exploration. To obtain pieces of land, establish a new sector of trading, and be known to other parts of the world that you have lived and conquered, all fall into the category of glory. Countries such a France, Brittan and Spain saw Africa and the Americas as parcels of land waiting to be divided and thrived in. Wars were fought, treaties were signed and lives were lost often times with little respect for the native inhabitants. Why should their needs, desires and customs matter? These countries believed that no matter what African’s and Native Americans original methods of living were, theirs would be better, stronger, and more civilized.

The third g “Gold” was also a huge factor in colonization. In this world and throughout history, there is one thing to be counted on: people’s love of wealth. The pilgrims traded the Native Americans beads and other worthless trinkets for knowledge of the land and other life-saving information/tools that they had no way of providing for themselves. As discussed in class, Africa was sought after for jewels, gold and other goods. When a country is discovered to have goods worth trading, suddenly the value and desire for parts of that land skyrocket. Countries began to carve away at the rich country of Africa, all seeking personal gains for their own economies with little heed to what would become of the societies they were pillaging.

As a person who is of both Native and African American decent I cannot help but feel overwhelming remorse for the suffering of my ancestors. While colonization of the Americas and Africa did bring about definition of the nations that we know and love today, it went hand-in-hand with the crushing of economies and the spirits of those natives who were expected to follow willingly into a life of despair and pain. Those hurtful actions are still being seen in our society today in fights for equality and reparation for past grievances. The toil of those who went before us is not to be soon forgotten as it can still be seen all around us.

African and American colonialism under Britian

The European nations were of the quickest in the world to develop. This led them to explore the world to expand and to grow even bigger. The United States of America was one of the colonies of Britain, amongst other European countries like France, Spain and the Netherlands, Along with an array of African countries that fell under British imperial control. lets compare and contrast the differences between British colonization of Africa and America.

England's colonial expansion

AMERICA
The British colonized the Americas during the late 16th century, they had colonies in North and South America. The British pretty much wiped out the Native population as their warrior were no match for the superior military and advanced weapons. The Europeans brought to the Americas foreign diseases which along with the military and weapons killed off the natives. The British government set up their system in the Americas. The Christian church launched a massive evangelism crusade, which is the start of the colonization of the Americas.

Africa
The British Government moved in on the continent of Africa seen as a means to expand their arm of imperialism. They arrived in Africa in 1539. The European nations of Belgian, Britain, French, Germany. Italy, Portuguese, and Spain all had colonies in Africa. The only countries in Africa not to be colonized would be Ethiopia and Liberia. Britain began taking over the territory of Nigeria in the 1880s, dividing the more than 200 ethnic groups into three regions: the Northern Region, the Western Region, and the Eastern Region. They brought with them the Christian religion that they tried to convert all the people of Nigeria to. Nigeria became part of the British empire January 1, 1901.

Comparison
The British colonization of the Americas was very similar to that of Africa. They basically came into these areas and began changing and altering peoples way of life to match that of theirs. The good that the British did in Africa was helping the Nigerians with health, agriculture, and education, schools. They taught the Nigerian people how to speak English. The British, in my opinion, designed the new Nigerian colonies to economically serve the British needs. Nigerians traded materials such as palm oil, cotton, rubber, and tropical wood for expensive British things such as clothes, and metal tools. However it wasn’t all good and jolly. The Nigerian people began trading humans for British weapons.
In the Americas the main influence or effect of the British colonization was the eradication of natives of the lands and the establishments of Coalition parties from British political establishments.

Ultimately America became sort of a spitting image of Britain while Africa was left damaged and ruined. America followed in British footsteps and began the exploitations of Africans as well. the mid Atlantic slave trade is started and Africa would never be the same. I think that Africa suffered most from the colonization from Britain as opposed to the Americas. The was an enormous amount of Africans brought to the Americas, which they benefitted from by selling them and making them work on Farm crops like cotton.

source: http://www.studygroup-bd.org/colonialism-british-colonisation-of-the-americas.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_Nigeria

Colonization

The Europeans colonized both Africa and the United States in an aggressive manner. For religious and economic purposes, the colonization devastated both continents and left an everlasting imprint on their respective histories. The colonization of both Africa and the United States had similarities as well as some differences.

 

Both Africa and the United States were colonized with the intention of expanding European power. Both were destination spots for the Europeans to seek economic opportunity. The Europeans forcefully pushed out both the Africans and Native Americans out of their native lands. The African population was able to stay afloat while the Native American population diminished exponentially. Both cultures and way of life were greatly altered with the entrance of the Europeans. The United States and Africa were used systematically in trade routes between the Eastern and Western world, being used as sources of labor, capital, and technology for the Europeans’ expense. In both countries, the native Africans were brutalized, debased, and discriminated upon heavily. Stereotypes and racists trends were created in both Africa and the United States. The colonization had a handful of similar effects in both continents.

 

On the other hand, there were some stark in the colonization of both the United States and Africa. Although both the United States and Africa were colonized with the intention of expanding European power, both colonized for different reasons. Africa was being primarily used for a source of cheap labor and the United States was being used for its resources and manufacturing. The sugar, cotton, and tobacco industries together were the sole purpose of colonization in the United States. These industries were so profitable from the cheap labor coming from Africa.

 

The idea of Imperialism can be traced to one of the big flaws of man: Greed. When the power get more powerful, they will stop at nothing to keep the power at a high level, even at the cost of another’s property, state of mind, and even their life. What the Europeans did to Africa and the United States is truly appalling when you go to the root of their actions. They extorted people from their homes for their own profits, neglecting the horrific actions they are partaking. Forcefully imposing your will on anyone isn’t right and taking extreme lengths to do so are a product of the darker side of man. Not only would they take over their land and resources, they would try to change the culture of the native peoples and impose their religion and customs on the. In Africa, this is referred to the ‘white man’s burden’. This burden shows the ignorance and the unnecessary paternal feeling that the Europeans had. They truly believed that they were better and smarter than the native people. This ignorance was a big characteristic of the Imperialist countries. Imperialism isn’t just from European exploration. It can be traced back to other events like the crusades and happenings of that nature. This led to man’s darkest creation; Slavery.

 

Slavery was a direct product from Imperialism. The enslaving of a mass of humans for cheap labor and capital usage might be the most heinous crime man can do. Slavery is one of the most dehumanizing activities that has taken place in our human history. It suggests superiority and inferiority between different people. It creates a world of hate and fear. I believe the slavery during the European expansion revolutionized racism and took it to another level. I feel that we are still feeling residual effects of slavery today. The racism that derived from that is still prevalent in many societies. I feel like racism will always be present in society but it will diminish greatly over time. However, it might take a while to do so.

 

The Tragic Histories of Colonization in the US and South Africa

If you look at a 20$ bill, Andrew Jackson’s face looks right back at you. This is a man who oversaw the passing of a law that legalized ethnic cleansing and led to genocide. Something that is usually lacking when Apartheid is discussed in the United States is self-reflection. South Africa and The United States have endless similarities, especially when it comes to colonization and the treatment of each country’s respective native people.

The US and South Africa are home to enormous amounts of natural resources. The presence of these resources encouraged European exploration and colonization of both regions. The United States was colonized by many countries including Brittan, France, Spain and the Netherlands. South Africa was colonized by the Netherlands and Brittan. Pre colonization, both counties were home to a diverse number of nation/states often referred to as tribes.

With an abundance of resources and no single concentrated government, the land belonging to the native people of both regions was taken explored and colonized by European powers. As European exploration turned into colonialism trade turned into the displacement, enslaving, and murder of the native people of both regions. The fate of indigenous groups often depended on resources. If a group were in the way of possible wealth they were removed. One particular resource that was especially fateful for the native people of both regions was gold. The gold rush in the Western United States led to extreme violence resulting in the decimation of entire American Indian Nations. Similarly British and Dutch discovery of gold resulted in wars between European powers and subsequent violence and displacement of Africans. The discovery of gold in South Africa helped to start a chain of events that would lead to Apartheid.

It is common to end the discussion of the colonization in the United States at the end of the revolutionary war, but this is not the case. The result of the end of the war was the United States-a country whose inhabitants were previously European. The new country set on a course of Westward expansion dubbed “Manifest Destiny”. The philosophy known as manifest destiny, is really nothing more than imperialism. This form of imperialism encouraged organized and often militarized violence against Native Americans. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 made the displacement of various Native American nations law in the United States. In 1851 land was designated to separate Native Americans from the rest of the population. These designated pieces of land were named reservations. Horrific events such as the Long Walk of the Navajos, the Trail of Tears, and the Massacre at Wounded Knee have come to define the brutal violence against Native Americans during this era.

In the late 1940’s South Africa Apartheid was enacted. This followed years of segregation and repression of non-whites in the country. Apartheid made it an official law that non-whites and whites would be separated. Laws made it illegal for non-white South Africans to travel in certain areas without documentation. Events such as the Sharpeville Massacre and the Soweto Uprising are reminiscent of the horrors that happened in the previous century across the Atlantic, in the United States.

In both the United States and South Africa signs of the past remain. Reservations and townships still exist with lingering social and economic issues caused by centuries of Oppression. It continues to amaze me that with all of the similarities of Apartheid and The Indian Removal Act that both subjects are taught with much different attitudes in the United States. Just recently I was watching Anthony Bourdain’s Part’s Unknown in which he visited Johannesburg, South Africa. In the show’s opening scene he questions why a statue of a Dutch solider, synonymous with colonialism and oppression, is still standing in post-Apartheid South Africa. It is a very valid question, but is it fair to criticize South Africa for the presence of a statue when Andrew Jackson (the president behind The Indian Removal Act) is on the United States’ 20 dollar bill?

Cited:

Bourdain, Anthony. “Parts Unknown: South Africa.” Anthony Bourdain’s Parts Unknown. CNN. N.d. Television.