If I asked you to give me an example of “lowbrow music” or “music for kids and dope addicts”, what style of music would you think of? Unless you already looked at the title of this post, you probably were not thinking of jazz. It will likely come as a surprise to learn that legendary Jazz trumpeter Dizzy Gillespie once explained that “the great mass of the American people still consider jazz… lowbrow music…To them, jazz is music for kids and dope addicts. Music to get high to. Music to take a fling to. Music to rub bodies to. Not “serious” music.” It will likely come as even more of a surprise that this was in an article that he wrote in 1957, long after the establishment of jazz and during the heyday of rock and roll (I will write another post about “rock and roll” and rock, they are not the same).
It would make sense that people would have this perception of jazz when it first became prominent: and they certainly did. In an article in the New York Times titled “Conspiracy of Silence Against Jazz” and dedicated to the “negation of rhythmical sound and motion called jazz”, Robert J. Cole wrote that teachers could “help to curb jazzing… by showing the benighted ones how much more joyful the artistic (ballet) steps really are”. He goes on to propose that “maybe the jazzer has no soul”. This type of criticism, while comically extreme, is not unusual for a new style that challenges conventions.
What is unusual is for a style to be accepted and then go back to being “music for kids”. Paul Lopez explains this in his book, The Rise of a Jazz Art World, by noting that Gillespie’s comments came during the “peak of a renaissance in jazz music – a rebirth of jazz as a high art movement that over the two decades of the 1950s and 1960s transformed American music”. To those teens that were not enamored with the Beach Boys and the British Invasion, jazz was coming back. This was not their parents’ jazz: it was more experimental, faster and more improvisational. It also wasn’t just the artists, the new wave of jazz “included record producers, concert producers, club owners, music critics, magazine publishers, and diverse audiences. All these various actors… brought their own meanings and practices to bear on jazz music.”
Also, as a style, jazz was designed to be rebellious. As behavioral scientist Paul Lopez puts it in “Signifying Deviance and Transgression: Jazz in the Popular Imagination”, jazz “represented a double consciousness of romantic rebellion and dangerous deviancy” and “acted to reaffirm dominant norms against a rebellious and deviant world in urban America.“ Jazz began as a rejection of what had previously been considered essential aspects of music. Rhythms were swung, non-harmonic tones were embraced, and (as Cole and Gillespie point out) the dancing was far more sexual then previous styles.
If any of this sounds familiar, it is because successive generations nearly always identify with new and evolving styles of music; and these styles usually reflect a rejection of previous convention and an increased sexualization of expression. A stark cultural revolution accompanied the arrival of jazz: to recycle a quote from my post on “Blue Skies”, “few times, standing so close together, has there been such a sharp line of distinction as that which existed between pre- and post-WWI”. While this shift was more extreme than usual, it was also centuries in the making. More recently, generations are defined in much narrower groups of years and music has evolved (or devolved, depending on your perspective) tremendously even in the last 10 years (see the Billboard year-end top songs from 2005 for proof of this). It is possible that the speed of this evolution has remained constant and my perception that it is accelerating is biased by a subtlety of differentiation that will be lost to time, but the ridiculousness of the idea of jazz music as lowbrow rebellious music to modern audiences is proof that a shift is happening: it will be interesting to see where it goes in our lifetimes.
69 years ago (the earliest year Billboard year-end chart data was reported), Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby were in the year-end top ten and dancing looked like this (https://youtu.be/I9zHYkKoL4A). 69 years later, you all know what dancing looks like. What will it look like 69 years from now? I am already scared for my grandkids.