The death penalty has always been a controversial punishment for serious crimes. Although, many countries have used it for centuries, most of them are beginning to abolish it because it is believed to be unethical and not an effective deterrent to crime. These countries include Australia, China, Mexico, Switzerland and 135 other nations. However, that this list does not include the United States, where 46 out of it’s 50 states still allow capital punishment to be used. I believe strongly that the United States should join those who have abolished capital punishment not only for ethical reasons, but for economic, and political reasons as well.
Our justice system exists as a way to protect the rights and lives of citizens by administering fair punishments to those who commit crimes. Under the U.S. constitution, no person may be subjected to “cruel or unusual” punishment. Many believe that the death penalty violates this clause. Forms of execution in the U.S. include electrocution, firing squad, lethal injection, gas chamber(by cyanide gas), and hanging. On their own they could be argued to violate this constitutional term, but often times these punishments are administered wrong causing unnecessary suffering. Administering the death penalty is not always a fool-proof process. It is promised that execution will be quick and painless, though complications can arise causing the victim to die slowly and painfully. These are a result of human error, equipment malfunction, and neglect of our justice system to provide proper administration of these already horrible ways to die.
In 1983 John Evans was sentenced to death by electrocution. His lawyer, Russell Canan recounts Evans execution “…the electrode burst from the strap holding it in place and caught on fire. Smoke and sparks also came out from under the hood in the vicinity of Evans’s left temple. Two physicians entered the chamber and found a heartbeat… another jolt of electricity was applied… more smoke and burning flesh. Again the doctors found a heartbeat.” The execution took over 14 minutes and left Evans’s body charred and smoking after being administered three separate jolts of electricity. This is one of many stories of execution gone wrong. Despite having committed an act of murder, Evans did not deserve this prolonged suffering and torture. In another case, Donald Eugene Harding was sentenced to death by asphyxiation in Arizona. It took over 10 minutes for doctors to pronounce Harding dead after convulsing violently for several minutes. One journalist reported “Harding’s death was extremely violent. He was in great pain. I heard him gasp and moan. I saw his body turn from red to purple.” In these cases, and many more, equally as horrible as these, people were denied their constitutional rights. The death penalty is a clear violation of the eighth amendment, and like any other unconstitutional violation of human rights this needs to be stopped immediately.
Not only does the death penalty overstep the bounds of the constitution, it oversteps many Americans moral code, especially that of the physicians required to be witness or administer the execution. Doctors take an oath to help those who are suffering and prevent the loss of life at all costs. Most states require that a doctor be present to administer or pronounce the death of a victim. As you can see, this puts the physician in place of confliction. Another question of the morality of capital punishment is not whether someone who committed a crime deserves death but whether the state should be allowed to make such a judgement.
When looking at the cost of keeping inmates in jail and the cost of the multiple trials for persons on death row, one expense is much greater than the other. Lawyer fees, costs of multiple lengthy trials, and the cost of the execution eventually add up. Many studies have showed that the costs of the death penalty can be up to 3 times more or 70% more costly than keeping an inmate in jail for life without parole. The money used to pay for the the expensive and lengthy process of capital punishment ultimately takes away funding from other important federally run programs. These include mental health, emergency services, education, or other state programs that should be priorities.
– Wrongly convicted people on death row
–Other Nations who have abolished death penalty and why it works. Alternatives to capitol punishment
–Conclusion
Recent Comments