Both Cole Camplese and Bart Purcell have written interesting posts commenting on the fact that students in one course only blog when instructors tell them to and no other time.
It’s somewhat depressing, but probably not surprising to anyone working with educational technology. Students also have to be prodded to write discussion board posts, turn in homework, take quizzes and read the material (via check-up quizzes).
The temptation is to blame the modern educational environment, but I really think it all comes down to another important educational factor … motivation. As many of us know, motivation is divided into “extrinsic” (motivated by certain social goals, like a good GPA) vs. “intrinsic” (true interest or “The Love”).
Blogging is fun if you are interested in the topic. If it’s another “essay” though, it’s not as much fun…it’s just work. When a course is taken to fulfill a requirement or fill out a schedule, the motivation to do more isn’t as strong.
It’s only you are in a course which you take for the heck of it, you may actually be willing to read the extra readings, do the extra exercises or even read items completely unassociated with your class. I actually did do the extra exercises in intro linguistics (and didn’t even turn them in). Did I do the extra exercises for statistics? Not really.
I wish all courses could be equally interesting, but I don’t think that’s a realistic possibility. Why should one instructor be interested in the bombadeer beetle and another in Ancient Athenian politics and drama? The beauty of the academic experience is that there are so many different ideas to obsess over – no one could ever possibly obsess equally.
So is blogging in the classroom a waste of time? I don’t think it is. If nothing else, a well-formed blog assignment may force the student to think about an issue in a new way. Sometimes, an assignment is about giving the student the “opportunity” to practice a new skill…whether they want to or not. And you never know…intrinsic interest may come later in life.
You would not know it from the amount I blog now, but there was a time when I found most writing courses very tedious. In retrospect, I feel sympathy for my poor instructors who were probably frustrated that I couldn’t find literature as interesting as I found Indo-European. Oh well.
One assignment I was particularly annoyed at was one based on the Dante’s Inferno where I had to define my “personal circle of hell.” It should have been fun, but I just wasn’t up to the introspective challenge, and my classmates did a much better job than I did. Years later though, I finally was in a situation where I was able to define it…and then it was so funny I had to laugh at myself. If I hadn’t had this assignment though, the “answer” would never have come to me.
P.S. My “personal circle of hell” is an eternity where I move my pile of books to another room, then I move them back to the original location in an endless cycle.
Search Blog
Categories
- Accessibility
- Arts/Humanities Website
- Authentic Games & PBL
- Blogs
- Cognition/Linguistics
- Commentary
- Copyright/Plagiarism
- CSS
- Current Projects
- Database Wonkery
- Dreamweaver
- Excel
- FileMaker
- Flash
- Globalization/Diversity
- Graphics
- Library Services
- MathML
- Misc Resource
- Multimedia
- Portfolios
- Project Managment
- PSEL
- Second Life Slideshow
- Standards
- Teaching
- Teaching Notes
- TWT Certificate
- Uncategorized
- Unicode
- Usability
- Web 2.0
- Web Tool
- World Computing
- XHTML
Monthly Archives
- July 2023
- April 2020
- November 2018
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- November 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- July 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
I appreciate your ideas in this post, especially as I am about to interview and gather info for my next faculty profile concentrating on blogging within courses.
I am probably expected to think otherwise, but I think no matter what era/technological (blogging or not-blogging) culture you’ve landed in, if you’re assigned something you’re not interested in, you won’t be motivated, and vice versa.
My senior year in college, I’d already completed all my English major credits, but audited Contemporary Literature because I was very interested. My professor was talking to me about an upcoming exam and I had to remind her I was just auditing. She said something like, “Wow, you’re a really good auditor,” because I’d done all the readings in depth and participated a lot in class.
Anyhow, blogging is another medium available to us, and a powerful one because of the ability to syndicate and to comment. It also invites a certain brief, distilled, cogent, get-to-the-point format as far as the craft of writing. You may have observed how I’ve taken to it like a fish to water (admittedly, I don’t always stay on-point). Still, it’s not about the implement/technology necessarily in my opinion; it’s how you use it! (As they say.)