Author Archives: Kyle A Homman

Papua New Guinea

In the past 7 days the area near Papua New Guinea has had 56 earthquakes larger than 4.3.  This included a magnitude 7.1 and a magnitude 7.5.  This area experiences large earthquakes quite frequently.  In the past 5 years there have been 40 events larger than magnitude 6 and 2651 events greater than magnitude 4.

l downloaded csv files from the USGS and made a couple histograms and a plot of time vs depth for the past 7 days. These plots can be seen here.

Earthquakes and Smart Phones

A team of geophysicists have established a proof of concept technique that uses smart phones as an early warning system for earthquakes.  The core of this concept utilizes the fact that smart phones have become prolific and are continuing to increase in number.  The idea is to have a ‘network’ of people’s phones and use the gps and accelerometer of the phone to measure movement.  The proof of concept analysis determined that this network of phones could accurately determine earthquake size and estimate the epicenter.

That then allows the app to send early warning notifications to users around the event.  Warning times could be issued.  The article states, “Assuming only a small number of potentially available smart phones would be active at any moment, the team found that phones representing 0.2 percent of the study area’s population – about 4,700 people – could trigger an alert for the Hayward quake within five seconds of its onset. That would represent a few seconds’ warning time for San Francisco and tens of seconds for San Jose that major shaking was on its way.”  The warning time, although not huge, could allow people to be better prepared for the shaking when it arrives.

You can find the article here.

Pennsylvania P-Wave Travel Times

For this blog post I figured I would use some of my prior work and construct a P wave travel time curve.  These travel times are from small seismic events recorded across Pennsylvania. The travel time versus distance observations are shown below.

Observed P-wave travel times for small earthquakes across Pennsylvania (Kyle Homann, 2015).

Observed P-wave travel times for small earthquakes across Pennsylvania (Kyle Homann, 2015).

This curve is about what I expected, with some picks that could be questionable, but the majority are consistent.  I think that around 150 km distance, some S wave picks managed to sneak into data.  The slope is slightly less at greater distances along with a “bulge” around 200 km.  This may be a result of Pn overtaking Pg.  If you recall, Pg is the P wave that travels within the crust and Pn is the refracted wave from the crust-mantle boundary. As expected, the Pg wave speed indicated by the slope of the graph is ~6 km/s.

The spectral content of a large and small earthquake

Here are links to the amplitude spectra of signals produced by two earthquakes, one large and one small, both recorded at station SSPA.

My goal was to explore the frequency content differences between large and small earthquakes.  To do this I used Sac’s FFT command to produce spectral amplitude  plots. The results show that the large earthquake has much lower frequencies than the small earthquake.  This is as expected.  The large event also shows a greater frequency distribution.

Magnitude 8.3 earthquake off the Coast of Japan May 24 2013

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BLVWkwyOM0nSnTlvOJomxhOwnPphy8tyVY1e_QtlXHc/edit?usp=sharing

Magnitude 2.6 earthquake near Williamsport, PA, September 27 2013.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lZCCNpyH338L3KAORY3riyee3EuDJlxg_Ib_0QHNQNM/edit?usp=sharing