Category Archives: Exploring Seismic Data

Coming soon, a seismometer on Mars

Insight, standing for Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport, is a NASA funded mission to place a single geophysical robotic lander on Mars. The lander is planned for launch on March 2016 and will be equiped with a seismometer and a heat flow probe. The main objective of this mission will be to study Mars’ deep interior and early geological evolution bringing a better understanding of the Solar System’s terrestrial planets and their evolutionary process. The seismometer will help determine whether there is any seismic activity in Mars as well as the size, thickness, density, velocity and overall structure of Mars’ crust, mantle and core. The seismometer is a broad-band instrument and is designed to detect sources such as quakes but also seismic ambient noise generated by atmospheric excitation and tidal forces from Mars’ satellite. However if any seismic activity is recorded, its source won’t be located because at least three seismometers are needed to locate the source of a quake. So besides the obvious answer of cost, I was wondering why they don’t plan on sending more seismometers. Would anyone have an idea ?

You can find more information on this topic on the NASA webpage dedicated to this mission : http://insight.jpl.nasa.gov/home.cfm

What’s all this talk about earthquakes? Part I

The detection and source characteristic of glacial earthquakes or “icequakes”.

Cryoseismic events are distinct from the earthquakes we have been characterizing and modeling so far in class. This wasn’t recognized until the latter part of the last century when a number of earthquakes were giving unusual results due to their atypical amplitude spectra.

What was obvious in these events, however, was their lack on high-frequency energy. As earthquakes scale in magnitude, typically the larger events lack in high-frequency signal; these smaller events, though, were breaking the rules. The answer to the puzzle was actually quite simple. The reason larger events lack the high-frequency energy is due to their long duration. Small events with short durations are very efficient at releasing short-period energy. Think about the Fourier Transform of an impulse function as an extreme. While these events (4.6 < M < 5.0) weren’t scaling up in magnitude, they were in duration.

As it turns out, a typical duration of an icequake is between 30 and 60 seconds – much longer than even many large earthquakes, which is great at quelling the high-frequency signal and the reason these events weren’t caught on traditional monitoring equipment using previous methods.

Later, attempts were made by Ekström et al. to invert the seismograms using the global-moment-tensor method to characterize the slip event. As expected, they ran into hurdles and the inversions were unstable. Their solution was to parameterize their inversion in terms of a centroid single force (CSF). A centroid single force model is a distribution of single forces equal but opposite of the slip direction. This is related to the event energy source being gravitational potential energy as opposed to elastic strain energy. Centroid single forces are also used in the characterization of landslides. CSF analysis can provide the product of mass and sliding distance, but neither independently.

Can anyone give a better description of a CSF?

Reference:   Ekström, Göran, Meredith Nettles, and Geoffrey A. Abers. “Glacial earthquakes.” Science 302.5645 (2003): 622-624.

NMSOP

In class we focus on more theoretical aspects of seismology so that you can see the origins of important seismological concepts. I recommend this book  to help with the practical (and relating the practical to theoretical).

New Manual of Seismic Observatory Practice

Bormann, P. (Ed.) (2012). New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice (NMSOP-2), IASPEI, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam; http://nmsop.gfz-potsdam.de; DOI: 10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2
urn:nbn:de:kobv:b103-NMSOP-2

This online book is a wealth of information on many aspects of observational seismology. Don’t overlook the sheets and exercises at the end – some are very good and useful.  I handed out a “data sheet” from the book earlier in the semester.

Books & Videos – Tsunami, Observational Seismology, & Programming

Penn State has good libraries and learning resources that you should take advantage of and immerse yourself in your studies. Here are links to two books available from PSU that you may find interesting (or that you should, since you are in this class…). Browse them and read what you can.

Tsunami, The Underrated Hazard (Second Edition) by Edward Bryant

Routine Data Processing in Earthquake Seismology With Sample Data, Exercises and Software by Jens Havskov and Lars Ottemoller

And if you are new to programming, but interested enough to invest some time to learn, try this video from http://psu.lynda.com, which requires about 5 hrs of investment, but my help clarify some of the fundamentals for you. I don’t think you need to learn to program in javascript, but the ideas of loops, conditionals, etc are common to all languages.

The spectral content of a large and small earthquake

Here are links to the amplitude spectra of signals produced by two earthquakes, one large and one small, both recorded at station SSPA.

My goal was to explore the frequency content differences between large and small earthquakes.  To do this I used Sac’s FFT command to produce spectral amplitude  plots. The results show that the large earthquake has much lower frequencies than the small earthquake.  This is as expected.  The large event also shows a greater frequency distribution.

Magnitude 8.3 earthquake off the Coast of Japan May 24 2013

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BLVWkwyOM0nSnTlvOJomxhOwnPphy8tyVY1e_QtlXHc/edit?usp=sharing

Magnitude 2.6 earthquake near Williamsport, PA, September 27 2013.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lZCCNpyH338L3KAORY3riyee3EuDJlxg_Ib_0QHNQNM/edit?usp=sharing