Army Ants: The Deadliest of Ants

army ant

 

A millions insects? Or a single creature? When ants get together they form sort of a super-organism. They work together very much in sync.  Army ants, from the rain forests of Central America, eat everything in their path. They take ant social behavior to the absolute extreme, they move and hunt like a single predator; one autonomous being. Individual workers are like cells in the human body, some are specialized just like the cells in our body.

Anything that stands in their way will be overwhelmed. Army ants have large scissor-like jaws called mandibles. They use them to cut their prey into pieces. They don’t eat and then digest. At the same time they are cutting their prey, they secrete a dissolving acid that liquefies muscles, tendons and other tissues so that they can eat during the attack and move onto their next prey sooner.

Army ant are fast, so most prey can’t outrun them. Therefore, the only defense it to not move at all. Army ants are nearly blind and they can only faintly see the difference between light and dark. They detect prey by movement and the smell of pheromones.

Some of the ants are scouts which go out and forage for food. If they find something they will release a specific pheromone that will call the other ants for reinforcement. They can easily kill bugs more than six times their size.

Some prey is carved into pieces and toted back to the colony. With their numbers they can carry pretty much anything. Actually ants are so numerous that they outweigh all humanity.

Army ants are not one type of ant, it is just a term to describe the over 200 species of ants that form predatory groupings that raid an area in a huge group simultaneously.

Unlike some other ant colonies, they only have one queen. Scientists think that the reason why army ants act so much as a group is because they all rely on one queen to extend their progeny. The fact that all of the worker ants (which are mostly female by the way) give up their right to reproduce makes the ants less autonomous and not at all likely to leave the colony and go off on their own.

You can tell the queen of arm ants just by looking at her. She is much bigger than the other ants and has a very enlarged gaster. Queens will mate with multiple males and their enlarged gaster allows them to produce 3-4 million eggs a month. This results in an enormous brood that are all synchronized in development and that are all related to a single queen, meaning they share most of their genes with their sisters.

To only way a colony can get a new queen is when about every three years a colony will get too big to continue and at this time it will split off into smaller colonies, each having a new queen. Conversely if a queen of a colony dies, that colony can join another colony.

The nesting habits of army ants are also interesting. They do not build nests like most other ants. Instead, they build a living nest with their bodies known as a bivouac. They tend to locate themselves in tree trunks or little burrows. The members of the bivouac apparently hold onto each other’s legs and build an organized ball-type structure. The oldest workers are on the outside because they are the least valuable, while the queen and brood are farthest interior. When the ants on the outside sense a disturbance, soldiers are quick to gather and are ready to defend the nest.

army ant bivouac

picture 1: http://www.myrmecos.net/2011/02/03/army-ant-week-is-imminent/

Picture 2: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28739371

Are Cows Causing Global Warming?

cows

First, what is global warming?

Basically, a layer of greenhouse gases (primarily water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide) absorb infrared radiation and trap heat inside the atmosphere of the earth (like a blanket) and it causes the surface to be a little bit warmer.

Methane is a greenhouse gas like carbon dioxide. However, methane negatively effects the climate 23 times more than carbon dioxide does. So what does this have to do with cows? Well, cow gas and manure contains a lot of methane. All ruminants, or animals that regurgitate their food and then re-chew it produce methane.  Combined, these animals emit about two billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year.

On average, a cow releases 70-120 kg of methane per year. So after doing the math, if a cow produces 100 kg of methane in a year, that equals 2,300 kg of carbon dioxide. But how much is 2,300 kg of carbon dioxide?

The average car had to drive 7,800 miles to produce 2,300 kg of carbon dioxide. That means you could drive 7,800 miles per year and produce the same effect on the environment that a cow does in one year of just pooping.

The average American drives 13,476 miles per year (according to the Federal Highway Administration).

So two cows have a larger carbon footprint than the average American driver.

There are about 1.5 billion cows and bulls on the earth right now.

In 2011 the number of cars reached 1 billion in the world (sorry I can’t find anything more recent than 2011).

Therefore (if I did my math right): All of the cows on the planet make ¾ as much green house emmisons as all of the cars on the planet make.

However, that is only compared to the cars that people drive personally, that does not account for all of the planes, trains, and trucks that are constantly transporting people and goods around the world.

The official statistic that I found was from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, said: agriculture is responsible for 18% of the total release of greenhouse gases worldwide. (This is more than the whole transportation sector).

There is another reason why this number is so large that I have yet to mention: with all of these cows, there is a need for more land for them to graze. The clearing of tropical rain forests to get more grazing land is responsible for another 2.8 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Livestock take up 30% of the earth’s entire land surface. Plus, 33% of all farm land is used for producing food for livestock.

In Latin America, about 70 % of former forests in the Amazon have been cleared for grazing. Having more cows leads to the production of more greenhouse gases and having more cows leads to less trees and forests. But trees and forests are essential because they are what removes the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide from the air! Basically cows are harming the environment from two angles.

But why are there so many cows that this has actually become a problem? Today more people have more money to buy more food. There has been a considerable increase (62% since 1963) in the available food consumption of meat worldwide. While many developed countries meat consumption has stayed relatively stable, there has been an increase in developing countries. Most developing countries such as Brazil, have seen a threefold increase, but China has seen a dramatic ninefold increase in their total meat consumption. (Kearney J., Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010; 365:2793–807.)

A Japanese study showed that producing one kilogram of beef leads to the emission of greenhouse gases with a global warming potential equivalent to 36.4 kg of carbon dioxide.

It is also interesting to note that it also consumes 169 mega joules of energy. This is enough energy to light a 100-watt bulb for nearly 20 days.

Table: http://timeforchange.org/are-cows-cause-of-global-warming-meat-methane-CO2 (Take this table with a grain of salt; I don’t know how reliable this source is, I just wanted to capture the overall trend.)

1 kg of meat from Produces kg worth of CO2 emissions
Beef 34.6
Lamb 17.4
Pork 6.35
Chicken 4.57

 

So what conclusions can we gain from this?

While it is not a fact that cows are the cause of global warming, it is a fact that they contribute considerably to the amount of greenhouse gases emitted. What we also know for sure is that it is environmentally friendly to eat less meat and dairy products. It is one of the simple ways that you can reduce your own personal carbon footprint and your own negative impact on the environment.