Category Archives: Civic Issues – Green Up Your Act!

Some Organic Foods Have a Dirty Little Secret

Within the past decade or so, organic options have been popping up all over grocery store shelves. People buy into this pesticide-free trend because they think it is good for their bodies and the planet, which is very true, BUT there are a few things to be careful of.

Growing and buying organic foods/products has a ton of environmental benefits. Using chemical pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, irradiation, biotechnology (like genetically modified foods, GMOs) on crops and artificial growth hormones and antibiotics on livestock create health and environmental hazards. For instance, Organic meat and dairy choices are often more humane than conventional options because the animals are fed organic feed, are usually giving more roaming freedom, and do not get injected with antibiotics and hormones.

Organic-Pet-Food

Fertilizers and all the other artificial things used with crops have the potential to contaminate our groundwater, thus filtering into drinking water and various waterways. When those get into the ocean, they kill phytoplankton, which is the base of the aquatic food chain…not good (DeCostole). Besides reducing pollutants in groundwater, organic farming creates richer soil that aids plant growth while reducing erosion, according to the Organic Trade Association. Additionally, organic farming used 50 percent less energy than conventional farming methods in one 15-year study. With the huge Go-Green campaign that swept the nation starting in the mid-2000s, its no wonder the organic market grew 21% in 2006 alone (“Quick Overview”). So with all this hype, what could possibly go wrong when buying organic?

woman-shopping-for-organic-food

Here’s a ‘would you rather’ scenario: Would you rather buy an organic banana from Chile, or buy a non-organic banana from a more local source? The truth is organic produce /products are much better for the planet when being grown, however if those things must be transported across oceans or via airplane then some of the good is taken away. An organic banana from Chile has to travel over 5,000 miles to get to a kitchen table in L.A. and that distance is much larger going to the east coast. Imagine how many harmful pollutants are released into the air transporting the fruit! Also, by the time fruits and veggies make it to the supermarket from exotic locations a lot of the nutritional benefits start to vanish (Fagan).

300_1136250Buying local foods from a farmers market might be the better option, if available of course, because there is a much smaller carbon footprint and that produce will contain higher amounts of vitamins and minerals. Obviously the ideal situation would be locally grown organic food but we take what we can get. Also, buying organic is more critical for some produce over others. Delicate skinned produce has a greater pesticide absorption capacity compared to those with more rugged exteriors. A study conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) found that “97.3 percent of nectarines sampled were found to contain pesticides,” which is an absolutely crazy amount… (Moore). This does not mean that if you eat a conventional nectarine you will develop some radioactive disease, but consuming high amounts of chemical pesticides can result in adverse health effects, especially for developing babies (DeCostole). Below is a simple guide for when to shop organically in order to reduce your produce’s carbon footprint and insure better health:

When you should buy organic

When you can pass on organic

Celery

Papaya

Bell peppers

Pineapples

Potatoes

Asparagus

Spinach

Bananas

Apples

Kiwi

Cherries

Avocado

Grapes

Broccoli

Nectarines

Cauliflower

 

Peaches

 

Corn

Raspberries

Onions

Strawberries

Peas

Pears

Mangos

 

 

 

Sources:

DeCostole, Jessica. “The Truth About Organic Foods.” Redbook. Hearst Communication, n.d. Web. 03 Apr. 2013.

Fagan, Raquel. “8 Ways to Not Get Tricked While Going Green.” Earth911com RSS. Earth911.com, 30 Mar. 2009. Web. 03 Apr. 2013.

Moore, Brett. “Top 12 Fruits and Vegetables You Should Buy Organic.” About.com Gourmet Food. About.com, n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2013.

“Quick Overview.” Organic Trade Association. Organic Trade Association, 1 Apr. 2013. Web. 03 Apr. 2013.

 

 

 

 

Ohhh…zone

Now that some misconceptions about recyclables, biodegradables, and compostable have been straightened out, it’s time to move onto a bigger concept: Climate Change

ozone_hole_1995_2007_sep_large1

As it turns out, there is not an actual hole in the stratospheric ozone layer; it’s really a reduction of the ozone concentration in certain spots AND they do not cause global warming. The energy wavelength of interest for the heat up is Infrared Radiation (IR). The presence of ozone or lack of ozone is not going to influence how much IR impinges on the surface of the planet, but other things will like greenhouse gases. Naturally released greenhouse gases include: water, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Ultra Violet radiation (UV) will penetrate the atmosphere and a portion will be absorbed by the surface of the planet. When radiated back into the atmosphere, it will be in the form of Infrared radiation, thus greenhouse gases will absorb some IR radiation and portion of it goes back to earth. THAT is what warms the planet (“Global Warming.”). It’s easy to connect global warming to the ozone “hole” because there is no connection! I was shocked when I found out that the two were not correlated. But of course, keep in mind that the thinning ozone is still an issue that needs to be fixed for the health of the planet and it’s inhabitants.

global-warming-2100-timeline-future

On that note, many people step outside on a random tremendously hot summer day and automatically blame “Global Warming” for the high temperature. That is incorrect! The truth is global warming is not an issue here, climate change is. You may wonder what the big difference is, right? Although rising temperatures are usually the case, not all areas of the planet are likely to experience a warming: some areas will experience a cooling and so climate change is the better terminology. The weather naturally varies on a day-to-day basis, sometimes drastically, making a few bizarre temperature/weather patterns inevitable.  On the other hand, climate change occurs over a much longer period of time, decades or centuries. Since 1900, the planet has seen an increase of about 1 to 2 ° F. (“How Much Has the Global Temperature Risen in the Last 100 Years?”). Single weather events on one day cannot be attributed to climate change. However, this rise or fall of average temperatures can influence the weather in other ways.

watercycleEven slight shifts in the heat level can effect the precipitation cycle and since the turn of century, the globe has experienced great changes in that process. Precipitation in the United States has increased by about 6 percent, while the frequency of intense precipitation events, like torrential downpours, has increased by 20 percent. Such events can create drastic situations such as flooding, soil erosion, hurricanes, tsunamis, and even death. Conversely, in some mid-continental areas, increased evaporation has led to drought because those extreme downpours fell somewhere else (“Climate Change Over the Last 100 Years.”). Wheat for example is grown in the heartland of America because that is where the conditions are appropriate. While initially the land may increase their productivity as it gets warmer (plants like warm), productivity will decrease and the appropriate location for growing wheat might move across the boarder into Canada.

SO, is climate change just a part of earth’s natural cycle or are there things we can do to help prevent its drastic effects?

 

Sources:

“Climate Change Over the Last 100 Years.” Climate Change Over the Last 100 Years. The White House, n.d. Web. 21 Mar. 2013.

“Global Warming.” Www.ucsusa.org. Union of Concerned Scientists, 13 July 2009. Web. 21 Mar. 2013.

“How Much Has the Global Temperature Risen in the Last 100 Years? | UCAR – University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.” How Much Has the Global Temperature Risen in the Last 100 Years? | UCAR – University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 2013. Web. 21 Mar. 2013.

Don’t Throw Away the Scraps!

Once again, the quest continues to distinguish what is “green-living” tomfoolery from what is a legitimate eco-friendly lifestyle. Now that we’ve covered recycling and bio-degradable products, lets move on to simplest of them all…COMPOST. I’m sure that a good portion of you are familiar with this term and the general concept: using scraps of organic material to produce nutrient rich soils and fertilizers for landscaping/gardening/crops. However, there are a few tricky components to composting that may hinder the creation of the best, most beneficial final glob of decayed super-soil.

images

For a little behind-the-scenes info, the composting process requires four basic things: Carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and water. The microbial oxidation of carbon creates heat, thus CARBON is the energy source of this whole operation. OXYGEN assists the oxidation of the carbon and aids in the decomposition process. Then NITROGEN is utilized to help foster the growth of more of those little microorganisms that oxidize carbon. Finally, the “just right” amount of WATER is required to maintain an ideal state for the organisms to be happy without causing anaerobic conditions (since oxygen is needed for materials to break down) (“Composting for the Homeowner”). All of this decay sounds marvelous I know, but like most things in life, proper composting requires the right balance of those four components. The ideal ratio that will allow beneficial bacteria to thrive is a carbon-nitrogen mixture of 30 parts to one. For example, fresh grass clippings average a 15 to one ratio and dry fall leaves have a 50 to one ratio, so when you combine them together the better balance leads to better compost (Compost Mix Calculator).
compostlogo2There are a ton of benefits to composting when this proper balance is achieved. People can reduce the need for chemical fertilizers, which end up draining into the ocean when its rains through storm drains. When those fertilizers wind up in the open ocean, it kills plankton, the foundation of the marine food chain. No plankton, no marine life. Also, this homemade substance is like fertilizer on ‘roids. By using compost (the broken down usable product is called “hummus”) it can actually yield more crops than traditional chemical options. Its also quite affordable; in some cases its even free! Since you only need to use the scraps of organic matter leftover after mowing the lawn, or making dinner, the savings are huge compared to buying expensive bags of fertilizers. The only capital cost would be buying a composting bin. Composting keeps excess things out of landfills as well. This is especially important since the decomposition of natural things, like food scraps and plants, releases methane and leachate into the air (two greenhouse gasses). There are a ton more up-sides to composting, I could go on for days. (“Composting for Facilities Basics”).
compost12363
Now, everything sounds all honkey-dory with compost but there are a few drawback and some things to avoid throwing into the big decaying heap. First, people may get lazy and not follow the proper steps to create the most useful home-made fertilizer, there is after all time and up-keep involved. Some may neglect to mix the stuff up and this leads to the pile over-heating. If the composting materials create too much warmth, then a lot of steam will escape which throws off the proper water level. Second, there are numerous things that should never work their way into the compost bin. Bread products (cakes, ect.), cooking oils, meat products, dairy, and rice all attract unwanted critters like rats. Rice also proves to be a catalyst for a bacteria that is harmful to the decomposition process. Walnuts should  either end up in your stomach (rich in Omega-3s!) or the trash because they contain a compound called juglone, which is toxic to certain plants and vegetation. Stubborn plants like weeds are also a No-No because they might grow in the heap rather than break down (Baskind).
Composting has so many benefits that it seems like an obvious thing to partake in. Its super cheap, helps the environment (land and ocean), and helps grow more beautiful plants and healthier crops. Well, not always. If the proper precautions are not taken, then the composting process will wind up becoming a ratchet mess that only attracts unwanted pests and harms your plants. So, its it worth all the fuss? I suppose it all depends on how much will power you have!

 

 

Sources:

Baskind, Chris. “30 Things You Should Never Compost.” MNN – Mother Nature Network. Mother Nature Network, 16 Mar. 2010. Web. 17 Feb. 2013.

“Compost Mix Calculator.” Compost Mix Calculator. Klickitak County, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2013.

“Composting for Facilities Basics.” EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2013.

“Composting for the Homeowner – University of Illinois Extension.” Materials for Composting. University of Illinois, n.d. Web. 17 Feb. 2013.

 

 

 

Bio-de-what?

 

Many people today try their best to promote an earth-conscious lifestyle. However, little do they know they might be doing more harm than good! So, in an attempt to set these people straight I will try to clear up a few of the misconceptions. Last week, recycling was the hot topic. This week, we will move onto another tricky green concept: Biodegradables. Yes I know, sounds boring. BUT read on and be shocked!

landfill-1

Biodegradable: What does this word mean to you? Something that can completely vanish into the dirt like it never existed in the first place? WRONG…ish. According to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Green Guide, a product or package qualifies as biodegradable if it “completely breaks down and returns to nature, decomposing into elements found in nature within a reasonably short period of time after customary disposal”. Yes, biodegradable products can eventually breakup into smaller and smaller pieces as time goes on, but it takes much longer than people realize. There are two main reasons for this.

First, biodegradable things require certain ideal conditions to break down in a timely manner. Sunlight, moisture, and air are crucial in the proper breakdown of these products and packaging. When these criteria are not met, there’s no breakdown and that leads to the second reason these products don’t disappear. Where is one place that does not have air, sunlight, or excessive moisture? Landfills! That’s right, biodegradable things cannot do

Landfill Diagram(highres)

their thaaaang as efficiently when they end up in landfills. In fact “researchers have found in landfills legible 30 year old newspapers; 5 year old lettuce and 10 year old hotdogs,” the BPI said in a recent article (Compostable vs. Biodegradable). Now that’s nasty, folks. But it gets worse…

Biodegradable things are often praised as these eco-friendly alternatives to plastic, as many are under the assumption that they safely break down and create no permanent damage to the environment. Unfortunately, new research conducted by North Carolina State University finds that biodegradable products may actually be doing more harm than good. The exposé reveals that when biodegradable products are thrown into landfills they actually release methane– a powerful greenhouse gas! (Singh). The little microorganisms that break down all of the so-called green products create tons of this gas, which gets into the atmosphere. Now, methane is a very useful energy source but only when it can be captured, other wise it just wreaks havoc on the environment. The most ironic thing about this whole shebang is that the “rapid decomposition” quality of biodegradable products is one of the major issues with it! Yes, they breakdown at a much slower rate in man-made mountains of trash (and certain things like those 10 year old hot dogs are a bit extreme), but they still decompose much faster than regular garbage. Landfill management teams are not required

Greenhouse-Gasesto capture the methane from the landfill for two whole years. Since most of these green products getting thrown into the trash break down earlier than that (around a year to a year and a half), most of those greenhouse gases are not captured and utilized for good (Shipman).

I think we should popularize biodegradable waste plants. Not only will they reduce landfill sizes, but they will also ensure the proper break down of potentially hazardous products and stop the release of harmful greenhouse gases into the air. Plus since the plant would know these products break down faster, they can capture the methane well before that other 2 year restriction. They would generate tons of useful methane as a cheap and renewable energy source What do you think?

 

 

Sources:

“Compostable vs. Biodegradable -€“ What’s the Difference?” Earthcycle Blog Compostable vs Biodegradable Whats the Difference Comments. Greencycle.com, 5 Feb. 2010. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.

Shipman, Matt. “Newsroom.” NC State News. North Carolina State University, n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.

Singh, Timon. “Study Finds Biodegradable Products Release Potent Greenhouse Gases in Landfills.” Inhabitat Sustainable Design Innovation Eco Architecture Green Building Study Finds Biodegradable Products Release Potent Greenhouse Gases in Landfills Comments. Inhabitat.com, 31 May 2011. Web. 06 Feb. 2013.

Civic Issue #1: The Recyclable Recyclables

Lately, the green thinking trend has gone a little, well, over kill. Now everyone has jumped on the bandwagon, but do they really understand the concepts of an environmentally friendly lifestyle? Each blog will expose the truths and clarify the misconceptions involved with environmentalism while providing some recommendation on how to green up your act! One topic that always seems to confuse people is the difference between recyclable, biodegradable, and compostable products. SO, this blog will set things straight week by week, starting by focusing on recycling. Then once these basics have been but to rest, we will explore other misconceptions.

Recycling is something the majority people have heard of and most likely participated in at least once in their life. Materials such as paper, cardboard, plastic, glass, aluminum, and most electronic waste parts can be collected, reprocessed, and ultimately reused again. (which greatly reduces the amount of garbage in landfill and conserves natural resources like petroleum). This is by far and away the most commonly used method of earth-friendly disposal, however it is not completely fool-proof. It is very easy to be misled about what can and can’t be recycled.

recycle_codes

For example, on a lot of packaging the famous “three arrows” symbol, which stands for the three R’s of recycling, appears to signify that that particular plastic bottle (cardboard box, ect.) is recyclable, right? WRONG. Just because that symbol is on a package does not automatically mean its eligible for reuse. The small number (#’s 1-7) often found in the center of the three arrows indicates the type of resin used in order to ease sorting, and while most numbers (1, 2, 4, 5) can be recycled, if a container has a number 7, 6, or 3 on it, it might be better to avoid it. Some number 7 plastics can be reused to make more plastic bottles or plastic lumber. However, other number 7 plastics made with polycarbonate can actually release harmful chemicals into the air and have been linked very detrimental effects on brain and behavior development of unborn children. Thats not good…(“What Does the Recycle Number Mean on a Plastic Container?”).

 

article-new-ds-photo-getty-article-193-57-sb10067658g-001_XS

Also, many have heard that glass is the most easily recycled material out there…once again, all wrong. In fact, glass is the most expensive thing for recycling plants to gather, melt down, and repurpose, especially if the glass shatters into fragments and gets all over the other materials. Debbie Brady of Pocatello, Idaho’s Sanitation Department notes that glass is made of sand, and thus will not hurt the environment. It can be disposed of with the normal trash and sit for thousands of years in a landfill without any environmental impact. (“Why We Don’t Recycle Glass in Pocatello”). Surprisingly, this is great news because sometimes recycling facilities get so overwhelmed with materials that they have to dump the excess into landfills anyways. So why not let that portion of land-fill bound materials be glass if it just breaks down into sand and doesn’t release any greenhouse emissions? This does’t mean its bad to recycle glass in the least bit, but  if a glass jar ends up in the trash, don’t fret about it too much.

Fortunately, one good thing to expose about recycling is that its actually a lot less complicated than some obsessive compulsive environmentalists make it seem. Plants now a days have much more effecient equipment that can easily separate glass from aluminum from plastic with ease, making it much easier for average Joes to separate their recyclables. Why?

single-stream-recycling-in-ct

Because they don’t have too! Modern recycling plants have machines that use things like magnets to target specific materials. These are called single-stream recycling plants, and they are becoming increasingly common. Single-stream recycling is a fantastic innovation because people are far more likely to recycle when they don’t think of it as a hassle, trying to determine which materials go in what bin. (“8 Misconceptions About Recycling”). Plus, it allows for automated truck routes for the collection trucks, conserving gas and allowing for less air pollution. With an increasing amount of cities beginning to recycle, this will make the massive amounts of bottles, glass, papers, and metals much easier to process and repurpose. Some facilities still need this update, but this system appears to be the future of the recycling industry.

Although recycling seems like a guaranteed way to help the environment, there are some hidden disadvantages. Many are misinformed about the dark sides of green living, especially when it comes to recycling. As a general rule of thumb, follow the three “R’s” and recycle, reduce, reuse but keep in mind that not all things can be put into those big blue bins! Harmful chemicals can be released from bad plastics, and glass is a very expensive thing for plants to process. Of course with new technological innovations, strides are being made everyday in making the recycling process more efficient with the help of Single Stream systems. My question is, however, why can’t companies avoid this confusion by labeling their products as “recyclable” or “non-recyclable”? And why is it taking cities so long to adopt recycling policies, especially since they have the most people that contribute most to landfills?
 
 
Sources:
 
1.) “What does the Recycling Number Mean on a Plastic Container?”
http://greenliving.nationalgeographic.com/recycle-number-mean-plastic-container-2484.html
 
2.) “Why We Don’t Recycle Glass In Pocatello”
http://www.cityofpocatello.org/mayor/opeds/oped_10511.htm
 
3.) “8 Misconceptions About Recycling”
http://www.homeownersinsurance.org/8-common-misconceptions-about-recycling/