29
Apr 14

The Reality of Disparity in Pennsylvania Education Funding

In the 2011-12 State Budget,  Pennsylvania faced a dramatic decrease in education funding, reducing funding to districts by nearly $900 million. Representative James Roebuck Jr, the minority chair of the House education committee describes the effects of these cuts, “You find an increasing number of schools in financial distress. Even now, more affluent districts are beginning to see they are three or four years away from a major financial debacle. … They relied on reserves to get over initial cuts, but now schools have laid off teachers, they’ve laid off staff, they’ve reduced programs. Some schools have cut arts and music, they’ve cut libraries, they’ve cut sports”. However, the students in the  poorest districts are bearing the largest cuts, making it even harder for students with the greatest disparities to achieve. “The hardest-hit districts, such as Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Reading and York, lost more than 10 times the money per student as some other districts, such as Cumberland Valley in Cumberland County, Council Rock School District in Bucks County, North Allegheny in suburban Pittsburgh and Tredyffrin-Easttown in Chester County”.While certain affluent districts cannot support their art programs, the poorer districts can no longer ever afford to buy textbooks and in recent years, these districts continue to see little relief.

As the creators of the figure above describe,  “Districts with more than 50% of students categorized as low-income had per-student cuts of $883 on average in 2011-12, more than five times higher than districts with a quarter or fewer low-income students, whose cuts totaled $166 per student on average.” The students who face the greatest economical challenges are now facing further disadvantages within their education. While the Pennsylvania  General Assembly has attempted to alleviate some of the impact from these devastating cuts by approving $49 million in funding for severely impoverished school districts, it is still not enough. Many desperate districts were even excluded from extra funding including Philadelphia, revealing the manner in While certain affluent districts cannot support their art programs, the poorer districts can no longer ever afford to buy textbooks and in recent years, these districts continue to see little relief.  which this aid overlooked desperate communities, skewed funding and overall how this funding can be considered nothing more than a poorly planned temporary fix.

Further, the Education Law Center, a legal advocacy organization in Pennsylvania, and the Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia reports on March 26, 2014, that they are strongly considering a lawsuit against the state within the next few months. The Executive Director of the Education Law Center Rhonda Brownstein describes the reasoning “By failing to provide adequate funding to allow all students to meet standards, the state is violating the ‘thorough and efficient clause’ of the Pennsylvania constitution”. Lawsuits of this kind are not uncommon: in 1997, the Ohio state high court ruled in DeRolph v. State that Ohio’s school funding model is unconstitutional, describing that

“Ohio’s reliance on local tax dollars leaves too much to the chance of where someone is born and raised. Property-rich districts could provide an education that property-poor district could not afford.”

It seems that over fifteen years later, Pennsylvania is still facing these exact issues. Money impacts an education and young students who attend well-financed and well-resourced districts are ultimately more likely to succeed. As the education law center describes, “Money matters in education, and children attending well-resourced schools perform better on achievement tests. Pennsylvania is one of only three states that creates budgets without using a statewide education funding formula”.

 

With all of this said, the introduction of a funding formula for the distribution of state funds to public schools is not only necessary but critical for our future.

Sources:

http://www.csg.org/pubs/capitolideas/sept_oct_2012/educationbudgetcuts.aspx_

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/08/poor_schools_hit_hardest_by_bu.html

http://www.elc-pa.org/fighting-for-fair-school-funding/#sthash.VbEmylim.dpuf


18
Apr 14

Team Leading

I’m going to use this blog as a reflection on the dynamics of my policy team. The past two weeks we have made incredible strides.

After a meeting with a lot of stressed faces, realizing we only had a month left to write this policy, we turned it around and got focused. During this meeting, we revealed our concerns of our policy and delegated assignments. Both of these are important when working with a team. One must be able to communicate effectively and also voice one’s strengths to complete a task.

From that meeting, we managed to then create a detailed outline on the structure of our policy, and finally this week, we have 15 pages written. Throughout this time, we have been meeting and motivating each other. By providing each other with assignments, we ignited some dedication to the task at hand and made each member accountable. Accountability can be a powerful force in leadership and teamwork and it seems our group used it effectively to get each other moving.

Another huge component of teamwork is trust. I think many of us are familiar with projects where the amount of work individuals did was not equally distributed. However, in this team this was not the case. Everyone was ready to work. Accepting that we could trust each other to do the work assigned was hard at times. I can admit that if I have a doubt that something will get done, then I feel a need to do the work myself. However through this project I have been reminded to trust and to never underestimate someone’s abilities. I very proud of the work we have accomplished so far.

Further, I think it was important for all of us to realize that we are not going to be the conventional “leader” and every point in our project. The beauty of team is its fluidity, and compilation of strengths and weaknesses. The team itself can be a leader, which sometimes boggles people mind. How can a group be a leader? To me it makes sense because the dynamic allows us to constantly push forward and lead, even if we are not all leading at one. Each of us were able to make decisions on when to step forward and “lead the way”, and when to step back and release some control. Determining when to do which is sometimes difficult, but having practice through this project was definitely valuable.


07
Apr 14

The Power of Perspective

This Saturday I spent my day in Gettysburg with about 10 other classmates studying the role of leadership in the Battle of Gettysburg and extrapolating life lessons from the strategy of War. One of this lessons fell within the realm of the power of perspective. Having a different vantage point can save you, and quite literally in the battle of Gettysburg perspective can the Union the advantage.

While we were walking on the battle fields our tour guide pointed up to “Little Round Top” and I thought basically just that, “It looks pretty little. The north got the advantage from there?”. I did not fully comprehend how a hill would have altered a war. However, when we eventually got to the top, I understood. unnamed

You could see the entire battle field. While this is relatively obvious physical shift in perspective, it sent me a powerful message to question my intuition and challenge myself to find new view points. Not only can new perspective give you an advantage over a challenge, but it can also help you become a more adaptable and relatable being.

Linked with perspective is vision. Throughout the day we discussed the power a vision can have over any team or coordinate of people. It is imperative as a leader to not only maintain one’s ability to view the larger picture but also to remind the people around him or her to also see that dream. People lose motivation if they forget what they are working towards. I imagine this is particularly pertinent in times of war, but for any mission, the people involved sometimes need a shift in perspective from the tiny details into the larger scheme.

In the last month of writing our policy papers, this lesson is incredibly pressing. I will admit that reading source after source and the endless excel sheets can be draining. It is possible to get lost and frustrated. However when I think about the potential of overturning a swayed system and creating an environment of equal opportunity within primary education, I get re-inspired. I truly believe this policy will have sound suggestions and evidence to make an impact on the policy makers and knowing that keeps me grounded to keep working hard with my team.


04
Apr 14

Connect

Throughout this week I have been reminded of the power of human connection specifically with regards to team dynamics, personal growth, and advancing knowledge. These thoughts were triggered in PLA class on Tuesday when Admiral Michael Giorgione came to speak with us again. He gave us his advice that when leading a team to go out and meet some of them individually. Build up a connection because team dynamics will be key to success. In further projects, I will try to emulate this and be an initiator of team activities.

Further, this week I realized that reaching out to others will not only give them a sense of ease that you care, but you will always learn something from another person and  it will then in turn teach you more about yourself.

Finally, truly to make any progress in life, you need to know who you should talk. You need to know who you can get the best information from and you need to know who would have the best advice. You need to start talking with people in order to get anywhere. This idea was put into action by our team this week by advancing our connection with Dr. Edmondson. Talking with her on Wednesday gave us new isight on how to organize our policy and provided us with further knowledge on education funding.

She also eased our anxiety over our general idea for our paper. In the past we faced question like “Can we accomplish this? Is this a good idea?” Having someone of her prestige say, “Yes this is a good idea. This is a critical issue” was motivating and comforting to hear. When asking her about our general outline of our policy, featured below, she also approved and then proceeded to find us more sources on the disparity between districts in Pennsylvania.

Outline:

I. Why education funding is an issue in PA.

– Unconstitutionality (Lawsuits, PA constitution)

II. What we want PA to adopt and how it has worked in other states

III. Implementation plan for PA policy

IV. How the change in the funding formula would affect how schools allocate money.

V. Conclusion: how increased funding/changing the funding formulas could decrease human service costs in the future. How edu can benefit social, political and economic spheres and future.

Further after doing her best to provide us with all of the information she could think, she pushed us further to contact more experts in the field. She recommended reaching out to Professor Bill Hartman who specializes in education funding and also Ron Cowell, the president of the Education Policy and Leadership Center. Now our team can continue to push further and reach out to these members while sort through the sources we have attained. Overall, connections are contagious and necessary for a leader or a team to succeed.

http://www.eplc.org/about/board-of-directors/ronald-r-cowell/

https://www.ed.psu.edu/educ/eps/edldr/faculty-and-staff-directory/william-hartman

 


Skip to toolbar