Monthly Archives: October 2012

Tell me what you guys think

So I’m trying to branch out a bit with this blog, because I feel like I’m boring you guys and I don’t want to make you keep reading a boring blog every week (considerate, right?)

So here’s some questions for you guys, so I can get some idea of where I can go with this to make the whole blogging and commenting thing a little more painless.

First idea would be to pick a quote or a song or something of that nature every week that has to do with existentialism and talk about that and how that pertains to the decisions we as freshmen in college are making now. Would you guys be even remotely interested in that? I’d try to make it amusing, pinky promise.

Second idea would be to just kind of examine different lifestyles that are possible aside from the traditional suburban family life. Unless you guys are pretty happy and fine with that and I’m the only crazy one sitting here wanting something different? I thought it could be worth a shot….but what’s your opinion?

Also, have any of you actually gone through your own existential-crisis/confusion/general questioning? Or am I kind of just missing the mark here entirely? If I am, what could I do to make this more relevant to you guys?

Media and Sexuality

So this is super rough guys. Like, about as rough as rough gets. I ended up changing my topic pretty late in the game tonight, so really I’d just love suggestions on how you would arrange it/places I could take it I haven’t thought of/critiques of general ideas. I have some different ideas for shaping it up better, but this is my working thesis and my initial ideas puked on paper (well…blog). So yeah. Sorry you have to struggle through this.

 

The hyper-sexualization of the media has led to the emergence of hookup/rape culture.

Sex sells, as they say, so it comes as no surprise that advertisements and pop culture have become increasingly sexual in recent years. If you’ve ever walked into a Hollister or Abercrombie and Fitch store, you’ve seen the hardly clothed models pictured in very provocative poses plastered on every wall and shopping bag. Television, music, and especially advertisements have dealt increasingly with the idea of casual sex and erotic appeal.

What’s becoming increasingly disturbing about this trend, however, is the effect it’s having on societal views on sexuality. What many people don’t realize is that advertisements don’t just sell products, and television and magazines don’t just entertain – they teach us standards of love, beauty, sexuality, success, and what is normal and expected of us. And when we are surrounded by media where casual sex is the norm – from perfume and colone commercials which imply the use of a certain fragrance will end in a hookup with an attractive stranger, to alcohol commercials which are as much an advertisement for one night stands as they are for liquor – society as a whole begins to adapt the mentality that casual hookups are not only acceptable, but also, to a certain extent, encouraged.

The University of Buffalo conducted research on the sexualization of images in recent years, using Rolling Stone Magazine as an indicator, and found that in the 2000’s, 17% of images of men were sexualized and 83% of images of women were sexualized, while in the 1960’s, only 11% of men and 44% of women were sexualized. And in the 2000’s, of those images, 2% of men and 61% of women were hypersexualized. This is a dramatic shift in a relatively short period of time, and it’s concerning because we’re no longer just seeing female icons that are sexy, we are seeing female icons that are sex objects – too often, we are seeing women stripped of worth that is not related to their sex appeal.

Take a look at the music idols that have appeared in the 21st century – we had Brittany Spears, who came out with the sexually charged song “Slave 4 You” in 2001 when she was 19 years old, and who was known for little more than her embodiment of the whore-madonna dichotomy. Now we have Rhianna singing about sadomasochism in her song “S&M”, Nicki Minaj singing about wanting a man to “take over control”, and Ke$ha glorifying hookups and party life. Combined with the extremely sexual wardrobe and general style of each of the above, this has contributed to a media environment which celebrates casual sex and puts pressure on young people to participate in the hookup culture they promote.

An even more disturbing edge to the sexual nature of modern media is the promotion of rape culture, which is essentially a culture in which rape/sexual violence has been trivialized, normalized, or excused. Many times, sex in advertisements is borderline sexual assault, with the woman portrayed as powerless to the man. Women are often portrayed in positions that imply vulnerability or submission: they have their hands over their mouths, they’re bent in slightly unnatural positions (think vogue models), lying on their backs, etc. while men are pictured as large and strong, typically assuming power stances. This emphasis on stereotypical gender roles leads to an idea of women being submissive and helpless to the violence and power of men – in fact, in many ads, violence is eroticized, showing bound, battered, or (in some extreme cases) murdered women portrayed in a sexualized manner. This kind of imagery, when viewed repeatedly, desensitizes people to sexual violence and makes them far more likely to blame the victim or see sexual assault as an unavoidable and even somewhat normal aspect of life. Erin Hatton, an assistant professor in the department of Sociology at the University of Buffalo stated “Sexualized portrayals of women have been found to legitimize or exacerbate violence against women and girls, as well as sexual harassment and anti-women attitudes among men and boys. Such images also have been shown to increase rates of body dissatisfaction and/or eating disorders among men, women, and girls, as well as decrease sexual satisfaction among both men and women.”

So ironically, the increase of sex in the media has actually made women and men watching feel less sexy, as they are constantly comparing themselves to the ideal images of “sexiness” they are seeing on television and in magazines. The media’s portrayal of men being large, muscular, and very dominant leads to pressure on men to live up to this stereotype, which is just not attainable for some. In the same way, the media’s emphasis on extremely skinny, yet well-endowed women leads to the increase of eating disorders and general lowered body-image for women, who feel they must be hypersexual all the time to prove their worth, since that’s what they’re seeing in magazines and on television.

The objectification of women and ubiquitous nature of casual sex in mass media has created a toxic atmosphere where both men and women feel pressured to conform to predetermined ideas of sexuality that are not only dissatisfying, but also dangerous in their promotion of rape culture.

 

Diary of an Existentially Confused Teenager

As per your suggestions, here’s a little history about existentialism:

Existentialism is essentially a school of thought which focuses on the idea that meaning comes from the individual, that existence precedes essence, and that it is important to find authenticity.

What all that basically means is:

1) Life in itself has no meaning

2) It is up to us as individuals to give our own life meaning

3) We should stop focusing on labeling ourselves and the world around us before we focus on examining what things actually are (this is the existence before essence bit). And

4) It’s important to find yourself and then live in accordance with yourself, ignoring all outside pressures and influences. This ties in deeply with the idea of individual freedom that is also a common theme in existentialism.

So as you can see, it’s not all bad. It’s actually a really great philosophy if you ask me – the downside is what comes before all of the things I listed. Because before you can set out on finding authenticity and giving your own life meaning, you’ve got to start questioning everything you’ve held as unquestionable truths.

This is scary. This is confusing. It’s actually kind of terrifying at first – thinking for yourself is difficult when you’ve been taught how to think since day one. And once you reject your old truths, you’re faced with the daunting task of finding new ones.

Where this blog finds me is in the very beginning stages of finding my new truths – back in my Junior and Senior year of high school I began the process, rejecting pieces of the reality I’d been taught to accept.

First was the idea of a “good person” – I’d always been a goodie-two-shoes but around when I was 16 I started questioning what made someone who broke the rules any worse than someone who followed them. I started to wonder if there really was a “good” and a “bad” – and I realized that these were ideas that came entirely from human perception, and that therefore I was free to create my own definition of the terms.

After that, I started questioning the path I’d been taught to follow – the whole “comfortable suburban consumer life” I’ve talked about before. I started to realize how utterly boring and safe that life was – and I also realized I never wanted to live it.

My senior year of high school, my AP Literature class did a unit on existential literature and that only accelerated my systematic questioning and rejection of my previously concrete reality.

I would say that was the peak point of my Existential Crisis – and man, it hit hard. I stopped doing my homework, I applied to less than half of the colleges I’d wanted to apply to, and more than once I found myself sitting at a train station seriously contemplating just getting on a train and leaving for a while. I mean, to most people that would seem absurd, but I was just thinking “why not?”

And I still find myself thinking “why not?” on a fairly regular basis. The absurd is a pretty engrained idea in existential thought – mostly because of the idea that life has no meaning that we do not assign to it. So if in my authentic state (which I am still quite a ways from finding) getting on a train to a random city was meaningful, and continuing with my school work and career was meaningless, by all means I should get on the train, no matter how absurd it may seem to an outsider.

I haven’t found my authentic state though; I haven’t figured out how to assign my life meaning, and I haven’t managed to define my own reality.  I haven’t even gotten over the initial fear and confusion of rejecting my old reality.

So that’s wehre this blog finds me, existentially confused and essentially grasping at straws as I attempt to sort out who I am and what on Earth I am going to do with my life. After all, existentialism is really just another way to find meaning and fulfillment – albeit an unorthodox one.

 

Paradigm Shift Visual Map: Feminism (or maybe…)

First Wave:
  • mid 1800’s – 1920’s
  • women’s suffrage
  • “Declaration of Rights and Sentiments”
  • Highly political
Second Wave:
  • 1960’s -80’s
  • “The Feminine Mystique”
  • Break from traditional housewife molde
  • encouraged women to be independent and get jobs
  • sexual liberation/exploration
  • brought race and class into the discussion
Third Wave (Modern Feminism)
  • 1990’s-present
  • lgbt rights
  • reproductive rights
  • fight against rape culture
  • global feminism/civil rights
  • step back from the “free love” of the 70’s (very possibly due to STD’s and rape culture)
  • power through expression of sexuality (good or bad thing? too much sexuality?)
Name Connotation:
  • In recent years, “feminist” has become a dirty word
  • man-hating lesbians – no one wants to associate with that image
  • many women who hold feminist values will say things like “Now I’m not a feminist or anything, but….”
  • Does this show a societal shift away from true activism? A fear of expressing unpopular beliefs?
  • Definitely damaging feminist goals
Effect on the Modern Woman (aside from the obvious political rights):
  • pressure to be high performing – old housewife values added to new independent working-woman values. Makes it extremely difficult
  • Over sexualization of women all over again? Have we taken a step backward?
  • Women are getting married later or not at all – has feminism degraded the traditional family?
Okay, so that’s my first/main idea, to track feminism and what that’s done to society/how society has affected feminism, but I’m also considering focusing in on sexuality…here’s a much rougher outline of how that would go:
  1. Up until the 1950’s and 60’s: No sex acceptable before marriage, no tolerance of homosexuality, sex was taboo and a sin unless between husband and wife. 
  2. 60’s and 70’s – sexual revolution, free love, free expression of sexuality. Experimentation was encouraged, as was the use of mind-altering drugs. Birth control pills were made publicly available in the 60’s, bringing a new sense of freedom to women who didn’t have to fear unwanted pregnancy any  longer
  3. Growing acceptance of the LGBT community and the fight for their rights
  4. The emergence of STD’s like herpes and AIDS puts a marked damper on the sexual revolution – schools begin teaching rigid sex ed “if you have sex, you are at high risk of getting AIDS, and you will die” (exaggerated but you get the memo)
  5. Once STD’s became a legitimate concern, teens still began having sex younger than before, but rather than having multiple partners at a time, we saw (and are seeing) a trend of relatively short monogamous relationships. 
  6. Exploitation of sex by the media – how has the commercialization  of casual sex affected this generation outlook on sexual relationships? How big/small of a contributor is the media in hook up and rape cultures?
  7. Grey areas in definition of sexuality – rise of terms like “pan sexual” and acceptance of sexual experimentation. Losing the rigid definitions of sexual attraction
  8. How has the internet/texting affected sexuality? Rise of sexting and online interaction changing the game for teens

Diary of an Existentially Confused Teenager

As the clock nears 4 a.m, I can’t help but think that I’m putting myself through all kinds of unnecessary pain here.

I’ve spent more time watching youtube videos of poetry and scrolling through my tumblr feed than doing my work, and at this point it’s more a case of “paralysis by analysis” than procrastination.

Since the majority of you probably have no clue what I mean by “paralysis by analysis”, it’s that tricky little thought process where you can’t get any work done because either you’re being a dumb perfectionist like I always am and are waiting for an amazing idea to miraculously hit you, and/or you’re questioning (again like I usually am) why you’re putting any importance on the assignment in the first place.

Recently, I’ve been facing a major roadblock in that I can’t get anything done because I’m too busy worrying about whether what I’m doing is the right thing, and oh my God what IS the right thing, and everything I’m doing is pointless because I’m just going to die anyway, and I’m still very much unconvinced that there is any legitimate kind of afterlife.

I’m probably having this problem mainly because I’m up at 4 am doing homework every night, but you get the point.

I’ve just been doing a lot of life-questioning lately (more than usual) – for instance, right now I’m a Biochemistry major, and while I’d have a good job and make good money, I’m honestly terrified of ending up exactly like my parents, living the suburban American Dream in the cookie cutter house, with the nice cars and the big television and the expensive electronics and all the shit I don’t need but buy anyway, with kids to raise to be exactly like me.

I know a lot of people really want that, and if you do I am by no means saying that wanting that is a bad thing, but the thought of living that life really scares the crap out of me. And that’s what started this whole messy existential crisis business – I realized that on a very fundamental level I didn’t want to live the life I’d been raised to pursue.

But that leaves a very important question: what life DO I want to pursue?

I wish I knew, I wish I knew.

 

Your favorite Existentially Confused Individual,

Kaitlyn Stocker

 

Poetry as Activism

If you’re wondering why my blog post is starting off with 3 random youtube videos,  just give me a second to explain.

For around a year now, I’ve been a pretty big fan of spoken word/slam poetry, which is basically poetry written with the intent to be performed in front of an audience, rather than read on paper. And generally, the intent of spoken word poetry goes beyond just the expression of an emotion of the description of an object or event – spoken word poets write with the intent to evoke thought, enact change, or raise awareness.

Check out one or two of the links I posted above (especially the first – it’s a personal favorite) to get a feel for the genre, especially if you’ve never come in contact with spoken word poetry before. The first deals with rape culture, the second with abortion, and the last with gender identity.

Spoken word poetry is one of many intersections between art and activism – and as it’s extremely personal, passionate, and interactive, I’d say it’s a very effective way to get an issue across to an audience.

In the first poem, “Blue Blanket” by Andrea Gibson, the realities of rape culture are conveyed in a way that’s much more effective than most logical approaches could deliver. Poetry appeals primarily to pathos – therefore, for emotional issues like rape, or abortion, or gender identity, poetry serves as a highly effective platform to convey complex issues to a broad audience and help to stir up a movement.

For me, when I heard “Blue Blanket” for the first time, I was struck especially by the last line “She’s not asking what you’re gonna tell your daughter/ She’s asking what you’re gonna teach your son” because for the first time I realized how skewed rape education is; We focus so much on telling girls not to walk alone at night, to always be careful, to avoid riding elevators alone, etc. and spend very little time focusing on teaching boys to respect women, and making sure they understand the  gravity of sexual assault.

Just food for thought and something to look into – poetry isn’t everyone’s thing, I know, but I’ve found that it’s hard to watch a substantial amount of slam poetry and not, at the very least, be moved to rethink your perspective.

Work in Progress : Paradigm Shift Ideas

Now that we’ve just barely completed our Rhetorical Analysis essays, it looks like it’s time to start brainstorming for the next big assignment.

Unlike the Rhetorical Analysis paper, I’m actually fairly excited about the Paradigm Shift essay (okay, so “excited” might be an overstatement, but you get the point). I’m weirdly interested in tracing trends and matching them to social change, so this is sort of up my ally.

I was thinking of  doing one of a few things for my paper, but they’re all fairly similar I suppose.

The first thing I thought of was tracing shifts in the feminist movement (first wave, second wave, and then modern) and talking also about the shifting stereotype of what a “feminist” is (I know for a while I was hesitant to use the term because of the in-your-face man-hating connotation some people associate feminism with). I thought that could be especially interested as many girls who consider themselves new age feminists have taken an extremely sexual stance, focusing on freedom of sexuality. The issue with this is that some people (especially second wave feminists) would argue that they’re moving backwards – by over sexualizing themselves, they are turning women back into objects. (Just some preliminary thoughts on it).

Another idea (stemming from the first) is to focus on the changing views on sexuality – from the “no sex before marriage” era, to the late ’60’s “free love”, to today’s hook-up culture. I’d probably get into how media affected some of these changes (music in the ’60’s, and recently increasingly sexualized advertisements and television shows that feature sex as a casual affair). That’s a little more risqué I suppose, but I think it’d be interesting to look at.

The last idea I’ve seriously considered is drug culture in America, beginning with the prohibition of alcohol to the rise and illegalization of marijuana and other drugs, to the psychedelic movement in the 60’s where drugs were a social/spiritual vehicle, used primarily to enhance human connection and the human experience, to the 80’s cocaine obsession (especially in the music industry), to today’s drug culture, with the rise of pill popping, ecstasy, and designer drugs. It could be interesting to trace how and why these trends arose and how drug culture has affected mainstream society.

Right now I think I’m leaning towards Feminism, but let me know what you think!

Define “Success”

Earlier this week, I had an exceptionally quality conversation with my RA. I couldn’t tell you how we got to the point of discussing career choices and balancing monetary success with general happiness with a desire to enact change, but I can tell you that it had me thinking.

As it turns out, my RA began as a Chemical Engineering major – and she still is, but now she’s picked up a second major in the business college and plans on attending law school. Her dream? To work for nonprofit environmental protection organizations in the hope of somehow helping to save the planet.

She could make close to 6 figures a year as a starting salary as a chemical engineer, and be highly respected and enjoy her job well enough, but she’s choosing to have a significantly reduced salary and years more schooling so that she can live the life she wants.

Recently, I’ve been having my own doubts about being a Biochemistry major, for much the same reasons as my RA decided Chemical Engineering wasn’t for her. I’ve never been one to want the “cookie-cutter” life. You know what I’m talking about – having a respectable job that provides for a respectable family, so I can live in a bigger house than I need with more stuff than I even want, and raising children who are good members of society who go to college so they can get respectable jobs and repeat the process all over again. I don’t find pleasure in routine, in monotony. I have no intention of growing up to become my parents.

However, breaking free of that “cookie-cutter” life is a lot harder than I imagined. I’ve been taught to pursue that routine security my whole life – every adult I know has neatly followed the pattern and fallen easily in line.

So how can I be sure that when I think I want to do something different, something like what my RA is doing, sacrificing that security for something a little bigger than the sum of my parts, that I’m not making some grand miscalculation that will only lead me to regrets?

I can see now being old and bitter that I never lived up to my monetary potential – I can see regretting giving up that comfortable suburban wonderland.

But I can also see being old and bitter that I blindly accepted the prepackaged notion of success I was sold by my parents. I’ve always believed that life is a story and it’s only going to be as good as you make it.

So do you step up and change everything you’d planned out to try to get a better story? Or do you let go of the story for traditional comfort and security?

Close, but no Cigar

Today I went to the free Cobra Starship concert in honor of my middle school obsession with the band (it was middle school don’t judge!). Aside from it being a terrible concert and a general waste of time (especially considering the rough draft I had yet to write), I found the premise of the concert interesting.

Like most free concerts, this show was funded by an organization backing a cause; namely, it was funded by the organization “the truth” which aims to educate teenagers and college students on the dangers of tobacco usage.

Now this I have no issue with – I would agree that it’s good to inform teens of the negative health effects of tobacco. What I did have an issue with was how they went about this.

If you go to the organization’s website (thetruth.com), you will find that they clearly state multiple times that their goal is not to tell kids not to smoke. They claim they are not against smokers, that they merely want the facts to be clear and on the table.

However, as the concert progressed, I realized that there was considerably more to it than that. During what I can’t help but assume were purposefully long breaks between acts (I attend a lot of concerts – these breaks were unnecessary), a series of very strange and quite honestly disturbing images played on the big screens on either side of the stage, all of which were aimed in some way at building a very dark and negative view of the tobacco industry.

But I’m not talking the typical “your lungs are filled with tar” images – these were much stranger and more random than that. At one point, there was a frog’s head on human legs bouncing up and down, with a speech bubble above it giving some fact about how ammonia is used to clean toilets and also used in cigarettes. And every piece of information was delivered in an equally random and disturbing manner.

Between facts about tobacco usage, however, were images clearly condemning tobacco usage. The word “SCUM” flashed across the screen over top of a psychedelic background reminiscent of the 60’s or 70’s. Sculls were a ubiquitous component of every scene. And every few minutes a short clip of demented pseudo-humans killing people and stuffing them in body bags would run.

All in all, I found the propaganda more than a little disturbing and, considering their strong assurance that they were not “anti smoking” just “pro facts”, maybe a tad hypocritical…not to mention that I’m sure the members of Cobra Starship all smoke themselves.

I just don’t think that the concert was an effective way to prevent teens from smoking, and I don’t feel dramatically more informed on the issue by any means. It was way too weird and extreme to be effective – I was more concerned with why a demented chicken head had a human body than what that demented chicken head was supposed to be saying.

This is one campaign that just really failed to click with its audience. Better luck next time, I suppose.

Rhetorical Analysis Paper Rough Draft

So this is still verrrry rough. I know it needs a lot of work with rearranging/grammar/clarity, but you get the general idea. Any suggestions you guys have are greatly appreciated! 🙂

A woman is flipping through the pages of a magazine – what makes her stop to read a particular ad? It might feature a favorite celebrity, bear a witty catch-phrase, or, more often than not, appeal to the woman’s vanity.

Lancome’s ad featuring Julia Roberts pulls readers in mainly through an appeal to vanity – although Ms. Roberts undoubtedly plays her part as well. Women see a celebrity with an apparently perfect appearance and are pulled in by the desire to emulate that look. The elegant pink and beige color-scheme of the ad also plays a part in drawing the attention of the audience; it creates a tone of soft femininity and sophistication, which are both appealing qualities for most women.

This ad seeks to convince women to buy Lancome’s Teint Miracle foundation through creating/exploiting an ideal of female beauty above what is achievable, backing up their product with celebrity endorsement and science, and creating strong subconscious connections between beauty and lancome cosmetics.

The rhetorical strategies of most cosmetic ads are fairly similar and straight forward: a problem is created, and then the product is offered as the solution. The “problem” presented to women reading these ads is imperfection – they display an unattainable ideal of female beauty, and on a very basic, subconscious level (occasionally not so subconscious) they tell women that they do not measure up, that they are not beautiful enough. Notice in this particular ad that Julia Roberts’ face has been digitally altered to be absolutely flawless – she has no blemishes, no wrinkles, she doesn’t even have pores. Women reading the ad will subconsciously compare themselves to the face in the ad, inevitably falling short, which creates the problem.

The copy to the right states “A light emanates from the most beautiful skins. We can reproduce it,” which directly implies this “create the problem, present the solution” strategy. The first statement (“a light emanates from the most beautiful skins”)  appeals to pathos: it makes women desire to have their skin be among “the most beautiful skins” and are led to feel a vague sense of discontent with their appearance. The second  statement (“we can reproduce it”) presents the solution: don’t worry, if you use our product, your skin will glow as well, making your complexion as beautiful as Julia Roberts’. In this way, the ad presents hope to a negative situation. Although women do not naturally possess flawless complexions, and therefore are brought to feel insufficient when faced with a barrage of images of ideal female beauty, they are told that there is hope, with Lancome’s new foundation, they can reproduce that flawless appearance.

Within the copy itself, the diction adds dramatically to this theme of flawlessness and perfection (it also emphasizes the idea of a natural/bare appearance, but I’m going to focus on the related trend of perfection). Beneath the title of the product, the text reads “Natural light creator – Bare skin perfection.” Below that is the line mentioning “the most beautiful skins.” Towards the bottom of the ad, you see another mention of “perfect skin”, “natural perfection” and then the concluding phrase “Sublimely bare, truly Flawless.” I’m sure you can see the trend – the word choice is used to drive in the notion of perfection as something to strive for. It reinforces the problem; it tells women that they should want flawless skin. It also implies that they don’t already have it; they need to use the product to obtain that level of beauty.

Now, that’s all well and good so far as pathos and the subconscious level of the advertisement go, but the ad also appeals to ethos and logic (logos), both through backing their product with the assurance of scientific research and through the use of the brand name and the celebrity endorsement of Julia Roberts.

The top line of the copy states “Now, Aura is our science.” A few lines down it goes on to assert “30 years of research, 7 patents pending. Lancome invents its 1st foundation that recreates the Aura of perfect skin.”  Referencing scientific research, and even the vague mention of science in the first line of the copy builds the ethos of the product, as it increases the consumer’s trust in the product. It also pulls in logical appeals – their foundation “recreates the Aura of perfect skin,” which is, as I previously established, something the audience has been prepped to desire. Therefore, women should buy this foundation in order to pursue the standard of beauty presented to them as ideal.

This emphasis on science is especially interesting in juxtaposition with a repeated use of the words “miracle” and “aura”, both of which imply a certain mystique. They build their product to be a miracle of science – even the name of the product, “Teint Miracle” is rhetorically potent in building its worth.

Advertisers must also consider that the amount of attention lent to the ad may vary; some women will merely glance at the ad, others will take time to read the entire thing. Advertisers must therefore spend some energy deciding how to make the ad effective even for those who spare only a fleeting glance at the ad, in addition to making the advertisement effective for those who read the entire thing.

Notice that the most prominent text is the brand name, “Lancome” directly beneath Julia Roberts’ face (the focal point of the ad), which ensures that even the most casual glance will subconsciously form the connection between ideal female beauty (Julia) and Lancome cosmetics. If that seems like a bit of an overstatement, consider that the vast majority of an ad is processed subconsciously (all but 8%) according to the top advertisement executives in the country. This implies that while a woman might not be able to consciously recall ever even coming across this ad, the next time she’s shopping for makeup she may find herself drawn to Lancome cosmetics due to her mind subconsciously processing this ad and drawing connections between ideal beauty and Lancome cosmetics.

Whether or not these strategies are ethical is a topic certainly up for debate (should advertisers sell women on the idea that they can never be good enough in order to promote consumerism?), however the effectiveness of this strategy is much clearer cut. The best way to get to a woman’s purse is through her insecurities. This ad ,and other ads like it, certainly (though subtly) appeal to these natural weaknesses in self-esteem. Combine that with the use of celebrity and scientific research, a rhetorically sound advertisement is born.