Transformational leaders influence their followers to do more for themselves and their community. Bass & Steidlmeier suggest, (1999) “Authentic transformational leadership provides a more reasonable and realistic concept of self—a self that is connected to friends, family, and community whose welfare may be more important to oneself than one’s own” (p.186). There have been many leadership approaches that we have discussed so far in class and when considering transformational leadership is it important to know and understand what this process entails. Northouse states, (2016) “transformational leadership is a process that changes and transforms people (p. 161). This particular leadership approach has proved to be a popular approach to examining leadership because “ it raises the level of morality” (p.162). Northouse (2016) suggests that this approach is “concerned with emotions, values, ethics, standards, and long term-goals. It includes assessing follower’s motives, satisfying their needs, and treating them as full human beings. (p.161) How would President Donald J. Trump fit into this leadership model?
In leadership, Northouse states, “transformational leadership is the process whereby a person engages with others and creates a connection that raises the level of motivation and morality in both the leader and the followers” (p.162). Since our election, many critics state that our country is divided more than ever on political issues and the person who occupies the most prestigious office in the country, President Donald Trump, isn’t taking the job as serious as he promised during the election. Immelman (2017) suggests that “relating to the public, outgoing, confident leaders such as Trump typically are active (preferring direct engagement), articulating and defending their policies in person rather than relying on surrogates and proxies (p. 11). According to Green (2017) , “Trump’s most powerful message during the recent election, at least among some Americans, was about defending the country’s putative culture” (p.4). He was able engage the voters by tapping into their cultural anxieties. In addition, he stated that he was “attentive to their needs and motives of followers and tries to help reach their fullest potential”(p.162). However, considering transformational leadership, preying on people’s anxiety doesn’t seem like a “morally uplifting” leadership strategy.
Interestingly enough, his various manipulative actions throughout his first year in the oval office do not fit into the transformational model of leadership. His leadership style is better suited to be placed in the category of pseudo-transformational leadership style. Bass et al. reports “Authentic transformational leaders may have to be manipulative at times for what they judge to be the common good, but manipulation is a frequent practice of pseudo-transformational leaders and an infrequent practice of authentic transformational leaders”(p.186). His concern for the good of “all” Americans appears disingenuous and full of counterfeit promises according to many critics. Northouse (2016) states, “ Psueduotransformational leadership is considered to personalized leadership, which focused on leaders own interests rather than on the interests of others (p. 163). Northouse also suggests that pseudo transformational leadership is inspired leadership that is self-serving, is unwilling to encourage independent thought in followers, and exhibits little general caring for others (p.163).
In order to become a transformational leader President Trump would require demonstrating consistent transformational leadership factors. These factors include idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. Northouse states, (2016), “ idealized influence describes leaders who act as strong role models for followers; followers identify with these leaders and want very much to emulate them”(p.167). A difference between authentic transformational leadership and pseudo-transformational leadership lies in the values for which they are idealized. For instance, the authentic leader calls for universal brotherhood; the pseudo-transformational leader highlights fictitious “we-they” differences in values and argues that “we” have inherently good values and “they” do not. (Bass et al., 1996, p. 187). This is a common theme among the Trump community. While President Trump demonstrates many great leadership qualities, he has publicly spoken untruths, which question his moral values. Transactional leaders usually have very high standards of moral and ethical conduct and can be counted on to do the right thing (Northouse, 2016, p.167).
President Trump’s dominant, strong willed, and outspoken personality inspired enough American citizens to win the electoral vote for president in the recent election. Bass et al. (1999) state, “The inspirational motivation of transformational leadership provides followers with challenges and meaning for engaging in shared goals and undertakings” (p.188). An example of this would be how the Trump team and Trump himself motivated their followers through pep rallies, commercials, and television appearances to be exceptional citizens and go out and support him with their vote. Bass et al. (1999) states “The inspirational appeals of the authentic transformational leader tend to focus on the best in people—on harmony, charity and good works; the inspirational appeals of the pseudo-transformational leader tend to focus on the worst in people—on de- monic plots, conspiracies, unreal dangers, excuses, and insecurities” (p.186).
The intellectual stimulation of transformational leadership incorporates an open architecture dynamic into processes of situation evaluation, vision formulation and patterns of implementation (Bass et al., 1999, p. 186). This important factor allows the leader to encourage follower development and think independently. In contrast, President Trump prefers for others to think like him. When an original idea or thought is introduced in which he doesn’t agree, he makes this publically known via his twitter account trying to publicly shame whomever has crossed him. Along with intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration is an additional factor that Burns (1978) suggests the degree to which the leader attends to each follower’s needs, acts as a mentor or coach to the follower, and listens to the follower’s concerns and needs. (p.2). President Trump prefers to attend to his needs and does not seem to always listen to advisors around him. Immelman (2017) suggest, “As an extraordinarily confident individual with an unshakable belief in his own talents, leadership ability, and potential for success, a quest for power will be the prime motivator for Trump’s leadership behavior, punctuated by a need to control situations and dominate adversaries” (p.10).
In conclusion, transformational leadership is a process that changes and transforms people’s emotions, values, ethics, and long-term goals. President Donald Trump has the platform and opportunity to move his current followers and even his new followers to accomplish more. Immelman (2017) states that Trump’s limitations include the propensity for a superficial grasp of complex issues, risk of failing to keep himself adequately informed, an inclination to act impulsively without fully appreciating the implications of his decisions or the long-term consequences of his policy initiatives. (p.11). In addition, he also has preference of loyalty over skillset with his employees. While President Trump is passionate about many issues that concern our country, his impulsivity, narcissism, and lack of empathy prohibit him from being an exceptional transformational leader.
References:
Bass B., Steidlmeier P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217
Burns, J.M, (1978), Leadership, N.Y, Harper and Row.
Immelman, A. (2017). Leadership style of U.S. president Donald J. Trump. Retrieved from Digital Commons website:http://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/psychology_pubs/107/ (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32000.64001)
Northouse, P. (2016). Leadership Theory and Practice. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
cms41 says
Hi Kerrie Ann:
Your blog made me question. When does one know when a transformational leader has turned into a pseudotransformational leader? Is there a defining moment? Northouse describes a transformational leader as an individual who provides idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. A pseudotransformational leader is described as an individual who is inspiring but who is also self-serving, unwilling to encourage independent thought, and exhibits little caring for others(Northouse,2016 p163) I believe that most pseudotransformational leaders start out following the path to transformation and somewhere along the way the mask comes off. The definitions just do not provide a clear path to identifying the warning signs.
A study by Parry and Proctor-Thomson, made things a little clearer for me. The study compared the perception of transformational leadership and the basis of overall integrity. Integrity was defined by these researchers as behavioral integrity(Parry,K.W.&Proctor-Thomson,S.H.2002,p2) This behavioral integrity definition was identified by Becker and used as a basis “integrity is commitment in action to a morally justifiable set of principles and values…”(1998, p157-158). My take on this is that we must judge the whole person, not just by his leadership actions but by all his/her endeavors. I considered the trait approach and “the great man” theory. This theory talks about the traits that identify a leader and a great man but even those who are leaders and great men are not always good men. Behavioral integrity according to Parry and Proctor=Thomson explain that the development of trust, increased commitment, and reciprocal respect cannot occur if the leader’s actions undermine the necessary constructs of transformational leadership by not matching the definition ((Parry,K.W.&Proctor-Thomson,S.H.2002,p2). I believe the true transformational leader must also be a good man in all his/her behaviors.
In considering the behaviors of many who we might be considered transformational leaders, labeling them as such may not be possible if this definition is applied. I would not say that all Fidel Castro’s action were based on behavioral integrity nor are those of Donald Trump, Napolean Bonaparte, or Bill Clinton. The research I am citing is a study on the perceived integrity of those considered transformational leaders and how their behaviors are measured in terms of vision, justice, honesty, and caring behaviors. In our lifetime we have seen many charismatic leaders, but when their behaviors are measured according to integrity they fall short. Even the researchers in their work conclude that more empirical research must be done to determine leader motivation, follower perception and tools that measure integrity. Parry and Proctor-Thomson sum up that future research needs to occur to make a distinction between “doing the wrong thing and not doing the right thing” Parry,K.W.&Proctor-Thomson,S.H.2002,p17).
Northouse, P.G. (2016). Leadership theory and practice. Sage Publications, Inc.
Parry,K.W. & Proctor-Thomson, S.H.,(2002),Percieved integrity of transformational leaders in
Organizational settings, Journal of Business Ethics,35(2)Retrieved November 1, 2017
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.604.2937&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Katie McGarry says
Forgot my reference!
Reference
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and Practice (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Katie McGarry says
Hi Kerrie Ann!
I love how you chose to analyze a leader (Donald Trump) and then tried to see how it fit with the factors of transformational leadership, diagnosed him as psuedotransformational, and then came up with ideas that would make him an actual transformational leader. My blog post is actually quite similar to yours, except I chose a transformational leader (Fidel Castro, of course influenced by our last movie paper!) and showed why he fit the transformational factors even though he was a bit controversial. However, I like your idea of picking a controversial person and analyzing them better. It was a really interesting post! Do you think it is likely that Trump will change any of his strategies within the next 3 years that will be authentic transformational leadership factors? If so, which factors are most likely to change?
Northouse (2016) stated that pseudotransformational leadership “is threatening to the welfare of followers because it ignores the common good” (p. 163). As you stated in your post, which came from the Northouse text (2016), pseudotransformational leaders are self-serving and do not want their followers to be independent thinkers, preferring, instead that followers believe what they believe. Do you think it is possible for pseudotransformational leaders to change their ways of thinking so that they can become transformational leaders, or is the selfish mindset so ingrained in them that they can’t change to become genuinely caring about their followers?