Ever since the massacre that occurred in a church in Charleston, South Carolina, the Confederate flag has become a prominent issue. People are rushing to both sides: some wish to ban this ‘racist icon’, while others desire to preserve what they call a ‘historical piece’ or ‘beacon of independence’. This conflict is inherently polarizing as some see the flag as an insensitive symbol of oppression while claim that it represents the spirit of this rebellious nation. Regardless, we can all agree that nine people are dead. According to the New York Times article “South Carolina’s Senate Takes Step to Remove Confederate Flag”, Senator Joel Lourie stated, “I am very respectful to those who would argue that this flag is a part of our state’s history, and that, too, is undeniable. But it’s also a flag that brings back horrible memories of slavery” (Blinder). Reportedly, the killer donned his Confederate flag to signify white supremacy, and his crusade against those of color. However, is that alone enough to indict a flag that is undoubtedly a historical and cultural icon? As published in the New York Times, the South Carolina Senate believes so. The article reads, “… the South Carolina Senate voted overwhelmingly to remove the Confederate battle flag from the grounds of the State House” (Blinder). Statements such as this, along with “The 37-to-3 vote propelled the state toward a landmark moment” make it clear to the reader that, like me, The New York Times does not support the usage of the Confederate flag on government property (Blinder). As there is little concrete evidence to be presented in a case like this, the article relies heavily on pathos- emotional appeal- to portray both sides. The authorĀ also skillfully paints those who support the flag as an aimlessly rebellious mob. Although, I guess I have to admire people who can gleefully fly a flag that represents a group who LOST a war over 150 years ago.
Blinder, Alan. “South Carolina Senate Casts First Vote to Remove Confederate Flag.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 06 July 2015. Web. 07 July 2015.
Annie Elizabeth Ellis says
Matt, I think you brought up some really interesting points in this exploration of this particular article. Like Nicholas, I also like that you stated the multiple opinions of the flag and its meanings.
Laura Yohe says
I also used the same article that you did. You bring up the points of both sides of the argument, but the main reason that they are concerned with this particular flag is because of one particular massacre. My question to you would be why do people think it is acceptable to take down the flag if it a representation of our history and we all know you can’t erase history.
Zach Robinson says
I like the points made in the article, and I enjoyed reading about it because I just wrote a similar piece this week.
Nicholas Ciatto says
Good job summarizing the multiple opinions of the Confederate Flag. Some people only see it as a racist symbol, not as a large part of the history of South Carolina. It is important to include all sides.
Earl Brooks says
You raise some good points here, Matt. The real question is what the next steps will be to improve this situation.