Being a collegiate athlete, most people know that there are some pretty nice perks. These include things like free gear, scholarships, trips, etc. However, recently there has been some controversy regarding Athletes and what exactly they deserve in return for their services on the competition floor. What most people don’t know is that for a vast majority of schools, basketball and (to an even greater extent) football receive a lot of the benefits. Though, this is understandable. Realistically, these two programs, and pretty much only football here at Penn State, are the programs that make money and help fund all of the other “non revenue” sports.
Football players at Northwestern and a member of the National Championship winning team UConn have all been vocal in their opposition to the current policies regarding the NCAA. The NCAA has strict rules, which prohibit athletes from receiving any benefits other than scholarship and room and board fees. Football, with 85 full scholarships allowed, and basketball with 12 (basketball rosters are usually less than 15), most athletes receive a full scholarship, and all of these benefits. However, for most other sports, the number of allowable scholarships is much less. This means that for other sports, athletes go through similar experiences, however they are not motivated by full-paid scholarships.
The NCAA has responded this week, calling for schools to offer athletes, both scholarship and non-scholarship, free and unlimited food during their years competing. While I will definitely welcome this gesture, because who doesn’t love free food? It seems a little curious that those who are the most vocal of their opposition are the ones that receive full scholarships. I know of a few athletes who receive no financial aid, yet have not complained about their treatment. It is just an interesting thing to ponder.