Mary Robinson’s lecture earlier this semester was thoughtful, candid, and extremely appropriate for a college audience in my eyes. Having been an advocate for human’s rights all her life, I think her words resonated well with an audience of young adults who are trying desperately to make changes to the world around them. I really appreciated the humility she carried. I thought it was impressive for someone in such a lofty position to have remained so grounded in her principles. I have often heard people say that the qualities one needs to get elected to presidency are very different from the qualities one needs to actually be a good president. It always seems as though the candid, good-natured people can never make it to presidency because they are unwilling to compromise their values or be sycophant and sweet-talking. However, it seemed that Mary Robinson gained her prominent role in a very honorable way. She described travelling around the countryside, speaking to the common man and advocating for their issues. It was reassuring to know that genuine candidates could still rise to positions of power.
I also appreciated how she tied humility into her experiences with international affairs. I thought a real stand-out moment came when she shared the piece of wisdom from Eleanor Roosevelt who encouraged policy makers to use clear, simple language that everyone could understand. Far too often, our leaders use lofty, confusing language that just deceives the audience. Additionally, the idea she cited from Nelson Mandela who said that even Human Rights activists should never assume that they know more about a country than the people who actually live there. It is very easy for wealthier nations to feel that they know best, but history tells us that too much meddling can have disastrous effects. It is important for us to remember that we will never be an authority on a foreign land when we live thousands of miles away from their society.
Another major idea that she brought up in her lecture was the idea of a symbolic leadership. I liked the anecdote she told about setting the lamp on her window sill to represent the Irish natives who have left the country. She talked about how this symbol took on a life of its own and became so much more powerful and prominent than she could have ever imagined. This made me think about how symbols from our history can take on forms and take on a power that no one can ever really predict. Obviously, even though symbols can be really effective forms of positive advocacy, they can also develop very dark or unfavorable connotations from what they were intended to mean. For example, the swastika which was initially taken to mean a sacred force has now come to represent the utmost inhumanity and ethnocentricity. Even for Mary Robinson, this simple symbol earned her respect in the eyes of many but also angered a percentage of the Irish population. As students at PennState strive to become better leaders, consideration of the symbols we use to represent our cause is something very significant.
In general, I think Former President Robinson’s lecture brought up important ideas that were very applicable to a group of students trying to get more engaged in global affairs.