Please evaluate your peer’s contributions to the History of a Public Controversy project honestly. Your privacy will be respected and protected. Numeric scores correspond to the following:
9-10=great efforts and strong contributions.
7-8=okay performance; not amazing work or participation, but respectable.
6=less than par or did not pull weight; dock grade by 3% of portfolio grade.
5=substandard, flawed contributions; dock grade by 6%.
4=weak participation; dock grade by 12%
3=minimal participation; dock grade by 18%
2=student should fail this project
1=student did not participate at all in project
Member Name: ___________________
Rate the quality of writing or editing submitted by this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Characterize the overall contributions of this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rate the member’s level of cooperation:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Briefly describe this member’s contributions:
Member Name: ___________________
Rate the quality of writing or editing submitted by this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Characterize the overall contributions of this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rate the member’s level of cooperation:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Briefly describe this member’s contributions:
Member Name: ___________________
Rate the quality of writing or editing submitted by this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Characterize the overall contributions of this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rate the member’s level of cooperation:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Briefly describe this member’s contributions:
Member Name: ___________________
Rate the quality of writing or editing submitted by this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Characterize the overall contributions of this member:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rate the member’s level of cooperation:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Briefly describe this member’s contributions: