Just read the following blog entry by Karl Kapp:
http://karlkapp.blogspot.com/2010/08/we-teach-as-we-are-taught.html
Quote: “As schools adapt to new technologies and hardware and software, curriculum changes need to reflect more than just the inclusion of technology; changes needs to impact methodology, approach and instructional activities….Teachers and professors (who often don’t have formal instruction on how to teach) teach in ways similar to how they experienced teaching during their own schooling and hold beliefs based on those experiences (Borko & Putnam, 1996; Thompson, 1992).”
Reflection: This is why it’s so important to have training included with introduction of technology. Without a pedagogical framework included with a technology, the user is left to experience to apply it. As I think back to my days in the secondary math background, I can see the constructivist approach being encouraged in the use of graphing calculators and laptops.
Quote: “…simply adding computers to a traditional classroom without a corresponding change in instructional delivery or strategy doesn’t work.”
Reflection: Students and educators need to understand why a technology is being implemented before they can truly embrace it and make it effective. There needs to be a larger conversation happening and reasons highlighted for successful adoption.