Sarah D’Souza
ENGL 137H Section 027, Dr. Jessica O’Hara
Rhetorical Analysis: Advertisement
Due 10/16/2014
http://www.axepeace.com/#film
“Make love, not war,” is the anti-war motto of the 1960’s that is generally associated with hippies and the counterculture of the time. Starting with the Vietnam war, it has been invoked again and again over the years to protest the many wars around the world. The sentiment of this expression is not just free-spirited, but also sincere, nonviolent, and amorous. Contrastingly, the company AXE sells products with a reputation of being malodorous and overused. In addition to this, AXE typically has highly sexualized, and sometimes controversial, print and video advertisements. These two things are very different and seemingly should not be able to coexist, but the AXE Peace: Call to Arms commercial changes this.
The phrase “make love, not war,” is clearly illustrated, followed by a juxtaposition to the new product, AXE Peace, in this advertisement. Axe Peace is the company’s new line of peace shower gel, peace deodorant, and peace body spray, along with harmony shower gel and harmony body spray in honor of World Peace Day, which was September twenty-first. The commercial cuts between four different scenarios that start out in dire, war-torn settings. Between the tense music, expressive faces of the characters, and bleak settings, violence and utter destruction seem impending, until one woman stops in front of a tank about to fire. But the tank, a machine gun, a control panel for what is assumed to be a bomb, and what appears to be a communist rally all end up being something completely different than what you would expect, with each scene ending in favor of a kiss. This stresses the point of making love instead of war before introducing the new line of AXE Peace in the final seconds of the commercial. In addition to these juxtapositions, the commercial draws upon societal commonplaces and stereotypes as well as pathos and kairos in order to be rhetorically effective.
In the first scenario, a man escorted by multiple security personnel carries a briefcase that he is handcuffed to. Viewers can see that they are clearly supposed to be in and from the Middle East. The briefcase is placed on a table in front of an important-looking man, in an extravagantly decorated room, who proceeds to open the briefcase, revealing a control panel of sorts as he flips switches and prepares to press the clichéd big red button. The fact that this particular situation occurs in the Middle East draws upon commonplaces and stereotypes about terrorism and bombings while simultaneously creating kairotic connections to recent crises. The handcuffs and security detail in the beginning are suggestive of high classification for the briefcase and grand precautions as well. Many people will experience fear while viewing this scene due to the prevalence of terroristic violence in today’s society that the Middle East is so often lumped together with. The pathos involved in just this one quarter of the commercial is a journey that takes the viewer from apprehension and fear to relief and contentment because the big red button turns out to be a switch for a firework show as a display of affection. The important-looking man and the woman across from him smile as he kisses her hand while the rest of the security men in the room applaud the light show outside the main window.
It is open for interpretation on what and where the second set of clips is from, but it is reasonable to assume that it may be representative of Crimea or the Ukraine and their respective conflicts with Russia. A tank rolls through a darkened gray street, crushing mirrors and a grotesque doll head underfoot. Most pedestrians are unfazed and go about their day-to-day travels as if this is a regular occurrence, until one woman steps out into the middle of the grimy road right in front of the tank’s path. She is immediately distinguished from the rest of the population by her vibrant red lipstick – the only real “color” in the scene. The fourth scenario is very similar with a presumably American soldier flying in on a helicopter to a remote village in Asia armed with a machine gun. The children flee, but one woman turns towards the noise and starts approaching the vehicle. Viewers are fearful and anxious as the gun of the tank swivels toward the lipsticked woman’s unwavering glare; while, halfway across the world, the soldier heads out of the helicopter and approaches the unarmed woman, gun in hand. But after this tense moment, the couples embrace. It is clear that both couples have been separated for an extended period, but have now been reunited in unexpected situations. There is a grand juxtaposition that exists between the menacing connotation of tanks and war vehicles and the way they are portrayed, facilitating romantic reunions. Again, the kairos surrounding the scenario makes it extremely relevant to society and today’s ever changing world. It may remind viewers of certain events and locations in current events, but because no specific place is mentioned, it is also completely open to interpretation at the same time. The breadth of this scene makes for an especially striking and relevant appeal.
North Korea has been in the news many times in recent history, bringing back spots of inflammation from the red fever that was never truly cured. In the third scene, a militant leader is shown atop a balcony facing a highly organized sea of citizens. He raises his hand in salute and the crowd of officials behind him follow suit. When the leader nods a go-ahead signal to his right hand man, viewers may feel apprehensive, not knowing what is to come. But then, all of the members of the crowd proceed to put up a giant picture depicting the leader and his significant other in a heart. She is clearly taken aback and immediately reaches for his hand in a discreet but loving and appreciative gesture. This scene draws upon the commonplaces that are held about communist societies. Everyone in the crowd is dressed the same way and is arranged in formations that must have taken a considerable amount of organization and regulation. While the woman takes the leader’s hand as they both smile, there is no further physical display of affection between the two. This is typical of strict and conservative nations, despite the fact that the purpose of the entire assembly was to visually depict their love.
The AXE website states that “When love is in the air, aggression melts away and the world is at peace” (The AXE Peace Project). Their product is supposedly sparking and promoting love, which in turn creates peace and harmony. This is the train of thought that the company is following and assumes that viewers will as well. The men in these scenarios made the right decision and chose love over war. And according to the end of the commercial, the manner in which they did so was through using AXE products. While the reputation that AXE has come to have greatly contrasts with the connotation of a genuine and peaceful notion, the rhetoric of this advertisement unites the two.
Works Cited
“The AXE Peace Project.” AXE. Web. <http://www.axepeace.com/#about>. 10 Oct. 2014.