Global Medical Brigades Presentations

Over the course of the Global Medical Brigades Conference last weekend, I had the privilege of listening to two very interesting speakers talk about their approaches to life in hopes of inspiring their attendees to make changes in their own lives. I first listened to Linda Caldwell’s talk called, “Learning How to Help A Society Help Themselves — The Appreciative Inquiry Approach“ and then shuffled over to watch the keynote speaker, Bob McKinnon, make his presentation called, “Make it Happen: A call to action for risk takers, doers and agents of the future.” I noticed my true sense of passion for helping people as well as the ability to inspire others as I listened to these speakers, and I believe their intentions to inspire were truly working on me.

The first speaker I watched was Linda Caldwell. She is a Professor of Recreation in the Department of Park and Tourist Management here at Penn State and is the Director of the Global Leadership Initiative as well. She talked about how she went abroad to areas in Africa and practiced “Appreciative Inquiry” with the people in these places. The concept of Appreciative Inquiry in this context involves the idea that if Americans or people from more privileged countries travel to a third world country in hopes of promoting positive change, they must approach the root of the problem in a positive way. The root of the problems in these countries is, of course unintentionally, the people. The people are the ones living in these areas and the only ones who know the true story behind living here, including their struggles and inconveniences as well as the aspects that bring them joy. They are also the only ones who can come up with ideas and take action to change their lifestyle for the long-term. That being said, if for example, Americans, come to a third-world country and ask the people everything that is wrong with their community in hopes of changing it, the problems will seem overwhelming and this approach can lead to self-destructiveness and shame instead of progress. Also, if Americans come and simply change the society themselves, no long-term change will take place because the Native people will not understand how or why the change has happened and therefore cannot keep it going, and feel disrespected. Therefore, the Appreciative Inquiry approach focuses on a dialogue between the people living in these communities and those visiting them. The visitors ask questions prodding answers about the positive aspects of the community in order to strengthen those. This approach truly inspires and empowers the people in these third-world countries through recognition of their successes and in turn, building confidence. Therefore instead of approaching people with a condescending or doubtful tone, this type of leadership uses an approach of respect and humbleness to give others the power of autonomy.

Bob McKinnon’s presentation was equally inspiring and, I felt, enhanced by the ideas I obtained from the previous talk. His main message was “Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can.” At first I doubted this message a bit because the phrase, “Do what you can” seems to be a bit limiting at times- we are often capable of much more than we think we are, and this phrase seems to encourage limiting oneself. However, McKinnon gave twelve examples of people who proved my doubt wrong, and exemplify the true message behind the speaker’s philosophy. He gave one example of a man who studies viruses for a living. This man had read a story about gang violence in the United States and wondered what he could do to help, not thinking that he had the resources to make much improvement in this area. However, he realized that gang violence spreads in a similar way that viruses spread, so he used his specialty knowledge as a metaphor to promote change in a seemingly unrelated way. He decided to hire gang members to stop violence in communities and in that way, the gang members actually had jobs and were using their skills to positively impact the world. McKinnon gave another example of a man who traveled abroad and saw poor kids asking for money in the streets. He knew it was unacceptable to give them money, so he handed one of them one of the only readily available items he had at his reach- a pencil. The kids expressed their gratitude and need for more pencils, so the man started and organization called Pencil to Promise which raises money to buy children in other countries writing and drawing supplies that seem so mundane to Americans, but are actually extremely valuable to others as a form of expression. McKinnon also talked about an ex-marine who used his desire to help people and skills as a qualified, highly-ranked military personnel, to create an organization giving other ex-marines the opportunity to use their skills to help people in Haiti. Basically, these people realize something missing in the world and use this realization as well as the skills and knowledge they have to bring people together and create something impactful.

Both of these speakers emphasized the idea of positive leadership in order to make an impact in the world. The speakers were truly inspiring in their approaches to spread the word about these leadership methods, and their stories were unquestionable. I am incredibly thankful for the opportunity to witness these presentations and hope that I can take their words as advice on how to live my life each day.

Posted in Work in Progress | Leave a comment

Nature vs. Synthetics

I’m breaking this into two blogs because it will be very long. So stay tuned for next week’s blog on this topic!

Basically, I think our world is interesting in that it’s such a mix of everything. A mix of cultures, foods, people, etc. One mixture I find particularly interesting for this day-in-age is the mixture of synthetic things and natural  things. I say “things” because there are so many different items in these two categories that they can only be described using a word this general. I feel like there is a lot of debate between what is real and what is fake. Are robots, computers and technology, and synthesized materials “real?” Or does using natural products and performing tasks using our natural abilities the “real” way of life? I think there is beauty in both aspects of life and that the truth is that now, both nature and synthesis are aspects of our lives. They are both present and important not only for useful purposes, but also for cognitive and spiritual purposes.

Nature’s beauty:

1. What comprises “nature?”–  Nature or natural things are raw materials that we find exist in nature (…uh, duuhh). In this context, they are things that preferably are obtained without human synthesis in a lab or creation by technology such as robotic or computer intelligence. (for example, we need to use huge machines to drill in the ground and obtain oil. The oil is natural, but the process requires sensors and computers to locate the oil and huge machines to get it out from deep in the ground so, using gas that is sooo far into the ground is not natural) Nature could be described as “pure” or freely existing in its state without human corruption.

  • Flowers, plants, vegetables, fruits that are grown from seeds that had not undergone genetic alteration or enhancement
  • Plants grown locally, or distributed manually
  • Waterfalls or landscapes that could be eroded by water or weather, but no humans have corrupted them
  • Materials or tools such as yarn made out of sheep’s fur, or wool, or a knife made out of metal found in the ground and wood from a tree- the yarn and knife were made by humans, but by using their natural abilities and these natural materials, not by pushing a button and turning on a machine to make them.

Synthetics

2. What comprises “synthetics?”- Synthetics are things that are man-made

  • Fabric materials that are not from natural fibers or natural means of obtaining them
  • food products with added chemicals to form them such as genetically engineered seeds, or chemicals needed to manufacture processed foods
  • robots or technologic intelligence that although was created by humans at one time, eliminates the need for understanding behind the processes of the technological device, or the processes that the task would involve without the technological device (cell phones allow us to push a button and call someone, or type a text and send it to someone when naturally, this would not happen)
  • Someone looking differently because of genetic alteration (before they were born), surgery, or makeup

There are positives and negatives to both types of things in our lives and I think it is interesting why they are both looked at in this way. I think a balance is needed between them in order for people to be happy. However, the balance is the difficult part to find. Many people criticize people for being “too natural” because they seem to be out of touch with reality and just too conservative or closed-minded to all the new innovations and ideas of the world. However,  we hear all time that our society is too technologically immersed. It seems like we have gotten out-of-touch with ourselves and other people because technology forms a barrier between us and how it “should” be.

So I think it’s interesting that there is this tug  of war going on between the two. On one hand, nature is better but on the other hand, synthesis is better. So how should we think about this to find some piece of mind? Or some kind of conclusion so we are not constantly battling our human intuitions?

 

Posted in Passion | 2 Comments

Issue Brief and Advocacy Project

My issue brief is… well, I haven’t made too much progress with it since last week. But I have some ideas for my advocacy project that I want to talk about. My project will be about art in schools (I think) and one of my ideas is to make a cartoon video illustrating a story for the topic. It would take some time but I figured out how to actually do it and I think it could be fun to do something like that. I also think it would be something different that could catch people’s eye. However, I would have to find a way to do this without making it look too childish. I want people to take the issue seriously as well as intrigue them. If I decide not to do the cartoon idea, I could also interview people about what makes them “happy” and make this the focus of the video- that taking away the arts eliminates people of a source of relaxation and ways of coping with more stressful subjects such as math or even writing (although some people find art class, music class, or gym class stressful in themselves, or find that they enjoy doing math problems!). Even if people feel differently about the arts, the word, “the arts” includes all kinds of art forms and introduces kids to new ways of thinking. So if I interview people about what they find relaxing or fun, I can compile those, then present some hard info on the topic.

I also have another idea- the issue of Native American reservations. I went on a retreat with my church a few years ago and there was a Native American speaker who told us about appreciation of the land, people, and the world and it really stuck with me. I think the Native American traditions are interesting and meaningful, but extremely undervalued in our capitalistic society. For that reason, Indians are allotted their land, but do not have private rights to it, cannot own pieces of it, and the entire system is a mess but it’s easier for the government to just leave it there than to work on cleaning it up. I agree that there are many important issues that the government needs to work on right now such as the country’s major debt, education, etc. but I think this is an important issue to bring out of the works. Indians are oppressed in our country and most people don’t give it any thought. I could illustrate this one too possibly, or make a documentary-type video for it. There are many other possibilities for it as well though. I’ll have to think about it.

Posted in Work in Progress | 1 Comment

Taking the “Middle” out of School

According to a 2007 New York Times article, certain districts are beginning to eliminate middle schools from their school systems because middle schoolers score lower on standardized tests than their preceeding and subsequent age groups. Instead, these districts are introducing K-8th grade or 6th- 12th grade schools, eliminating middle school altogether and hopefully, the low test scores. This article seems a bit dated, but according to a 2010 article titled, “Stuck in the Middle”, this information is still very relevant. This article recalls the evidence found when researchers followed students in NYC schools from 3rd through 8th grade- some attending middle school and some attending K-8th grade schools. According to the researchers,  “the simple fact is that students who enter public middle schools in New York City fall behind their peers in K–8 schools.” This decline in success is observed in both Math and English, and plummets even further starting from 6th through 8th grade. The researchers also noted a drop in attendance in the students who attended middle schools. They averaged attending about two less school days than the students in the K-8 schools; a seemingly small, but significant difference.

None of the research supports that class size, funding, or age gaps are the cause of these differences. It does support the reasoning that middle schools combine classes from multiple elementary schools, making the transition more difficult and sudden for students and simply, creating a larger cohort of students.

” We estimate that an 8th grader who attends school with 200 other 8th-grade                     students will score 0.04 standard deviations lower in both math and English than he would if he attended a school with 75 other 8th graders, the average cohort size for a K–8 school.”

Although K-8 grade schools seem to show their advantages, what about the disadvantages?  The New York Times article points out that some students enjoy these schools because they feel more secure around other students and teachers whom they have gotten to know through the years. Students are also more likely to be in school with their siblings and experience that sense of security as well. However, some older students do not enjoy being in the presence of kindergardeners and students who are much younger than them. It creates a less independent atmosphere and they are robbed of those crucial transitioning experiences.

Another question arises about high school education. Will students in K-8 schools be ready for the transition from K-8 to high school? Will test scores instead, plummet from 9th grade on?

I think the idea of these K-8 and 7-12th grade schools is interesting. As a student who attended a public middle school after elementary school, I realize that the transition process from elementary to middle school can be daunting, but is also necessary in making new friends and breaking out of little cliques that formed in elementary school. After K-8 schools, students will be lacking experience in this aspect at a time when they could benefit the most from a smooth transition. However, the K-8 schools could also allow students to build more quality relationships to promote more peer support and pro-social behavior throughout high school. This model of education is interesting and I would be intrigued to hear more about it as more research is introduced.

Sources:

http://educationnext.org/stuck-in-the-middle/

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/education/22middle.html

Posted in Rhetoric and Civic Life | 3 Comments

Pursuit of Truth and Beauty

“The Pursuit of truth and beauty is a sphere of activity in which we are permitted to remain children all our lives.”– Albert Einstein

So, beauty quote of the day, actually… of life- up there. I love this quote for many reasons. First of all, I have this quote book that I received as a stocking stuffer from “Santa Clause” when I was in fifth grade. I forget the name of the book but it has a lot of quotes like this one in it that I didn’t understand back then, but the cover of the book was decorated in a kid-friendly way so I think that’s why I got it as a gift. ANYWAY, I was looking through the book last time I was home and noted this quote as one of my favorites. It’s just awesome and explains things full circle in this one sentence. I mean, it is Albert Einstein who said it so is that really a surprise?

The “Pursuit of truth and beauty” to me, is the definition of curiosity. Babies crawl around, pick things up, and put them in their mouth in the pursuit of truth and hopefully beauty (otherwise they will have a bad experience, and who WANTS a bad experience?) Scientists develop theories in pursuit of truth and beauty. They aim to get at least as close to the truth as possible, and beauty comes with discovering the answer to the driving force to learn about the world.

When he says it is a “sphere of activity,” in which we are “permitted to remain children all our lives” is also interesting. The phrase “sphere of activity” could be interpreted in a few ways. Maybe he means that truth and beauty are never completely attained so even when you believe you have found either one, it will never be so and you will need to go back and figure out the process of attaining these things again, possibly in a different way. It could also mean that Once you attain truth and beauty in regards to one life aspect, the only way you can be happy is if you start over and pursue them with another aspect. This relates to the phrase talking about how because of this, “we are permitted to remain children all our lives.” This goes back to that “spherical” idea because even as an adult, you can return to your childhood and in a way, re-discover your youth. Especially in our American society, you always hear people talk about how the years go by too fast and how they would kill to be a kid again, but this phrase inspires you to embrace your life the way you are. You are going to age- it’s a fact of life. But if you are always in pursuit of truth and beauty, you will never feel old, or like you are wasting your life away. You are always working for a purpose, and that will create satisfaction in your life.

Posted in Passion | Leave a comment

Issue Brief Draft/ Outline

Art Education in Public Schools

A recent movement has taken place within the last five years indicating that children receiving an American public education are not scoring as highly in the reading, writing, and math sections of standardized testing as children in other countries are. However, America is also in the middle of a budget crisis and education systems already spend significant amounts of money on their programs. Should more of this money be concentrated to reading, writing, and math programs? With a limited budget, if more money is allocated to these standardized-tested subjects, less money will be put forth for programs to the “side” of these such as the arts and physical education. In fact, many schools have begun this financial re-distribution. However, before every school eliminates their arts programs, it is important for them to actually consider enhancing them. Much formal research and many personal reports indicate the positive learning effects of art and physical education in schools and taking away these programs would be more detrimental to the educational process than any other move. Removing these important programs would mean removing critical thinking and creativity from children, ridding them of the ability to think through problems in their own ways, and in multiple ways. It would provide a strictly content- driven knowledge base before the true rigor of college and after that, the real world where even simple forms of creativity are a necessity to survival. It would also inhibit children’s abilities to think through math and reading problems on standardized tests. More money being allocated to reading and math programs does not necessarily mean improved programs, but adding outlets such as art and gym do. Taking away these programs will take away true learning opportunities for children at a time when the country needs these opportunities and advancements the most.

Background

It had been reported in many sources that standardized testing scores of American students have dropped significantly within the past few decades, especially as compared to students in other countries.

  • present statistics showing lower scores in America than other countries/ lower scores in America now than before.

-present graphs?

-This presents a few additional questions:

-Why is this happening? (taking away the arts and phys ed)

-What do these test scores even mean? (Should we be alarmed in the first place? Do these lower test scores correlate with children’s intelligence and learning abilities outside of tests?)

-Of course this does not indicate causation- it is an observable pattern and is important to consider

-could also be because of many other reasons such as more affluent families who can afford art education or the addition of art programs, also provide more support to children in other ways

-Evidence that art specifically helps children learn- Fox 29 news report

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/books/27gugg.html?ex=1311652800&en=46d2acd42565a9f0&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=1&

-Evidence comparing educative success years ago with art education and phys. Ed. with evidence of less educative success now

-Evidence comparing educative success in other countries with art education and phys. Ed. With evidence of less educative success in America (without them)

-Schools that do not have art education- do worse?

**The reading age- also found that kids now do not read as much as they used to and that reading scores are much lower now than they used to be.  http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre2008022200

-Could reading less be another culprit of lower scores?

  • Issue of money- some schools simply do not have the money to allocate to the arts and sometimes even to math and reading programs- what should be done about this? http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1999121000&type=hitlist&num=13
  • Issue of Standardized testing at all- Are these standardized test scores even fair evidence? Do they accurately portray the abilities of American kids to think, innovate, and compete in the world amongst people from other countries? Do kids simply not understand the value of the test, so they do not try?
    • Compare test results of poorer areas to those of wealthier areas- will show how support and being taught to care/ having support (financially and usually, morally and emotionally) helps testing scores so these standardized tests are in fact, accurate portrayals.

Solution:

Basically, America wants higher test scores because these scores indicate whether or not our kids will be ready for the future in competition amongst other countries as well as helping within America. However, even if test scores are the most concrete way we can assess the comprehension success of students, and in a way, are a priority, they should not be at the forefront of our minds. They need to be a distant goal that can only be achieved by doing the honest work beforehand to reestablish a ground for education. The test scores will follow the quality of education.

-Quality education:

-Quality training of teachers/ treatment of teachers- if education is so important in this country, the government should treat it that way

-Evidence showing teacher pay/ teacher satisfaction with their jobs

-This also means teachers and administrators recognize and respect the true needs of students such as the arts and phys ed and fight for the rights of their students to have access to programs such as these instead of settling for education without them in fear of higher-ups

-Determining what is truly necessary for children to learn and allocate those items and programs to every school

-This may require additional formal research to find out in what environments and with what materials students learn best

-Making education a true priority (instead of just talking/worrying about it), finding evidence about how to make it better, and make progress that people can see by increasing expectations and providing the necessary resources that schools need to fulfill these expectations

-Forming a less competitive system among states, counties, and schools in regards to testing and replacing it with a more unified approach, emphasizing the importance of America as a nation and therefore improving overall education and test scores.

Posted in Work in Progress | 2 Comments

Pretty vs. Beautiful

One of my pet peeves is when people interchange the words “pretty” and “beautiful.” This to me, is incorrect usage because when something is pretty, it is not necessarily beautiful, and when things are beautiful they do not always have to be pretty. Let me show you.

First of all, when you type the word “pretty” into Microsoft Word and look at its synonyms,  beautiful comes up as one of them. Now, it is not a bad thing that this happens, because beauty and pretty-ness share connotations and that mini-thesaurus might help you realize that you actually need to change the word you originally used because you were trying to say what the other one describes. The point is though, these words do not mean the same thing.

The word “pretty” is related more to a level of attractiveness. It describes things relating merely to the senses, and describes a pleasing experience or thing. You can say that something looks pretty or sounds pretty, even smells pretty. However, this word does not go beyond these sensational experiences delighting you. When it does go beyond this though, you get…

Beauty. Something beautiful is more encompassing and fulfilling. It has an element of initial attraction and evokes strong emotion in response to it. Also, the initial attraction does not need to be pleasant. It simply needs to capture you in a way that changes your thinking from that moment of experience so that you are not be the same person you were before. I also feel that beauty is more of a subjective interpretation- it varies from person to person and among different contexts. We often say, “I think this is beautiful in its own way.” The word “pretty” is subjective, but it describes something in a less personal way than beauty does. You could describe the same picture and say, “I took a pretty picture the other day” or you could say, “I took a beautiful picture the other day.”- These two sentences conjure up different images in your head right? Even if they are only slightly diffferent.

Next time you write that paper, describe something, or give someone a compliment, keep these differences in mind! They make the difference between how people perceive what you are saying.

Posted in Passion | 2 Comments

Ideas ideas…

I’m debating whether I want to stay on the topic of education for my issue brief project or choose another topic. I think education is interesting and super important, however that is my blogging topic  so I might want to change it up? Still not sure. My main idea is keeping the arts in schools. I know there are a lot of schools trying to get rid of them because they don’t seem absolutely crucial and use up a fair amount of money. However, there is a TON of psychological evidence in favor of keeping them and I think I would have a lot to work with.

I’m not sure how I would present this though. If I am doing something with art, it might be fun to give it an artistic touch and do something different or a little off-beat. I really liked the example we saw in class of that photo gallery presentation so I could do something like that. I could even create a cartoon or something haha, but that would be a lot of work. A video would be good- I could go to State High or a local elementary school and interview some students, and I also know of the SOMA club that promotes the arts of all kinds on our campus. Those would be worthy interviews and I could make a quality video using them.

As for other ideas besides those related to education, I’m not quite sure! I could do something with women’s issues or rights because I took a women’s studies class last semester and feel like I would be happy to share my new knowledge for this topic in some way. Also, I feel like the attitude toward this topic is that women should stop complaining now because we have gained many perks for our gender already. However, there are still many issues present within this topic that most people do not even recognize and my project could be quite interesting and surprising. I’ll have to think about it a bit more!

Posted in Work in Progress | Leave a comment

Hampered Beauty

I’m subscribed to a website called Daily Glow and they send me daily updates about health, fitness, and beauty and at times I like reading them, but for the most part I ignore them because I receive so many. However, last week there was one titled, “10 Depression Symptoms to Watch For” and it’s not that I was questioning whether I was depressed or not, but depression seems to be increasing in our society and I find it interesting to learn about it. Therefore I clicked on it. The article listed many symptoms that I could have guessed, but I didn’t expect one of them in particular. Apparently when people experience depression, they do not perceive colors or sensations as vividly as they would normally.

This makes sense because depression is thought to be caused by an imbalance (often a lack of) serotonin,  a neurotransmitter that effects anything about our bodies from temperature regulation, to learning and memory to social behavior. Neurotransmitters also play an extremely important role in sensory perception, so if serotonin is lacking in the body or in neurotransmitting processes, perception will be lacking as well.

I think this is interesting because this symptom of depression actually seems to be more of a cause. After people begin feeling depressed, they begin perceiving sensations less vividly than normal. However, the decrease in perception also would add to a person’s depression and the lack of magnificent sensations in their life keeps them in a hole they cannot get out of.

The disability of people with depression to even perceive beauty shows how important it truly is to our health. Without it, we stay stagnant, uninterested. internal, and cannot see the light that the world offers. There is no motivation, because why would there be? What do you have to work for if it’s not positive?

Not to be a Debbie Downer or anything! So here’s a picture of  a sunset that I hope brings you some more beauty into your life 🙂 Other than that, do what you love- that’s more long term.

 

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=beautiful+pictures&aq=f&um=1&ie=UTF8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=w&ei=JB9CUbGDFsnE4APl9IGQAw&biw=1366&bih=643&sei=Jx9CUf-BGYe64AODq4GwAQ#um=1&hl=en&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=beautiful+pictures+of+nature&oq=beautiful+pictures&gs_l=img.1.1.0l10.2235.2235.3.4835.1.1.0.0.0.0.66.66.1.1.0…0.0…1c..5.img.mBJepQxKlag&bav=on.2,or.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.43287494,d.dmg&fp=91d5bac1a37b379e&biw=1366&bih=643&imgrc=JtYY5vRbde6-hM%3A%3BJkhAS1I9_MXJ-M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.deshow.net%252Fd%252Ffile%252Ftravel%252F2009-04%252Fscenic-beauty-of-nature-photography-1-503-2.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.deshow.net%252Ftravel%252Fscenic-beauty-of-nature-photography-1-503.html%3B1024%3B768

 

Posted in Passion | Leave a comment

All About the Style

http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/21428981/students-at-pa-school-leave-class-with-a-little-bounce-in-their-step

This link is funny for me to watch because my little brother is in it! This is the middle school in my home town and my mom sent me this link so I thought it would be perfect for this blog.

When you first watch this video, it also looks funny because these kids are just bouncing on balls while in class. We never got to do this in elementary or middle school, certainly not high school, and it appears almost humorous. however, I think this is a serious advancement.

It reminds me of this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U by RSA Animate which is lengthy, but if you skip to about minute 4, the narrator talks about how kids get distracted from what they are learning in school because the school environment is so unstimulating compared to their lives outside of it. Therefore, more kids than ever are being diagnosed with ADHD and drugged so that they can calm down and “pay attention” in school. But according to this video, the drugs are “anesthetizing” these kids and “we shouldn’t be putting them to sleep, we should be waking them up.” He also mentions how the arts are very crucial to our learning experiences because they engage all of our senses, allowing us to be fully present in the moment, absorb more information and retain it better because we can relate it to sensory experience.

This relates significantly back to the news report. The teacher, Mr. Duey, has the children engage in songs about the subjects they are learning first of all. These songs force the kids to be engaged because it requires them to listen, speak, move, and stay in rythm- all sensational activities that require motivation to help them pay attention in the first place, and also gives them different points of relation to the actual content of the song. The balls that the kids sit on in class help with keeping the kids attention when they need to complete written work. The teacher talks about increased blood flow to the brain which allows the children to focus more and think more clearly, but when you listen to the kids’ interviews, they talk about how these balls are more enjoyable than just “boring old chairs.” They allow the kids a form of self- expression, bouncing more or less, however they feel necessary to focus, and the kids’ grades have improved. The kids are not constrained to a chair and told to focus in that one condition, but this ball-chair method allows for much more freedom and personalization of learning style.

Many people are against methods like this because they think kids should just be able to concentrate, or discipline themselves. According to my Psych 105 teacher, Andrew Peck, our generation averages at a third grade reading level when we become freshmen in college, while our grandparents generation averaged a tenth grade reading level. What? It seems like the system our grandparents had worked a lot better! However, in the beginning of the RSA Animate video, the narrator also talks about the need for education reform all over the world with the changing economy and technology because the current system is based off of a time when the surrounding circumstances were different. There wasn’t a fraction of the technology we have today and things were much less complex. Therefore, I think one of the greatest problems with our education is the style of teaching and the need for kids to personalize their education instead of force themselves into a mold that doesn’t quite fit.

References:

http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/21428981/students-at-pa-school-leave-class-with-a-little-bounce-in-their-step

Andrew Peck, Pennsylvania State University Professor of Psychology

Posted in Rhetoric and Civic Life | 5 Comments