Reaction Week 5

This week in class we read  chapter 9 “Latino Americans and Asian Americans in Film & TV”, and chapter 10 “Native Americans, African Americans in Film & TV”. Both chapters were discussing these different races, and how they are portrayed in the media. Latinos are displayed as either Greasers, or Latin lovers usually. Asian women were always seen as “sexually deviant”, and one that I had never heard of before; Dragon Lady. Apparently Dragon Ladies would seduce American soldiers that had come overseas to fight. This put American men in a favorable and heroic light, while the natives of the land were accused of seducing them.

Native Americans were portrayed as lovers of all animals and nature, yet always primitive and simple. They could be very passive or violent. African Americans however have always been portrayed as lazy, slaves, violent, or usually always under the white man. What’s still prevalent today is that there are so many movies in which the lead is a white man, and the secondary is a black man. There are many lead black man movies, but this stereotype has always been used. The chapter also went over the use of black face, which is extremely distasteful and rude. White actors would leave a large area of their white skin near their mouths showing to emphasize the stereotype or large lips, and the rest was a black face.

We also watched an episode of “The Office” this week in class. The Office is very funny in my opinion, and in this episode was about diversity in the workplace. The office does a good job of trying to break these stereotypes by placing its characters in uncomfortable situations. Michael Scott gets called out for being racist in doing an embarrassing impression of Chris Rock. He also had his staff participate in a “diversity day” his way.

Our student led presentation that my classmates gave this week continued on various ethnicities. It was disheartening to continue learning and hearing horrible situations about how terrible people are being treated. We are all human, we are part of 1 humanity, we breathe the same as anyone. The group also discussed how Asian characters are never main characters in the show and if they are, they are being ridiculed in a way.

MLE #5 Letter to Zeta Tau Alpha, Alabama Chapter

So for MLE #5 we had the liberty of writing about something that we would do to promote change and influence for the better, I took it as. So as I waited a couple days and when I saw the new Bloomingdale’s 2015 holiday catalog, I was thought that I might write a letter to the big guys at Bloomingdale’s and express my concern for the very strange and concerning ad. However when I shared this story with Professor Nichols, she directed me towards the Bloomingdale’s apology for their very strange and concerning ad.

Over Thanksgiving break something that hit pretty close to home happened. My best friend’s little brother is trans and even though he was born with female body parts he is male because he simply states that he is. An acquaintance of ours whose sibling is friends with my friend’s brother, heard that he now identifies himself as male and that he is “confused.” This rubbed me the wrong way like it does every time when I hear people using the same excuse. It resists accepting the fact that change is good and just because we were not always accepting in the past of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer community, does not mean that we have not evolved from such narrow views today.

The mentioned acquaintance is a member of the Zeta Tau Alpha, Alabama Chapter. I know that Greek life performs philanthropic events, and I was curious if Greek life and which sororities/fraternities were accepting of the LGBTQ community. My flaw in my prep research is that even though I know a couple Zeta member’s in various chapters at their respective institutions, I do not know for certain all of the events that they hold and what they stand for, but by the definition of “philanthropy,” I assume that these events have to do with helping humanity, and doing things for the good of all people. Should that not mean that members of Greek life that associate themselves with helping humanity, which is honorable, and all members should be picked specifically because they most stand for the values of the sorority, and if acceptance, compassion, and sensitivity is not executed by members of that specific chapter, does that not reflect upon the entire sorority?

I researched how I may and who I may contact of the Zeta Tau Alpha, Alabama chapter, to express my concern for the discrimination that had been committed in a letter. I don’t and did not intend to disrespect the privacy of the individuals involved, thus names had been replaced and my name is the only real on in the letter, the rest are fiction to protect all involved, and more importantly because it is not a letter to shame the wrong doings either, but rather a chance to learn from this and grow. I believe if I express my concern about the mentioned wrong-doing, than I will await a response, if one comes, and I will hope to read that the Alabama chapter of Zeta Tau Alpha, understands to increase efforts in raising awareness of discrimination of all forms. I’m just thinking that there may be members of the LGBTQ community in the chapter…now what kind of sisters treat each other like that? …That they are “confused” and what they believe they are is not actually who they are, “it’s just a phase.”

picture of letter 1picture of letter 2picture of letter 3

MLE 4 White Privilege could be used positively?

I have to say I enjoy attending any multicultural experience opportunities, but being affected by the Penn State plague can cause one bed rest for an unfortunate amount of time. However, you can learn and be influenced daily by all of the different people that you can meet in all situations. The internet, and movies and speeches allow us to experience even from inside our homes.

I digress. A recent trend on Facebook is to share various videos, and sometimes, luckily more than often on my news feed I will come across positive themes promoting change, and I find it wonderful that people my age are interested in such studies and topics. A girl shared this video that I have uploaded as well, and it is only about four minutes long, but in these four minutes, educator, author, and researcher, Dr. Joy Angela DeGruy tells a personal experience story of how white privilege impacted her life one day. Before I continue with the summary of the video, I did research on Dr. Joy just for more background knowledge and credibility.

Dr. Joy DeGruy is a nationally and internationally renowned researcher, educator, author and presenter. With over twenty years of practical experience as a professional in the field of social work, she gives practical insight into various cultural and ethnic groups that form the basis of contemporary American society in workshops that she holds. Dr. DeGruy’s workshops also go far beyond the topic of cultural sensitivity and diversity; she provides specialized work in areas of mental health. Her seminars have been lauded as the most dynamic and inspirational currently being presented on the topics of culture, race relations and contemporary social issues. I think that I would very much like to attend a workshop held by Dr. DeGruy in the future. I will look into seeing if she has more educational videos, and would share it with my comm 205 class.

Dr. DeGruy begins her story with telling her audience that her sister, Kathy, is half black half white, but her skin is white and dons blue eyes, unlike herself. The two seem very close and not only to mention again that they are family but they protect and help one another. The two sister’s accompanied by Dr.DeGruy’s 10-year-old daughter, are standing in line to purchase groceries, both sisters paying in checks separately. Dr. DeGruy mentions that the cashier is a Caucasian and strawberry-blonde lady. Dr. DeGruy’s sister checks out her groceries first, and the cashier is talking up a storm and interacting with her, and accepts her checks without any problems at all. When Dr. DeGruy and her daughter step up to the cashier with their groceries, the cashier suddenly ceases to talk at all. Her demeanor seems to have changed entirely. Apparently, Dr. DeGruy’s young daughter immediately picked up the body language and social cues that the cashier is giving off, and was clearly beginning to get upset. When Dr. DeGruy went to write her check, the cashier asked her personally for TWO different forms of IDs. Dr. DeGruy said that the cashier followed to pull out the list of people that the store recognized that were constantly writing bad checks, and looked for Dr. DeGruy’s name intensely. Her daughter started tearing up and asked her mother why this was happening to them and signalling out to embarrass them, when her Aunt Kathy had gone by with no issues. Kathy came back to the cashier and asked why she was putting her sister through things she did not put herself through. The manager and multiple people in the store started agreeing with Kathy and stood up for Joy against the unjustifiable racial discrimination.

Dr. DeGruy specializes in ethnic and cultural topics, and categorized the White Privilege that Kathy acted on that day as being used in a positive light. Due to the fact that Kathy’s skin was a lighter color than her own sister’s, the two were treated entirely different in the same situation. Dr. DeGruy said that she used her privilege and acted on the truth and was able to explain, have her sister’s back, and get people to empathize with the unjust situation, all because she had lighter skin than her sister. The discrimination and situation are terrible all together, especially because a young child was affected by it. An innocent mind experienced a direct act of hate with no explanation at all. That type of experience would make anyone start to question their own worth, and notice the differences between how blacks and whites are treated.

White privilege is a real issue, despite that many claim they do not experience it, and most of the time this comment comes from white citizens. Just because you are oblivious does not necessarily mean that it is blissful. All as people of communities need to want to make an effort and get educated on racial issues and will then be more aware and sensitive to not discriminate and make small girls cry and embarrass them in the grocery line. And what leaves me speechless, is that I have worked as a cashier, and when you have a couple costumers and a line is forming, you want to check them out as fast as possible so that the customers don’t get aggravated. This cashier deliberately held up a line and Dr. DeGruy from going on with her day, just to make her feel bad. The cashier was a young lady and there could had been multiple reasons for her insolence but if you are the cashier and they are your customers, you are nice to every single customer equally.

I hope to one day attend one of her workshops because I very much enjoyed this video and shared it on my own Facebook page in hopes that others in my social circle can become enlightened on these sensitive topics. Facebook and twitter can honestly be very powerful tools, if used correctly. I have posted the video for you all to watch, and I hope that you do.

 

 

 

MLE 3 – Black Lives Matter – Truth and Reconciliation series

At 7 p.m on Monday, October 5, I wandered downtown and into the Attic Room of the State Theatre. Amongst the many programs and events Penn State can offer, the Penn State Institute for the Arts and Humanities welcomed professor James Braxton Peterson to give a speech about Black Lives Matter movement, as part of its Truth and Reconciliation series. Before attending, I reflected upon the “Truth and Reconciliation” title. I first hypothesized that all that is related to this must be about really dwelling on the truth and facts of the subject, in this case Black Lives Matter movement. Wikipedia states: A truth commission or truth and reconciliation commission is a commission tasked with discovering and revealing past wrongdoing by a government. By now I’m putting two and two together and realizing that by attending this speech, Professor Peterson might be able to shed some truth and facts on the matter of this movement, because it is widely misrepresented. When I say this I mean to say that I have noticed the black community saying that Black Lives Matter, while other racial communities will go to say that ALL lives matter, and that it is unfair to only enforce that black lives matter. While I stand by 100% that indeed ALL lives matter, the black lives have suffered numerous unjustifiable actions taken against them, and with this mindset I was excited as I waited for Professor Peterson to give his speech and give me the ammunition to fuel enforcements in the cause of the Black Lives Matter movement.

Right away I knew that I had chosen the correct MLE opportunity for me to attend and write about and Peterson hooked me in when he talked about Kendrick Lamar’s “Alright.” I love Kendrick…one of the best rappers of this time and I stand by that AND I could go on for many paragraphs on reasons why he is a genius overall, but I will talk about his song “Alright” and speak of what Professor Peterson had to say about it in relation to the movement.

Peterson pointed out that in “Alright,” Kendrick creates an allusion with his lyrics in reference to the Bible. Whether Kendrick is religious or not, he was raised by a religious mother. I believe Kendrick alludes to the bible because if there is a God, many always come across the same question: why is God doing this? Why does he treat some different than others, and why does it seem that the black community is so greatly affected, in this case? Kendrick is singing his lyrics as an anthem to those that want to hear it, and the black community, that they WILL be “Alright.” Very powerful.  Peterson continued to talk about police brutality towards black people. I took one single criminology course at Penn State so far (it has nothing to do with my major but it is entirely fascinating and relevant) and I can sum up what I learned in the class by saying that we are putting people in charge of incarceration, and they are making all the wrong choices, and what’s worse is that they are unequally tough on the black community as opposed to any other race, and especially white people. I understood this concept more when Professor Peterson stated that “there are different levels to discrimination.” Discrimination itself means the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. So in relation to the black community, it is not only that they are already being discriminated as a race but the problem on top of this problem is that there are even DIFFERENT LEVELS of discriminating. Black women, black men, white women, white men, gay, straight, blue, purple, all these categories are being treated harshly in more or less ways. Discriminating is not okay at. all. but what’s even worse is that if you are already going to discriminate, you’re even going to put more effort in hating a black person over a Mexican or the homosexual over the cross-dresser??? All human beings should be treated with equal respect, equal rights, and given equal respect.

It wasn’t a very long event and the Professor was having some technical difficulties with his presentations, however I found it interesting that he said he was unsure if he even wanted to show us the videos that he had prepared on his presentation. He said is evidence could be too much for the audience, and that may be so but discrimination against black lives is real, and it is terrible, and if the audience cannot handle seeing evidence of this, than we should not discriminate people at all, ever. If these videos were to be shown to the entire population of America, would people cringe? Would they realize racism is wrong? Would they understand the different level of discrimination that black people endure?

Peterson also touched upon the subject of the #SayHerName movement. Keisha Jenkins…rest her soul in peace, because lord knows she suffered both discrimination against her race and her gender identity. This is an example of “discrimination on different levels.”

The speech was very interesting to me, but now I’m all heated as I’m writing about what I remember all over again. I have preached in my blogs about equality, and I strive to act in such ways to everyone I meet. We will never have changed until each one of us personally makes an effort to bring about change. It was a pleasure to hear Professor Peterson speak.

My evidence that I was there was that I wanted to include a link to the song Peterson talked about. Listen to it, and understand why Kendrick is a lyrical genius. 🙂

 

MLE #2 IAT “Race” Implicit Test

In class, one of the student discussion groups asked us, the students, to partake in a race implicit test online. A description on the website states:


Race (‘Black – White’ IAT). This IAT requires the ability to distinguish faces of European and African  origin. It indicates that most Americans have an automatic preference for white over black.


 

Basically the survey results will give you a general idea of an implicit bias of white over black or “European Americans” over “African Americans.” Taking the test was interesting, and I may had focused on making sure I was pressing the correct words to the correct group when one of 3 different ways are tested. I fulfilled the test and my results suggested that I have little to no automatic preference to either European Americans over African Americans or vice versa. The whole point of the test is for you to take it quickly rather than completing it slowly. And depending by how much longer it takes you to associated “good” words and “bad” words to a face of a white man or woman and a face of a black man or woman. Several factors may explain the reason why it takes different amounts of time to react to different races and the results of your test. I would say my results do relate to how I feel towards white people, or black people, or any ethnicity; we are all people. I know that sounds vague but we are all equal in the way that we all live and breath and create or destroy, but we are all living and our common destination is the same. All people should be treated with equal respect. Basic rights are everybody’s individually (in most cases.)

However, I digress (but it was my introduction,) I wanted to do a sort of an experiment or survey myself and asked my roommate, my boyfriend, and his roommate, all very good friends, to take the same test. I wanted to know if the fact that I have learned about this test from the class that I am taking in school, and if what I am learning about will have a significant impact on my results in the test as compared to my friends that were taking the test, and I didn’t tell them what the test was about until they all took it individually, therefore had no prior knowledge that could possibly alter the results of their automatic preference of white over black, or vice versa, or little to no preference.

I think an interesting side study of these tests are the specific ethnicity of the person taking the test. For that reason I will state that my roommate, is an American girl from Pennsylvania, very close to the Harrisburg Area to be specific, my boyfriend is South Korean and his roommate is born in Abu Dhabi. I asked all three to take the test and share their results with me, if they felt comfortable to do so. All three received that they had  an automatic preference of European Americans over African Americans. Their results may have been a causation of many different possibilities.

my results

my results (hard to see sorry)

I encourage my readers to take the test, and explore the website overall, because there are other tests available as well. What will you do with the information of your results once you take it? It is important to study the factors that may contribute to your automatic preference results.

Ch. 7; Q. #7; pg. 85

While reading the textbook: Race, Gender, Class, and Media, keeping in mind the questions at the end of the chapter, really help to understand and really think about what we have read. The 7th question asks to research one out of five synopses, and extrapolate 4 important points mentioned and some that were not discussed.

The specific study that I chose to further research, is found on pg. 89 at the end of chapter 7. This study was conducted by Chiung Hwang Chen; “Outwighting the Whites: An Examination of the Persistence of Asian American Model Minority Discourse.”

Did you automatically think about how the topic of the reading could be about the stereotypical success of Asian Americans being compared and outweighing the value of the “whites” ?

Chen starts with describing the positive and negative effects of the “Model Minority” stereotype that originated during the 1950’s-1990’s. The Model Minority is the Asian American that has succeeded in all aspects and is associated with “fulfilling the American Dream.” These assumptions, that Asian Americans–which the term itself is socially constricted, and rather, that a variety of countries contribute to the “Asian” ethnicity–are in numbers substantially more successful in comparison to other minority groups, is a stereotype. Despite beliefs that such a stereotype could be considered a positive view of those of Asian ethnicity, but really it could be ostracizing the Asian people and their culture. Chen states that several Asian scholars believe that to be seen as such successful people overall is setting them and their basic human needs aside. Americans overall may not be aware that many people of Asian ethnicity lived in slums in America during the 1950-1990’s and therefore fewer opportunities were available to them during the 70’s-90’s.

So what do we believe? Who do we believe? Whose job is it to lessen the usage of this stereotype? (as well as stereotypes overall) Chen states that it is the duty of journalists to increasingly be aware of not referencing to the stereotype and further encourage the use of it. The media will continue to associate whatever they see with the belief that all Asians are doing fine. This stereotype is closely related to another: the Yellow Peril. The Yellow Peril stereotype is pre-World War II and was the fear that the success of Asians was taking away from the jobs of the white people. Some schools even altered their acceptance rates so that more whites over other minorities could be the top percentage of students as opposed to an Asian representing an American school.

To further agree that it is the job of the media to become aware and cease the use of stereotypes, I believe we could keep growing into generations of equality and respect amongst humanity will be vital. Chen discusses the issue of the stereotype discourse. The discourse, in a simplified explanation, is the particular ways of writing about particular subjects. An example referred to in the book was that in 1993, a Time article written by James Walsh, was about a young Asian girl, Took Took Thongthiraj, as the “personification of American promise.” While the author was praising the young lady that attended UCLA for her academic successes, he stereotyped her situation by stating that such a situation was “hardly unique,” thus minimizing the true success of Ms. Thongthiraj as saying that any of Asian ethnicity are able to achieve such as Thongthiraj has. Such is not always the case. Walsh’s article contributed in this way to the stereotype discourse.

The article continues to provide fascinating information and examples of a few other journalists that have contributed to discourse. The news is directly related to what the public understands about their current environment. We learn everything in the most subtle of ways from what we are exposed to and in the ways and where we receive our information from. It is the media’s duty to provide facts and cease the inferences of stereotypes in any way, only then such an issue will no longer be a problem. I found Chen’s article and study on “Outwhighting the Whites” very informational.

#1 MLE – Ask Rachel

asdfghjk This is a selfie of me taking notes at the #AskRachel forum. I can vouch I was there because I was surprised Rachel herself wasn’t there. I was nervous, who was I going to ask my questions?! Joke. Just a joke because there were many people and moderators that were there to guide the discussion during this forum to be as effective and useful as possible.

I enjoyed it, to be honest it was too long. The topic was “Cultural Appropriation.” So I hope people that read this don’t misunderstand me, in thinking that I was uninterested, I was most certainly interested, and can appreciate a good debate and conversation with fellow students and professors. But it was too long because after we explained what it means to “appropriate” and “appreciate” we should have spent the forum discussing positive ways on how to end the negative appropriation of various cultures. I think that any person with a good sense of what is right and wrong and what is respectful and disrespectful, should have the knowledge to refrain from appropriating  cultures in negative ways, because you do it once, you do it twice, someone will pick up your actions and continue the appropriating cycle thus degrading the specific culture. It is detrimental to the people with different cultures because it lessens their importance, ideals, individuality, and is directly related to a system of power. The ones appropriating are placing themselves above the ones they are appropriating.

There could be an instance of “appreciating” instead.

An example that I can relate to in popular media is in the movie “Mean Girls.” Great movie, but that is beside the point. The protagonist, Cady Heron moves from South Africa to America and has to attend an American school. Cady Heron’s skin is white, but her ethnicity isn’t exactly mentioned. She grew up in South Africa and is shown with braids similar to the culture of African women. In the Heron’s household there are multiple African tribal vases and knickknacks. Because the Heron’s skin color are all white, are they appropriating or appreciating the African culture? This example to me, is a definition of appreciating the culture. The Heron family lived in South Africa, they were zoologists, they lived amongst African culture, it was their life, everything they understood and knew. — Fast forward later into the movie, Cady herself assimilates to American culture. She becomes friends with three girls, all white, and learns to deal with the American high school culture and understands, in a skewed perception, the way of ways. So back to the tribal vase, Cady throws a party in her home and hides the vase under the kitchen sink, forgetting it’s once important meaning (as mentioned in the movie, Fertility Vase of Ndebele Tribe.) Her mother is shocked, that Cady has thrown a party, and above all, that she had forgotten the meaning of the vase and treated it in such a tossed-to-the-side way. Cady Heron had appropriated the culture, and assimilated to the American high school culture. Which, I could continue to argue that Cady had also appropriated American culture by acting in the way that she does in the movie, because not all American teenagers act like that.

I hope I didn’t lose the interest of my readers, but to confirm that you understand is to prove and explain in your own words. I hope the example made it easy for those that don’t have knowledge of what appropriating is, to understand and further see the differences for themselves.

At the forum, there was a man that in was passionate about how to define that we are appropriating culture, when we first need to define what culture is. In my notes I wrote what I heard: material and nonmaterial beliefs, unspoken rules followed by a mass of people. Culture to me is all that, and the respect and appreciation that to have a certain culture is what makes one unique. All cultures however are made up of living, breathing people. Though all 7 billion people on Earth may have different cultures, are different races, have their own ways of living life, we are all ultimately people, and we are all the same in a way where death and ceasing of existence should be our only enemy.

We also spoke of media’s influence on the issue of appropriation. Film, TV, newspapers, and various mediums for transmitting information, are all the most powerful influencers of how people view cultures, races, and other people. Celebrities like Miley Cyrus, people that portray themselves in such ways that they are not positively influencing others, appropriate culture, and because they are famous, some people may or may not listen. If they do listen, it is detrimental that they are following these negative examples, such as Miley’s at the VMAs and her braids. The problem however stems with those that first decided to set rules against African American women, that wearing braids in their hair, which is part of their culture, is not allowed in the work place, but a white young woman such as Miley Cyrus is celebrated or having braids in her hair. One last thought on Miley Cyrus- when this young lady dresses and acts in ways that are seen as disrespectful, AND follows to wear braids in her hair, she is indirectly insinuating, in the eyes of her audience, that being disrespectful is directly related to braids. It is detrimental. I have said this word a few times in this post but I cannot express it enough. We are diminishing the pure beauty of difference. In essence, change and the concept of time are the only things that have lasted since the creation of our Earth, and when our generation dies, the world will continue to rotate. It will continue to change, and it’s as if we’re putting roadblocks in front of our own path.

Ending thought- I raised my hand and talked at the forum and brought up an example of appropriating: American celebrations of St. Patrick’s day. We call it STATE PATTY’S. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll find a few excuses to drink, but we drink on a day that doesn’t have ANYTHING to do with drinking, simply because we relate it to the Irish, and we have always negatively stereotyped the Irish as drunkards. It’s ridiculous…I especially didn’t like it when people pinched me on this day because I didn’t wear green to school??? Don’t pinch me. Don’t disrespect culture, because you wouldn’t like it if yours was being disrespected…it’s all so simple it makes me sad we’re only making it harder for ourselves.

Racial Stereotypes in Film/TV in Media

Comm 205

Racial Stereotypes in Film/TV written by Omar, Adeline, Alyssa, Jon, and Alex

The United States is now more diverse than it ever has been, but from watching Hollywood films and television programs it’s easy to overlook that development. That’s because characters of color remain underrepresented in mainstream movies and TV shows. In addition, many actors of color are asked to play stereotypical roles—from maids and immigrants to thugs and prostitutes in Hollywood. This lecture breaks down how African American, Irish, Hispanics, Italian, Jewish, and Middle Easterners continue to face stereotypes on both the big and small screen. These common misconceptions about groups of people are still being portrayed in the media. The inaccuracy of ethnic groups can affect how we perceive one another and relate to one another. Children are especially vulnerable to the media’s stereotypes because they have a very limited view of the world.

African Americans

African Americans are the most stereotyped people in the modern and historical United States. They are portrayed as lazy, unintelligent, loud, immoral, destructive, and obnoxious as well as being portrayed as criminals or thugs in the media. As with all stereotypes, these stereotypes are lazy and only used to denigrate people who are seen as “different” from the person asserting the stereotype. These stereotypes are pushed even further by the media and how African Americans are portrayed in films. They tend to be cast in only certain roles that can be considered racist or at a minimum, stereotypical. These roles include the “Magical Negro”, thugs, a maid or butler, and a brash woman. These casting patterns can have a huge impact on how African Americans are viewed, especially when they reinforce stereotypes that are demeaning.

The thug role that African Americans portray in movies may be the most common stereotyped role. This role is usually an African American male who lives in the inner city or in a worn down suburb. They dress in baggy clothing with a lot of jewelry and are shown hanging out on street corners carrying guns and doing drug deals. This role is extremely stereotypical and very racist. Very rarely do you see any white males portrayed in this role, and when it is, it’s usually lampooning the idea (i.e. “Malibu’s Most Wanted”). The role is so stereotyped that it has been included in movies as a counter-stereotype. For example, in Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay, the main characters drive into an area where a group of black men are hanging out. The main characters wreck their car and the men begin to approach them and they become scared and drive away. The black men then become disgusted because the crowbar was to help replace the tire and they were only looking to help them. The fact that this stereotype is so common, that it is able to be counter stereotyped, shows how out of control its prevalence has become.

The brash and sassy woman and the maid or butler are two more roles often portrayed by African Americans. These two character types are less racist, but still demeaning nonetheless. The maid/butler role is demeaning because of the role the character plays in the family. Usually they are catering to a white family which is even more belittling. It creates the sense that African Americans are beneath the family and must work for them. The brash and sassy woman is a character that is loud and obnoxious, with often proclamations of how independent she is and very vibrant body language. This stereotype is one that is very commonly how people think of African American women. This can be seen in how little push there is when this type of role is cast. Unfortunately, this stereotype receives very little attention, further pushing its prevalence.

The “Magical Negro” is one of the most racist stereotypes in any type of film or television. It is a role that, quite literally, gives an African American special powers, making them seem like a mystifying creature to the audience who must help the white protagonist achieve their peace/goal. They also tend to be janitors or criminals, who are content with their “lowly” life. The term “Magical Negro” was coined by Spike Lee at a speech he gave. This character can be seen in films like “The Green Mile”, “Bruce Almighty”, and “The Legend of Bagger Vance”. This is demeaning because it creates a sense that the character is inhuman and makes them seem comfortable in lower wage jobs.

The Irish

The Irish are the subject of some of the most lasting and clichéd stereotypes. In their long history, they’ve been painted as weak and submissive, lazy, uneducated, helpless, and reliant on the kindness of others for their own survival, as said in chapter 4 in  “Race, Gender, and Media.” As with so many aspects of the human experience, there’s a lot more to the Irish than overgeneralized negative characteristics. In many cases the same negative characteristics attributed to Africans and African Americans (sloth, immorality, destructiveness) were often also associated with the Irish. In fact, some scientists believed the Irish were, like Africans, more closely related to apes than to other Europeans, and in some cases in the U.S., Irish immigrants were classified as Blacks, not Whites. Such stereotypes were and are further encouraged by the film industry by depicting incredulous and cliche situations within different races because they are the most interesting to watch. A white man will not watch a movie about a black family’s dying mother, and instead avert his attention to the loud black actresses acting in a scene.

Irish pub culture is known worldwide and has contributed to the stereotype that Irish people drink all of the time. Ireland is included with the rest of Western Europe amongst the world’s most frequent drinkers, Forbes Magazine conducted a study in 2008 that stated, “After a surge in binge drinking during the mid-1990s, Western Europe has sobered up substantially as greater affluence, education and the professionalization of the work force have changed drinking patterns.”  Yet directors seem to be fascinated with filming the same idea over and over again, and that is what they do when they use the stereotype of “The Bar-Popper.” As any Hollywood screenwriter/producer knows, Ireland is full of alcoholics. It stands to reason, therefore, that any male over the age of 50 to be found anywhere on the island will spend most of his time in his local drinking establishment, red-nosed face in a pint of the black stuff. This character is most likely good-natured and amiable (especially if the visiting lead buys him a drink) and probably owns a fiddle that will be put to good use in the final ceile around the pub. Examples of this is shown in movies like: Most of the cast of Waking Ned Devine, the supporting cast of Leap Year, most of the cast of The Quiet Man, Darby O’Gill in Darby O’Gill and the Little People.

The red haired character is also a dead give-away to the audience that the character is Irish, supposedly. This particular character was set in stone around the time of The Quiet Man, with Maureen O’Hara playing passionate and unreasonable opposite lovely quiet John Wayne. Admirers may describe her as “tempestuous” but in reality we’re talking plain-old bad-tempered (although, given that her tiny village is full of bar-proppers, it’s not without reason). She bosses her hapless brother / father / son around, keeps house and still finds time to make eyes at the male lead, before sniffing, adjusting her shawl and stalking off. The hair colour may vary – the better to disguise her fearsome temper from unwary men – and the wardrobe may have changed in recent years but the type is alive and well. Examples of films that depict the red-haired stereotypes are: Maggie O’Toole in Waking Ned, Mary Kate Danaher in The Quiet Man, the girls in The Commitments.

The fisherman stereotypes is also frequently bestowed upon the Irish character. This character may also farm, but either way you’ll find him looking manly and rugged in an Aran jumper. His thick accent and lack of refinement may initially repel any more sophisticated visitors from the city (the lead female), but after fate has flung them together she’ll probably realise that he’s just the rugged hero she’s been looking for. Once he demonstrates that he can play music, talk politics or look really good semi-naked, and she’ll abandon all career aspirations for a life in the back of beyond. Huh. Must be the accent. Oh, and under no circumstances will this role be played by an Irish actor. Some example of these are Declan in Leap Year, and Billy in PS I Love You.

Italian Americans

Italians, like the Irish, have faced similar treatment when they immigrated to the United States in the late 1800’s According to Race, Gender, Class, and Media Chapter 2; Whites closely resembled Italians with African Americans. They were depicted in the media with having curly hair, and very dark skin tones which caused white people to think they were black. In recent decades with film, and television; Italians have been portrayed as mobsters, men/women of power, and guidos.

When Italians immigrated to this country, they were not considered by many to be white. Italians represented the biggest wave of nineteenth-century immigrants, with more than four million coming to this country. When trying to look for work, Italians faced many difficulties. Many had little education, which meant they took many manual, and menial labor types of jobs. Early on in their presence in America, Italians were stereotyped with having big bushy moustaches, with a big smile on their faces. A few other stereotypes included simple-minded, working-class, small business owner, and large families.

In recent media, Italians have been portrayed as mobsters, gangsters, men of power and respect, guidos, guineas, and tough and violent guys. Films such as The Godfather, The Godfather Part II, Goodfellas, The Untouchables, and Mean Streets all portray Italians in this type of fashion. With the exception of Marlon Brando as Vito Corleone in The Godfather, The films I have listed portray Italians as ruthless gangsters. The Godfather and The Godfather Part II  portray mobsters with a stylized fashion. The stereotypical way gangsters dress would be in pinstripe suits with wide brimmed fedora hats and carrying Thompson machine guns. They have tight knit family in which they take immense pride of, but when they aren’t home the organized crime begins. A typical gangster in this fashion would set out hits on members of other crime families such as the Tattaglia Crime Family or the Barzini Crime Family.

As a tough guy or violent guy this stereotype is best represented in the Martin Scorsese film Goodfellas. Goodfellas portrays Italian mobsters as tough, relentless men whose lives are chronicled in three decades from the 1950’s all the way to the 1980’s. These men were fearless, murderous, and showed very little respect for anyone outside of their circle. Joe Pesci’s character Tommy Devito is the one who is most recognized as the group’s “tough guy”. His Funny How Speech is recognized as the centerpiece of the film.

Jewish Americans

Unlike the Italians and the Irish, the Jews were treated very differently when coming to America.  According to Race, Gender, Class, and Media Chapter 2; The Jewish people were treated differently when immigrating to the United States because both ethnicity and religion play a factor in Jewish culture. While all three groups were treated as inferior to White Americans, the Jewish people got it a little harder and assimilation into White society was the toughest for this group.

The Jewish people were forced out of Europe due to terrorism, genocide, and the Holocaust. The Holocaust has played a big role in creating the stereotypes associated with Jewish people, even to this day.  Nazi propaganda described Jews as deceitful, greedy, and manipulative. Some propaganda even stated that the Jewish people were part devil. Since they did not fit the mold of the ‘perfect person’  in Hitler’s mind, the Nazis used propaganda to get everyone else to agree with them. It worked and the Jews were forced out of Europe during World War Two.

While the Holocaust ended, the stereotypes created during this time continue on. The Jewish people are very resilient and I believe that should be one of the biggest associations with the Jewish culture instead of those imposed upon the Jews by Hitler. The Jewish people have withstood the test of time and have bounced back from being slaves in Egypt along with many genocides. While the Jewish people have withstood all of this hate there are seen as weak, fragile, and nerdy in many TV shows and movies.

Shows such as South Park and Family Guy have weak-looking, money hungry Jewish male characters. Due to shows such as these, this is how the Jewish American man is usually portrayed. There have also been many cases of anti-semitism in the media (for example Septa buses in Philadelphia had It almost seems as if it is acceptable to publicly stereotype Jewish people, and this is wrong. Nobody should be stereotyped or publicly shamed regardless or race or religion.

Muslim stereotypes

The way the world viewed Muslims changed magnificently after September 11, 2001. The world and the West in particular had no problems with Muslims and no particular stereotypes faced Muslims. It was actually the opposite, the world viewed Muslims as peaceful people and there were good relationships between the West and leaders of Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan. Even though Saudi Arabia and the United States were good allies, everything changed after September 11, 2001. After the bombing of the twin towers by Al-Qaeda members and the death of many U.S. Citizens, the whole world started portraying Muslims as terrorists.

Due to the bombing of the twin towers, George Bush thought that he would fight terrorism by invading countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan even though the real terrorists were not affected, innocent lives of ordinary people were the ones who were affected. After the world viewing what happened on television, shock stroke the people. No one believed what happened and the media gave it the most attention possible. From that day on, the news had nothing to talk about other than the Muslims being portrayed as terrorists and this became the new stereotype. “Random security checks” in the airport started happening with all Muslims entering European countries and America. Dirty looks were thrown around Muslims all the time. Veiled women were treated differently. The media put so much pressure on the Muslims that it was hard for them to handle. Stereotypes were after them wherever they went.

The media took this case to a new level where misrepresentation of Muslims were shown. Rudeness was present as well as mistreatment. TV shows presenting Muslim men with beards as terrorists started becoming very popular. Moreover, presenting Muslim men with multiple wives also started becoming popular. TV shows such as “family guy” and “Ahmed the dead terrorist” became the center of attention.

Finally, the media has portrayed and stereotyped all Muslim men as being terrorists and all Muslim women as being controlled by their husbands all over the media. Muslim men now are paying for what some Muslim men decided to do on 9/11 which certainly doesn’t demonstrate what Islam as a religion is. Islam actually means peace and even though the West reacted a negative with another negative (invading Iraq and Afghanistan, killing Saddam Hussein etc.) made it even worse on the Muslims because it became more and more the center of the topic everyone is talking about.

Bell Hooks

First of all, Bell Hooks seems like a bad ass lady with several degrees to back her knowledge and claims. The series of 8 clips in which Ms. Hooks deals with different topics and mediums in which media is corrupted and centralized upon were each credible and shocking to hear and see.

What marked me was when she spoke about the skewed recognition of Spike Lee’s work in comparison with shitty films created with the only form of black entertainment, as it is perceived; stereotypes. Spike Lee is an incredibly gifted man that created movies about real issues and things that people could be going through and therefor relate to. He created movies that make you think and question. He created movies through his vision and creativity, movies which were transmitters and mediums for his own ideals and theories and perception of the world and environment, and yet he was slandered in the media saying that his movies didn’t have a plot and his career was a failure.

However, there are several movies in the Hollywood industries which will present us with black characters in stereotypical situations, and those movies are the ones that make the most money.

Such a fact is saddening. Film is a beautiful form of art and a mere medium among the many others through which art is portrayed. If a movie can make you think or feel then the screenwriter, and director, and all actors and those involved in the creation of the film, have succeeded. Spike Lee’s movies have done just that, and he is an artist.

She also talks about Madonna. Madonna…she had always been seen by the public influenced by the media as out-there and rebellious, as well as using her body image. She may as well had been a feminist but when the money flows you may even choose to sell your body and soul to keep the $$$ coming in, as we see this happen to many celebrities. Miley Cyrus being a sad example.

Media decides what to show us in order to influence us, but it is in its turn influenced by the large amounts of money coming in supporting even topics that could be in some way detrimental, because those are conceived as the most interesting.

When Ms. Hooks spoke of the O.J. trial, she respectfully stated that she had not given her interest in such an event because it was absolutely preposterous and wrong to begin with because in any way that you look at it, there was violence being committed, in this case by a man against a woman. And when he was declared not guilty, because the media had skewed the story and put the American people against each other once more into thinking that the blacks had to root for their fellow black man, completely over-looking that just this specific man had committed hideous crimes and wrongful doings. It should not had been a debate over the color of his skin, a human being was being abused physically and in ways, both involved were mentally abused in their own rights as well.

Listening to Bell Hooks was a pleasure as her voice was calm but full of wisdom, and she hits it home for the modern college student when she drops a couple F bombs here and there.