Category Archives: Conflict

Somalia Hope

This Video contains graphic images from the Somalian civil war. If you are unable to view such images i advise you to fast forward or to not watch the video.

Dig Out of Poverty: Education (Final Film Project)

by Wanying Xie

During the whole semester, I’ve learned a lot about Africa, about its past and about its presence. When it comes to the future, I believe that the education is the key point in order to create a brighter future in Africa. In my assigned country, Ivory Coast, literacy is extremely low, probably the lowest in Africa. As the country recovers from the war and moves on, education becomes one of the most important things in Ivory Coast. The future of the country depends on the new generation. If we can make sure that every or almost every child is properly educated, we can build a bright future.

In this video, I simply explained how poverty is related to education and how education can help people dig out of Poverty. When I was doing my research, I found out that not only the international forces were helping, but also those Ivorian who received higher education and wanted to make a difference for their homeland.

Christine Kadjo, an Ivorian who was highly educated, sets up Education Center for locals. She teaches women basic life skills so that they could make money of it. She sets up scholarship for teenage girls who want to pursue higher education. All she does is to help her home country get rid of poverty.

1040i is an international organization dedicated to bring more education resources to Ivory Coast. Volunteers build school in Ivory Coast and help the kids with their school works. They bring essential facilities as well as hopes to Ivorian kids.

Growth of Sierra Leone

In American media, Sierra Leone has been scrutinized to great lengths and in turn, has led to a very poor reputation amongst American people.  A major factor that has influence American’s beliefs of Sierra Leone was award-winning film Blood Diamond. This movie portrays a country torn apart by the struggle between government loyalists and insurgent forces and many of the atrocities of that war.  Blood diamonds are diamonds mined in African war zones and sold to finance conflicts, and thereby profit warlords and diamond companies across the world.  This has put an image into the people’s minds of Sierra Leone being a place filled with poverty, destruction and hate.  This is all that media has allowed to be seared into the minds of people, along with almost entirely negative stories about the struggles of Sierra Leone and other African countries.

However, this image does not do Sierra Leone its proper justice.  Sierra Leone is filled with prosperity in many different forms.  The small country is rich with gems and minerals, specifically diamonds.  The export of these minerals accounts for about 78 % of the countries revenue with diamonds making up about 46 % alone.  Along with the large amount of diamonds in Sierra Leone, there is also vast deposits of rutile, bauxite, gold, iron and limonite.  Even though Sierra Leone is a very small country in size it is still one of the top ten producers of diamonds worldwide and top five for rutile.

Sierra Leone is still recovering from a very recent civil war which was due mostly to illicit diamond trading.  The country is still recovering from this event, with a great deal of the diamonds mined being smuggled out of the country illegally or sold through corrupt individual officials, thus only creating profit for themselves.  Several years down the road, the Sierra Leone government will be able to put policies in place preventing this movement thus creating an even larger revenue from the mining of their natural resources.

Sierra Leone, along with its mineral and diamond wealth, is rich in ethnic diversity. The country is made up of 16 major ethnic groups.  The largest and most influential group is the Temne people followed by the Mende. These two groups make up about 2/3 of the total population in Sierra Leone.  The other groups make up small portions of the remaining population.  All these people interact reasonably and peacefully with one another, with most holding strong ties with select others.  Along with ethnic diversity, Sierra Leone also has religious diversity.  Large groups of Muslims and Christians make up the majority of the population.  These two groups both have large subgroups that practice a syncretic mixture of their belief with traditional indigenous beliefs.  There is an organization in Sierra Leone named the Sierra Leone Inter-Religious Council, which is made up of both Christian and Muslim religious leaders who promote peace and tolerance throughout the country.  Because of this there is very little religious conflict, causing Sierra Leone to be regarded as one of the most religiously tolerant nations in the world.

When it comes to children, much work is being done to improve the lives of many of the Sierra Leonean children.  One of the leading organization is the Craig Bellamy Foundation, a charity that offers underprivileged children in Sierra Leone the chance to reach their true potential through sport and education, enabling them to build a better life for themselves and their communities.  The CBF League was launched in 2009 with support from UNICEF. Using football to empower a new generation to bring about positive change they focus on increasing school attendance and respect for fair play, while delivering community development projects. Involving more than 2,000 boys and girls around the country the CBF League is having a considerable impact.

While all people in America hear about is poverty and war, Sierra Leone is much more than just the negative.  An accepting country, working every day to better the lives of the people.

 

The Soul of Ivory Coast: Soccer

Soccer - International Friendly - Ivory Coast v South Korea - Loftus Road     

     When people talk about the country Ivory Coast, the first thing come across their mind is soccer. As the largest sport worldwide, soccer does have vitally important influences on Ivory Coast. In Ivory Coast, you can see children playing soccer on the street, adults talking about soccer in the work place and television station playing soccer games all the day. The sport becomes more than a sport itself to Ivory Coast people during the past decades.

     The national team of Ivory Coast made its name in 1992 by winning the African Cup of Nations. It was not the first time for Ivory Coast to take place in the African Cup but it was the best time for Ivorian. In Senegal, Ivorian welcomed their first championship. Winning Algeria with the score 3-0 and getting a draw with Congo with 0-0, Ivory Coast successfully advanced to the quarterfinals. In the quarterfinals, Ivory Coast kept its momentum and won  Cameroon in a penalty kick. The final was not easy for Ivorian, they had a draw with Ghana in the regular game time. Penalty kick followed and Ivorian won it with the score 11-10. This score is still the biggest score in soccer games till nowadays.

     African championship made Ivory Coast famous out of African continent. People all over the world started to know the country and its fantastic soccer team. In the following years, Ivory Coast national team has become a strong force in Africa. They got a great record since 1992. They got the third place in 1994, fourth place in 2008 and the Runners-up in 2012. Now, when people talk about African soccer, they can avoid Ivory Coast since it is such a strong team.

     The championship did not only bring fame and reputation to Ivory Coast. The championship started to change the country and young kids. Boys all over the country started to play soccer as their extracurricular activity. This change brought Ivory Coast a squad of young and talented soccer players in recent years. From Didier Drogba to Yaya Toure, these young players made Ivory Coast a stronger team and finally brought Ivory Coast to international stage. The 2006 World Cup in Germany was the first time for Ivory Coast to attend huge international games. The unstable domestic political situation didn’t influence the progress of the national team. In 2005, Drogba led the whole team beat Cameroon, another strong team in Africa. It was this victory that gave Ivory Coast the opportunity to attend the World Cup next year. Although they didn’t make it to the quarterfinals, they gave the whole world a strike and made more and more people start to know about their country. After the first World Cup, Ivorian didn’t slow down their progress. They also made it to the final stage of World Cup in 2010 and 2014.

     The fast development of soccer not only made the national team famous all over the world, but also brought the country changes and opportunities. Those famous Ivorian soccer players, especially Drogba, actually became the role model of Ivorian kids. Their posters were all over the country. Young boys played soccer after school dreaming of becoming a national hero one day. Soccer brought people in Ivory Coast a little peace in their life. When playing soccer or watching their kids playing soccer, they temporarily get rid of their anxiety due to the unstable political situation. What’s more, during the sever civil war, soccer did bring real peace to the whole country. As the most famous player in the country, Drogba called for peace several times in public. But in 2008, Drogba brought his words into action. Drogba brought the separated country sit together and fight together in a soccer game against Madagascar. In this day, people put their anger and weapon down and fight as one.

The making of Idi Amin’s Regime

Amin-2

“His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.”

– Self title

In 1971, General Idi Amin elected himself as President after over throwing the first established government of the nation under Milton Obote, post independence. He ruled as Commander in Chief for 8 long years. During that period of time, Idi Amin went on a rampage, killing over 300,000 Ugandans.

Obote was a well respected Ugandan politician but didn’t meet the Western standard in regards to English-Ugandan relations. He desired his country to be as liberated as possible, after all, that was aim of the fight for independence.

Let’s back track a little…

Interestingly, Amin was inducted into Britain’s Colonial African Troops, “KAR” at a young age with no significant educational experience. This military organization in question was a multi-battalion regiment, carried on by the British during colonial times, extending over most of East Africa.

As he was ascending through the ranks, he became infamous for his brutality and torture. From ordinary soldier, Amin excelled to  an “effendi”, the highest position achievable for an African soldier within the British army.

Once President, Idi Amin terrorized the entire nation of Uganda as England turned a blind eye.

One question I cannot help but ask myself: is it by pure chance, that the English bred one of the most ferocious dictators in the History of Africa, immediately after their Independence, at such a crucial, vulnerable and premature time period?

Idi Amin1

In recently declassified documents from England’s Colonial era, many of their atrocities lead and influenced  globally, including Asia and East Africa, were revealed. 

According to Sky News, a very reputable English TV channel, they quoted these British documents stating “Amin was reliable”.

Eleven days before the Coup against Obote’s government, Richard Slater, British High Commissioner in Kampala stated many issues the new regime caused the British, qualifying the Anglo-Ugandan relations as “deplorable”. What issues you may ask?

  • Obote’s new legislation gave all ownership of the import and export business to the Ugandan government.
  • 60% of the shares of oil companies, manufacturing industries, banks, insurance companies and others would be nationalized.

Normal right? Considering, Uganda was an INDEPENDANT country. But no, this was greatly challenging the British business interests in Uganda.

Moreover ‘there is a danger that other countries will be tempted to try and get away with similar measures with more damaging consequences for British investment and trade’. Three weeks after Uganda proceeded with all these new legislations, Sudan decided to nationalize foreign businesses in a “ even more unacceptable way”

African burden

Amin being a simple marionette, unconsciously  by his “allies”, he plummeted the country’s economy, racked up over 200 million dollars in debt, raised inflation to 20%, destroyed families, established poverty and unemployment but moreover mentally emotionally and physically scared an entire nation.

According to the British High commissioner , Ambassador Harold Smedley, Amin was ‘corrupt and unintelligent’ fully aware of his savagery but yet “despite his limitations Amin has considerable dignity and more the air of a leader than Obote.”

We’ve all seen Amin’s cruelty in class, dismembering his own spouse, using government officials heads as trophies. Now, is that the new definition of “dignity”?

Coming from a family of Ambassadors myself, the thought alone of someone of such stature conveying these thoughts is very frightening because this mindset itself can go a long way. And as we’ve learned, it did. It was only during the last few years when Idi Amin’s craziness made him turn against the English that they in return decided to stop any funding and ended relations with the country.

We need to open pour eyes and carefully inspect such situations in order for it to not repeat itself.  Nothing is really as it seems . A little food for thought.

” Nobody is as powerful as we make them out to be” – Alice Walker

http://www.biography.com/people/idi-amin-9183487

http://africanhistory.about.com/od/biography/a/bio_amin.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/17/world/idi-amin-murderous-and-erratic-ruler-of-uganda-in-the-70-s-dies-in-exile.

html://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/36/502.html

Steven Bantu Biko

Steven (Bautu) Biko is one of the most famous advocates in South Africa. He was born December 18 1946, Tylden in the Eastern Province now called Eastern Cape. He died on September 12, 1977 in Pretoria, Transvall now called Gauteng. Steven was a Member of the SRC at University of Natal (Non-European section), first president of SASO, Chair of SASO Publications, Black Consciousness Movement leader, banned person, political prisoner, killed in police detention. Biko was not alone in forging the Black Consciousness Movement also known as the (BCM). He was by far South Africa’s most prominent leader, who with others guided the movement of student discontent into a political force unprecedented in the history of South Africa.

Biko and his peers were responding to developments that emerged in the high phase of apartheid, when the Nationalist Party (NP), in power for almost two decades, was restructuring the country to conform to its policies of separate development. The NP went about untangling what little pockets of integration and proximity there were between White, Black, Coloured and Indian people, by creating new residential areas, new parallel institutions such as schools, universities and administrative bodies, and indeed, new ‘countries’, the tribal homelands. The students that launched the South Africa Students Organisation (SASO) belonged to a generation that resisted the process of strengthening apartheid, in any manner they could. Biko’s rise to prominence is inextricably tied to the development of the BCM.

Steven believed mostly in politics and speeches, he strongly believed in the idea of a non-violent way to end Apartheid in South Africa, and to have the whites return to their original homes. Also he was strongly influenced by Mohandas Gandhi and the way he stood up for Indian rights in a non-violent way, and by Martin Luther King Jr. with his non-violent attempt to end segregation in the United States. This south african acknowledged that blacks could support themselves and live in a world without whites, and so, he started the Black Consciousness Group, which was a group that believed in black pride. He then started the Black Peoples Convention in 1972, which was a political front for the Black Consciousness Group and consisted of only blacks, all whites were excluded.

From the beginning Steve Biko  always found Anti–Apartheid interesting. He had a high appreciation toward groups and pollutions/politics. Biko, after going to a medical school, was involved with (NUSAS) National Union Of South African students. Steve himself worked on the social uplift project for the students around the Durban area. In 1973 the apartheid government banned Steve Biko. He was arrested and restricted to his house, but that did not stop him from helping out. He wanted to help the families of the blacks that were arrested and thrown in jail, and so, Biko set up a Zimele Trust Find, which helped support political prisoners and their families.

It has been 37 years since Biko has been killed yet his impact he had on the South african people still stands today. He was an ordinary young man of his time. Nothing could have distinguished him, his family circumstances and environment from any other young man growing up in a small township in a small Eastern Cape town. Steve Biko was an ordinary young man who lived in ordinary times but who made something extraordinary out of his life, not out of his own will, by but the machinations of an evil system. He touched the lives of young men and women of his generation and he was part of an abiding movement capable of changing the social and political face of our country. In other ways he gave birth to a society that could shape its own future. The first time I had heard of Steven Biko when I was watching a movie called the “The Color of Friendship”. It was a disney movie that highlighted an interracial friendship but Biko was mentioned for anti-aparthied riots that was at it’s peak. Apartheid ended in 1994 the year I was born but, Biko could not see the day that the south african people were free from it all. I am glad i was able to learn more about Steven Biko and how his impact changed the lives of the South African people forever through his commitment that could not have been denied.

http://allafrica.com/stories/200709130385.html

http://myhero.com/hero.asp?hero=S_Biko_nehs_US_2010_ul

http://www.sahistory.org.za/people/stephen-bantu-biko

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FLN- Terrorists or Freedom Fighters

zohra drif

Zohra Drif

 

casbah

Modern Picture of Algiers Casbah

 

There were many small cells and groups who began to organize in the early 50s to try and force the French out, eventually they all came together to form one cohesive group.

After nearly a century of French control, Algerians were more than tired of the colonial presence. The socialist political party FLN (Front de Liberation Nationale in French) or the National Liberation Front was formed to try to offer the Muslim population of Algeria hope for future independence from the French who had killed thousands of innocents, and continued to occupy land which was not theirs.

In November of 1954 there was an armed rebellion by Muslim forces. There were some skirmishes between French troops and the FLN, but it failed to gain international attention.  The FLN wanted their voices to be heard, and wanted the world to take notice of their struggle. Media attention would gain traction for their trajectory toward freedom.

In 1956 the FLN decided to begin to direct their efforts towards the capital city of Algiers to gain international attention, and also to combat the thousands of troops being sent to Algeria by the French government in 1956.

By May, around 250,000 troops had been deployed and there were frequent raids in the Casbah of Algiers. The FLN didn’t want to negotiate, and by the next month the French Prime Minister Guy Mollet increased the military presence to 400,000.

The FLN began ordering random killings of French officials,  The french bombed the casbah back in retaliation. Many Muslim residents sought to get revenge and planned to move into the French Quarter in a mob and inflict violence. The French had caught wind of the idea, and it was sure going to be a bloody exchange if followed through.

Yacef Saadi, the military leader of the Algiers FLN, sent his lieutenants to tell the mob to turn around to minimize civilian deaths. The FLN swore they would avenge the people of the Casbah.

The FLN began bombing French police stations and administrative institutions, as well as popular hang outs of French civilians. An infamous incident of such was on September 30th of 1956. A young woman Zohra Drif planted a bomb in “Milk Bar Cafe” killing three and critically wounding many others.

Because there were curfews and blockades around the Casbah, they used Drif to plant the bomb, as she had a lighter complexion and could pass for French when the curfew was in affect.

In 1957 the FLN sought to argue on their behalf to the United Nations that they were a legitimate political party and not a terrorist group who had the support of the Algerian Muslim population.

They planned a strike among shop owners and workers, yet after only eight days the French broke them down with force.

The FLN carried on with random killings. Soon Jacques Massu was appointed as leader of the French forces. He was a fierce military leader, and after the blunder of the French’s war with Vietnam, they wanted to avoid such an outcome in Algeria.

Massu was not opposed to extreme tactics against his FLN enemies. He was able to justify such treatment, as there had been much violence and brutality to French women and children, and their attacks were often at times when the military personnel were unaware and unable to fight back.

They eventually captured Ben M’Hidi, the FLN’s leader, it was a big media gesture. He eventually died in prison. The formal explanation was that he killed himself in his cell, but it is more likely he was tortured to the point of death.

The French would win the Battle of Algiers, but would go on to lose the war. There were around 1,000,000 casualties over the course of the struggle. And while both sides were suffering heavy losses, the Algerians could sustain it theoretically, yet the French could no longer politically justify such a heavy loss of life for a war not concerning their domestic country.

Charles De Gaulle, leader of France, decided to pull out. So the FLN succeeded in driving the French out.

The interesting thing about the FLN, is that they used very controversial means to achieve their freedom. Bombings of public buildings with much loss of innocent life is hard for me to justify. I know their cause was an important one to them, but it is morally disgusting to me. Yet, the French killed many innocents as well, and over time committed genocide. So, I suppose the rebels were merely firing back in accordance with what the French had done and were doing. If viewed through a Machiavellian lens, the end justified the means. A downtrodden people who had been oppressed and recognized as less than people had gained back the territory that was naturally theirs.

Zohra Drif, whom I mentioned earlier, would serve later in the Algerian government. While she and her counterparts may have used terroristic and dirty methods, they had something they wanted to accomplish, and many among the Muslim population saw the FLN as heroes beating the oppressors out of their homeland.

 

Sources:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/algeria.htm

 

http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Algerian_War.html

Background and thoughts Algeria’s colonization by France and colonization in the US

french algeria

What do Algeria, the United States, Canada, Haiti, South Africa, Brazil and almost any country you can think of have in common? All of these nations were at one point places of colonial rule by foreign powers. More specifically, Algeria and the United States were both controlled at one time by European countries. And in fact, both were colonized by the French at certain points, though, the United States would later be unanimously controlled by Great Britain.

As in colonization of any area, the country of power who comes in and encroaches upon a land in some way. Imperialism is no coincidence, and is a vicious, unfair vehicle for the controlling nation to extract some kind of resource tactical or material out of occupying a land.

In the case of Algeria, the French sought out to establish a tactical foothold, as well as a colony for entrepreneurs to exploit. Here in America, when the French were here, they established fur trading posts in Detroit and established a major port in New Orleans. In New England there was much timber trade by the British. And in the South Tobacco was a big cash crop for Great Britain.

In Both America and Algeria, the economies were propped up by the use of slavery. Although the difference here, is that the French enslaved the Algerians, while the British transplanted people from East Africa and brought them to an unfamiliar land. Both are gross travesties. And, even after their abolitions, created major dividing lines, between whites and native, darker skinned people. The outsiders, as in all imperialist situations, were seen as the people in the right, in charge, to be looked up to. After all, they inflicted violence upon the natives if they didn’t.

In the first half of the 1800s there were many pirate attacks on European shifts along the Mediterranean. Much of North Africa offered safe havens for these pirates.

The land which now constitutes Algeria was a part of the Ottoman Empire in the 1830s. The United States were also controlled by other countries before the English established the thirteen colonies, such as, the French, the Spanish and the Dutch.

In France, Napoleon had been out of power for some time, the Bourbon Restoration was going on. It was a time of conservatism and in general, the nation needed to prove it was strong again.

France’s ruler of the time, Charles X, used a petty disagreement between a French consul and an Ottoman leader, as a springboard to invade Algeria. And so they did. In what was supposed to be a civilized overtaking, women were raped, goods were stolen, people were arrested for arbitrary reasons, and people were killed for no good reason.

The French installed many of their own rulers. Over their occupation, the French changed power multiple times. For a brief period, Algeria was actually considered part of the nation of France. They moved in many citizens, some who were entrepreneurs looking to buy land, and some who were peasants and sought to live cheaper and start anew in Algeria.

Much like America, beyond perhaps a few figurehead local leaders, Algerians had no representation, and were being mistreated by French authorities. AND much like in America, as when the British controlled and when the United States won its independence, genocide occurred. Many Berbers in Algeria were killed in order to deal with insurrection or unwillingness to move out of land, much like the United States killed off many Indians.

Abd al Qadir emerged as a fighter of the people, and sought to create an independent Algerian state. He fought a Guerilla war, much like we fought in some of the mountains and valleys of New England, and the Indians fought against our forces.

He established a government in the areas not yet occupied by the French.  It provided military resources, collected taxes and had a focus on education. But in 1836, after a defeat to French forces, they allowed him to have territory they referred to as the Moslem State. Yet, three years later, they attacked and overtook territory that was supposed to belong to al Qadir’s state.

Fighting ensued back and forth until 1843. At this time the French had one third of its whole army stationed in Algeria.

Algeria would not gain independence from France until 1962. The United States can at least say that we’ve had a few centuries of independence. This enabled us to figure out what works and doesn’t work, it allowed us to fight for human rights for different minority groups (something that is still going on), and it enabled us time and infrastructure to take advantage of multiple periods of progress, development and modernization.

While Algeria is now independent, they still are not as stable as the United States. For a country to have only been independent for less than a hundred years, they have not had ample time to work out domestic issues and develop all of its potential socially and economically. They are still beholden to some foreign influence, and are considered a developing nation. Perhaps, had the French not been so ruthless in their control of Algeria, or never invaded, who knows how different things could have been.

Though it is important to note that there was never a nationalist move to make Algeria a nation of its own until French control. While the French killed many people and acted in no part in the interests of the Algerian people, in a way, their colonization, helped the Algerians come together and helped solidify their cultural identity.

sources:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/algeria.htm

http://www.cairn.info/zen.php?ID_ARTICLE=CEA_195_0805

http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/algeria-colonization-and-independence

Zimbabwe

On February of this year al Aljazeera website they posted the following article

Bulawayo, Zimbabwe – On February 21, Africa’s oldest sitting head of state, President Robert Gabriel Mugabe of Zimbabwe, turns 90. At the helm since the country’s independence in April 1980, Mugabe – once a shy and studious boy who kept company with Catholic priests – became Zimbabwe’s most renowned freedom fighter whose distinct brand of nationalism, pan-Africanism and authoritarianism has enabled him to rule the country for 34 years.

Armed with revolutionary zeal and degrees in education, economics and law earned during his 11-year incarceration, Mugabe’s early policies sought to improve the lives of the disadvantaged. However, as time wore on, the chaotic struggle unleashed by Mugabe’s more controversial policies on land reform, black empowerment and war veterans brought the country to its knees.

So in this blog I will be talking about Bulawayo and what he did and contributed to Zimbabwe.

According to the worldbank, SOCIO-ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROJECT IN HARARE, BULAWAYO AND MUTARE

  • Baseline surveys
  • Detailed Expenditure Tracking systems
  • Training Tool Kits
  • Training of Trainers
  • Documentaries
  • Popular Budgeting Monitoring and Evaluation
  • Loan tracking
  • Public Meetings

And for the sake of this initiative the following advocacy was used:

  • Training of Councilors on Public Finance
  • Roundtable discussion with Council Treasury
  • Training of Journalist on Municipal Reporting
  • Parliamentary Advocacy
  • Participation in the Zimbabwe Social Forum.

The intervention is based on capacity building and technical assistance to Residents Associations. More sharing is at the level of civil society where Zimcodd works using the coalition concept.

The same issues are shared with regional networks and international justice coalition with increased interface in critiquing privatization policies, international debt crisis, unfair trade regime and regional integration as espoused by NEPAD/Africa Union, World Trade Organization (especially the General Agreement in Trade and Services, SADC Trade Protocol, etc.)

The impact is difficult to measure given that the project is still in its infancy and without adequate resources. However, the project is becoming popular with civic organizations and local authorities.

The initiative is institutionalized in Zimcodd. It falls under the Policy and Advocacy Program. On this project, Zimcodd works in liaison with the Parliamentary Committee on Local Government and National Housing. Zimcodd also works with the Finance Committee in the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development and the Ministries of Local Government and Public Service, the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Ministry of Public Service Labour and Social Welfare.

Zimcodd also has international links with Institute for Democracy IDASA (South Africa), the International Budget Project (USA) and Christian Aid (UK). This linkage will be developed to facilitate exchange study visits on the use of participatory budgeting, score cards and alternative public finance revenue sources. The initiative will be scaled up. At the moment focus is on conceptualization.

Zimcodd is profiling Municipal Debts. Research work in progress on Municipal Budgets in three main urban areas Harare, Mutare and Bulawayo.

Popular Budgeting is a welcome exercise. However, there is no sufficient interaction between research institutions, NGOs and residents. The Zimcodd project has been failing to take off the ground as a result of these bottlenecks especially when there are financial constraints. Zimcodd is making this effort a program with full time researcher and involve a wide reference group of players to make the project a success.

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/02/zimbabwe-controversial-leader-turns-90-2014218112154224986.html

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.worldbank.org%2Fsocialaccountability_sourcebook%2FRegional%2520database%2FCase%2520studies%2FAfrica%2FZimbabwe%2520-%2520Socio-economic%2520justice%2520and%2520municipal%2520services%2520pro.doc&ei=S288VN3dPMuONuHpgdgF&usg=AFQjCNG-0TP-k9zlVwVk0noNwVJr7XQrNA&sig2=Z8SHEmGLoWHhHhFKH_2ArA&bvm=bv.77161500,d.eXY

Angola’s independence and Agostinho Neto

Revolution, with that a lot of sacrifice, death and blood are brought in order to achieve freedom and Angola’s independence was no exception. Angola was a Portuguese colony for almost five centuries but between 1950-1960 Angola’s population started to create revolutionary parties to fight the Portuguese regime. The three major parties were MPLA leaded by Agostinho Neto, FNLA leaded by Holden Roberto and  UNITA leaded by Jonas Savimbi. These three parties fought the Portuguese but also fought each other what delayed the country’s independence but after a revolution in Portugal against the dictator regime in April 25 1974 Angola finally had a real chance to become independent and achieved it in November 11 1975 after a war for independence that lasted 13 years. Angola finally became an independent country but the same three parties that fought so hard for independence also fought each other for the control of the independent Angola in a civil war mostly between MPLA (government) and UNITA that lasted almost three decades.

Angolan Flag
-Angola flag

 

Holden Roberto, the founder, leader and face of the FNLA was one the major figures in Angola’s fight for independence but his party was no match for the MPLA and UNITA. Seeing how the Portuguese treated the native Angolans inspired him to begin his political career and fight for Angola’s independence. Even though MPLA and FNLA were/are rivals when Holden Roberto died he was mentioned by Jose Eduardo dos Santos actual Angola’s President as one the pioneers in the fight for independence.

fnla3 holden-roberto-profile-picture
-FNLA flag and Holden Roberto

UNITA’s leader Jonas Savimbi (former member of the FNLA) founded the party and fought for the independence as well as for control of the country. Jonas Savimbi was a master in guerrilla, an excellent military commander and strategist. He leaded the UNITA through the find for independence and then in the civil war against the MPLA to get control of the country until his death in February 22, 2002.

UnitaSavimbi
-UNITA flag and Jonas Savimbi

The MPLA (party in power since the independence) was founded by Agostinho Neto and Viriato da Cruz (both were politicians and also poets) but was leaded by Agostinho Neto that eventually became one of if not the biggest national hero in Angola.

Movimento_Popular_de_Libertação_de_Angola_(bandeira).svgAgostinho Neto
-MPLA flag and Agostinho Neto

He was born in Bengo province in the Northwest region of Angola in 1922. He left Angola to study medicine in Portugal and in 1956 after becoming a member of a small Angolan underground party he helped in the foundation of MPLA The People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola as president and returned to Angola in 1959. By that time he wrote his first volume of poetry at that time using liberation and freedom as theme. One year later he was arrested by Portugal’s dictatorial regime. I’m talking about a man whose arrest made many of his patients and supporters march to ask for his freedom which resulted in a massacre because the dictatorial police shot at the people that marched for him. Thirty people were killed and over two hundred wounded. After this incident he wrote his second volume of poetry, being his people suffering and pain the themes. Also, because of that incident he was deported to Portugal but then in 1962 he escaped and went to Washington DC to ask the United States of America for help in his country fight for Independence. The White House turned him down and chose to help another party, but in 1965 he met Che Guevara in Cuba, created a political alliance with Fidel Castro and Angola received Cuba’s help in the Liberation movement and fight for independence. He was also able to develop a close link with Soviet Union that prized him in 1975 with a peace award.

In that year, in 1975 Angola finally became an independent Nation and he became its first President. Unfortunately after the independence Angola entered into a civil war but he didn’t live long enough to see his country reach peace. He died in Moscow during a surgery in 1979 at the age of 56. During his lifetime he was a doctor, a poet, a political leader and one of the most responsible for Angola’s independence and until this day his face is in Angola’s currency money (the Kwanza), there’s a University with his name and several statues and monuments spread all over the country to pay tribute to this great man.

11348533aneto
-Agostinho Neto statues