A Pop of Color

Abby Harper's Blog for Rhetoric and Civic Life 2020-2021

CI4: If You Liked It Then You Should Have Put a Label on It

Image made with Canva

As I’ve touched on in previous blogs, the process of picking out and buying food has some added stress for those with food allergies. A reason for this is the labeeling on the food, which can make or break their comfort and safety. 

Food labels traditionally have the usual nutritional facts, a list of the ingredients, and an extra line to highlight any allergens present in the product. An accurate label will account for all of these allergens, including the possibility of cross-contamination or other sourcing, which is referred to as “may contain.” Labeling in this way brings ease to the process of selecting food with restrictions.

Between companies, these labeling practices can vary. For example, General Mills is consistent in labeling any “may contain” ingredients. Frito Lay is, too. However, Kraft does not typically list these and ensures that their ingredients list can be trusted. Unilever only includes them on the label sometimes, deciding on a product-to-product basis if the production could have had cross-contamination or not. Another instance of this is seen with different ice cream, a product typically produced in mass with various mix-ins and flavorings, and creating a bit of a gamble for the consumer.

From person to person, there are different comfort levels in which types or brands of food are ‘safe’ to eat. Some may choose to trust the ingredients list alone, while some prefer to know for sure from the may contain list. However, accurate labeling can do nothing but benefit people with allergies in their confidence of purchase.

In the United States, there are regulations in place that dictate how allergens are included on food labels. Under FALCPA, or the Food Allergen Labeling Consumer Protection Act, certain allergens must be listed, but the may contain statement is not required. Currently, the FDA requires that labels include all major food allergens: milk, egg, fish, Crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, peanuts, and soybeans. Additionally, in the U.S., companies are allowed to list “natural flavors,” which can mean any sort of additive from spices and plants to eggs, meat, and dairy.

Canada’s regulations are similar but cover a bit of a wider scope. The allergens required to be listed on their food labels are the same ‘major’ ones as in the U.S., with the addition of sesame seeds, mustard seeds, gluten source, and sulphites. They also require that all allergens over 10 ppm need to be listed amongst the ingredients, but a may contain list is not needed.

In 2015, the EU tightened specifications on the presentation of information on food labels, including allergens. 

According to FARE, the primary reason in the U.S. for food recalls are undeclared allergens. If a company changes its formulation but does not list it, trouble arises. FARE advocates for more accurate labeling and consumers to report mislabeling. 

All in all, accurate labeling is important and should be encouraged. There are enough things to worry about in life; knowledge of the food we eat should not be one of them.

Previous

RCL2: If It Ain’t Broke… Do Fix It?

Next

PAS4: Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt – It’s a Miracle!

2 Comments

  1. jpp5979

    I love the visuals you included in this blog, they were super helpful and informative. I remember learning a little about food labels in elementary school, but I never understood the importance until later. People need to know what they are consuming because in some cases it could be life threatening. Great work!

  2. Celine Ferrari

    I never knew that food labels differed so greatly across brands… I just assumed that all companies had to abide by a standard label! This post was super informational, and I really hope that some labeling changes happen soon.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

Skip to toolbar