Spring Semester Blog #2 (February 25th, 2021):  The United States And North Korea Relations

The country of North Korea is commonly seen and is a hot topic throughout the United States of America’s media.  The media coverage is almost always not positive whether talking about North Korea testing nuclear weapons or widespread starvation throughout the country.  A large part of why North Korea receives such negative press is due to the fact that the United States has never and continues to not hold diplomatic relations with the DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea).  An understanding of why the United States and North Korea continue to struggle to ease tensions and build relations stems from an analysis of the relatively short but complex history of North Korea.

The DPRK was formally founded in 1948 at the onset of the two military superpowers, the United States and Soviet Union divided the once united Korean peninsula after WWII.  Prior to this period the Korean Peninsula was considered a united territory.  Though the peninsula was united, the citizens of the country were not always granted the ability to rule themselves.  In 1910, the growing and ambitious superpower Japan decided to recognize it colonial ambitions by annexing the Korean Peninsula.  For the next 35 years, Japan ruled Korea with an iron fist often committing atrocities against the Korean people.  For example, during World War II while the Korean men were forced to fight at the front, at times against their will, the Korean women were raped and forced into prostitution.  In 1945, as the United States defeated Japan at the conclusion of WWII, the United States and Soviet Union took control of the Korean Peninsula and subsequently divided the territory along the infamous 38th parallel.  South Korea instituted a pro-U.S. government while North Korea instituted a pro-Soviet government.  Syngman Rhee led the anti-Communist regime in China while Kim II Sung led the pro-communist DPRK.  Neither leader wanted to admit that they did not rule the entire Peninsula therefore leading to a territorial dispute.

In 1950, with pro-communist support, North Korea invaded South Korea beginning what would become known as the Korean War.  The United States swiftly backed South Korea, sending a massive amount of U.N. troops to aid the South Korean army.  After 3 years and 2.5 million casualties (including both military and civilian), an armistice was signed.  The war resulted in little changes with the borders remaining the same for the most part and increasing the military presence along the 38th parallel on both sides.  A peace treaty was never formally signed which actually means that formally a war is continuing to occur (it isn’t) though no formal fighting is taking place.

Kim II Sung began to work to shape the country into the modern (as modern as North Korea gets) country that still stands and operates today (Ma).  Like the Soviet Union, North Korea had heavily controlled State media, control over the economy, collectivized agriculture, and control over private property.  Furthermore, travel was heavily restricted in and out of the state.  All of these efforts were attempts to create a self-reliant country that was fully independent of using its neighboring countries and pronounced “enemies” resources.  To do this, the new nation also heavily invested in mining and steel production to build its economy and bolster and support the growth of it’s military.  The Soviet’s also assisted the North Korean’s during this period by providing military supplies and the means to build nuclear weapons.  The Soviet’s did this by training North Korean scientists.  North Korea’s economy rapidly expanded, quickly surpassing the South Korean economy.  As mining became less important and other countries became less reliant on North Korean raw materials, economy sharply declined.  It was not long before the South Korean economy surpassed the North Korean economy.

In 1994, Kim Jon IL rose to the leadership role after his father died.  The new leader instituted new policies that bolstered the North Korean military.  During the 1990s the North Korean state was forced to allow some market-economy policies to come into play as a huge black market emerged to meet government shortages.  Flooding and poor agricultural and economic management led to hundreds of thousands of people dying from starvation and malnutrition.  Many people referred to this as the “Great Famine.”  Yet, citizens still revered their leader and the government (“North Korea Profile Timeline”).

During the early 2000s, North Korea began to open its doors slightly to foreign assistance and aid.  It allowed aid to flow specifically from South Korea.  In addition, the country began to ease hostiles with the United States.  The country went as far as to host Madeleine Albright, the U.S. Secretary of State in 2000.  These attempts at seeking peace and a movement towards greater openness quickly vanished as North Kore continued to and ramped up its nuclear programs in violation of the NPT or Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.  Underground research into nuclear weapons were reported in North Korea and flurried throughout U.S. news further heightening tensions.  Tensions came to front when North Korea withdrew from the NPT and pushed weapons inspectors out of the country in 2003.

In 2011, Kim Jong Il died and Kim Jong Un succeeded him.  The young leader worked to consolidate power and continue the countries race to expand its nuclear weapon capacity.  North Korea in 2017 went as far to launch its first intercontinental ballistic missile.  Such actions prompted harsh repercussions from the international community.  Kim Jong Un continues to rule the country today and tensions continue to run high (History.com Editors).

The North Korean’s hatred of the United States is made clear throughout its history.  The United States repeated interventions in the country along with the assisted killing of the North Korean citizens during the Korean War reveal why North Koreans have such malice towards the U.S.  It will be interesting in the coming years to see the attempts on an international level that countries make to repair these relations or if any attempts are made at all.  As North Korea Builds its nuclear arsenal, how will other Nations respond?

 

Works Cited

History.com Editors. “North Korea.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 28 Sept. 2017, www.history.com/topics/korea/north-korea-history.

Ma, Alexandra. “Photos over 70 Years Show How North Korea’s Kim Family Went from Starving Guerilla Fighters to Going Toe-to-Toe with Trump.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 9 Sept. 2018, www.businessinsider.com/north-korea-history-in-photos-2018-8.

“North Korea Profile – Timeline.” BBC News, BBC, 26 Apr. 2019, www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-15278612.

Spring Semester Blog #5: Questions To Ponder: “Trump’s Incitement Of The Insurrection”

The capital riots that happened in late January 2021 were a demonstration of numerous things that the country is currently facing.  It demonstrates the buildup of tension and overflowing anger about the United States actions in dealing with racial issues, COVID-19, and an election process that was not transparent.  As President Trump officially lost the election and was project and planned to move out of White House in the ensuing weeks, rioters, most of whom touted pro-Trump memorabilia stormed the capital building.  Many cited that Trump’s speech at the “Save America” rally prompted the rioters while others disagree.  In order to determine if Trump’s speech truly can be tied to the incitement of the riots, a rhetorical analysis of the speech is necessary.

From the start of the speech, Trump calls out both the media and the radical left.  He asserts that the media unjustly crucified him during his presidency and during the election.  Throughout his speech he further delves into why the media was unjustly going after him and how they stole the election.  In addition, Trump claims that the left worked to “steal” the election.  Whether this statement is true or not, it is certainly a large assertation to make.  On top of this he justifies the ways in which the election was stolen including a discussion about mail in voting and computer-generated tallying.  For these reasons, Trump claims that he will not concede the election and that he will not stand down.  Trump then continues to lay out why it would have been impossible for Joe Biden to win this election.  Throughout Trumps over hour-long speech, he asserts the many injustices that he, citizens and his party has faced.  He commends himself for standing up against the media which he claims is tyrannical and controlled.

What many claim Trump said that incited the riots is when he told listeners to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue and demand change.  While it is true that this happened and that it likely caused rioters to move closer to the capital, yet, asserting that Trump instigated the riot would be a huge exaggeration and overstep.  Trump was simply stating his political beliefs on what happened during the election, why it was a rigged election, and why people should question the integrity of the voting process.  In doing so, he calls on his supporters to call for congressional change.  Nowhere does Trump directly call for a riot or tell his supporters to storm the capital.  Therefore, Trump is within his right to claim that he was not responsible at all for the capital riots.  It is the action of the masses that caused these actions not the words of Donald Trump.  Claiming that Trump incited the riots would also be infringing on the free speech amendment.

By no means did Trump instigate or cause the riot.

Spring Semester Blog #4: Questions To Ponder: “Biden’s Inaugural Addresses”

There is no debating that President Biden’s inauguration came at one of, if not the United States most trying and difficult times.  Racial injustice, full scale insurrections, along with the COVID-19 pandemic has put the country and its citizens through extremely trying times.  The economy has slumped and public trust and confidence and trust in the government is at an all time low.  In addition to all of this, the Presidential Election along with the controversies over the election results has and continues to cause citizens to question the true validity of the election itself.  Therefore, as Joe Biden comes into the presidency at such a pivotal time in American history, it is important that he attempts to sew the country back together.  This is what makes Joe Biden’s presidential speech so valuable and important.

 

 

Joe Biden’s first order of business when creating and writing the inaugural address is to perform the ceremonial function.  From the get-go, Biden’s speech works to convey that he will attempt and work to unify the country.  He addresses that his role and movement to becoming president should not be looked at as if they voted in one person but rather voted in democracy.  He tries to instill in the people, the ideas that he will bring the country back together.  He states, “…we come together as one nation…”.  Such assertion are essential to address the nation so that he can get the entire country, not just one political party or small group behind him.  In addition, Biden discusses pivotal figures in American history such as Abraham Lincoln in order to add an element of the discussion about the great things this country has achieved, yet how much it still has to achieve.  These types of discussions lead to another discussion about how rhetorically effective the speech is.

President Biden attempts to answer and at a minimum discuss the many issues that are currently plaguing the country.  Biden addresses from the start the issues that the pandemic has created.  He addresses how widespread the implications of the pandemic are, asserting that the pandemic has caused jobs to be lost and forced business to close. In addition, to addressing the pandemic he also addresses racial divides and issues in this country.  Specifically, Biden asserts that now is the time to address white supremacy and domestic terrorism.  He also discusses making schools safer for children which is a reference to recent gun violence in school.  While Biden obviously cannot and does not have the time to address every issue the country is facing, he does effectively lay out all the issues the country is currently facing and how he will work hard to bring the country back together to address these issues.

Overall, Biden’s speech rhetorically and from a ceremonial aspect is effective at addressing the current issues that face the country.  Yet, his speech is ineffective in that he paints an overexaggerated bleak picture of the country.  His focus on so many of the issues and not on the positives demonstrate a seemingly negative take on the country, not a positive one.  This is one of the few elements that detract from his overall speech which all-in-all is rhetorically effective.

Spring Semester Blog #2 (February 18th, 2021): Skiing In Utah-The Difference

Image of Snowbird:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowbird,_Utah#/media/File:Snowbird_Tram_at_Hidden_Peak.jpg

I have been born and raised on the East coast for my entire life.  If you have ever skied or possibly have even heard people talking about skiing, chances are you have heard the expression, “ski the East.”

Skiing on the East coast is known for two things, icy slopes and lack of natural snow.  At most mountains it’s probably true that the majority of snow is man-made because there is not enough snowfall.  This lack of snowfall also makes skiing conditions icy because people ski off any natural or man-made snow early in the day leaving only packed down and icy conditions.  These packed down and icy conditions make skiing difficult for even some of the best skiers and it’s not uncommon to see some nasty wipeouts.

All of this talk about skiing on the East coast was done just to demonstrate what usual skiing conditions were during my normal ski trips which normally took place in East coast states like Vermont, New York, Canada, and Pennsylvania.  Now I am going to switch gears and talk about skiing on the West coast.  Skiing on the West coast (it’s ironic cause most skiing on the West coast actually takes place on states that I would consider more middle America) is known for great conditions and always having fresh powder.  Such conditions are unheard of on the East coast and are sought after by every skier on the East Coast.  Therefore, when I was given the opportunity to ski out West for my 16th birthday, I was elated at this opportunity.

Prior to my 16th birthday, I never skied out West and had only heard stories about how amazing it was.  For my trip out West, I went to Utah and skied at Park City and at Snowbird.  Park City was the first mountain I skied at and it completely changed the way I viewed skiing.  I had to use special powder skies which were longer and wider, making them easier to glide over powder as opposed to skies back home which were smaller and narrower and did well with ice.  In addition, out West, the mountains are typically much larger and much higher resulting in the usage of gondolas as opposed to traditional lifts.  My runs at Park City were incredible.  They each lasted upwards of thirty minutes and each time I was graced with trails full of fresh powder.  When I skied at Snowbird, the conditions were even better.  There was even more fresh powder and the runs were even longer.  Snowbird is famous for getting the most snowfall in the entire country, and this was proven true when I was there.  At times, I was skiing through a half foot of powder, something that would be unheard of on the East coast mountains.

Skiing on these mountains made me appreciate skiing slow, taking my time, and enjoying each run.  While I am not often graced with such incredible conditions when skiing in the East, it makes me grateful for the times I do get to ski in more than an inch of fresh snow.

Spring Blog #1 (February 11th, 2021):  The United States And China Relations

Two major players at the center of both politics and economics, both of which are strongly intertwined, is the United States and China.  The United States for approximately the last decade has been at the forefront of economic, political and social policy.  This has allowed the United States to become the most prosperous and wealthiest nation in the world.  Increasingly in recent years, the United States global dominance has come into question and is even being challenged as another world player, China, has rapidly increased its own economic and political power.  Understanding the similarities and differences between the United States and Chinese government and economic systems, allows one to better understand why each country makes its respective decisions and why the U.S. and China are at odds.

China has a distinctly different form of government than the United States.  China refers to itself as a republic, often denoted as the Republic of China, although the majority of the rest of the world recognizes that China operates under a one-party communist system (“China: Government”).  Such a system of government stands in stark contrast to the United States which operates under a federal republic (“U.S. Government”).  The U.S. system of government allows the people to hold power whereas in the Chinese government, large government figures such as the current leader, Xi Jingping hold the majority of power.  As a result of this system of government, the Chinese government has much greater power and a greater ability to exert this power over its citizens.  The Chinese government, for example, is notorious for its censorship laws which limit free speech and the freedom of expression.  The United States denounces these policies and establishes the contrary inherently promotes its free speech policies.  These policies are also, protected by law and formally written in the Constitution.  In the First Amendment, it is written that congress cannot make a law limiting the freedom whether it be in regard to speech, organization, press, petition, etc., of the people (“The 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution).  In addition to free speech laws, and lack thereof in China, the country also has different judicial laws/policies.  In China, the judicial system is a pseudo judicial system in that the reigning parties political and Legal Affairs Commission has direct control over the court system.  This allows the government to unjustly punish political prisoners, political opposition, and citizens who speak out against the government (“China Justice Observer”).  The so called, “false promise of fair trials,” has become a focal point in modern day news as ethnic minorities such as the Uighur Muslims are presently being persecuted and forced into labor camps (“What Is Happening With…”).  The lack of a central justice system within the country is a primary reason that such injustices against these ethnic minority groups are allowed to continue.  In the United States on the other hand, a centralized justice system is in place and the United States appears at least in writing to pride itself upon using the justice system to uphold the law and maintain order within the U.S.  While the United States itself is not free from its own crimes against humanity, take for example for the forced concentration of Japanese citizens after the Bombing of Pearl Harbor, the country has continuingly worked to improve, rectify, and uphold law.  The same cannot be said for China.

While the previous paragraph has focused primarily on the shortcomings of the Chinese system of government, there are numerous benefits as well.  Take for example, the current COVID-19 crisis.  The Chinese government, although at first having reported the first outbreak of the novel virus, was able to quickly eradicate the virus.  This was due to widespread lockdowns and laws against leaving one’s residence.  In the United States however, the lack of a such power allowed for states to make their own decisions, with some remaining open while others shutting down completely to contain the spread of the virus.  Such inability has allowed the virus to continue to spread throughout the United States whereas in China, the virus has been largely contained.  Another benefit to this system of government is the rate at which infrastructure is built and implemented.  The Chinese government is the largest investor in the entire world in infrastructure, spending more than 8% of its annual GDP on these projects (“How China Uses Infrastructure…”).  Such state-controlled projects and finance allows these projects to happen at a rapid rate and has allowed the country to construct an interconnected country in only a matter of years.  This is a large part of why China has so rapidly economically grown and caught up with the rest of the Western world.

The United States and Chinese government also operate on different economic systems.  The United States operates on a mixed economy, incorporating elements of both capitalism and socialism to efficiently run while the Chinese government runs on a socialist market economy.  While the United States does have socialist elements to its economy, such as Medicare and Medicaid, the extent to which the economy is socialist is miniscule in comparison to how much state control there is in the Chinese economic system.   The major reason China’s economic system is referred to as a socialist economy is due to the governments control over the countries industrial development (Seth).

There are innumerable reasons why the United States and China are at such odds.  Both countries are trying to assert their dominance in the economic and political sphere.  This scares the United States who has become accustomed to being the “top-dog” politically and economically.  In addition, economic growth and superiority also helps to power the militaries of each countries.  As China grows economically, so does its military.  This puts the traditional balance of political power in question where the United States may no longer hold militaristic superiority.  Understanding how each government’s political and economic system work is becoming increasingly important as both of these countries respectively vie for global dominance.  Whichever country becomes the dominant one in the years to come could have an unimaginable impact on the world as a whole.

 

Works Cited:

“The 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.” National Constitution Center – The 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendment/amendment-i.

“China Justice Observer.” What Is the Court System Like in China – China Legal Research Guide – China Justice Observer, www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/what-is%20the-court-system-like-in-china.

“China: Government.” >> GlobalEDGE: Your Source for Global Business Knowledge, globaledge.msu.edu/countries/china/government.

“How China Uses Infrastructure as a Means of Control.” World Finance, www.worldfinance.com/featured/how-china-uses-infrastructure-as-a-means-of-control#:~:text=China%20is%20the%20world’s%20largest,according%20to%20data%20from%20McKinsey.

Seth, Shobhit. “Socialist Economies: How China, Cuba, and North Korea Work.” Investopedia, Investopedia, 22 Jan. 2021, www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081514/socialist-economies-how-china-cuba-and-north-korea-work.asp.

“U.S. Government.” U.S. Embassy in Argentina, 10 Nov. 2016, ar.usembassy.gov/education-culture/irc/u-s-government/.

“What Is Happening with the Uighurs in China?” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/.