Empathy and Democracy

In this podcast, Georgetown University public policy professor, E.J. Dionne speaks about his perspectives of empathy in our current democratic society. In the podcast, he introduces the topic by speaking about the consequences of recent political polarization and the dangers that stemmed from it. He then went on to explain how those effects culminated in the Trump administration. However, the main topic of his podcast spoke about how it would be possible to get us back to an empathetic society where we were many years ago. How do we take advantage of the climate and reaction to the Trump administration and become more proactive about it?

To start, Dionne speaks about his work during the months leading up to the midterm elections of 2018. Dionne called for “a partisan response to achieve a non-partisan goal in returning a sense of legitimacy to our politics”.  He claimed that, within the scope of the midterms, the Republican candidates were far too “right-leaning”, thus setting a converse with the democratic candidates. But at the same time, he noted that through historical data, a massive shift can be seen in general public support of the democratic party, now towards the Republican party. He mentioned how this change was likely the cause of dissatisfaction within the American populace and their efforts at sending a message. Instead of blaming this type of ugly reaction on pure bigotry, he asserts that the root cause of the issue was the idea that the same political party that provided the civil rights laws and voter rights acts is now unable to act or acts on a very poor scale.

Something else that was talked about was what the standpoint was of conservatives that were not necessarily aligned with Trump but still supported the conservatives ideas. Dionne mentioned that it was worth remembering that, back in the 2016 election, over fifty percent of college-aged, white men actually voted for Trump. How do we turn that around in the next election cycle?

Another idea that Dionne brought up that I thought was particularly interesting was how the Trump administration actually had more of a positive effect on government and politics than initially intended. He states that the number of people, who were originally uninvolved in politics, that was riled up to join this “Anti-Trump” movement will allow a more pressing retaliation in the next cycle. He joked that President Trump didn’t actually damage our democracy, but may have accidentally saved it in a way that was unintended at first.

All in all, I really enjoyed this podcast. Dionne did an excellent job at presenting an idea that, while controversial, is also worth listening to, especially with the 2020 presidential election coming up. Personally, I will take what I have learned from this and try to apply it to thinking about future political participation. I think that making a good voting choice is not only about staying informed, but about making an on-the-spot decision that is creatively secure too. I hope that this idea is shared more around the internet for the next few months.

Beethoven Symphony No. 9

Beethoven composed his 9th Symphony in D minor in the summers between 1822 and 1824. It was premiered in Vienna, Austria in the winter of 1824.  The 9th symphony is one of, if not the most recognizable works written by Beethoven in his time. Certain critics and musicologists regard it as “the greatest accomplishment in classical music”. In an international orchestral survey in 2010, it stands as the most commonly played orchestral work.

The symphony was the first example of a major composer using voices in a symphony (thus making it a choral symphony). The words are sung during the final (4th) movement of the symphony by four vocal soloists and a chorus. They were taken from the “Ode to Joy”, a poem written by Friedrich Schiller in 1785 and revised in 1803, with text additions made by Beethoven. In 2001, Beethoven’s original, hand-written manuscript of the score, held by the Berlin State Library, was added to the United Nations Memory of the World Heritage list, becoming the first musical score to be named as such. 

The first movement, Allegro ma non troppo, is written in traditional sonata form without an expositional repeat. The piece begins with the tonic chord of d minor before going into sets of oscillating 5ths. In measure 301, the piece shifts from the minor key into D major, altering the mood and tone of the movement. The movement then proceeds into a lengthy coda.

The second movement, Molto vivace, is written as a fast and lively movement. The movement is written in a compound ternary design in which the specific sections repeat but get noticeably shorter each time they are repeated. At times during the piece, Beethoven specifies one downbeat every three measures—perhaps because of the fast tempo—with the direction ritmo di tre battute (rhythm of three beats) and one beat every four measures with the direction ritmo di quattro battute (rhythm of four beats). Beethoven had been criticized in his more recent symphonies for failing to adhere to standard Classical form for his compositions. He used this movement to answer his critics and reintroduce a considerably older idea.

The third movement is an Adagio, written in F sharp major. The movement itself is slow to progress and acts as more of a catalyst into the 4th movement.

Finally, the 4th movement, Finale, is presented. The movement starts in the low strings with one of the most recognizable melodies in classical music, the “Ode to Joy”. The piece then proceeds to play on different sections imitating the movement that came before. The movement ends with a majestic set of chords that characterize the piece in a royal fashion.

Unfortunately, this was the last of Beethoven’s complete symphonies. An attempt to write the 10th one was made. However, it was never finished. Next week, we will look into what was written of the 10th symphony and investigate the different interpretations of which critics and musicologists tried to complete it with.

Beethoven Symphony No. 8

Beethoven’s eighth symphony is written F major and was composed and premiered in 1812. Beethoven fondly calls it his “little symphony” as it is the shortest of his 9 complete works. His eighth is characterized by a much more lighthearted tone when compared to that of his seventh and fifth. The piece is riddled with musical jokes and accented passages, alluding to a sense of humor and happiness.

The premiere took place on 27 February 1814, at a concert in Vienna, at which the Seventh Symphony (which had been premiered two months earlier) was also played. Beethoven was growing increasingly deaf at the time, but nevertheless led the premiere. Reportedly, “the orchestra largely ignored his ungainly gestures and followed the first violin instead.

The first movement, Allegro Vivace,  starts with the home chord of F major and begins a lively tune in 3/4. Like almost all of his works, the movement is written in sonata form. When the development section starts, a variety of eighth note runs are played in rapid succession going into a coda section. In the coda, the winds take a solid lead and push for an F chord that lands on a C chord, the dominant of F. The movement ends with a resounding sound back in the tonic chord, resolving the movement system.

The second movement, Scherzando, is played at a much faster tempo than the first. The movement is characterized with a much lighter tone than the rest of the symphony. It starts with rapid notes in the upper strings and imitations of bird noises in the woodwinds. The movement then moves into a staccato section, with altercations in accented notes. The accented notes play into this idea of “musical jokes”. Because of the direct contrast that this articulation has with more serious and somber tones, seasoned audience members tend to chuckle during performances of these specific sections.

The third movement, Menuetto, is slower than the 2nd movementLike in most minuets, this one is written in ternary form, with a contrasting trio section containing prized solos for horns and clarinet. The movement is also recognized by a continuing pattern of triplets.

The fourth movement, Allegro Vivace, puts together all the thematic material we heard in the preceding movements into one unique blend. The idea of musical humor is still tugged at with light articulation in a relatively pleasing key. The movement ends with chords in F tonic, C dominant, and back in F tonic, concluding the blend of his second to last symphony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dV1zTM2P_LE

Beto O’Rourke’s State College Visit 3/19

On Tuesday, March 19th, Democratic presidential candidate, Beto O’Rourke, visited the University Park Campus to advocate for his presidential campaign. He addressed an audience of over 500-hundred people at Heritage Hall over topics in gun control, immigration policy, and healthcare. Unfortunately, due to the size and scope of the event, I wasn’t able to get myself in the best seat or position to watch. However, I was able to find a little riser in a corner to stand on and tried to listen and observe to as much of his speaking as I could. I wanted to use this opportunity to see what qualities make an effective public speaker and captivating public figure.

During his address, I took the time to try to identify some of Beto’s quirks or strategies that make him such a compelling public speaker and popular democratic candidate. One of the most obvious things that stood out to me was his sporting of a Nittany Lion baseball cap. As someone who is both an advocate and candidate for public office, I now recognize that it is important to be able to establish immediate amicability and rapport with your audience. It’s probably also important to adjust the method of building rapport so that it is appropriate for your audience. I think that Beto and his campaign team took the time to identify and recognize the power of school spirit and the young student body here at Penn State and capitalized on that fact through wearing the baseball cap.

Additionally, something else that Beto and his campaign made sure to do was establish a good public relations base. He made sure that he had only the best and friendliest relationship with Penn State students. Each mini interaction he had with students, whether it was a handshake or a high-five, continuously added to his credibility. The effect of this was a rage of social media posting and blurbing that, through the power of the internet, spread at a commensurate rate.

Finally, I want to write a bit about his style of speaking and rhetorical skills that makes him such a captivating person. Whenever Beto speaks, he strategically analyzes his sentences and knows exactly what topics and words get people excited. Therefore, he recognizes when to purposefully accent certain words and slow his speech so that the most emotionally powerful phrases are the clearest. This video is an excellent example of that!

As a political science major and an aspirant for a field in government and politics, I think that this experience really taught me a lot about presenting yourself as a public figure and running for public office. In RCL this year, we spent a lot of time learning how to best present ourselves to a public audience so that we may interest them and get them to think. However, I know believe that when it comes to public speaking and advocacy, there is no replacement for pure experience. I hope that in my future years here at Penn State, I will be able to better present my ideas and arguments in any given situation.

Beethoven Symphony No. 7

Beethoven’s 7th symphony is written in A major and composed in 4 movements in 1812. The piece was premiered in the spring of 1812 and was performed for the first time as a charity concert for wounded Austrian soldiers in the War of the Sixth Coalition.

The first movement, Vivace, is noted for the number of ascending and descending scale patterns. In measure six, an ascending A major scale immediately starts and is taken over by the wind section. The pattern is then passed around the entire orchestra, with the upper strings taking over followed by the lower strings. The movement finishes with a long coda, which starts similarly as the development section. The coda contains a famous twenty-bar passage consisting of a two-bar motif repeated ten times to the background a grinding four-octave pedal point of an E.

The second movement, Allegretto, is an extensively popular movement. The fast, fun and brisk melodies set an immediate attraction with the audience. Currently, the movement is often played as an encore piece, separate from the entire four movements as a whole. The movement is also noted for being particularly strings heavy, with a lot of emphases placed on the string sections. The winds in this movement predominantly show their parts by playing and holding long tones while most of the movement comes from the strings. An example of this can be seen in measure 56 as the violins begin an incredibly difficult technical passage that sees them running up and down the fingerboard.

The third movement, Presto, is even faster than the second. The movement begins in F major then follows into a trio section of D major. Like many of his other works, this movement is written in the ternary form, with an introduction, a development, and recapitulation.

The final movement is a fiery end to a fantastic symphony. A majority of the movement is written in loud volumes. The piece ends on loud A major chords, rounding up all thematic materials into one simple weave.

Critics and listeners have often felt stirred or inspired by the Seventh Symphony. For instance, one program-note author writes:

… the final movement zips along at an irrepressible pace that threatens to sweep the entire orchestra off its feet and around the theater, caught up in the sheer joy of performing one of the most perfect symphonies ever written.

As the semester comes to a close and we start running out of Beethoven symphonies to write, I think that it is important to reflect on how Beethoven’s writing style has changed throughout his short life. The 7th symphony is one of the first examples of his writing style changes. His music becomes less square and more free to interpretation and movement. When we investigate his 8th next week, we will see for sure how his music has drastically changed.

Beethoven Symphony No. 6

Beethoven’s 6th symphony, also known as the Pastorale, was composed in F major and presented in the summer of 1808. This symphony is known for highlighting one of Beethoven’s favorite hobbies and pastimes, walking in nature. The symphony was premiered at the Wien theatre in Austria the same month of its completion.

At this point in his life, Beethoven had gone completely deaf. His inability to hear frustrated him and it was noted by many of his closest friends and colleagues that he had begun acting extremely irrational and dangerous as a result. However, with his hearing stripped away from him, Beethoven began spending much of his time taking walks in nature and local forests. During the composition of the piece, he frequently left his home in Vienna to explore the countryside The cheerful and happy melodies within the Pastorale symphony is a clear testament to that fact.

The first movement, Allegro ma non troppo, begins with a very charming melody, indicating the composer’s initial arrival to the countryside. The pick-up eighth notes played in F major by the violins suddenly chime in. This melody is then further developed in the sonata form that the movement is written in. Beethoven continues to build themes and motifs based on this original violin melody with the winds.

The second movement, Andante, is written in the subdominant key of F major, B flat major. This movement is notably slower and sets a major contrasting tone with the tempo of the first movement. The second movement is primarily led by the string section with the baseline being played by a section of two cellos. The notes of the section are written chromatically, clearly representing the movement of the flowing waters commonly found in the Austrian countryside. The movement ends with cadenza by the oboes leading into the third.

The third movement, Allegro, sets another contrasting tone from the second. The movement is immediately faster representing an impending thunderstorm. The lower strings are required to play 64th notes at an almost unreasonable speed.

The final movement, Allegretto, returns to sonata-rondo form with another charming melody, similar to the first. The coda starts quietly and gradually builds to an ecstatic culmination for the full orchestra (minus “storm instruments”) with the first violins playing very rapid triplet trill on a high F. There follows a fervent passage suggestive of prayer, marked by Beethoven piano. After a brief period of afterglow, the work ends with two emphatic F-major chords.

Beethoven’s 6th symphony has left a strong impact on popular media and culture, not unlike the 5th. It was animated by Disney studios in 1999 to be featured in their Fantasia film.

Some Reflective Thoughts on “Plastic State University”

Overall, PSU Spring 2019’s Deliberation Nation was a highly successful and informative experience for me. For this post deliberation report, I will be specifically focusing on the deliberation elements present in the deliberations “Build-a-Baby (insights on genetic modification)”  at the State College municipal building and “Pour Decisions (insights on the binge-drinking culture in colleges) at Webster’s Cafe.

In terms of establishing a solid information base, both deliberations were extremely successful in that fact. Each team overview effectively established the background surrounding their respective issues and identified their root causes. Their approach teams were then able to expand upon that by reinforcing their claims with detailed evidence. I first noticed this in the “Build-a-Baby” deliberation in which team overview immediately established the history behind genetically modifying newborns and listed concrete points about both the potential benefits of modifying babies as well as the controversial ethical dilemmas that were involved. Each deliberation also effectively identified a broad range of solutions. The efforts of each of the approach teams are notable in the fact that their ideas and solutions were each creative and intricate in their own right. In the “Pour Decisions” deliberation, I particularly enjoyed that the presented solutions were unique and that their ideas were not cliched. When it comes to combatting binge drinking, it is very easy to slide into a solution that might be commonly mentioned but ineffective in terms of practicality. The deliberations also touched upon the social interactions between the participants. When preparing for our deliberations, we were aware of how important being respectful to our audience was. Respect and understanding are essential to the crafting of an effective and efficient deliberation. Each deliberation was able to ensure that emotions never overcame rationality and that no one ever spoke to others in a demeaning and disrespectful way.

At the same time, there were certain aspects of each deliberation that proved to be different in approach. An example of this is how each team managed the weighing of pros and cons for each situation and their interaction with the deliberative audience. The deliberation about genetic modification handled the weighing of pros and cons well. When teasing the idea of allowing genetic modification without restriction, the moderators knew when to focus on both the pros and the cons. The moderators knew that after discussing how unchecked genetic modification can lead to decreases of long term health disorders, they should immediately move on to the potential boundaries that unchecked power could cause. In the case of the binge drinking deliberation, the moderators weren’t able to effectively handle and weigh the pros and cons, mainly due to the inactivity of the present audience but also because of miscommunications that were present during the presentation.

Mutual comprehension was also a point that was somewhat lacking within the first deliberation. There was one point while discussing the finances backing modifications in which two of the active audience speakers got into a somewhat heated argument over whether or not an immediate cost was more detrimental than a long term cost. Each speaker was so disengaged from the other that it was clear the no progress was being made and that comprehension was the issue. The moderating team also had a difficult time ensuring that the speaking went back to normal because it was just so confusing. In the drinking deliberation, comprehension was slightly better in the fact that speakers and the audience remained calm collected, being able to share ideas and eliminate confusions or misconceptions through time.

Finally, when it came to making the best decisions, though it is impossible to reach out and know how every single persona felt or thought, it was clear that towards the end of both deliberations, people’s opinions had become more concrete and that certain individuals came to settle on an opinion based off of what they heard. When discussing the “truth style” campaign for the binge drinking deliberation, it was clear that the specific approach was beginning to click with certain individuals. This was evident when the campaign was alluded to during discussions of the other approaches. In the genetic modification deliberation, the more the deliberation continued, the more people began developing a clear opinion and began to open up more to the entire group.

In conclusion, while each deliberation had its share of issues, none of which took away from the overall productiveness of the deliberations. This was the first time that I was engaged in such an activity and it really opened my eyes for an alternative way of discussing differences between ideas.

Beethoven Symphony No. 5

Beethoven’s Symphony No. 5 opus 67 in C minor was written between 1804 and 1808 in Vienna, Austria. It was debuted at the Theater an de Wien in Vienna and is one of if not the most iconic piece Beethoven has ever written. The famous intro to the symphony has ingrained itself in modern pop culture and is one of a few classical works that are almost universally recognized. The theme has been used in various forms of media and has seen itself included in incantations of multiple different genres of music.

The first movement, Allegro con Brio, immediately presents the themes of four notes that we have come to know so well. The movement then continues to develop through several keys and motifs. The development section sees Beethoven transition from the dark and brooding key of C minor to E flat major. The new section is introduced with sets of blaring fanfares from the brass section. Following it, the main theme recaps and the four, fortissimo notes return to prominence, ending the movement.

The second movement, Allegro con molto, is a slower, marching theme played in A flat major, the subdominant key of C minor. This movement is written in double variation form and there are two predominant themes to this movement and they are alternatively varied. The movement opens with a lyrical section played by the low strings. The theme is then varied with the rest of the string section and the woodwinds with an alteration in rhythm.

The third movement, Scherzo, suddenly becomes very fast. This particular movement is composed in ternary form, with the scherzo concluding with a trio section. The middle of the third movement returns to the dominant C minor key of the first, with a section of rising quarter notes played by lower strings and viola.

Finally, the fourth movement is a bombastic Allegro. Beethoven writes the Allegro in C major, a strange dissonant contrast with the dominant c minor key. This movement boasts an unusual alteration of the traditional sonata form. Instead of the movement recapitulating to the original theme completely. It plays the theme but in an alternate key. The movement concludes its finale with a barrage of massive C major chords blared by each section of the orchestra, one after the next, concluding Beethoven’s 5th symphony.

Beethoven 5 is, without a doubt, the most influential work that both he and the classical time period left for the audience. No other work has been so featured in all aspects of life that virtually everyone knows the main theme. Don’t believe me? Take a listen. tell me if you know it.

Beethoven Symphony No. 4

Beethoven’s Symphony No. 4 Opus 60 in B flat major was composed in the summer of 1806. It was performed for the first time in the spring of the following year for Bohemian aristocrat, Joseph Franz von Lobkovitz. Like his previous works, Symphony No. 4 is composed of four movements, Allegro Vivace, Adagio, Menuetto, and Allegro ma non troppo. The four movements take roughly 35 minutes to perform.

The work was dedicated to Count Oppersdorf, a relative of Beethoven’s patron. The Count enjoyed Beethoven’s previous symphonies so much that he paid Beethoven to commission this piece for himself.

The first movement begins with winds landing a tonic B flat major chord with strings continuing the motif that was precedented by the winds section. At measure 88, a new theme is played by the strings in the dominant chord of B flat major. The movement ends with a coda section that is played by all the sections simultaneously, the movement suddenly shifts to a 3/4 section and ends with a waltz-like feel.

The second movement, Adagio, is a slow but playful dance. The movement is started with the lower strings playing a series of quarter notes that beat into the main passage. The winds then play a relatively faster passage of sixteenths that are displayed in an arpeggiating fashion. The movement concludes with the tonic chord being played by all sections and ended with just the winds finishing, concluding the second movement.

The third movement, Menuetto, is similar to the dance of the Adagio but in a much faster tempo. The winds are accompanied by a multitude of fast, technical running sections by the strings with a brass section fanfare. The phrasing of the movement is composed of sonata form, of which much of Beethoven and his predecessors’ music was. A middle developmental section is played that uses the tonality of the entire orchestra. The movement is then concluded with a brilliant display of technicality from all sections of the orchestra, maximizing the use of the harmonic resonance in the piece and concluding the third movement.

The final movement, Allegro ma non troppo, sets a completely new tone and idea for the piece. Instead of working in congruence with each other, Beethoven seemingly writes the movement so that each of the sections is being played against one another. This, in turn, gives the audience an uneasy feeling and keeps them on their toes for the fantastic conclusion of the piece.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctBqW5e16YM

Beethoven Symphony No. 3

Beethoven’s third symphony in E flat major, also known as Sinfonia Eroica (the Heroic Symphony), was composed between 1802 and 1804. Due to the majestic style and tone of the symphony, the Sinfonia Eroica is one of Beethoven’s most celebrated and performed pieces. The piece was composed in the middle of Beethoven’s life and is well known to have been one of the pieces that bridged his classical and romantic writing styles.  The symphony is composed in 4 movements (Allegro con brio, Adagio assai, Allegro Vivace, and Finale: Allegro molto) taking up to 54 minutes.

The first movement is written in 3/4 time and is composed in sonata form. The movement begins with large E flat chords that help establish the harmonic functions of the movement. The wind section starts the expositions with the chords and sets the thematic material of the movement. The string section then comes in the reinforce those tonic notes and continues the phrase. The strings then enter a large repeated section where quarter notes are being played in rapid succession in an ascending motion. The timpani supports the section by following with those respective sections. The movement then recaps the main theme, but this time in F major. The movement then ends with a lengthy coda section that sets up the following movement.

The second movement, Adagio Assai, is a sad, funeral march written in the ternary form, with an exposition, development, and a recap. The movement opens with the string section in C minor. Throughout, the movement, Beethoven consistently alters the key to keep the audience on its toes.

The third movement, Allegro Vivace, is a trio written in a lively, scherzo, tempo. The strings begin in a pianissimo volume and in the key of B flat major. The movement is notoriously difficult for winds due to the wide variety of volume changes that constantly occur. At measure 143, a trio section then occurs played in duple time. The movement ends with a coda with a sudden volume change from pianissimo to forte. 

The last movement is written in variation form, meaning that the main theme is played and sets of variations are played that revolve around it. The variations alter the keys, rhythms, articulations, and volume. For example, variation two consists of groupings of triplets that are played successively to each other. The movement ends with another coda with tonic E flat chords played on triple forte, concluding the “eroica” symphony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InxT4S6wQf4&t=1002s