In this podcast, Georgetown University public policy professor, E.J. Dionne speaks about his perspectives of empathy in our current democratic society. In the podcast, he introduces the topic by speaking about the consequences of recent political polarization and the dangers that stemmed from it. He then went on to explain how those effects culminated in the Trump administration. However, the main topic of his podcast spoke about how it would be possible to get us back to an empathetic society where we were many years ago. How do we take advantage of the climate and reaction to the Trump administration and become more proactive about it?
To start, Dionne speaks about his work during the months leading up to the midterm elections of 2018. Dionne called for “a partisan response to achieve a non-partisan goal in returning a sense of legitimacy to our politics”. He claimed that, within the scope of the midterms, the Republican candidates were far too “right-leaning”, thus setting a converse with the democratic candidates. But at the same time, he noted that through historical data, a massive shift can be seen in general public support of the democratic party, now towards the Republican party. He mentioned how this change was likely the cause of dissatisfaction within the American populace and their efforts at sending a message. Instead of blaming this type of ugly reaction on pure bigotry, he asserts that the root cause of the issue was the idea that the same political party that provided the civil rights laws and voter rights acts is now unable to act or acts on a very poor scale.
Something else that was talked about was what the standpoint was of conservatives that were not necessarily aligned with Trump but still supported the conservatives ideas. Dionne mentioned that it was worth remembering that, back in the 2016 election, over fifty percent of college-aged, white men actually voted for Trump. How do we turn that around in the next election cycle?
Another idea that Dionne brought up that I thought was particularly interesting was how the Trump administration actually had more of a positive effect on government and politics than initially intended. He states that the number of people, who were originally uninvolved in politics, that was riled up to join this “Anti-Trump” movement will allow a more pressing retaliation in the next cycle. He joked that President Trump didn’t actually damage our democracy, but may have accidentally saved it in a way that was unintended at first.
All in all, I really enjoyed this podcast. Dionne did an excellent job at presenting an idea that, while controversial, is also worth listening to, especially with the 2020 presidential election coming up. Personally, I will take what I have learned from this and try to apply it to thinking about future political participation. I think that making a good voting choice is not only about staying informed, but about making an on-the-spot decision that is creatively secure too. I hope that this idea is shared more around the internet for the next few months.