My ideas for public controversies that can be discussed revolve around the medical field. My first, CRISPR and gene-editing technology, is more technical and can be applied to the sciences as a whole. My second idea is to focus on the controversy of universal healthcare. These are relevant controversies that arise in daily discussions as they affect everybody.
There is a heavy focus on the rise on gene-editing technology. More and more people are becoming interested in this transformative technology, and they are trying to find answers to the many questions that remain at the forefront of the scientific community. As it grows and people try to grab all the information they can, they begin to question what can happen next. This presents a controversy before us. There are technical controversies in the true efficiency of gene-editing and making sure that there are minimal unforeseen consequences. There is also an overarching controversy that affects all of society, and it deals with the genetic modification/engineering of humans. There are questions about how much the research will impact human evolution and to what extent will society allow applications of gene-editing to reach. Scientists are still trying to figure out answers which renders this as an ongoing controversy that will be interesting to research.
My second idea focuses on healthcare coverage in the United States. There have been many calls for reform in this industry, but there isn’t any progress or agreement on how we should move forward with this topic. There are many factors that people want to consider that attribute to the controversy. There is debate on how to handle high insurance costs, the bureaucratic obstacles of the industry, and the socioeconomic issues in society. A commonly proposed idea is through universal healthcare coverage. Proponents of this would argue that this is a right that should be granted to every citizen, allowing for, supposedly, fair access to healthcare. Opponents argue that it interferes with the capitalistic ideologies we have in our economy. They argue that the governmental powers would stretch too far, and it is unnecessary for them to step in. We are still trying to find the best method to handle the situation. It is very relevant in our society, and as college students who are becoming independent of our families, we need to understand what our next step is for our healthcare.