Revised Essay

Imagine the tension as, in the midst of the Great Depression, a new president is elected into office. While people are struggling and overall pessimistic about the future, they still hope that their recent election of a new president might change things for the better. After winning by a relatively large margin, FDR was ready to transition from campaigning to announcing his plan to take action as the newly elected official. His First Inaugural Address was the first speech he made to the American people as President. Ready to take on the challenges the country was facing, FDR included emotional sentiments by imploring the American people to look to the future and his new administration with hope. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s First Inaugural Address articulates powerful examples of strong emotional appeals of confidence and hope, the Kairos of the tense political atmosphere of 1933, and the commonplace that an inaugural address usually lays out the President’s promises and intentions for the upcoming term.  President FDR’s application of these rhetorical tools also came to light in his Second Inaugural Address. Franklin Delano Roosevelt employs commonplaces, rhetorical situations in which these speeches arose, and the use of ethos and pathos to further enhance the promises and arguments he presents.

The kairotic moments of the time period are capitalized upon in President FDR’s First Inaugural Address. March of 1933 was close to the end of the Great Depression, but no one knew that yet. Instead, the people of America faced distress as they had to survive without their jobs and stability. FDR’s First Inaugural Speech emerged at this time following his election, and he focused this address around the current problems America was facing, specifically the Great Depression. President FDR also used this event and speech as an opportunity to blame these American struggles on the last administration of President Hoover, capitalizing on the fact that he had just been removed from office after one term. This speech takes advantage of the kairotic moment that is an election, inauguration, and public speech to contextualize the problems facing America. 

To engage the American listeners most effectively, President FDR’s First and Second Inaugural Addresses both consider commonplaces associated with presenting an inaugural address and the roles of the presidency in America. This inaugural speech is known for targeting the emotions and desires of the audience, but FDR’s First Inaugural Address slightly strays from doing so in the traditional sense. Not only does he include emotionally pulling sentiments, but he also includes direct initiatives he plans to pass through Congress. This aspect also ties into the notion that the inaugural speech allows the President to speak to the American people without campaigning. To add, another commonplace is that the President comes from a well-off family, yet is still expected to understand the needs of everyday Americans as the man of the people. He follows this idea in both of his speeches by coming off as a relatable figure that understands the struggles facing the middle and lower classes.

This speech heavily relies on emotional appeal to contribute to the style and ensure it’s message is received. FDR’s first speech tries to uplift the American people and inspire them towards an improved future, and that his new administration would solve the “evils of the old order,” referring to President Hoover’s administration. The language chosen in this speech emphasizes a call to action as well as vivid imagery of breaking free from the horrible evils that have held America back. This speech makes it clear that President FDR’s administration hopes to place the blame of America’s struggles not on the general people, but on individuals like the previous administration, bankers, and others. The famous quote, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself,” then goes on to describe the terrifying nature of fear, calling it “nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts”. FDR is quite literally implanting this fear of fear so that people break free and inspire them to move on from it while also mentioning where it originated from. 

FDR utilized similar tactics with his Second Inaugural Address, yet on a less extreme level. In 1937, the Great Depression was no longer a concern to most Americans, and they were already aware of how FDR ran his administration. FDR instead focused on the fact that he had won this election by an unbelievable margin, especially from lower and middle-class voters. He addresses this event in his speech, which leads him to mention the conditions these ordinary people live in every day, drawing attention to their situations.  In his Second Inaugural Speech, President FDR follows the commonplaces to address the problems of the country and give the people hope, all without offering much or any concrete legislation. FDR’s Second Inaugural Address depends on strong sentiment. However, for this speech, he relies on strong imagery not to inspire people, but to open their eyes to the struggles of the working and lower classes. He chooses to go on to “paint a picture” as he puts it, of the things he sees millions of families struggle with, including terrible working conditions, inadequate education opportunities, and malnourishment. Although his ultimate goal is to instill hope in the American people, this time, he does it by raising awareness of the real atrocities in their backyard, not just a figurative image of “fear”.

President FDR’s application of commonplaces, pathos, and the rhetorical situation all come together to produce a speech with incredible rhetorical significance. Ultimately, these tools contribute to the memorable invention, arrangement, and style that convinced the American people of their hopeful future and ability to persevere through difficult times. 

Categories: RCL

3 thoughts on “Revised Essay

  1. I think this was well written. Even though it has some gramatical errors but that is easy to fix. I think the last paragraph needs a little work in the last part. Overall, I think is a wonderful speech.

  2. 1. Identify the writer’s main claim about the rhetoric, ideology or and subtext of the piece.

    The main argument is that FDR used commonplaces, rhetorical situations, and ethos and pathos in his first two addresses as president.

    2. Identify and comment on the writer’s introduction of a context (rhetorical situation) for this piece of rhetoric. Name one thing that might be added, deleted, changed, or moved.

    I would not mind seeing a little more information about the Great Depression in this introduction. It would contribute to the piece as a whole to drive home the severity of that crisis. It was a really unique rhetorical moment that America had not faced. Perhaps some data about the Great Depression or some facts about how people were impacted would be welcome.

    3. Warning flags: check any of the following predominant themes this paper contains that might suggest a weak introduction or thesis:

    I do not see any of the given warning flags present here in any form. The only area you could look into is maybe providing more information as to the second address. You introduce it with one sentence that comes a little closer to a warning flag. Potentially, adding some more detail here could help out. Overall, it is a good introduction.

    4. Find a strong analytical topic sentence and a weak one. Explain why you have identified them as such.

    To engage the American listeners most effectively, President FDR’s First and Second Inaugural Addresses both consider commonplaces associated with presenting an inaugural address and the roles of the presidency in America.

    This topic sentence is perfectly tailored to what you talk about in the paragraph. It is specific and analytical. It goes beyond being a simple statement and includes context.

    This speech heavily relies on emotional appeal to contribute to the style and ensure it’s message is received.

    This topic sentence is simply too vague. I would specify the speech in the topic sentence and elaborate more towards the end as to style or message. It could help to more specifically identify emotional appeals here.

    5. Comment on the organization of the piece. What other possible arrangement strategies might make more of the material and develop arguments more fully? How well is the second comparative piece of rhetoric incorporated?

    The piece is well divided into the thesis subpoints. I like how you separated a thesis subpoint into two paragraphs when necessary. I feel as though the second speech could use some more contextualization and analysis. The context could be given in the introduction or in the kairos section. Analysis can go wherever you see fit.

    6. You wanted to read more about….

    I find the Great Depression to be a very interesting period. I think that the essay could benefit from including some more of the details of the Great Depression to set the scene for the importance of the addresses made by FDR. American life was changed immensely and they looked to him for a brighter future.

  3. 1. Identify the writer’s main claim about the rhetoric, ideology or and subtext of the piece

    I think that the rhetoric in this advertisement was to show FDR’S morality in a sense. it was a little confusing to me trying to understand the speech but I think the rhetorical claim was to show that due to FDR’S morality the U.S. citizens had hope for a new change in their society.

    2. Identify and comment on the writer’s introduction of a context (rhetorical situation) for this piece of rhetoric. Name one thing that might be added, deleted, changed, or moved.
    I think you should add about more what you are going to specifically say in each paragraph to make the audience have like a type of organization of each concept.

    3. Warning flags: check any of the following predominant themes this paper contains that might suggest a weak introduction or thesis: I think overall it has all the information needed

    4. Find a strong analytical topic sentence and a weak one. Explain why you have identified them as such.

    strong: President FDR also used this event and speech as an opportunity to blame these American struggles on the last administration of President Hoover, capitalizing on the fact that he had just been removed from office after one term. i feel like this is the center of the whole speech. Because it contributes to the way FDR wants to be visualized as better than his opponents by giving hope to the citizens
    weak:The famous quote, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself,” then goes on to describe the terrifying nature of fear, calling it “nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts”. I think this was a little confusing because you were talking about hope for the American people and then proceeded to quote FDR implanting fear

    5. Comment on the organization of the piece. What other possible arrangement strategies might make more of the material and develop arguments more fully? How well is the second comparative piece of rhetoric incorporated?

    I think overall it was good, but sometimes it was a little confusing to follow up in some paragraphs

    You wanted to read more about….how FDR presidency impacted the united States because we are talking about what he wanted to do but not what he did.

Leave a Reply