Perils of Teenage Vaping: The Urgency to Reverse the Trend
Introduction
Teens’ lives are being claimed left and right as the vaping epidemic ensues; how many more deaths are necessary before proper preventative action is taken remains unanswered. Vaping is an increasingly popular e-cigarette that was originally created to curb smoking amongst cigarette users but has since become the gateway smoking device for teenagers and adolescents. The potential health risks are endless: increased risk of developing various cancers, heart disease, brain damage, and perhaps the most common prospect — lung diseases. At one point, vaping companies seemingly targetted their products to teenagers by showing advertisements featuring young people who portrayed vaping as a cool trend. As the percentage of teenagers using vape products continues to skyrocket, vape companies and state governments’ reactions remain ineffective. In order to subdue the vaping dilemma, large vaping companies must shift their target audience back to smokers who are trying to quit instead of marketing towards kids, state governments must issue legislature that will prevent teenagers and young adults from legally purchasing vape products, and they must both work together to educate the youth on the dangers of vaping. All of this should be done with the deliberate goal of greatly depreciating the number of teens who vape and prevent any further damage to their previously healthy bodies.
Background
Vaping consists of using a battery-powered e-cigarette that heats a liquid into vapor with the intent of being inhaled. The liquid, usually in the form of a “pod,” can contain nicotine (a highly addictive drug that is found in tobacco products) and various kinds of flavoring along with other harmful chemicals. Marijuana, hash oil, nicotine, and other substances can be infused into the liquid in pods.
Teenage Vape Usage
In 2018, over 44,000 students participated in an annual survey conducted to decipher the amount of drug, alcohol, and cigarette use of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders. Approximately 37% of 12th grader students reported vaping in 2018, up from 28% in 2017. The majority of teenage vape users claim that they are vaping nicotine products, while others opt for marijuana or hash oil or “just flavoring.” (See Figure 1.)
The Damage
E-cigarettes and vape products, originally created to help current smokers wean off of cigarettes and ultimately quit smoking, is backfiring as it acts as a catalyst for teenagers’ newfound smoking addictions. Dr. Richard Miech, a researcher at the University of Michigan, says, “vaping is reversing hard-fought declines in the number of adolescents who use nicotine. These results suggest that vaping is leading youth into nicotine use and nicotine addiction, not away from it.”
“Teens are clearly attracted to the marketable technology and flavorings seen in vaping devices,” the director of News in Health’s (NIH) National Institute on Drug Abuse, Dr. Nora D. Volkow, signifies. “However, it is urgent that teens understand the possible effects of vaping on overall health, the development of the teen brain, and the potential for addiction.” Health professionals continue to warn that without proper education and awareness, teenage vape use will continue to flourish.
The Lack of Regulation
The unfortunate reality with e-cigarettes and e-liquids is that there is currently little to no regulation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “None of the e-cigarette products that are currently on the market have had a premarket review,” said Dr. Susan Walley, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. “And that’s largely because of the failure of the FDA to initiate that.”
Premarket approval (PMA) is a review done by the FDA, who is responsible for overseeing tobacco products, to assess the safety and effectiveness of certain medical devices. E-cigarettes fall under the category of medical devices as that is what they were claimed to be when they were initially introduced. In order to obtain marketing approval, these devices must submit a PMA application — as stated in section 515 of the FD&C Act.
Proposed FDA Guidelines
- Limit the sale of flavored e-cigarettes in brick-and-mortar shops to age-restricted vendors or restricting sales to areas that can only be entered by people who are 18 or older.
- Incorporate “heightened age verification processes” to strengthen the enforcement of e-cigarette products sold online.
- Prioritize regulations that will prevent the sale of flavored tobacco products and e-cigarettes targeted towards minors and teenagers.
The Lack of Education
Education is lacking significantly as many students are not aware of the contents of vapes. Patricia Folan, RN, CNP, director of the Center for Tobacco Control at Northwell Health in Great Neck, NY, warns that “nicotine is often an ingredient found in vape products, even though the user may not be aware of it (because) e-cigarette and vaping products do not have ingredient labels.” As a result, it is imperative that there is increased regulation for these products to notify users, particularly teenagers who have likely never smoked conventional cigarettes so that they can make more informed decisions when it comes to vaping. A proposed FDA guideline is to make the nicotine content more apparent or obvious to prevent unintended usage.
*This is a very rough draft — I was not able to complete the full 6-8 pages within the time allotted, so I will certainly be adding a lot more content. What kind of other information do you think that I should include? I have already chosen 3 graphs and created one of my own, but due to formatting issues, I could not display them on the blog page. What do we think of the title now that I have made it more specific? Still needs editing or is it better now? And of course, I am also still working on a conclusion, but it will ultimately state that both the federal/state governments as well as the companies that are creating these vape products must work together to resolve the issue that is teenage vaping.
1). Answer any questions the writer may have posed about the draft
I bet that your graphs will help you reach 6-8 pages! Your conclusion will also help with this! Definitely highlight the benefits of your proposed plans and address any possible counterpoints in your conclusion. You’ve got this!
2). Comment on scope of the thesis and whether or not it was convincingly argued. What improvements are needed to make it more convincing?
You have a strong thesis and have adequately supported it through your various sections and statistics!
3). Comment on the evidence for the policy or its implementation. Does the draft need stronger sources to support the arguments? What kinds?
Your statistical evidence and use of guidelines from the FDA do a great job as evidence. The section titled “teenage vape usage” is the best example of support for policy implementation, along with “the damage” that you have described. These two sections do a great job with exigency!
4). Did the piece handle questions of feasibility or objections to the policy?
I assume that the ending and conclusion of your issue brief will take care of this.
5). Comment on any improvements to an arrangement that could be considered.
I think your arrangement is superb. Talking about the percentages, moving into the damage, and then addressing why this problem is occurring shows that you are knowledgeable about this topic and that you have really done your research.
6). Comment on the structure of the issue brief, including subtitles.
I really like your section titles and I think that clarifies your points and strengthens the visual appearance of your piece. These allow for easy understanding, as well.
7). Make one recommendation for something that could be moved, changed, added, or deleted.
I am confident that you will have a very strong paper once you add a conclusion that supports your proposed changes and is able to stand up to possible backlash that these changes could receive.
1) oooo hey you used my advice:) I like the title as it is now, it shows what you’re talking about and why. You should definitely go deeper and talk about more harms, I feel like it would make it sound more urgent. Talk about all those kids on the news that have ended up in hospital. And add more info about the benefits of your policy. A lot of states have already changed the vaping age to 21 though, so instead of 18 you can say 21? And I feel like you should emphasize more on the marketing of the product. The smoking commercials we used to see as kids where they’d take out their teeth at the cash register were good and now they’re turning into vaping commercials. I feel like just denying someone to vape doesn’t mean anything now… there’s so many ways to get one. But the marketing is what really helps kids stop.
2). Comment on scope of the thesis and whether or not it was convincingly argued. What improvements are needed to make it more convincing?
Once again love the thesis, straight and to the point. Wouldn’t change a thing. But yea definitely add more info about how to do all the stufff you said, I’m sure you’ll get to it since we really didn’t have much time to make a draft, but so far it’s good:)
3). Comment on the evidence for the policy or its implementation. Does the draft need stronger sources to support the arguments? What kinds?
Yea maybe some more stats and just general Info would be good. Talk about what other countries have done??? THOugh I’m sure it’s probably a lot worse in other countries lol. Give marketing stats, like how much the smoking commercials helped kids not smoke. But you’ve got good info now.
4). Did the piece handle questions of feasibility or objections to the policy?
I feel like you definitely make it sound very feasible. It’s really not hard to do this, you just gotta use up some money and time and actually care about it. You could definitely write in some objections, though idk what Person would want kids to vape. Say how people think it’s hard to implement or how kids would still find ways to get it.
5). Comment on any improvements to arrangement that could be considered.
I think the organization is good. It was easy to follow and I would wrap my head around it all. Good job I wouldn’t change it, liked It.
6). Comment on the structure of the issue brief, including subtitles.
I liked the subtitles. Made it easy to read and I knew exactly what the next paragraph would be about. Good job.
7). Make one recommendation for something that could be moved, changed, added, or removed?
Hmm just in general some more info about marketing. I’m a marketing major so you know I have to say that lol. I just think it’s one of the best ways to actually get into people’s heads and make them want to change. Put some psychology in it. Because we all know laws and regulations don’t really always stop anyone in college and high school. But overall good. Your topic is really cool and I’m glad you picked it, very interesting.
Ohh what If you conduct some surveys? I feel like that would be cool. Do you vape, do you smoke? Would a law stop you from vaping? Why do u think a lot of people do it? How much harder has it been to vape now that the laws say you gotta be 21? Idk something like that. Could be an interesting perspective. Just a thought.