To Get Involved or Not To Get Involved
Have you ever found yourself in a position in which you’ve seen something (like a crime) that shouldn’t take place and you didn’t intervene or do anything about it because you thought that someone else out of the good amount of people who were around you would take action? Has there been an emergency type situation that’s occurred and you didn’t assist because you thought another witness to the situation would handle it first? The textbook talks about the “bystander effect” which is the phenomenon in which “people are less likely to help in an emergency when other bystanders are present” (Gruman, Schneider, Coutts, 2016). This ties into the “diffusion of responsibility”, which refers to an individual’s sense of responsibility being diminished because they have the belief that other people will or should intervene in the situation at hand (Gruman, Schneider, Coutts, 2016).
When the topic of the bystander effect comes up, the murder of a woman named Kitty Genovese is usually connected to the discussion. This tragedy is known to be shown as a huge example of what the bystander effect is. Kitty Genovese was a 28-year-old woman who had come back from work to her home in Queens, New York (History, 2018). As she was across the street from her apartment, a man attacked her with a knife and stabbed her as her neighbors did nothing to help her as she screamed. The man left and as she tried to make it to her front door, the man returned and stabbed her more and raped her as more witnesses watched from afar. The police were eventually called and Kitty ended up dying en route to the hospital. None of the witnesses did anything to stop the man or help Kitty because they all thought that someone else out of the group of witnesses would do something about it. One of the witnesses later claimed that he didn’t want to get involved at the time. It is said that this tragedy that occurred played a role in being one of the factors in which the 911 emergency system was set into place.
There’s a show that I used to watch called “What Would You Do?” that was hosted by a man named John Quinones. The show involved using actors to portray characters to create dilemmas in public places (like parks, restaurants, etc.). Then, with the usage of hidden cameras, John would observe individuals and see what they would do in the midst of that dilemma. He wanted to see if they would take action and do something, or if they wouldn’t do anything about it and keep to themselves. There was an episode where a young teenage girl (an actress) was sitting at a table at a restaurant and a male (also an actor) who is way older than her, approaches her and compliments her. He tells her that he’s a professional photographer and he can take great pictures of her and turn her into a star. At this point you can see people at the tables around this girl eavesdropping on the convo and most look very uncomfortable by this creepy man. People are wide-eyed and look at each other in disbelief that they’re witnessing this and that the teenager seems to believe what the man is saying, especially when he says that he’ll take her back to his place where he shoots the pictures. The man then goes to the bathroom for a second and that’s when John watches for the witnesses to see if they’ll do anything. Some of them actually went to the teenager and told her that she should be careful because the guy might not actually be a photographer and that she shouldn’t go with a stranger to his house. The teenager says things like “oh but it seems like a good opportunity” or something along those lines. Some of the witnesses respond by saying they’re not telling her what to do but are just giving her a heads up that it’s a bad idea. In some scenes, witnesses don’t say anything at all. Eventually when the man comes back, he beckons her to go with him and she proceeds to follow him. This is where John observed the most. Would these people mind their business and risk letting this young girl go with this strange alleged photographer man to his home? Or would they stop it? There were a few people who were so creeped out by what was happening that they followed the two actors outside to confront the man and pull the girl aside and begged her not to go with him. One lady told him to get lost and that she wouldn’t allow the girl to go with him. Soon after, John comes out and reveals that it’s a show and asks witnesses why they reacted the way they did or why they didn’t react.
There was an experiment done where actors were used to conduct a kidnapping in public, to see how people would react. A young girl was “kidnapped” by an older male and she is seen screaming for someone to help her as she says the man isn’t her dad, as he drags her by the arm (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJKgA9b_5p8). You can see people in the video seeing what’s happening, looking, and walking past. A woman is interviewed and she says that it’s one of those situations where you think that someone else will do something. Then you see three other men who hear the girl’s pleas and run together toward the man to stop the kidnapping. They’re then told that it’s an experiment. One of the men say that his friend wasn’t reacting so he thought not to, especially because he thought maybe the child was just being disobedient but then after constantly hearing the little girl scream, he couldn’t stand by and risk it so him and his friends ran after the guy.
It’s sad that this mentality that “someone else will do something, so I won’t/don’t have to”, exists. Sometimes we may not even realize that we’re doing it when we just make the assumption that other people will do something when a dilemma or emergency situation occurs. This kind of thought process is unfortunate, as people could really be in danger and require any one person’s help. It’s also understandable on the other end that people might be afraid that they’ll put themselves in danger too if they try to help. I recall a story where a woman was on a beach and went out deep into the water. The water came in strong and she was swept out further, unable to come back to shore and was drowning I believe. An individual was a witness to the woman struggling and so they jumped into the water, in an attempt to save her. The woman was saved and brought safely to shore. Months later, she ended up suing the individual who saved her, because she claimed that she had obtained injuries from them saving her. The individual thought that they were doing a good thing by helping the woman but ended up getting sued for doing just that. Situations like this may cause some people to stop themselves from helping. My hope is that one day we can get past this mentality that we don’t have to get involved because we think someone else will.
Works Cited:
Gruman, J. A., Schneider, F. W., & Coutts, L. M. (Eds.). (2016). Applied social psychology : Understanding and addressing social and practical problems. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
History.com Editors. (2018, January 5). Kitty Genovese. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/topics/crime/kitty-genovese
If social psychology has thought us anything, it is to never underestimate power of situation, because we don’t really know what our reaction is going to be until we are put in the situation in question. I honestly believe that I would attempt to help 100 times out of 100. But I can’t claim that to be the fact, as I was never in this kind of situation. There are many factors that are here in play. For instance, from my social psychology class, I remember that the best chance that woman can get help when attacked by a man is to say “I don’t know you.” Many people, when they see a situation in which a woman is attacked by a man, think that the woman and the man are in romantic relationship, and that it’s not their place to interfere in whatever the two have going on. It can also be expected that the potential helper asks him/ herself: what would be the result of my attempt to help? Would it be successful? Perhaps the attacker is bigger and stronger from both the victim and potential helper. Naturally, there are also questions of cost- effectiveness of such action- would it make things better or worse for the victim? Would my life be in danger?
Additionally, altruistic and helping behaviors are, as many others, based on factors that have to do with our evolutionary drives. Determination of cost-effectiveness of our behavior is done by subconsciously calculating how similar the person is to us, or in other words what is the number of genes that we share with that person. The more we perceive the person (and their genes) similar to us, more likely we are to help, as that way we help genes that are more similar to ours get transferred to next generation (by enabling them to survive and eventually reproduce).
I hope, the same way you do, that people of the future will be more altruistic, and indeed get past the mentality that someone else, other than them will help another human in trouble. Until that moment comes, the best we can do is try raise people’s awareness when it comes to existence of such phenomena as bystander effect.
What an amazing job you did with this post. I think the bystander effect is something that many people experience (not necessarily in horrible situations) but in any situation in life. I feel as though people always think that someone else is going to do something, so everyone waits and waits and then when no one does anything, something bad happens. I used to watch the show what would you do, and I couldn’t believe for the episodes that people could intervene and say something to the “actor” that no one said anything. I just think that is too common in society where people rely on other people to do everything so that they don’t have to. The example you gave about the girl being “kidnapped” really upsets me, because I know it must be hard for people to want to act thinking someone else will do it, but if a child is yelling that someone who is not their parent is taking them, that is scary and should be acted on quickly.
As far as your question, what would you do? I was actually put in a situation with the bystander effect. I was driving home around 12 AM Christmas morning from my best friends house and I slowly came to a halt on the highway because I saw other cars doing it. As I was slowing down my car, I noticed that there was a person laying in the middle of the road. I can’t even begin to describe the amount of angst that I felt at that moment. I started seeing people peering getting out of their cars, one car driving past the people who were stopped, and after that maybe 15 seconds of panicking and thinking, I jumped out of my car and started running toward the man laying in the middle of the road. All I remember is looking at him lying there and making sure someone was already calling 911, which they were, and at that time, you could hear the ambulance coming, so I sat back in my car. It truly is a moment that you have no time to think, and have to make a decision to act or not to act. It was amazing that night how many people actually jumped out of their cars, but there was really nothing we could do because the ambulance and police were already coming.
This was very well written. Thank you for sharing. I agree that it is very sad that people feel like they do not need to step up and help someone in need because there are other people are around. I also did a blog on the bystander effect. I wanted to find out if there were ways to reduce this. I found a couple ways, but nothing major that would completely stop the bystander effect from happening. I think that maybe if more people learn about this effect, then more people will help those in need. I know that I am going to pay more attention to my surrounds now and try to help someone in need. Again, thank you for sharing.