September 11

Thank You, Next

 

In late 2018, the pop sensation, Ariana Grande, dropped the music video for her hit song Thank You Next. The storyline of the video contained Grande’s rendition of classic “Chick flicks” including Mean Girls, Legally Blonde, Bring it on, and 13 Going on 30. Aside from the unique concept, there were endless celebrity cameos from her Victorious co-stars to even Kris Jenner! When it comes to the song itself, it is most definitely a self-love anthem. Instead of creating a song with a bitter message towards her exes *cough cough, Tayler Swift*, Grande opted to focus on how she grew from those relationships and how she values them regardless of how they ended.

Text:

  • How does a song with such personal lyrics (ex. explicitly stating her exes’ names) become a huge hit?
  • Grande pours her heart into the lyrics, even including her parents past relationship, how is that relevant to the bigger picture that she wishes to portray in this song?
  • What exactly does she mean by “Thank You, Next”? Thank you, onto the next boyfriend? Or perhaps she means onto the next lesson or life experience?

Audience:

  • It wouldn’t be a reach to say that the music video is “girly” exuding traditional femininity from its pink color palette to its movie references. How comfortable is the traditional male with bopping to this song?
  • Who exactly does this song attract? People who have had their hearts broken? People who wish to be empowered? Perhaps all of the above?
  • What is the general age range for her fans? Seems to be from Generation Z to Millennials.

Context:

  • How important is knowing Grande personally to understand the context of her lyrics? Are there any hidden messages that the general audience doesn’t know about?
  • Why did she choose to pay homage to these particular movies? Is it to convey a general message or is it more personal than that?
  • To the average music listener, what would be their first thoughts when listening to this song. Do they know about Mac or Pete or Ricky? Would they even care to know?

 

Category: RCL | LEAVE A COMMENT
September 4

The Romanticization of Criminals

To most people, murderers, rapists, and high profile criminals are far from appealing. This post isn’t about most people. It is about people who experience the phenomenon known as hybristophilia.

Perhaps the names Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, and Jeffrey Dahmer ring a bell. Well among the many commonalities these three share, having countless admirers happens to be one of them. While facing trial for raping and murdering dozens of women, Ted Bundy received fan mail from all over the world. Despite being a homosexual cannibal, Jeffrey Dahmer made a lasting impression among a young, teenage, female fanbase. The cult leader, Charles Manson, even had a fiancé in jail who somehow obtained a marriage license and delivered his child while he was facing time for his crimes. As alarming as it is, online communities and forums are dedicated to each individual and there are even fan clubs for these high profile criminals active as we speak. 

These admirers are far from your average fangirls, they are hybristophiles. A hybristophile is someone that is attracted to people who commit crimes. The unusual preference is far more common among women than it is among men. Even the very term has been romanticized in popular culture and has been deemed “Bonnie and Clyde syndrome”. Many questions arise from the very existence of hybristophilia; the main one simply being “why?”

 In an interview conducted by Vice, young teenage girls attempted to answer that very question. One in particular was from a small rural town and answered, “Violence is just exciting. If I was to have a killer as a boyfriend it would make me excited, you know? It’s a bit like Russian roulette—my turn could be soon and he could kill me. Spice things up a bit. Conventional stuff is boring.” This answer is bound to raise some eyebrows especially when the term “Russian roulette” is used in comparison to a so-called romantic relationship. Unsurprisingly, mental health concerns could also be taken into account.

According to an article by Psychology Today “From an evolutionary perspective, maybe such females have some kind of unconscious biological drive that would view any children of such men as having a better chance of survival.” This can then delve deeper into the societal expectation of men being alpha and having dominant traits delivered to their offspring but I digress. This theory is just one of many which psychologists and sexologists have brainstormed. Ideas have been tossed around left and right from women wanting to be “the chosen one” or “the one that could change him” to them simply having daddy issues.

Indeed hybristophilia is anything but a conventional attraction whether that be sexual or emotional. That then begs the question of what even is conventional attraction? As long as it is legal, should it be okay? Is there a bullet list of what society deems as acceptable to be attracted to or perhaps in this case, what not to be attracted to? (ex. high profile serial criminals). I, like you, have my own thoughts on the matter but our perception of these people will never deny their existence.