What COMM 409 Has Taught Me
This media ethics course has opened my eyes to the importance of ethics in maintaining journalistic integrity and trust. I believe that through this course, I am able to truly see how my actions as a journalist could impact my own reputation, as well as the organization I work for and the journalism industry. This course has taught me how to best serve my community as a journalist.
Two Ethical Lessons
Throughout the course we covered many case studies and ethical lessons. Two topics along with their ethical lessons that stuck out to me the most are: the case involving Jayson Blair and Sonia Nazario’s fly on the wall reporting that led to her piece called “Enrique’s Journey.”
Jayson Blair was a New York Times reporter who utilized plagiarism and fabrication that “misled readers and Times colleagues” (Barry et al., 2003). The worst part of his case is that, “he used these techniques to write falsely about emotionally charged moments in recent history, from deadly sniper attacks in suburban Washington to the anguish of families grieving for loved ones killed in Iraq” (Barry et al., 2003). Mr. Blair did not seek to carry out his journalistic duties to minimize harm, to report truthfully and accurately, and to be accountable and transparent regarding his actions. He blatantly lied to the community and to his co-workers and did not respect the journalistic principle of being loyal to his community. The New York Times reported, “Mr. Blair had by this point developed a pattern of pretending to cover events in the Mid-Atlantic region when in fact he was spending most of his time in New York” (Woods ,2002). The lesson here is that the lack of integrity in his actions damaged his reputation and that of the The New York Times as well as the public’s trust in journalism. His case raises the question, “How can journalists be trusted?” His case taught me that journalists need to practice ethical decision making by utilizing not only the SPJ Code of Ethics, but the ethical principles of Aristotle’s Golden Mean, Kant’s Categorical Imperative, Mill’s Principle of Utility, Rawl’s veil of ignorance, and Judeo-Christian Persons as Ends. Additionally, his case taught me that journalists have no excuse to jeopardize their news organization’s duty to report truthfully and transparently even on tight deadlines.
The second topic that I thought presented significant ethical lessons was Sonia Nazario’s reporting that led to her piece called “Enrique’s Journey.” In this case, the Los Angeles Times reporter followed “a boy from Honduras who was trying to reach his mother…in North Carolina” (Foreman, 2016, p. 42). In order to give an authentic view of the case Sonia could not intervene (Foreman, 2016, p. 42). She even watched as Enrique rode the top of a freight train, and she couldn’t give him her cellphone, so he could call his mom in North Carolina (Foreman, 2016, p. 42). This case demonstrates that journalists need to be fly on the wall reporters and that any intervention that they may have in a story could damage their integrity and the accuracy, fairness and truthfulness of the story in which they are covering. Sonia’s coverage of the boy’s journey demonstrates the ethical lesson as to why journalists should not intervene in order to be authentic and transparent. The reasons are: “Intervention changes the nature of the event, rendering it no longer authentic. Intervention can lead the audience to perceive bias on the journalist’s part” (Foreman, 2016, p.39). Her case demonstrates not only her integrity to live by journalistic standards, but her ability to set aside her emotion in covering such a dramatic story.
Both of these topics demonstrate that ethics are not always clear; ethical values, certain situations and certain threats will require different courses of action. The course of action should reflect journalists’ primary loyalty to the community they serve.
One Case Study that Impressed Me the Most
The case that impressed me the most was that of the Unabomber Manifesto that involved The New York Times and The Washington Post. In this case, Ted Kaczynski, who “claimed responsibility for killing three people and wounding 23 with a series of mail bombs the past 17 years that the killing would stop if the newspapers published his rambling manifesto and allowed for three annual follow-ups” (Woods, 2002). Both papers decided to publish “excerpts from the document as part of a story with a legitimate news peg. But neither has responded directly to the Unabomber’s demands” (Woods, 2002). This case truly demonstrates how ethical decision making contains different moving parts and that every situation is different. Journalists should utilize the professional code of ethics, ethical principles and diverse viewpoints in making a decision. In this particular case the ethical code that stands out the most is to minimize harm, and the ethical principle that is in play is Aristotle’s Golden Mean, which tells journalists to consider all the avenues of action before making a decision. Additionally, this case presented a lot of ethical dilemmas such as whether the information was newsworthy, whether the newspaper should make sure that the report is not influenced by the bomber’s requests, and whether how they consulted public officials was journalistically sound (Woods, 2002).
In this case specifically, I believe that by publishing the manifesto, the newspapers did less harm than if they had refused to publish it. As Times publisher, Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. “said in a message to his staff, ‘You print and he doesn’t kill anybody else, that’s a pretty good deal…You print it, and he continues to kill people, what have you lost? The cost of newsprint?’” (Foreman, 2016, p.47).
Course’s Impact on My Future Career and Life
Upon graduation, I will be a news producer in a producer in residence training program in Atlanta. This course has taught me how I may exercise journalistic ethics within my job. I will make sure that the coverage is fair and accurate, that a voice is given to the “voiceless,” and ultimately that first and foremost the news organization’s primary loyalty lies with the community that it serves (Foreman, 2016).
Additionally, this course has helped me to recognize that I am a journalist 24/7 and any activities that I support outside of work could interfere with my credibility as an unbiased journalist. I also believe that this course has encouraged me to not be afraid to ask questions in my career, after all multiple opinions will help me to make the best ethical decisions in covering a story where there really is no clear answer.
In my personal life, I believe this course will help me to be a good friend, spouse and potential mother one day. This course has taught me to see all sides of a story in order to get to the facts. As a friend, I could decipher the truth between friends who are arguing and as a mother the same if my kids are arguing. This class has taught me that everyone is entitled to an opinion, but it is my duty to decipher what is the truth by discovering many diverse viewpoints.
My Final Thoughts
I did enjoy this class, because it helped me to think on my feet and to consider every ethical code or principle that could be applied to situations. I enjoyed learning about case studies, because the class discussions we had regarding them helped me to better support my opinion or to better understand someone else’s. Additionally, I believe that I became a more confident person. Now, if I take a stance on an issue, I do not make a blanket statement, but I make sure that I have the proof to support my stance. Ethics not only help people be decent and honest, but most importantly journalists with integrity.
References
Barry, D., Barstow, D., Glater J.D., Liptak, A., Steinberg, J., Delaquérière, A., Wilder, C. (2003, May 11). Correcting the record; Times reporter who resigned leaves long trail of deception. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/11/us/correcting-the-record-times-reporter- who- resigned-leaves-long-trail-of-deception.html
Foreman, G. (2016). The ethical Journalist: making responsible decisions in the digital age (pp. 39, 42, 47). Hoboken: Wiley.
Woods, Keith. (2002, August 25). Unabomber case holds lessons for all journalists. Poynter.
https://www.poynter.org/archive/2002/unabomber-case-holds-lessons-for-all-journalists /