Moral Panics and Consumption

Moral Panic: an instance of public anxiety or alarm in response to a problem regarded as threatening the moral standards of society.

Oxford Dictionary

According to Buckingham, “the recent wave of concern around childhood obesity” has reached a new wave of ‘moral panic’ (Buckingham, 2004, p. 105). I know that throughout my adult life, I’ve constantly heard about the new epidemic of childhood obesity. According to Buckingham, there are “Alarming accounts of children ‘dying’ from obesity, of obesity as the new ‘Black Death’ (Buckingham, 2004. P. 105). According to Buckingham, Childhood Obesity is another ‘moral panic’ that makes parents feel guilty and individual children feel bad about their appearance, which leads to an increase in eating disorders. Buckingham also writes that the insurance, pharmaceutical, food, and diet industries all help push the narrative that children are overweight, which politicizes the ‘moral panic.’  If there is money to be made by pushing the obesity epidemic, then does it call in to doubt the actual problem?

According to the CDC, Childhood obesity is a problem and lists the following statistics:

Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States

Childhood obesity is a serious problem in the United States, putting children and adolescents at risk for poor health. Obesity prevalence among children and adolescents is still too high.

For children and adolescents aged 2-19 years in 2017-20201:

The prevalence of obesity was 19.7% and affected about 14.7 million children and adolescents.

Obesity prevalence was 12.7% among 2- to 5-year-olds, 20.7% among 6- to 11-year-olds, and 22.2% among 12- to 19-year-olds. Childhood obesity is also more common among certain populations.

Obesity prevalence was 26.2% among Hispanic children, 24.8% among non-Hispanic Black children, 16.6% among non-Hispanic White children, and 9.0% among non-Hispanic Asian children. (https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html)

According to NPR, parents are seeking out more medical treatment to include drugs and surgeries to help their children combat childhood obesity. Other parents believe society needs to stop holding children to a standard that values thinness.  Buckingham also mentions how BMI is not a scientific way to measure obesity, but it’s the standard used by the CDC and most other medical institutes. Furthermore, Buckingham mentions how preferred body standards have changed since past beauty standards valued heavier bodies. Do you think society has commercialized obesity to push medications, beauty products, diet products, and certain foods? Or do you think childhood obesity is the epidemic the medical community says it is?

https://mypositiveparenting.org/2016/11/23/fighting-childhood-obesity-a-clarion-call/

Below is a podcast by Dr. Susan Linn, a psychologist and expert on how technology, media, and commercial marketing make an impact on children. She’s also an expert on creative play, a director of the children’s advocacy group called Fairplay (they advocate for commercial-free childhoods) and a lecturer at Harvard Medical School. Linn joined Hilary Wilkinson on her podcast called “Healthy Screen Habits” as Linn was promoting her 2022 book Who’s Raising the Kids? Big Tech, Big Business, and The Lives of Children.

The full link to the interview can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttLZHa0dL48

Below are a few quotes from the podcast, highlighted for discussion. 

  • 6:32 = “advertising to children and the creation of toys to market on television started in the 1980s and escalated even more in the 1990s…so we went from television and then there were videos and then there was the digital, you know, revolution, basically and all of a sudden kids were just being bombarded” Linn says this bombardment was all of a sudden. How do you think this impacted the extent to which children were/are impacted by consumerism? 
  • 21:13 = “tech companies are quick to infer that protection of children should be placed on parents, not companies” Do you believe that companies and businesses have some shared responsibility in protecting children? In guarding them against consumerism?
  • 22:16=  “We’re at a time in the United States where books are being banned, teachers and librarians are being censored, but kids can go to Alexa or to Google Search and ask anything and the answers that they get are not necessarily accurate information and in fact can be very destructive disinformation and incredible biased. I mean the way responses are ranked might have to do with popularity, but it could have to do with with how much money companies are spending to get their products or websites high up in the search engine”  Do you see a connection between the crusade of book banning in some states/districts and children’s consumerism? 

Moral Panic and Childhood:

“The concept of moral panic was first developed in the United Kingdom in the early 1960s, principally by Stan Cohen, initially for the purpose of analyzing the definition of and social reaction to youth subcultures as a social problem. Cohen provided a “processual” model of how any new social problem would develop: who would promote it and why, whose support they would need for their definition to take hold, and the often-crucial role played by the mass media and institutions of social control. In the early 1990s, Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda produced an “attributional” model that placed more emphasis on strict definition than cultural processes. The two models have subsequently been applied to a range of putative social problems which now can be recognized as falling into five principal clusters: street crime, drug and alcohol consumption, immigration, child abuse (including pedophilia), and media technologies. Most studies have been conducted in Anglophone and European countries, but gradually, the concept is increasing its geographical reach. As a consequence, we now know a good deal about how and why social problems come to be constructed as moral panics in democratic societies” (Critcher, 2017).

Moral panic amongst children can be seen in a variety of forms. This can be social anxiety, child abuse, and other forms of psychological, criminal, and deviate behaviors. Do you believe enough is being done to understand and preserve children’s mental health or are we facing a greater form of moral panic that is going unnoticed?

Resources

  • https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/05/16/1169699513/wegovy-weight-loss-drugs-kids-bariatric-surgery
    https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html)
    https://mypositiveparenting.org/2016/11/23/fighting-childhood-obesity-a-clarion-call/
  • Who’s Raising the Kids? – Big Tech, Big Business and the Lives of Children //
  • Susan Linn, Ed.D. www.youtube.com, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttLZHa0dL48. Accessed 22 Feb. 2024.
  • David Buckingham’s The Material Child
  • Critcher, C. (2017). “Criminology and Criminal Justice: Moral Panics”. https://oxfordre.com/criminology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-155. Oxford Research Encyclopedias.

Moral Panics and Halloween Candy

Buckingham frames moral panics in regards to childhood obesity in an interesting fashion, noting that a ‘moral panic’ “tends to imply that it is merely an irrational phenomena” (107). One of the most famous moral panics over the last half century came in the 1980s, when legends began to spread about razors and drugs in Halloween candy. Listed below is a YouTube video covering these events.

This is a form of what legend and rumor scholars identify as “ostension,” which is the acting out of a legend. Rumors spread about people poisoning candies, or tampering with them, and in turn adults changed their Halloween trick-or-treating habits because of them.

But like Buckingham noted in regards to moral panics, these legends were wildly inflated and not happening nearly to the extent they were being reported. Still, there is something to be said about the intersections between consumption, childhood obesity, and ‘moral panics’ in the infamous 1980s Halloween candy legends.

Moral Panic and Online Safety

As we explore the theories of childhood and their relationship to moral panic, we’re engaging in conversations and dialogue about the importance of online safety and the threats that social media pose to our children. We use the internet for various things, from connecting with others globally to buying our necessities. Social media and the internet offer endless possibilities, both positive and negative. With the digital age and the adaptation of innovation, there has been an uprising in advocacy and programs to protect children online.

In the video above, Donna Rice, an Internet safety expert, shares her experience with exploitation and how it has led her to advocate for others, especially children, in online spaces.

In the book “The Material Child: Growing Up in Consumer Culture,” David Buckingham delves into this topic in depth in Chapter 1, titled “Exploited or Empowered.”

7 thoughts on “Moral Panics and Consumption

  1. This gallery reminds me of the video we watched near the start of the semester “What’s Happened to Childhood” where Hugh Cunningham said something to the effect of – we perceive consumerism in childhood as vile, but consumerism is the very heart of capitalism and is essential to the functioning of the Western adult world.

    Why are we surprised by the development of young consumers? In all aspects of child development, we are preparing children to function within society as independent adults. But, somehow, it seems almost immoral for them to be taught how to be consumers in our consumer society?

    If it’s unnatural and bad to be a consumer, why are all of us adults being consumers?

    This fascinates be because this thing that seems so grotesque for children is central to our everyday adult life, and unlike some aspects of adulthood that are not appropriate for the lifecycle stage of children, consuming goods and services is not an age-specific activity. Why do we have such a strong, almost gut reaction to this?

  2. I like your question, “If there is money to be made by pushing the obesity epidemic, then does it call into doubt the actual problem?” I wondered about this as I read Buckingham as well. Even if I don’t have real statistics, I can see that many people, including children, are obese. The reasonable focus should be on healthy bodies. I believe there is an obesity problem and it is getting worse due, in part, to the sedentary entertainment lifestyle many people have–something that has expanded dramatically since 2011 when Buckingham wrote his book.

  3. You did great on your exhibit!

    I like the picture you included in your exhibit “The Vicious Cycle of Childhood Obesity.” The part that sticks with me is the image of the little girl reading with the caption “All study; no action.” We put such a heavy emphasis on academics because they are really important for our future, but so is taking care of our bodies. Thinking back on my adventure, the time when I have gained the most weight has been when I am the busiest. I was not actively busy, just work busy. This is a great reminder that we have to teach our kids to make time for all important aspects of our self which includes our bodies.

  4. I like your question – “Do you believe that companies and businesses have some shared responsibility in protecting children?”
    It would be nice to think that company CEOs have a conscience and think things through before they advertise, but the reality is our society is very driven by money and companies instead think “what can bring in the highest profit?”

    1. Hey there Diane! I agree that corporate greed puts a great divide in society. Businesses have shown time and time again that money matters the most. It truly is unfortunate.

  5. Hi Lizzie, Jack, Khadyajah, Carrie, and Julia! I appreciate your focus on this important topic of moral panics and the variety of ideas, questions, and resources you provided.

    I want to mention the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) in the United Kingdom has a piece published on January 26, 2024, that points to impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic leading to an increase in children’s obesity levels. I wasn’t surprised at all by the “increases in screen time,” and I’m intrigued by “changes in sleep schedules.” I can imagine increased screen time, especially shortly before bed, is making a big difference in sleep quality and well-being.

    Source: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/rise-in-childhood-obesity-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-could-lead-to-lifelong-health-consequences/35330

    I wasn’t already familiar with Susan Linn’s work and am glad to know about it. Just to have this in our discussion, here’s a link to the “About” page on her website. I love her involvement in several episodes of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood.

    Donna Rice Hughes’s TEDx Talk is powerful. She has tremendous courage as a survivor working to improve internet safety for children and youths. In case anyone would like to check this out, here’s a link to the resources page on the Enough Is Enough website:

    https://enough.org/resource_center

    Thanks for your well-researched and thought-provoking exhibit!

  6. Hi Team!
    You did a great job on this side exhibit. I love the focus on moral panics, particularly as they relate to childhood obesity. This question stood out for me:

    “If there is money to be made by pushing the obesity epidemic, then does it call in to doubt the actual problem?”

    I have to wonder if diet culture is being pushed as early as possible. Push it early, and it gets normalized from the very beginning, right? I know you essentially made the same point, or similar, here, but it makes you think. I feel a little “conspiracy theorist” thinking this, but capitalism is a strong force in the US. So, to answer the question, yes, it calls the problem into doubt. BMI is still being used to calculate whether or not a person is overweight but it was never designed for that to begin with. It was supposed to be a way to estimate a large population’s weight versus height, not used for individuals. A person’s weight has such nuance that a chart can’t predict it. It just can’t. How many children are being called “overweight” or “obese” that really shouldn’t be?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *