Finding inspiration

Now that I’ve decided that I want to start painting again, using a few different mediums but starting with watercolour,  I have to find something to paint. My goal is to find my own art style as the easiest way to do that, I’ve found, it to explore a bunch of different styles. 

The Swing, by Fragonard, a good example of Idealism in art

Like many other people in the height of quarantine, I spent a lot of time in my head, imagining my ideal life. Although escapism probably (definitely) isn’t the healthiest pastime, it certainly helped me identify the types of environments I enjoy the most. Because I spent an unreasonable amount of time daydreaming about rolling fields and old, ivy-covered castles, I think the best thing for me to paint right now, the first subject of my exploration, should be landscapes. 

 

Some of the most famous landscapes and landscape artists are impressionists, whose bright colours and defined brush strokes produced some of the most recognisable paintings of the 19th century. Artists like Monet and Renoir created lively scenes with delicate natural details. Although I do love the impressionist style, and I appreciate the impact they had on landscape painting, getting their signature “clean from a distance, but messy up close” look is impactful with oil, but not ideal with watercolour (although I might consider this as part of my inspiration later, with gouache).

Impressionist painting by Debi Riley

The next style I stumbled upon, in my impressive google search “watercolour artists,” was cubism and futurism, in the artist John Marin’s work. Now cubism is a movement that I, ever uneducated, solely associate with Picasso. As it turns out, cubism, a style defined by its cube-forming abstraction of a subject, was an inter-discipline movement that was utilised by many artists, from architects to authors.

Lower Manhattan by John Marin, from MoMA

Now, I can’t say I particularly relate, or even like, cubism, but I am fascinated by some of Marin’s work, mainly “Pertaining to Stonington Harbor, Maine” (for copyright reasons, this painting can’t be downloaded) which has the strong, defined, brushstrokes that I found attractive in the impressionists, combined with a dry colour that forces the eye around the page.

(Also, his linework is just spectacular, like, wow) 

But, I think my absolute favourite piece, which honestly looks nothing like any of the rest, is “Village Scene” by Ted Kautzky. It’s exactly what you imagine when you’re talking about watercolour, a nice, fuzzy scene, with a distinct enough image that it’s memorable but ordinary enough that it could be anywhere, and somehow feeling familiar. This is what I want my art to do. Not just capture an image, but a feeling. The colours he uses are muted; they give all of his works a hazy kind of appearance. This might not be my go-to, I am a brash sculpture after all, but it really works for his subjects. 

Kautzky Village scene from watercolorpainting.org

I’m drawing inspiration from all of these pieces, despite their aggressive differences. However, I think, for my first piece at least, you’ll see a lot of Kautzky similarities. 

All the possible mediums

After having one too many art project inspired breakdowns and recognizing that I was about to experience life in a way I had never before in college, I decided that the way I was doing art was not satisfying me. I’m totally starting over, scrapping everything I learned (and everything I did) to get to that point and starting fresh. Now, I have a million different things to consider and hundreds of paths forward. In my mind, the first step in this project is deciding whether I want to work in two dimensions or three.

I know I’m going about this is a very scientific, maybe even algorithemic, way. Breaking down each element of art into categories and choosing a path like it’s a Choose your own Adventure novel. But I’ve found that there are so many different ways to make art that it’s impossible to try them all. So categorizing it is.

Nike from mymodernmet
Nike from mymodernmet

So, as I was saying, I really didn’t enjoy 3D art as much as I had been anticipating. Building things, getting m hands dirty, was always fun, but I never had a connect to the end product. This time, I’m going 2D.

There are many different 2D art mediums, some of them familiar, like drawing and painting, and some, like Print making and digital art that are so specialized and removed that they are almost impossible to get into without guidance. And for whatever reason, I’ve decided to go this alone, so those are out. Drawing is always fun, and can lead to positive results, however, I figure drawing is something I’ve been studying for so long, in every art class, on every project, that it only feels like a means to an end. So, that leaves painting.

Messi mural from ESPN
Messi mural from ESPN

Now, I could always make this harder for myself, and decide that painting on a canvas in too limiting and I need the ~freedom~ to express myself, but that’s bound to get messy and for the sake of my roommate, I think I’m going to stick t more traditional methods. With that, murals and fresco painting are out. Additionally, for the sake of my roommate, I’m not going to use oils because they have a very powerful smell and take forever to dry. And I’m not going to use tempera because it’s very similar to acrylic paint, but dries matte and is thinner, meaning I’d have to use a lot more of it to achieve the same look.

And so, the final mediums that I will try for this exercise are: acrylic paint, your common childhood paint and what most people think of when you mention paint; watercolour, also a staple of the childhood art room, a dry paint that is delicate and useable when water is added; and gouache, watercolour’s older sister, it has the finish of acrylic and the forgiveness of watercolour.

 

A flowchart I made to help you visualize the process I used