http://stand.org/national/about
The group that I looked at is Stand for Children, an organization that aims to improve childhood education across the country.
The exigence that this website writes about is rather multifaceted, but the different parts rotate around one main theme: too many children across the country drop out of school or don’t get the educational opportunities that they need in order to succeed. Their audience lies in two different areas: the community and the government. This organization tries to strengthen schools at the local level by working with the everyday community member as well as teachers and parents. They also write that they work at both the state and federal level to get legislation passed which would strengthen our education system, changing policies at the source. Since so many factors affect education, multiple constraints are present. Social constraints such as poverty can impact students at the individual level and worsen their educational experience, while other more tangible constraints like low levels of funding from the government can prevent necessary reform from being passed. This seems to be why the organization is targeting both local and governmental audiences — in order to actually solve the overarching problem, both social and technical constraints must be overcome.
It seems to me like this organization hits on all four levels of stasis, but really addresses two levels in particular: values and actions. Facts and statistics are presented along the sidebar of the home page to outline why this issue matters, with statistics about dropout rates and test scores setting the scene. Definitions aren’t really present, but this also isn’t a super complex topic — I would expect most people are familiar with education. Moving onto the two heavy hitters, the value clearly displayed is that this group thinks childhood education is really important, and the actions they are taking to achieve that value include community interaction and legislative lobbying. These two levels make up the body of the website, with different pages describing what the organization stands for (values) and what the organization has done or will do in the future to achieve those values (actions). The relative volume of writing about action and values compared to facts and definitions make it clear where this organization’s priorities lie, but I think that’s fine — like I said above, there doesn’t need to be a lot of explanation on this topic because most people are familiar with education.