Wow! What a difference a few months can make! I went back and read my first few blog posts from this class and was amazed at what I first wrote and where my thinking is now. In one of the first posts we were asked to state the definition on mobile learning. Here’s what I wrote:
“I think learning with computers allows people to take ownership of their learning. I think that if the availability of the technology is there, integrating technology into the everyday classroom can benefit the students both academically and socially. However, I think that learning with computers needs to be done intentionally and students need to be given scaffolded lessons so they know how to utilize the technology to its fullest potential.”
I definitely still see the importance of integrating technology into learning and (as long as the technology is available) making sure that it is being utilized as frequently as possible is important to students’ growth and development both academically and socially. What I disagree with is the part I wrote about lessons needing to be intentional and scaffolded. While I do think that some basic structures need to be explicitly taught, I have realized the importance of informal learning and think that students should be free to use their devices and choose which apps and functions they use for their own individualized learning.
It was also fun to see that one of the first articles I read in this class was “BYOD” an article that discussed the use of the Bring Your Own Device policy, the same policy that I will be basing my final project on. I think that this policy is crucial in the inner city where technology is difficult to come by in schools. As Emery points out in his article, “Factors for Consideration When Developing a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Strategy in Higher Education” the average person has 3 or more mobile devices. This means that if students were allowed to bring in at least one of their mobile devices to school it would decrease the number of devices that are needed for a classroom to do activities online.
I also read another article by Kong Cheung that explored the use of the BYOD in different school environments. One thing I learned from this article is the idea of using Edmodo in class with my students as a way to communicate both in and out of school. If students used the BYOD process they would potentially have a mobile device with them at all times which would then allow them to access this information whenever they wanted.
The third article I read was about developing a creative framework for BYOD. The authors, Thomas Cochrane et al. state, “A review of the literature indicates that there are yet few well-developed theoretical frameworks for supporting creative pedagogies via BYOD.” The article then goes on to examine and develop some creative frameworks such as using mobile devices to make movies in class or participate in augmented realities. Students can interact with a variety of different technology through the use of their mobile devices and have them tap into those different types of learning will make them deeper, more invested learners.
Overall, it’s been fun to see myself learn and evolve as I read more articles and do more research into mobile learning. Technology has been something I have been leery of using because of the lack of it in my classroom but also because I’m not super comfortable using it all the time. This course has taught me that it’s okay to learn and experiment with new apps and programs and that if necessary, students can become the teachers and I can use my lack of technological knowledge to let them teach me things.
Cheung, K. (2014, January 14). BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE FOR REFLECTIVE ENGAGEMENT OF LEARNERS IN DIGITAL CLASSROOM. Retrieved July 24, 2015.
Cochrane, T. (2014). Riding the wave of BYOD: Developing a framework for creative pedagogies. Retrieved July 23, 2015.
Emery, S. (2012, July 1). Factors for Consideration when Developing a Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Strategy in Higher Education. Retrieved July 24, 2015.