The final version of On the ‘Considered Analysis’ of Collecting DNA Before Conviction, previously mentioned, is now published in UCLA Law Review Discourse, Vol. 60, 2013, pp. 104-126. It is available on the review’s website or from SSRN.
A short essay on the relative insignificance of chimerism as a source of error in forensic DNA testing is in print: Chimeric Criminals, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter 2013, pp. 1-9. It is available on the review’s website or from SSRN. Jeremy Gans has a thoughtful comment posted on Forensic Science, Statistics, and the Law.