Key findings
- Indiscriminate, generalised, and mass protest surveillance is unlawful.
- Information gathering activities which have the effect of collecting, processing, and retaining any amount of personal data about protesters – whether publicly available or not, and whether obtained by overt or covert means, must be considered an interference with the right to privacy and a form of surveillance
- The right to protest is protected before, during and after a protest – and protest surveillance conducted at any stage of a protest should be subjected to legal limits and safeguards.
- Both the right to privacy and the right to freedom of assembly under international human rights law can be used to restrain police powers to surveil protesters.
Privacy International. (2023, January 30). Restraining protest surveillance: When should surveillance of protesters become unlawful? https://privacyinternational.org/report/5029/restraining-protest-surveillance-when-should-surveillance-protesters-become-unlawful