I am interested in mobile learning for Higher Education. This level of education applies to a broader audience and affects all the audiences suggested. Mobile content is becoming somewhat of specialized approach with research guiding the way. Hsu (2012) displays how effective the students continue the exchange of information in a concise manner, called micro-blogging. The delivery and exchange or communication of the contextualized material was well received and encourage a level communication among students and or enhanced the social learning outside of the classroom. Could mobile learning be encouraged among faculty and student discourse with the faculty participation? This expanded participation could be achieved with the instantaneous connections and resources available found in a mobile device.
Now, I ask this question because the resources and content available on a mobile device does not guarantee learning to occur. Arora (2010) makes many valid points about cultural views on learning and the idea of “wrong kinds of knowledge and teaching” (pg 697). She notes the issue with HiWEL providing technology without supervision or planned curriculum. To clarify, the technology provided in this paper was not mobile, but unsurpervised and provided in rural areas. The issue here is providing digitized information did not result in equitable learning gains. So, providing a mobile device with access to content does not allow someone to learn useful information for the formal educational environments with which we navigate in. The environment or delivery of the content is not the issue. The content structure and the objective of the learning situation is critical. Furthermore, the environments between formal and informal learning are now in flux with mobile technology and with the various mediums with which the content is delivered. Even school administrator, Todd Curtis, realizes the necessity to augment and redefine the learning experience for young students with the introduction of iPads into schools. As adult learners, this idea may still apply. In the webinar Garcia, a school teacher involved in implementing mobile learning, hosts and the other participates all seemed to agree mobile technology seems to call for a degree of creative latitude for the young students. The participants give many practical solutions and examples of curriculum combined with iPads throughout the webinar. Their practical experience makes them unique experts with mobile technology in a formal enviroment.
In the Martin (2012) paper, there is emphasis on chunked information being delivered. This was presented as a usability issue. But laptops and tablets have lots of visual realestate on the screens. So why is the way content delivered important? Whether one develops content for a mobile smart phone or a tablet, people still favor chunks of organized information to be delivered on the screen. The screenshots of the mobile module clearly show each pane as having one subject and building upon another; introduction, objective, content pages, practice and finally feedback (pg.50, Martin). The micro-blogging could be viewed as evidence for concise delivery of information in an informal way. If the message is unclear in one micro-blog message, a request to define the message follows. Then the preceding messages build upon each other for a clear communication of information. The users of mobile devices are requesting the chunking of information effectively, informally. The development of content is necessary to appease the students. (Hsu 2012)
The chunking of content is ideal for students to disperse what they learn over time. Sharples emphasizes this by bulleting that “learning dispersed over time: learning is a cumulative process involving connections and reinforcement amongst a variety of learning experiences (Dierking, Falk, Rennie, Anderson, & Ellenbogen, 2003) across formal and informal learning contexts” (pg 235). Highlighting this as a component of mobile learning reveals the benefit of mobile learning and the constraints mobile devices place on the delivery of information. Furthermore, the ability to use the physical space in addition to the mobile device and connect the two to build an experience is only enhanced by structured and concise related content. One must sort the content on the mobile device and the environment with which the content is applicable, if applicable at all. (Sharples, 2009, pg 235)
Basically, what I am arguing is just giving mobile devices is not enough to guarantee learning to occur. The use of a facilitator or teacher and well-structured and developed content is necessary for any form of instruction to be delivered with mobile devices. The first step to effective mobile learning is to deliver the information in a well-thought out manner that is conducive to the goals and objectives of what is being taught. Instructional designers and teachers who creatively develop curriculum around available applications, tools, and mobile devices being used do this.
Citation
Arora, P. (2010). Hope-in-the-wall?a digital promise for free learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 689-702.
Garcia, A. (Producer). (2013, August 07). Planning For Effective Teaching & Learning with Mobile Devices [Web Video]. Retrieved from http://youtu.be/QNTTAuSEU04
Hsu, Y. C., & Ching, Y. H. (2012). Mobile microblogging: Using Twitter and mobile devices in an online course to promote learning in authentic contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13 (4), 211-227. Available online: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1222/2313.
Martin, F., Pastore, R., & Snider, J. (2012). Developing mobile based instruction. TechTrends, 56 (5), 46-51.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233-249). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7