Tag Archives: education

My Proposed High School Required Reading List

by Michael J. Cawley IV

Earlier this semester, I posted this post about required reading in school, mainly high school, and the Western Literary Canon. The basic gist of the post is that high school required reading lists used to be dominated by the Western Literary Canon, but due to concerns about diversity and complaints that students were only reading books by “dead white men,” high school reading lists now feature much more contemporary, diverse literature, often at the cost of the Western Literary Canon. I argued that this is depriving many high school students of a large and important part of our cultural heritage and of the important skill of cultural literacy, and I advocated for a restoration of the Western Literary Canon to high school required reading lists.

I was just thinking, however, about why we need to keep having this debate anyway. What if there was a compromise, where high school required reading lists were still mostly taken from the Western Literary Canon, but accounted for diversity by including works by minorities and women both within and outside of the Canon, and including some more modern literature? I think this would be a great idea, so I decided to come up with my own proposal for a high school required reading list. This list is meant to span all four years of high school, so it contains thirty books, one for every 1.2 months (I know, that’s a little impractical, but these are guidelines assuming the most efficient of reading speeds). The books are in no order and do not correspond to any particular year of high school. Each book is accompanied by a brief explanation of its inclusion on the list.

So, without further ado, here is my proposed high school reading list:

  1. Hamlet by William Shakespeare:  Shakespeare’s greatest play and the quintessential Shakespearean tragedy has had unmeasurable influence on our culture, literature, and art, so it is the perfect start to this list.
  2. Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare:  The quintessential tragic romance is just as influential as Hamlet and even more relatable for teens.
  3. Macbeth by William Shakespeare:  This iconic tragedy about power, evil, regicide, and guilt is influential and powerful.
  4. Othello by William Shakespeare:  Not only is this a masterful tragedy of jealousy and paranoia with one of the most evil villains ever conceived, it also dealt with racial issues in a time when such themes were beyond rare in literature.
  5. A Midsummer Night’s Dream by William Shakespeare:  This delightful comedy shows the lighter side of Shakespeare and is one of his more fantasy-based plays, showcasing inspiration from Greek mythology.
  6. Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare:  A more realistic comedy, this wonderful play offers a witty, relatable, and accurate depiction of love and relationships.
  7. The Epic of Gilgamesh by Unknown Author:  Considered the first great work of literature, this epic poem was written in ancient Mesopotamia.
  8. The Odyssey by Homer:  The quintessential Ancient Greek epic is the perfect introduction to Ancient Greek literature and mythology, and it is a thrilling read as well.
  9. Oedipus Rex by Sophocles:  The quintessential Greek tragedy that named a psychological complex (Possibly a misnomer considering the accidental nature of the tragic act).
  10. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens:  One of Dickens’ greatest works, this Victorian novel is a great introduction to the French Revolution and the surrounding social turmoil.
  11. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain:  A frequent candidate for the “Great American Novel,” this classic is witty, hilarious, and exciting, and it offers commentary on race and slavery in the 1800s in America.
  12. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald:  Another frequent candidate for the “Great American Novel,” this Jazz Age masterpiece is a tragedy exploring themes of unrequited love, obsession, and the American Dream that recently made its way back into popular culture with a major motion picture starring Leonardo DiCaprio.
  13. The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway:  Hemingway was an American literary master and a contemporary and friend of Fitzgerald. This is one of his greatest works, dealing with perseverance, old age, and humanity’s struggle with nature.
  14. Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë:  A quintessential Victorian romance and coming of age novel which deals with, among other things, gender roles in Victorian England.
  15. Lord of the Flies by William Golding:  A high school staple about the conflict between nature and civilization and the dark side of human nature.
  16. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad:  This bleak novella shows the horrors of colonialism in Africa from a European perspective. It loosely inspired Francis Ford Coppola’s classic film, Apocalypse Now.
  17. Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe:  This novel shows the horrors of colonialism in Africa from an African perspective and is something of a modern Greek tragedy set in Nigeria.
  18. Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes:  This classic Spanish novel has greatly influenced art, culture, and literature since it was published, and it is the best-selling novel of all time.
  19. The Art of War by Sun Tzu:  This Chinese classic may be the most influential book on war strategy ever written.
  20. The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith:  This classic Scottish work is an essential for understanding economics and is basically the founding text of capitalism.
  21. The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels:  This German text is the founding text of communism and the opposing viewpoint to The Wealth of Nations.
  22. Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky:  Long but surprisingly entertaining, this is one of Dostoyevsky’s greatest works and a classic of Russian literature.
  23. Night by Elie Wiesel:  A bleak and heartbreaking memoir of the horrors of the Holocaust.
  24. The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank:  Another heartbreaking memoir of the Holocaust.
  25. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley:  A classic of Gothic horror, this is also considered by many to be the first science fiction novel.
  26. Dracula by Bram Stoker:  The other essential Gothic horror classic, the greatest vampire story ever told is genuinely scary.
  27. 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne:  Verne is considered by many to be the father of science fiction, and this may be his most iconic work.
  28. The Time Machine by H. G. Wells:  One of the greatest works of Wells, without whom science fiction would be nowhere near where it is today, this novella offers interesting commentary on class relationships and evolution.
  29. The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien:  Much better than the film trilogy, this classic and its sequel, The Lord of the Rings, form the foundation of modern fantasy literature.
  30. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass:  The inspiring true story of a man’s journey from slavery to freedom to becoming one of the greatest abolitionist leaders.

 

Sources:

http://meghanward.com/blog/2013/05/22/the-literary-canon-what-books-should-be-required-reading/

The Case For School Vouchers

by Michael J. Cawley IV

The following post is a response to this post by Corey Capooci.

The school voucher debate is one of the most controversial and frequently discussed and debated subtopics under the larger topic of education reform in general. It is an issue that many people on both sides of the debate are very passionate and opinionated about. While I am not particularly passionate or opinionated about this topic, I do think that school vouchers would be a good idea for a number of reasons.

Before we go on, it would be a good idea for me to define school vouchers for those of you who are unfamiliar with them. According to Dictionary.com, a school voucher is “a government cash grant or tax credit for parents, equal to all or part of the cost of educating their child at an elementary or secondary school of their choice” (Dictionary.com). You may have also heard the concept of school vouchers referred to as “school choice.”

Basically, in states that have implemented school voucher programs (twelve states and the District of Columbia), unlike most states where public school is paid for by the government and private school is paid for by parents with tuition, some to all students in the state receive an equal, set amount of money from the government to attend any school of their choosing, public or private. Proponents of these systems argue that they prevent students from being forced to attend sub-par schools and promote competition which will improve quality of education.

There is much opposition to school vouchers, however. Opponents of school voucher systems argue that they take away necessary funding from public schools, that they are unfair and promote inequality, and that they violate the separation of church and state because vouchers can be used for religious schools.

I would counter the argument that school voucher systems take away necessary funding from public schools by arguing that it is unfair that only some schools are funded by the government. This takes away parents’ freedom of choice for their children’s education, an extremely important aspect of their lives which they deserve a greater say in. Also, many public schools are sub-par, but children are forced to attend them because of where they live.

I would counter the argument that school voucher systems are unfair and promote inequality with basically these same counterarguments. In my opinion, it is unfair that only some schools are funded by the government, which is making one of the most important decisions in children’s lives, the decision of which school they should go to, a decision so important that parents should have most of the say in it. I also find it unfair that many children are forced to attend sub-par schools because of where they live, a condition they cannot control, and which their parents often cannot control due to financial burden. It would be more fair if parents had the freedom to choose where their children receive their education.

I would counter the argument that school voucher systems violate the separation of church and state because vouchers can be used for religious schools by pointing out that under school voucher systems, schools sponsored by all religions as well as secular schools have equal opportunity to receive voucher money from students. It would be the parents of the students, not the government, making the decision as to which religion, if any, the school they send their children to will be sponsored by. No one religion or group of religions would be receiving more favorable treatment from the government, and church and state would remain rightfully separate.

In addition, another advantage of school voucher systems in that they do not, as opponents claim and imply, disadvantage public schools, but rather improve their performance. According to the Friedman Foundation, a 2009 study conducted by the University of Arkansas, a 2011 study conducted by the Universities of Arkansas and Colorado, and another 2011 study conducted by Northwestern University have all shown with reliable data that school voucher systems in Milwaukee and Florida actually improve the performance of public schools in the area through promotion of competition, which better motivates public and private schools to succeed.

I believe that a national school voucher system would be preferable to our current public school system because it would promote competition, which would motivate better school performance, and it would give parents greater freedom of choice in their children’s education.

 

Sources:

https://sites.psu.edu/educationreform/2015/04/20/school-vouchers/

http://www.econedlink.org/lessons/index.php?lid=185&type=student

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/school+voucher

http://www.edchoice.org/getattachment/School-Choice/School-Choice-FAQs/How-does-school-choice-affect-public-schools.pdf

The Importance of the Humanities in a College Education

by Michael J. Cawley IV

For this week’s post, I will diverge slightly from my usual topics of required reading and public schooling vs. private schooling vs. homeschooling to discuss the recent plight of the humanities and their continued importance for a college education.

First of all, the humanities are defined as academic disciplines focused on humans and human culture. They include languages, linguistics, literature, the arts, philosophy, religion, music, law, history, and archaeology. For many years, it used to be that the humanities were some of the most consistently popular areas of study in American colleges and universities. In recent years, however, the humanities have been on a steady decline in American colleges and universities. There are multiple reasons for this decline, but most of them fall under the general reason that the humanities are being de-emphasized in order to place more focus on the STEM fields; that is, the science, technology, engineering and math fields.

The reason for colleges and universities emphasizing the STEM fields over the humanities is that overall, for a number of reasons, the STEM fields are regarded as more important, serious lines of study than the humanities. There is much more obvious practical, “real-world” application for the STEM fields. We use math and science frequently to solve problems in our daily lives a good deal more than we use literature or music. Also, the job market for STEM fields is much more lucrative and high-paying than that for the humanities. An engineer or a scientist certainly makes a good deal more money every year than your average struggling writer or “starving artist.” Because of this perceived superiority of the STEM fields, STEM programs in colleges and universities receive much more funding from the federal government than programs in the humanities do. As a result of this, colleges and universities often downsize their humanities departments in favor of increased funding and resources for their STEM departments, in order to receive more government funding. This has only increased with the recent economic recession, which has made frugality and careful spending all the more important. As a result of all this, the number of college and university students in America who choose humanities majors has decreased greatly in favor of STEM majors. Statistically, 7 percent of American college and university students are in humanities majors currently, compared to 14 percent in 1970.

The question you may well be asking right now is, why does this all matter? If STEM fields are more practical and useful and create more jobs, do we even need the humanities? The answer to this is that there are in fact many reasons why the humanities are essential to a college education. In fact, they can even serve practical purposes and have economic benefits.

The humanities teach important thinking and reasoning skills, including creative thinking, critical thinking, reasoning, good question asking, logic, skeptical weighing of evidence, and insight. The humanities also teach about the world we live in and about our own culture as well as all the other cultures of the world, and their values and contributions to the world. Foreign languages are a part of the humanities, and they provide the most crucial tool to communicating with people of other cultures and gaining appreciation for the differences between people. Philosophy and ethics are part of the humanities, and they keep us asking the important questions that keep us from crossing moral lines in politics, science, and life in general. Law and politics are connected to the humanities, and these are crucial to changing laws and the world. The humanities help to sustain democracy by teaching us to be informed citizens. The knowledge of other civilizations the humanities give us allow us to better deal and trade with other countries, and this combined with the skills in logic and critical reasoning offered by the humanities can help us to make more intelligent and thoughtful economic decisions.

The humanities have seen a gradual but constant decline in American colleges and universities in recent years. This is because they are not seen as being as worthy of attention as STEM fields; that is, science, technology, engineering, and math fields, because they are not as practical and do not offer as many job opportunities. However, the humanities have other tremendously valuable benefits that put them at the same value as STEM fields. Specifically, the humanities help us to understand human cultures, ethics, and critical thinking, among other crucial disciplines. To conclude, the humanities are just as important to a well-rounded education as the STEM fields and should be treated as such.

 

Sources:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/education/as-interest-fades-in-the-humanities-colleges-worry.html?_r=0

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/mar/29/war-against-humanities-at-britains-universities

http://www.brown.edu/about/administration/president/NHA-remarks

http://curt-rice.com/2014/02/25/here-are-9-reasons-why-humanities-matter-whats-your-number-10/

http://shc.stanford.edu/why-do-humanities-matter

Required Reading and the Literary Canon: An Introduction

by Michael J. Cawley IV

 

In addition to the debate over public schooling versus private schooling versus homeschooling, the other main topic which I will be writing blog posts on this semester is the debate over required reading in school and whether or not it is necessary, and what books and types of books should be required reading for students. This topic is typically mainly centered around high school English classes, but it can easily apply to English classes in elementary school, middle school, and college as well.

Traditionally, students in every stage of school are required to read a number of fiction books throughout the academic year. They analyze their themes, writing styles, diction, and so forth, and sometimes connect them to a historical context by examining the life of the author and the context in time and place of his or her works. Historically, the lists of books to read from school to school have been largely similar to one another, borrowing from a vast and ambiguously defined reservoir of literature known by different people as either the American Literary Canon or the Western Literary Canon. While this canon is ambiguously defined, there are many authors whose works are universally acknowledged to be part of it. These include Homer, Sophocles, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, John Milton, Geoffrey Chaucer, William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, and F. Scott Fitzgerald, to name a few. These authors were all unique, and the works of each one are vastly different from the works of every other. They all have one thing in common, however. They are all, to cite a popular cliche, “dead white men.”

Now, the claim that the authors of the Western Literary Canon are all “dead white men” can actually be easily debunked, since a number of them, including Jane Austen, the Brontës, and Mary Shelley, were in fact women, and there are even non-white people to be found among their ranks, such as Alexandre Dumas, pére, who had an African mother and gave us The Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo. Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that the majority of the writers in the Western Literary Canon are “dead white men,” the majority being from Europe with most of the rest being from the United States, and this has not sat well with many academics in our modern, diversity-valuing age. So, beginning in the 1960s, a backlash against the Western Literary Canon began in academia, with professors beginning to replace many of the works of “dead white men” with more modern works written by minorities and women. Despite these changes, complaints about too much required reading written by “dead white men” have persisted to the present day. However, if you look a little closer, the required reading problem has actually changed in many situations.

For example, the author of the blog post which I have cited as my main source for this post relates an anecdote that illustrates an interesting reversal of the required reading stereotype:

Last week, a member of the San Francisco Writers’ Grotto presented this dilemma: She had a Latino American high school student in one of her classes who didn’t feel he was prepared for college because he felt that his high school reading list was dominated by Latino and African American writers and that he had missed out on reading many of the works of other writers of the American Literary Canon. (Ward)

Ironically, the push to downplay the writers of the Western Literary Canon has resulted in modern, minority writers dominating the required reading lists in many schools, replacing many to all of the writers of the Western Literary Canon. You may now be wondering why this matters, and whether writers of the Western Literary Canon or modern, minority writers are preferable for required reading. In answer to this, experience has shown many benefits and advantages to writers of the Western Literary Canon being predominant on required reading lists.

The Western Literary Canon is still essential for required reading in school because of how it has pervaded all aspects of our culture. Countless phrases and terms we use every day, such as “Trojan Horse,” “Sisyphean,” “star-crossed lovers,” and “Dickensian,” came from the Western Literary Canon. Modern storytellers of all mediums still constantly borrow storylines and character types from Shakespeare, Homer, and Dickens. The Western Literary Canon is such an essential cornerstone of our culture that we cannot afford to disregard it altogether in schools. While diversity should be present on required reading lists, the majority of required books should, in my opinion, come from the Western Literary Canon.

 

Sources:

http://meghanward.com/blog/2013/05/22/the-literary-canon-what-books-should-be-required-reading/

Homeschooling: Pros, Cons, and Facts

by Michael J. Cawley IV

 

One of the main topics which I will be writing blog posts on is the debate over whether public schooling, homeschooling, or private schooling is the most beneficial to students, and whether or not public policy should be reformed in regards to which type of education is most promoted. To that end, the goal of this first post shall be to provide a preliminary overview of the concept of homeschooling, its advantages and disadvantages, useful facts and statistics pertaining to it, and common myths associated with it.

The concept of homeschooling is a simple one. Basically, rather than send their children to a traditional public or private school to be educated, parents choose to educate their own children themselves at home. Homeschooling is older than many people think it is, as it has been recorded in the United States as early as the colonial times. However, homeschooling did not really take off until the familiar modern homeschooling movement, which began in the 1970s. Reasons why parents choose to homeschool their children vary widely, from the belief that they can provide a better education than public schools to safety concerns to the desire for a religion-based education. Over the years, Americans have gradually become more and more accepting of homeschooling and willing to allow homeschooling to remain legal.

Studies have shown that there are many advantages to homeschooling. When compared to public school students, homeschooled students have equal or higher SAT scores on average as well as equal or higher scores on college admissions tests and state assessments. Homeschooled students have also scored notably higher on average than public school students on the Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale, which measures socialization skills. These results contradict one of the more popular and enduring myths about homeschooling.

There are a number of popular and enduring myths about homeschooling. One of the most popular and enduring is the idea that homeschoolers are isolated from society and socially inept because they do not get to interact with classmates on a daily basis. In fact, a 2006 study found that ninety-two percent of high school superintendents believe that homeschoolers are isolated from the real world and do not get enough socialization experience. However, many studies, including ones in which homeschoolers scored better than public school students on the Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale, have proven these myths wrong, proving instead that homeschoolers are just as socially competent as public school students, if not more so. Another popular and enduring myth is that homeschoolers grow up to be bad citizens. On the contrary, a 2006 study found that homeschool graduates are more likely than non-homeschool graduates to work for or contribute money to a political party or cause or to participate in a protest or a boycott, that seventy-one percent of homeschool graduates participate in community service, compared to thirty-seven percent of American adults, and that seventy-six percent of homeschool graduates aged eighteen to twenty-four vote regularly, as opposed to twenty-nine percent of overall Americans from the same age group. Another popular and enduring myth is that homeschoolers find it difficult to be admitted to college. This myth has been debunked by studies as well.

There have also been valid criticisms made of homeschooling which should be taken into account in this debate. Some say that homeschooling may increase the risk of unreported physical abuse. Also, the immunization requirements of public schools do not apply to homeschoolers, creating a possible health risk. However, less data has been found to support the accusations made against homeschooling than there has been found to support the advantages of homeschooling.

Overall, homeschooling, or the decision for parents to educate their own children rather than send them to traditional school, has many advantages as well as disadvantages. Studies have shown that homeschooled students have equal or higher SAT scores on average when compared to public school students as well as equal or higher scores on college admissions tests and state assessments. Studies have also shown that homeschooled students score considerably higher on average than public school students on the Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale, which measures socialization skills. This shows that, contrary to popular belief, homeschoolers are socially adjusted. However, there are those who will point out that homeschooling presents risks in regards to physical abuse and immunization. Overall, the benefits of homeschooling seem to outweigh the risks, but public schooling’s benefits to not seem to be substantially lower.

 

Sources:

https://www.nmu.edu/education/sites/DrupalEducation/files/UserFiles/Moreau_Kathi_MP.pdf

https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-214999687/the-harms-of-homeschooling