My Thoughts on Debunked Research

In the article, “Studies Show That Studies Are Bunk,” Andy Kessler has an exciting take on showing that a lot of studies are not trustworthy. He addresses that the two most dangerous words are “studies show,” which automatically makes people believe that these things are real.

The Writer’s Opinions

The opinions held by the writer seem pretty authentic because he has obviously dealt with a number of these “studies.” People sometimes just use that phrase to make their made-up argument sound plausible. One of the things Andy says is that studies are “sciencey” with a sense of false authenticity. We do not even know where these studies are coming from. They may just be grad students in a lab doing random experiments to classify them as “studies.” The famous phrase “don’t believe everything you read on the internet” comes to mind.

Image result for gpus and cpus

Source: maketecheasier

In The Essay

These findings are going to be important in paradigm shift research because there needs to be credibility in the sources that are used. Articles from the actual companies referenced will be used. Not to mention that a lot of the things that will be talked about do not need any research since they are known facts. The creation of hardware and company wars actually happened. For example, no one needs to be told that Intel and AMD had CPU wars in the twentieth century. An essay that overviews the long process of getting eSports around the world is hard to argue against.

When presenting research in the essay, there will need to be some factual basis for what happened. If the information is not accurate and has to be presented from a perspective, there will need to be some extra authentication to make sure that it is being told from an objective perspective. For example, if an employee says that Nvidia definitely won the GPU wars in the late twentieth century, then that would have to be backed up by statistics from the company compared to AMD. Sources are already going to be cited, so the reader should have no problems with the credibility of the essay.

Who Has Credibility?

When researchers are going to be used for the essay, a variant of a background check should be applied. Where has this person gone to school? What kind of degree do they have? How many years have they worked in their field? After credibility has been established, then they can make their way into the “Works Cited” page of the essay. Anyone should take research on the internet with a grain of salt because, literally, anyone can post with fake credentials, leading others to believe otherwise.

Leave a Reply