Category Archives: HigherEdFuture

PART IV: ARE DEV CAMPS A SIGN?

mRkGtzy.jpg

Note:  This article is from a series on change with strategic implications for higher education.

 

 

In “Dev Camps” I think I may have discovered higher education’s next-generation MOOC! 

MOOC’s have generated much discussion of late, offering free learning to tens of thousands of students at a time.  I was early to discuss MOOCs previously in “Part II:  Why a MOOC?”, and slow to dismiss MOOCS despite many encumbrances identified to include high attrition rates, learning assessment issues, academic integrity, viable business models, missing credit and accreditation, and placement. 

To be clear, it is not the encumbered MOOC itself that I saw as a major threat to higher education, but rather what MOOCs portend. 

By analogy, consider that in 1995 web pages were dismissed by many as nothing more than digital brochures, capable of producing little other value.  Shortly after, however, the rapid innovation and development accompanying technology disruption occurred, and ecommerce was born. 

Here I liken MOOCs to early web pages, and have thus been scouting for signs of next generation iterations.  Dev Camps could well be one of these signs.  These intense programming experiences offer a product traditionally associated with higher education, and deliver that product at a much lower price point and time frame.  Dev Camps show early promise to be successful, without burdens of accreditation, credit, or transcripts.  

Dev Camps have a few catches, although previous computer programming skill is not one.  Candidates must be willing to commit 1,000 hours in the nine-weeks to learning, leaving only 500 hours for “errata” (e.g., sleep).  The work expectation is 80-100 hours each week.  Class time alone is Monday through Friday from 9:00AM through 6:00PM.  Fees do not include room or board.  There are no age or nationality requirements, although less than 20% of the video-applications are accepted.  Dev Camps do not pretend to be a school, and as such are not accredited, and offer no credit.  They will, however, connect 90% of the students with high-paying employers.  So, in a nutshell, Dev Camps bridge training to employment with laser precision, and without “all that other school-stuff.”

So, in a nutshell, Dev Camps with laser precision bridge training to employment, and without “all that other school-stuff.”

What are Dev Camps?

Dev Bootcamp is one example of computer-programming schools spreading out from San Francisco.  These camps turn students into programmers in less than three months, with starting salaries between $80,000 and $100,000.

Dev Bootcamp, for example, teaches “Ruby on Rails ” in three phases.  Phase 1 is Basic Ruby and programming fundamentals.  Phase 2 introduces the web and front-end development (including HTML CSS and JavaScript), and Phase 3 puts it all together through the Rails framework.  Admissions are rolling, so every three-weeks another “16-20 boots” are admitted to replace those graduating.  Each new cohort is assigned two teachers and a facilitator. A little time each day is spent learning from books and tutorials, but most time is spent working in small groups solving problems and challenges, and building applications.

Perhaps better than universities, these programs make complete mind-body connections, and as such include “yoga, stretching, and even basic meditation and mindfulness training.”  My personal experience from a two-week boot camp that did not consider this was permanent ulnar nerve damage!  Computing is very tough on the body, and good habits are important.

Good news for colleges?

Dev Bootcamp’s web site states their motivation is because, “…college is broken. Recruitment is broken.”  Ironically, however, there could be very good news here for agile colleges, especially in urban areas.  Traditional colleges work primarily on a nine-month cycle, and have unused infrastructure sitting idle over the summer.  With relatively little investment, colleges could leverage this infrastructure to offer intense learning experiences in programming and beyond.

LINK

Chea, Terence (2013) Coding boot camps promise to launch tech careers, The Associated Press, April 12, downloaded from http://apne.ws/110i4Jc

Image Credit: xymonau at RGBStock

  

PART III: BY THE NUMBERS

Note:  This article is from a series on change with strategic implications for higher education.

 

 

Higher education enrollment concerns stem from a peak in college-bound high school graduates, combined with growth in alternatives, such as on-line and for-profit degrees.  Also looming are growing concerns from a mediocre economy and student debt burden.    

Groups tracking education statistics include the Department of Education, College Board, and Chronicle of Higher Education.  For reference, the National Center for Education Statistics’ College Navigator search engine cites over four hundred post-secondary options in Pennsylvania alone; ninety-three of these offer bachelors programs or majors in computer or information sciences and support services. 

In 2009-10, the most popular bachelor’s degree granted nationwide was business (357,354); for comparison, 39,589 were conferred in computer and information sciences.

PSU, University Park

With 38,594 undergraduates, U.S. News ranks Penn State’s University Park as the fifth largest campus. For 2012, over 28,000 students applied for 7,200 University Park seats.   Each year over half of the University Park graduates first began at one of the other nineteen campus locations.

Fig1JPG.jpg

Figure <!–[if supportFields]> SEQ Figure * ARABIC <![endif]–>1<!–[if supportFields]><![endif]–> Image Source:  http://bit.ly/NJpkGF

Penn State Live reported a modest undergraduate enrollment growth in 2011. In Figure 1, after Pennsylvania (4,260), the 2010 biggest state contributors were New Jersey (792), New York (453), and Maryland (318). 

Fig2JPG.jpg

Figure 2 Image Source:  http://bit.ly/TjsjsK

Figure 2 shows the current decline for in-state high school graduates.  Out-of-state students are an opportunity to overcome increasing competition for Pennsylvania students amid stagnant demographics.

Another recruiting opportunity comes from “non-traditional” students, such as adult learners, veterans, and transfer students (i.e., students with eighteen or more credits); currently more than thirty percent of all students transfer.  To take advantage of this, policy changes may be needed to improve transfer receptiveness as well as providing success programs normally reserved for first year students.  For reference, Penn State’s admissions office has created a transfer fact brochure.

IST, University Park

In addition to undergraduate minors and certificates, Penn State’s College of IST offers a B.S Degree in Information Sciences and Technology (ISTBS), a B.S. Degree in Security and Risk Analysis (SRABS), and a B.A. Degree in Information Sciences and Technology (ISTBA).

The University Budget Office’ Fall 2011 Penn State Fact Book reports 823 total IST undergraduates: 83 (first year), 158 (second year), 260 (third year), 275 (fourth year), and 47 (fifth year plus).   Note that here Penn State counts “unique” residential students, rather than degrees; students pursuing more than one degree or minor are only counted once, and credited to his or her primary degree college. 


Fig3JPG.jpg

Figure <!–[if supportFields]> SEQ Figure * ARABIC <![endif]–>3<!–[if supportFields]><![endif]–> Image Source:  http://bit.ly/Q6KLBK

Figure 3 reveals that IST’s Fall 2011 University Park undergraduates came mostly from Pennsylvania followed by New Jersey, Maryland and New York.

Current College of IST (University Park campus) entrance policies include the following:

  1. IST undergraduate math course requirements are more similar to students in the Smeal College of Business, rather than the College of Engineering.  However, high school applicants must meet the more rigorous College of Engineering SAT math standard, instead of the lower minimum used by the Smeal College of Business.
  2. Students already enrolled at another Penn State college or campus must successfully complete three-course SRABS or ISTBS entrance-to-major requirements before the start of the junior year.
  3. Students considering the ISTBA degree must apply before the end of the third semester and meet a two-course entrance-to-major requirement.
  4. The College of IST does not accept transfer students (i.e., students with eighteen or more credits from a non-Penn State institution).

Readings

PART II: WHY A MOOC?

Screen shot 2012-09-18 at 12.25.20 PM.png

[Image:  What is a MOOC?, video by David Cormier]

Note:  This article is from a series on change with strategic implications for higher education.

 

 

My first exposure to online education was the summer between my junior and senior year in high school.  I wanted to take calculus as a senior, but first needed to complete a course in trigonometry.  The solution was an online trigonometry course offered by Penn State.  It took a great deal of self-discipline and time management, but I enjoyed a deep sense of satisfaction putting my final assessment in the mail.

Jumping ahead a few decades the impact of a connected world on distance education becomes visible.  First, simply replacing the postal service of my trig experience has enabled more interaction opportunities, such as more assignments and instruction.  Next, opportunities have expanded to include more offerings to a larger audience.  It is not unusual for search results to also return paid placements for online degrees by traditional higher education institutions.  These are, in essence, an opportunity pay a college or university to complete degree requirements remotely.

In the past few years, however, there has been growth in opportunities for anyone to participate in online courses without payment.  Enter the wild frontier era in open teaching and learning involving the “Massive Open Online Course” (MOOC). 

WHY FOLLOW MOOCS?

I suggest two reasons for higher education to follow, or even participate in, the MOOC, despite MOOC’s low completion rates and lack of accreditation, credit, or degree potential.  The first reason is to learn from the successes and failures of this fascinating experiment in teaching with technology.  The second is to reflect on possible higher education paradigms stemming from historical constraints on course offering, size, length, or assessment, for example. 

In particular, I discourage dismissing or ignoring MOOCs.  David Cormier believes some academic negativity may stem from incorrect suggestions the MOOC will replace traditional classrooms, or is superior to resident instruction.

MOOC HISTORY

Wikipedia traces thinking behind the MOOC to a presentation by Buckminster Fuller in 1961.  The term MOOC, however, was coined by Dave Cormier to describe a 2008 course taught by Siemens and Downes.  The “Connectivism and Connective Knowledge” course was offered for credit to twenty-five registered participants, but opened to 2,300 non-credit participants.

MOOC EXPLOSION

New MOOC offerings are announced regularly, often with significant funding, and occasionally with industry partners. 

Players include:

POSTSCRIPT

Penn State’s College of Agriculture “invented” correspondence courses in 1892 (i.e., way before the Internet). Penn State’s most celebrated correspondence students are two guys named Ben and Jerry.  By the way, the tradition continues as my current home in the College of IST was recently ranked #1 by the Best Colleges for online IST degree programs.

READINGS

  • Cormier, Dave and Siemens, George (2010), Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement, EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 45, no. 4 (July/August 2010): 30-39. http://bit.ly/OWzqRy
  • What You Need to Know About MOOC’s, The Chronicle of Higher Education, http://bit.ly/S5CJcH 

PART I: HIGHER EDUCATION’S “CROSSROAD”

mhivWvC.jpg

Note:  This article is from a series on change with strategic implications for higher education.

 

 

I am hyperaware of disruptive innovation and technology, combining faculty experience during the dotcom business transformation with two previous experiences: first as a mechanical engineer in manufacturing, and later partnering with Telco to offer multimedia and other digital services.  So it seems I may need to brace myself for a fourth, as the web shifts attention to higher education.

Shifting Focus of the World Wide Web

Like aggressive digital ivy, the World Wide Web has flourished and expanded steadily since gaining prominence in 1995.  Initially empowered with nothing more than a magical hyperlink, the web has greatly surpassed its glorified glossy brochure beginning.

In an early demonstration of strength, the web possibly invoked Metcalfe’s Law to inflict great damage on sophisticated private information networks, such as Prodigy and AOL.   The sheer number of web devices connecting through the Internet was proving a formidable information adversary.

Around 1999, the web turned attention to traditional “brick and mortar” business, and began using its transformative “e” mark, as in “eCommerce” and “eBusiness.”  Online companies such as Amazon jumped at the web opportunity, while more established companies such as Barnes and Noble, proceeded more cautiously.  This was a fascinating time to serve as a MBA faculty member.  It was also fretful attempting to anticipate changes and impact, such as disintermediation (i.e., claims that the middleman would be eliminated).  Although details were foggy, it was clear to business educators that the web would be impactful and should not be ignored.

Disruption in Higher Education

These experiences are why I carefully follow discussion of disruption in higher education, and related technology changes such as free Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC).   Major MOOC players include faculty from credible institutions such as Stanford, Harvard and MIT

I also find fascinating Anya Kamenetz’s “DIY U” (do it yourself university) initiative.  Ms. Kamenetz reached TED status,  where one commenter posted:

In the classic case of an “industry” that is prime for disruption, our existing 1,000 year-old model of education will probably be radically different as a result of lower-cost, more efficient competitors that are able to deliver learning to a new generation. Maybe the traditional institution’s role is in coordinating the open resources available for free rather than being simply a rigid house that is resistant to change.

What to Do?

All conjecture is currently valid, so I listen without opposition to faculty arguments that higher education is exempt from disruption.  At the minimum, I believe disruption in higher education should be monitored.  Better to anticipate and prepare for change, including MOOC experimentation (either as instructor or student), than be caught off guard.  This includes the online research center initiative by PSU’s College of Information Sciences and Technology.   

Suggested Reading

·      Christensen, Clayton M., et. Al. (2011), Disrupting College:  How Disruptive Innovation Can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education, www.americanprogress.org

·      (2012), Virtual Princeton: A guide to free online Ivy League classes, theweek.com

Photo Credit:  mzacha at rgbstock.com