Research Proposal
Motivations in the Art Classroom
I. Introduction
A. Problem Statement- Why do different levels of motivation in the art classroom exist, and how do they impact learning?
1. Purpose: By studying this issue, I hope to uncover some of the reasons behind motivational differences in the classroom, and aim to level them as much as possible in each situation.
2. Context of Problem: Students have varied levels of motivation in the art classroom, which leads to varied levels of participation. This also leads to behavior problems and general lack of respect in the art room.
3. Background of Problem: This study was started because I often wondered why some students were more motivated than others to complete their work. My classroom observations led me to think and wonder how and why some students are motivated and some are not. I have a great interest in learning more about this topic, and improving my classroom environment.
4. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to explore why different motivational levels exist, specifically in my classroom, and what I can do to level them out. I will look at my own classroom techniques, as well as research on motivation, and interviews with other teachers on motivation. Many subquestions have arisen from my original question. They include the following; What motivates students in the art classroom? Are there gender imbalances in my lessons? Am I properly motivating at the beginning of a lesson? Are outside forces (home life) hindering students in ALL subject areas? Do students understand what I am teaching?
B. Preliminary Literature Review
1. Sauders, Robert J. (1982) The Lowenfeld Motivation.
My research started with Victor Lowenfeld. He studied motivation, and came up with the idea that you had to move step by step through different levels of art competency before you could achieve a mastery of drawing, painting, etc. This theory was eye opening! I had only been my students’ art teacher for two years, and beyond that I had little knowledge of their skill sets, and preparedness to tackle new information and projects.
2. Studio Learning: Motivation, Competence, and the Development of Young Art Students’ Talent and Creativity.
Stemming from Lowenfeld’s ideas, another article talked about how “we get interested in what we get good at” (Rostan 2010). The idea of competency was being reinforced with another’s research. It makes sense that we are uncomfortable with the unfamiliar, and some of my students were very unfamiliar with art. This made me consider going back to basics in each project and checking for knowledge and skills before we began drawing or painting.
3. Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Academic Performance. Institute of Business Management
Further research talked about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Extrinsic motivation is done for the final prize such as a grade, intrinsic motivation is done because it is personally satisfying. While I find some students do things just for a good grade, most who are passionate about art do it because they love it, grades are secondary. These two types of motivation definitely factor into how each student is motivated.
4. Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: implications for motivation
NLC- non learner centered classrooms vs. LC or learner centered classrooms also have an effect on motivation. In an NLC classroom, teacher present information and students are expected to learn it by taking notes or memorizing. In an LC classroom, students are active participants in their own learning, and they choose which path they want to take. Most of my lessons allow for more LC classroom time than NLC. My introductions are short, and I rarely lecture, give notes, or tests. Students are encouraged to make their own learning path. I like to say that art is a creative way to solve a problem. I give you the project (problem) and you come up with a creative way to solve it.
5. Gender differences in the academic ethic and academic achievement
My last bit of research had to do with gender imbalances in grades, and academic performance. In some studies, females performed better academically than males. This is definitely something I have observed in my classroom, especially if a male student does not like art to begin with.
C. Foreshadowed Problems-
I expect to get some answers to this problem, but not all motivations will be explained as I will not be talking to all students about all problems. I expect some teachers to be too busy to be interviewed.
D. Significance of Proposed Study-
I hope to change the atmosphere of my classroom with research and understanding of this topic. With more insight, I can better understand why some of my students thrive, and why some are left behind. This information can lead me to change my personal teaching methods to include every student, and make my classroom an environment where everyone is included and can feel successful. I aim to make my room friendly to all, and hope to make each student appreciative and interested in art. I do not believe this is possible 100% of the time, but I hope to improve the current situation with this new quest for motivating all students.
II. Design and Methodology
A. Suitability of Site- I teach art in an elementary center. I teach seven classes a day in grades kindergarten through sixth, 45 minutes each class. The environment in my classroom is very busy, noisy, and sometimes chaotic. Students are moving at their own pace through a project, and are not all on the same step at the same time. This can lead to non-motivated students being left behind.
B. Researcher’s Role- My role will include interviews, surveys, literature reviews, looking at historical data (classroom size, socioeconomic factors), taking personal notes in the classroom, and writing down observations of motivated vs. non-motivated student behaviors.
C. Purposeful Sampling Strategies- I will use all the grade levels that I teach (k-6) to collect my data. I will use equal amounts of female and male students to make sure my samples are even for gender purposes. I will make sure students are not affected in the classroom by my observations or data collection.
D. Data Collection Strategies- I plan to collect data during the school day while teaching each of my classes using field notes, and observations. I also plan to collect interviews outside of school hours using email and telephone conversations with colleagues. Data will be collected and managed by me in notebooks and journals. A male vs. female chart can be made to show gender differences in students motivational needs.
E. Inductive Data Analysis- The results will be presented in a written paper showcasing the hypothesis that were met or broken. New results will be analysed with new meaning for classroom implementation.
F. Limitations of the Design- This will be a qualitative study designed to show research results that can be applied to classroom design and instruction. This study will spread over the course of two semesters and the results will be calculated over the summer. The final research will be presented in the following fall. Students and teachers will participate only if they are willing and able. Anyone interviewed will be told up front what my research is about.
III. References
Sauders, Robert J. (1982) The Lowenfeld Motivation. Art Education Vol. 35, No. 6, (pp 28-31)
Jaquith, Diane B. (2011) Intrinsic Motivation and Autonomy in Children’s Artmaking. When is Creativity?.Art Education; Reston Vol. 64, Iss. 1, (pp 14-19).
Pavlou, Victoria. (2006) Pre-adolescents’ Perceptions of Competence, Motivation and Engagement in Art Activities. International Journal of Art & Design Education. (pp 1-9).
Rostan, Susan M. (2010) Studio Learning: Motivation, Competence, and the Development of Young Art Students’ Talent and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal (pp 261-271).
Daniels, D.H., Kalkman, D.L. & Mc Combs, B.L. (2001) Young children’s perspectives on learning and teacher practices in different classroom contexts: implications for motivation, Early Education & Development, 12 (2), 253-273.
Chee, K.H., N.W. Pino, and W.L. Smith. 2005. Gender differences in the academic ethic and academic achievement. College Student Journal 39, no. 3: 604–19.
Gnezda, Nicole M. 2009. The Potential for Meaning in Student Art. Art Education: Vol 62, no 4. Pp. 48-52.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality.
In R.A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Ayub, Nadia. 2010. Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Academic Performance. Institute of Business Management (pp 1-10).