Option 3 Deliberation

Option 3 Skills

Melissa and Amanda

 

  • Learning skills more important than developing a theme?
    • Exploration is more important, should be more emphasis on skills. Need to be able to take these classes earlier-like English 202 or CAS 100.
    • Skills important for your job should be covered by your major. Gen Eds should cover general skills that everyone should have. Major should teach you most of your skills that you need to focus on independently
    • Everyone should know how to write.  Know the basics (from English 15), learn a lot of different way to write which is a good way to start and then writing should be further developed within your specific major.
    • Professional email writing? Should this be a focus? Want to look professional- should be a skill covered in a class like English 15
    • Mash CAS 100 and English 15 into one class – good idea
    • What else is important besides writing and speaking? What other skills are important?
      • General math
      • How to work with different programs (Example – Excel) – technology class for each major just to get familiarized with these programs that you may need to use later on – Powerpoint, prezi, etc
      • Are people already competent in how to use excel? Some say yes, some would say no. Generally know how to use it but they don’t know how much the program can actually do
      • Art majors – something
      • Does this take away freedom of Gen Eds?
        • Yes, but only taking it away because its important
        • Already kind of forced to take these classes – wouldn’t change much
        • More useful and interested because the classes will actually help them- learn skills they will actually have to use rather than taking something like Astro where you probably don’t care as much about the material.
        • “Recitation” could be held by grad students and TA’s? For extra help- or have these classes in very small numbers of students (~30) so that you can get individual attention and attendance would be more likely
        • Badges??
          • Not really sure how we feel about it
          • Just a way to recognize student achievement
          • Can’t be overly subjective – what quantifies a superior essay?
          • Going to vary on every class
          • Comparing yourself to the entire student body which is very difficult especially because every professor teaches differently and grades more or less harshly
          • Participate in workshops as part of a class requirement – resume, interviews, etc

Personal Stake

-Personal experiences with this issue?

I have a real problem with general education courses right now. Not so much the chemistry or physics or math courses, but more the courses I have no interest in. Currently, I’m taking Linguistics as a general social and behavioral science class. Honestly, I take nothing from it. I attend class and write the papers and follow the notes, but I have no interest in really grasping the material. I’d rather be focusing on the courses geared toward my major (veterinary and biomedical science). For next semester, I have to pick more general art or humanities courses that I already know will just take up time I could’ve spent studying for something else.

-What concerns you the most about this issue?

My concern with this issue is that it really effects some people’s GPA. They spend their time studying for these gen ed courses that they have no interest in which makes them less successful in the classes that actually matter to them. Or they just don’t spend any time on the gen ed course and that also drops their GPA.

Paper 3 Draft

Paper Option 3 Idea 3: http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/ysbw7d/sports-illustrated-barbie

Stephen Colbert report about women and Sports Illustrated magazine. Barbie put on cover. Introduction Sports Illustrated is popularly known for their swimsuit addition, featuring attractive females with a relatively small amount of clothing. Degrading? The answer from the majority will most likely be yes. This magazine cover attempts to grasp the man’s idea of the perfect women, potentially belittling others than don’t look quite like her. They rarely have a flaw in their body, which makes men attracted to them and women insecure over them. There is a Stephen Colbert report about women and the Sports Illustrated magazine, specifically the addition with a Barbie on the cover. The report is absolutely filled with satire- utilizing primary strategies, commonplaces, and persuasive aims to create a strong piece. There are many strategies used in Colbert’s report about women and the magazine to generate the idea that the magazine can be seen as degrading and that it represents an unrealistic image of a woman.

Sports Illustrated releases an annual swimsuit edition featuring an attractive woman with very little covering her body. The magazine is dedicated to sexualizing women and presenting them as more of an object than anything else. The interesting aspect behind this magazine though is how they created a 50th addition featuring a Barbie on the cover with the slogan, “#unapologetic.” Stephen Colbert spoke about this specific edition in a report during Women’s History Month, just to make a stronger point. He begins talking about the magazine and how it fully encompasses “how far women have come.” This immediately introduces his satirical stance on the swimsuit edition as a whole. To say women have come so far because they’re featured in a magazine dedicated to a male audience while wearing a virtually nothing is completely sarcastic. It is as almost to say that women are being more degraded and objectified more than ever.

To add on to the idea of the progress of women, Colbert makes a comment that Sports Illustrated’s annual swimsuit addition has “long been a bastion of civil rights from the occasional black model to the one that was under 5’10”.” This humorous approach is what Jay Heinrich, author of Thank You For Arguing, would call wit, or situational humor (Heinrich 100). Colbert uses this witty comment to make it seem like a women under 5’10” is some sort of minority in the eyes of the swimsuit addition. By breaking these barriers and putting “minority” women on the cover, he mocks that women are really making progress in terms of civil rights and respect.

 

The next “milestone” the magazine was said to make was featuring Barbie in the 50th anniversary edition. This caused a lot of controversy due to the confusion of why a little girl’s toy would be put into a magazine that sexualizes women. A news reporter in the clip states that having Barbie on the cover “only serves to further sexualization of girls and objectification of women.” Colbert replies that this is not the objectification of women, but instead the “womification of object.” This tactic can be seen as a type of chiasmus, a change in word order that creates a crisscross sentence, as well as the invention of new words (Heinrich 218). The Barbie is dressed in a bathing suit, just like a regular featured model would be, which is why Colbert tries to twist the order of the statement. He jokes that women are not being objectified because of the doll, but that the doll is being “womified” because of how the audience will now see her after the edition.

He proceeds by making a witty comment about how Barbie doesn’t need him to defend her because she can do it herself with her glued together plastic fingers. The humor is taken even further when he pulls out a fake magazine article with a quote from Barbie stating, “It’s time to stop boxing in potential. Be free to launch a career in a swimsuit, lead a company while gorgeous, or wear pink to an interview at MIT. The reality of today is that girls can go anywhere and be anything.” This whole idea becomes a mockery due to the use of examples of swimsuit models having the opportunity to be anything they want to be solely because of the sets they’re working on. He says that Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition is all about “achieving women’s dreams.” This is humorous because he then makes a mockery out of this by showing women modeling as desert explorers and astronauts. Heinrich would refer to this progression as a cliché twist, or more specifically a surprise ending, meaning that a cliché was started as normal but then ended differently (Heinrich 378). This is not the perfect example of how this rhetorical tactic works however it follows the same general idea with the use of a stereotype. He grouped all women into the idea that they can be anything they want to be, as long as they’re exposing their bodies or looking pretty. This was a surprise ending, but it made a humorous point that supported his claim about objectifying and degrading women.

            The Colbert Report touches on different controversial subjects in every episode while keeping the satirical aspect in tact for each. Stephen Colbert attacks the subject of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition in this specific segment with special focus on the featuring of Barbie. Through rhetorical strategies, commonplaces, and fallacies, Colbert captures ideas of the objectification of women and how the magazine interacts with this issue.

Always a Project, Not a Problem

IMG_0008

 

I’ve previously talked about persistence and now I’m going to bring it up yet again. It’s just that important in riding. This one was a common lesson that I heard while riding my own horse, Chuck. Learning how to ride can be difficult, especially if your horse really doesn’t help you out. My horse was one of those. He’s the cutest animal alive, but he can definitely be a handful on the days he doesn’t feel like cooperating. Always a project, never a problem came up a lot during my lessons with him. Basically this just means you have to keep working. If you fight the horse, you probably won’t win (they’re a lot bigger than you). You have to pick your battles in riding and more often than not, you can get around the fight. Making a problem into a project allows you time to gradually learn and figure out how to fix the problem. You can stay more focused on the task and stay calm while trying to complete it. With my horse, he’d spin away from the jumps, and usually I’d fall off. It was frustrating and I was definitely getting angry about it. Then I heard, “always a project, never a problem, get back on.” So I’d keep working at it until finally I figured out how to 1) stay on and 2) keep him from stopping out at the jumps. It was a long process, but it was a project. I never picked a giant fight with him because if I did, I probably would’ve lost.

This saying brought me a long way in riding because it made me realize the difference between working at something and just fighting it. I use this idea in my life every single day. When I’m struggling with school, I just tell myself to keep working at it. Don’t get frustrated and don’t get overwhelmed trying to fight what you don’t understand. I tell myself, just make it a project, and then I can work much calmer and really be more effective. Some things can’t get resolved in a day, which makes them become a project in my mind. Projects are much easier to resolve than a problem. You can’t force a problem to be resolved especially because it usually makes you angry or anxious. Projects give you time and allow you to learn and work with what you have while remaining more relaxed.

The picture below is of me jumping my horse Chuck in the 3′ equitation. This is a relatively high level class and it was definitely a step up for me with my horse. I worked hard and focused on the projects  he gave me and ended up getting to this point. If I remember correctly, this was one of my first few shows at the 3′ with my own horse. Because I made all of his little flaws into a project instead of fighting them, I was able to be successful and ride my horse that much better in the long run. To this day, I still hear, “Always a project, never a problem,” even if it comes from myself in every day life.

26135_384826238990_7547381_n

March 7 Satire Assignment

Find three video clips and/or pieces of writing that make an argument through satire. In a blog post under the “Class Work” category titled “March 7 Satire Assignment,” include links to the works you analyzed, along with a long paragraph (about 200 words) for each piece that explains how the satire works: the rhetorical elements, fallacies, figures, illogic, or word play the satirist uses to make the argument effective.

You might check out theonion.com, the dailyshow.com, or colbertnation.com for some fun clips to analyze. This assignment is due by the time we blog on Monday, March 17.

1. http://www.theonion.com/articles/dog-doesnt-consider-itself-part-of-family,35532/

2. http://www.theonion.com/video/story-of-small-businessman-struggling-under-obama,34037/

3.

 

 

Paper 3 Outline / Ideas

OPTION 3: Rhetorically Analyze a Satiric Work

Write a rhetorical analysis of a sophisticated satiric piece. Stephen Colbert is an excellent resource, but there are countless other possibilities in print and broadcast media from which to choose. Your analysis should include a thesis about the primary strategies, commonplaces, and persuasive aims of the satiric piece. Your analysis should also draw upon terminology from Thank Your for Arguing regarding rhetorical devices, fallacies, figures, and strategies.

A strong rhetorical analysis of satire should include:

1. An argumentative thesis claim and strong topic sentences

2. A convincing analysis of the satirists’ rhetorical tactics

3. A compelling introduction and interesting conclusion

4. Strong organizational principles

5. Fitting diction and usage

Paper Length: about four pages, double spaced

Idea 1: http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/uov6m4/outrage-over-military-budget-cuts

Stephen Colbert report about the outrage over military budget cuts

Idea 2: http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/300ry4/black-history-month—laser-klan

Stephen Colbert report about a current event occurring during Black History Month

Idea 3: http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/ysbw7d/sports-illustrated-barbie

Stephen Colbert report about women and Sports Illustrated.

Eyes Up, Shoulders Back

IMG_0027One of the biggest lessons to grasp in riding involves your posture. As you learn how to ride and you develop a style, you constantly hear “eyes up, keep your shoulders back.” It sounds simple, but if you’re really involved in riding you’ll find yourself repeating this in your head over and over. You have to constantly remind yourself to stretch your shoulders back that extra inch, over exaggerating the motion, and to keep your eyes on what’s ahead of you. It’s funny because they tell you, “don’t look at what you don’t want to run into,” because usually, if you stare at something, the likelihood is that you’re going to find yourself approaching it within a couple seconds. This is all very technical, but still very important. Keeping your shoulders back protects you when you ride. If your horse decides to slam on the breaks underneath you, you’ll be prepared for it. You’ll have your weight slightly behind the motion so that you can support your upper body and keep your legs on tightly around the horse. It’s a lot harder than it sounds, trust me. If you get too far forward on a horse that has a lot of power, you’re simply encouraging the animal to keep building and going faster. Keeping your shoulders back allows you to have leverage and control of what is going on underneath you. Instead of encouraging the motion, you have the ability to control it when needed.

Keeping your eyes up is probably one of the most important aspects to remember in riding. Paying attention to what is ahead of you is SO critical I can’t even begin to stress it enough. You have to pay attention to everything in this sport- your surroundings, your track, your horse underneath you (without looking at it), what’s right in front of you, and even what’s behind you. They teach this very early. By keeping your eyes up and ahead of you, you’re focused on everything and naturally, your body posture improves. You have to keep your eyes over the jump you’re approaching to encourage your horse to go over it. If you stare down at it, your body will slowly lean forward which then does the opposite of encourage the horse to jump. Trust me, I had this issue with my horse Chuck for a long time. Also, the very obvious point is that if you’re staring down at the ground, you can’t see what is around you. There could be a little girl on a pony right in front of you and if you weren’t looking, you could get in big trouble. When you’re on a horse, you are responsible for yourself and your surroundings.

So, even though this is all about technical stuff and functional parts of riding, it still applies to my life in different ways. It may be more symbolic or metaphorical than straight forward, but it is still effective. Keeping my shoulders back just reminds me to stay grounded. For one thing, just walking around it keeps my posture up and makes me feel more confident. The other part of this, however, is to not get ahead of yourself. By getting ahead, you’re not focused on what is happening right then and there (or on a horse, right underneath you.) I’ve learned that when you get ahead of yourself, you’re more likely to find yourself struggling or leaving something else behind. By staying grounded and “keeping your shoulders back,” you can remind yourself to focus on what’s going on and remaining confident. Keeping your eyes up and ahead of you is another thing. Keeping my eyes up is still important in real life off a horse. For one thing, it really does keep you from running into people or just objects in general. You can focus on what’s ahead of you and be aware of your surroundings. With the combination of these two actions, you can keep yourself grounded in the present, while also looking ahead into the future.

Letter of Introduction

Dear Dr. O’Hara,

For paper 1, I focused on analyzing an advertisement presented by TOMS shoes. The advertisement I chose held my attention for the whole course of the video and offered up a lot of topics to discuss in my paper. Even though I thought this would be easy to dig into, it wasn’t as simple as I thought. My first draft of this paper was very generalized and focused more on my interpretation instead of real evidence from the ad. My thoughts were slightly scattered and definitely needed serious touching up. I went back to this paper multiple times before finally becoming happy with it. I looked at each paragraph separately while listening to the advertisement. This helped me focus in on what parts of the ad would fit in strongest with each idea I originally came up with. This helped me to find solid evidence from the commercial to make my interpretations seem more factual. This definitely was a first experience for me. It really helped me learn about how to be more creative in my supporting arguments and really pull in detail.

Paper 2 was a lot more challenging than paper 1 in my opinion. I had a really hard time finding two articles that could actually hold my attention. I knew that if I picked articles that I would be bored reading, I wouldn’t ever be happy with the outcome of my paper. I ended up focusing on Shaun White at the Sochi Olympics. Similar to paper 1, I had to keep the two articles up in front of me while trying to fill in detail and evidence to support my writing. Honestly, at times I got a little frustrated with my topic of choice and questioned my ability to create strong enough arguments. During my editing process, I literally copying and pasted paragraphs and just moved them around. The structure of the paper was really difficult for me to get right. However, I think I pulled enough from the articles and dug deep enough that what I’m trying to get across made sense at the end of it all. This paper definitely helped me with my thinking and writing processes. I was really forced to think hard about what I wanted to say and how I wanted to say it. If I phrased something wrong, it seemed to mess up my whole point, which is why my writing skills were a bit tested. Overall, I think this paper came together a lot better than I thought it was going to. I still think I could’ve made a stronger piece though.

-Melissa Stecklow

Million Ways to go Wrong..

“There are a million ways to go wrong, but only one way to go right.” It took me a long time to understand this statement, but over the past years it has really started to make sense. Learning how to ride a horse well is not easy. We’re trained to make it look easy, but I promise it’s a lot harder than it looks. Part of the reason it can be so difficult is because there are literally hundreds of ways to make a mistake. Even harder is that one little mistake can mess everything up. If one thing is incorrect, it can change your whole form and function of your ride. In order for everything to come together and be correct, each individual aspect of needs to be functioning correctly.

IMG_0015

This is sort of a confusing concept. I’ll try to explain through example. The first time I heard this phrase was during a lesson a couple summers ago. I was riding a horse named Henry with Miss Kate. For the most part, it was going well until we started jumping a little higher. A lot of people have trouble with this horse because if you don’t place him correctly and help him out with the jumps, he’ll stop right in front of it. Trust me, I crashed with him a couple times in the past before I finally figured him out. This one lesson specifically I stopped at the same jump probably about five times before something finally clicked. My trainer wasn’t really angry at me because she knew I’d figure it out as long as I didn’t quit. She also knew this horse wasn’t easy to ride, especially as at a higher height. The next time I came to the problem fence, I just rode it differently. I held my shoulders back just a little more, put my leg on a little tighter, and just felt out his stride. To my surprise, I made it over the jump this time. The key was simply paying attention to his stride. I was riding the fence correctly, or so I thought, every time. I hardly changed my body position. But, what made all of the difference was feeling out his steps and realizing that the first couple times we had went to the jump, his stride gradually got bigger. This increase in his stride altered the distance I found to the fence every time and resulted in an awkward placement that he refused to take. Once I realized this and controlled his stride, I didn’t miss again. My trainer then told me, “there’s a million ways to go wrong, but only one to go right.” This one little mistake threw off everything, but once I put it all together, it all just worked.

The whole idea with this lesson is that you usually have to make a million mistakes before you can get something right. In order to be successful, you have to experience failure – just like I did with Henry. It’s important to learn from your mistakes so you can figure out that one way to go right. Messing up will make you appreciate your success that much more.

IMG_0009