Public Controversy Script

Introduction (Taliyah):
To Vax or Not to Vax? That is the question. According to the Oxford Dictionary, a vaccination is defined as “a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases.” Since the beginning of civilization, people have found methods of protecting themselves from various deadly diseases, and since the invention of the vaccine, the ethics of vaccination have been debated. Though vaccines bring injections to mind, numerous ancient methods introduced diseases to the body in small doses to prevent illness. One notable method in 15th-century China was grinding smallpox scabs and inhaling them in order to protect oneself7. In modern times however, with the increased use and popularity of vaccines, many controversies have arisen. The term “anti-vaxxer” represents those who are against vaccinations today.

 

History of Vaccination (Ellen) :

Ancient civilizations in Asia may have started inoculating against diseases like smallpox as early as the year 200 BC.7 One common early method of inoculation against smallpox involved grinding up and inhaling smallpox scabs7. The first successful vaccine injection was also a smallpox injection, developed by Edward Jenner in 17966. A method called variolation, which involved scraping infected materials across the skin, was also used against smallpox8. From then on, vaccine development exploded throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The development of viral tissue culture methods led to the famous Salk and Sabin Polio vaccines. The Salk Polio vaccine was a high point for the role of vaccination in public life, as thousands were saved from the disease. According to contemporary research, nearly 200 million illnesses, and approximately 450,000 deaths have been prevented in the US alone between 1963 and 20155.

Despite this, anti-vaccine movements have existed as long as vaccination itself. Anti-vaccine movements thrived in England starting in 1837, when the government made smallpox inoculation mandatory3. The Anti Vaccination Society of America was founded in 18793, and the following years featured controversies and safety concerns about a variety of vaccines in a variety of stages of development. Even as vaccines continue to get safer and more precise, however, the modern anti-vaccine movement has re-emerged with a vengeance. Most notably, modern anti-vaccine advocates are concerned about vaccines causing autism-spectrum disorders in children. This idea came from an article printed in the British Medical Journal in 1998, which was denounced the very next month by the journal as “an elaborate fraud”2.  The doctor responsible for the study had committed massive ethical violations and printed information the journal later said was incorrect, and lost his license to practice medicine in the UK. Nonetheless, the idea remained planted in the mind of the public.

 

Public Risks and Herd Immunity (Aaliyah):

One of the most prominent issues that affects the general public is the crisis that is non-vaccinated individuals contracting a disease and spreading it to the vaccinated community. Once a non-vaccinated person contracts a disease it allows for it to be spread among the general population. The public risk that  not being vaccinated brings is something that is unprecedented because of the nature of herd immunity. Herd immunity occurs when a majority of the population is vaccinated. It stops the extreme spread of a disease or illness by stopping the transmission between a large group evidentially protecting the individuals that are not vaccinated from acquiring the disease. The only flaw that herd immunity has is the fact that around 90% to 95% of the population has to be vaccinated to properly protect everyone. Another big issue is that not everybody has the capability of getting their vaccinations due to insufficient funds or health reasons. Many of the prominent medical journals support getting vaccinated and offer free vaccinations if individuals are not able to afford it.

 

Celebrity Influence (Leo):

Vaccinations and the debate on whether or not to get them has been around for awhile and a huge factor in shifting opinions has been celebrities. Starting back in 1777, George Washington gave an order to have his men get the variolation for smallpox which helped the colonies win the war9. At this time, Benjamin Franklin was also a promoter of variolation because he lost a child to smallpox, and did whatever he could to make sure families didn’t suffer10. Some other notable celebrities who promote the use of vaccines are Elvis Presley, who publicly received the Salk vaccination against polio to show his support of the vaccine, Seth McFarlane, who has been on twitter recently promoting immunization, and even Donald Trump, who has recently shown his support of immunization. However, with a long, growing list of supporters, there is another growing list of celebrities who are opposed to vaccinations. Some of these include Jim Carrey, who wrote in The Huffington Post that vaccines aren’t fully researched and could be potentially dangerous, Robert F. Kennedy, who is the chair of the Children’s Health Defense, and Jenny McCarthy, who for the last decade has voiced her concerns for vaccines and how they supposedly caused her son’s autism10. Celebrities, regardless of their stance, have a huge influence on the public, especially in the age of social media. Chris Altman, a pharmacist from Harrisburg, states “Celebrities have a strong influence just in general, it seems to me that they’re using those platforms to then push out their personal views on health care.”10

 

Why people don’t get vaccinated (Claire):

Ever since the first smallpox vaccine people have been against it. In the beginning parents were concerned about putting a needle in their children as it was a new thing to happen, now parents are still against vaccines, but not because it is a new concept. The four main reasons why people are against vaccines are for safety concerns, religious beliefs, philosophical reasons, or personal reasons11. In current society many parents believe that vaccines lead to many health issues, which they heard about from either the media or another parent. Andrew Wakefield lead to many parents not vaccinating their kids when he falsely linked vaccines to autism. Once his findings were published, it lead to dramatically higher rates of parents not vaccinating their children12.

 

Conclusion (Taliyah):

Taking into account the information provided by those interviewed and the sources used in this video, it’s easy to tell that vaccines are still highly controversial and the controversy is only growing. Public discussion of these issues is necessary to dispel misinformation and ensure the safety and comfort of the general public.

 

Works Cited:

1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/

2: https://www.vaxreport.org/vax-january-2011/561-research-that-sparked-anti-vaccination-campaign-called-an-elaborate-fraud

3: https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/history-anti-vaccination-movements

4: https://measlesrubellainitiative.org/anti-vaccination-movement/

5: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170303163208.htm

6: https://www.immune.org.nz/vaccines/vaccine-development/brief-history-vaccination

7: https://www.historyofvaccines.org/timeline#EVT_1

8: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/full/10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.611

9: https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/blog/vaccine-celebrities

10: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/resource-centers/immunization/antivaccine-celebrities-have-inordinate-amount-of-influence

11: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15568260

12: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869767/

  1. https://www.aappublications.org/content/36/5/14.1

14.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/02/03/why-a-few-unvaccinated-children-are-an-even-bigger-threat-than-you-think/

 

Original vs. Remastered vs. Revamped

Many popular games get remastered or reconstructed years after their original release. The companies producing these games make a significant profit just from the re-release of the once extremely profitable games. People that were big fans of popular games tend to replay the missions and do the different story lines of the games that they like the most. While replaying games is much more inexpensive than buying a new game it results in a lack of proper updates and maintenance for the game. As technology advances, it results in the graphics being a lot less developed then the more modern games. A great example would be the heavily popularized game “Spider-Man 2” made in 2004 by Activision that is still only playable on archaic (but still fun) gaming stations such as the original Xbox and the original PlayStation. The graphics on that game are extremely lackluster compared to today’s 4K graphics that most of the games being produced today have. Another big reason why companies like Activision and Ubisoft choose to revamp or remaster popular games is to update the gaming station capabilities so that newer customers with the more recent gaming stations can play. They also make a lot more money buy reintroducing the updated and new version of the games.

Spider Man 2

Remastered games have the exact same plot and story line as the previously released game of the same name. While, revamped games have the same name and same overall theme but the plot, missions, and story line are different. The most recent example that I can think of would be the game “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare”. This game has its original that was produced in 2007 by Activision and was rated “Best Overall Game of 2007” by a video game magazine called GameSpy. The remastered versions which is basically the same game but with enhanced features and much better graphics garnered a significant amount of profit when it was released in 2017 by the same company. The revamped versions of “Modern Warfare” had a completely different plot and story line and overall had a much more modern day transition from each mission throughout the game. Having played and completed the campaign mode on all three of these games, In my own opinion each has their own individual benefits and I would definitely play all of them again. I think that I really enjoyed the newest version of Modern Warfare because I personally believe it was one of Activision’s best campaigns to come out of their company in the last couple years.

A player wearing heavy Juggernaut armor aims a minigun at another player in a bombed-out cafe in a screenshot from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019)

Revamped Modern Warfare