When I first set my eyes on this Australian news, entitled “Multicultural groups are pledging their support for the Voice, but some people say they still know ‘zero’ about it” I thought to myself, nothing could get more multicultural than this very event that brought all these different nationalities together for one good cause. It’s no surprise that all these immigrants and descendants of immigrants are joining hands to support the Indigenous Peoples of Australia, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander’s as they are trying to make their voice heard since these immigrants also experience their fair share of marginalization and inequity. Though these people may have different colors and speak different languages, they all have one thing in common, facing racial injustice.
“The joint resolution describes the constitutional Voice as “modest, practical and fair”, and has been signed by multiple Indian and Chinese community organisations, as well as Sri Lankan, Italian, Irish, Iranian, Greek, Vietnamese, Filipino, Sikh, Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist and Pacific Islander community groups” (Handley & Cheng, 2023). The question is, what is this “good cause” that brought all these different nationals together? It is the Voice to Parliament; a proposed Law, to alter the Australian Constitution to recognize the first people of Australia by establishing an advisory body known as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice (the Voice). According to the Parliament of Australia (2023), the Voice “…may make representations to Parliament and the Executive on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and give Parliament the power to pass legislation with respect to matters related to the Voice.”
The first people of Australia are believed to have inhabited the continent for many millennia. According to National Geographic, aboriginal Australians have dwelled on the land for more than 50,000 years (Blakemore, 2019). Despite the fact that these Aboriginal people are the first inhabitants of the land, the sad reality is that they have been facing heartbreaking oppression, injustice, and unimaginable violation of their human rights for generations.
Hannah McGlade, Aboriginal Australian activist and human rights lawyer, underscores the severity of the heart wrenching challenges that the Aboriginal people are facing even today, “In some ways our rights situation is getting worse, according to the Government’s own data. We’re seeing more incarceration of Aboriginal people; more Aboriginal children being removed from their mothers and families, increasingly to non-Indigenous families where they lose their cultural identity; and we’re seeing more Aboriginal suicides as well. These are the shocking, ongoing impacts of colonization and we know that systemic and institutional racism and discrimination is a key driver of these issues” (United Nations, 2023).
Would the Voice ameliorate some if not all of the injustices these indigenous people are facing on a daily basis? Some remain hopefully optimistic that their voice will eventually mean something. Bella Swann is among those hoping that the Voice will truly bring about change, “It’s about justice versus injustice. It’s about hope versus despair. It’s basically saying, ‘Let us decide what is best for us.’ And honestly, it’s giving us the dignity also to decide it. Because, so far, the outcome of other people deciding for us has been tragic.” (Handley & Cheng, 2023).
What really struck me in reading this article about the Voice is though the whole idea seems on the surface to appear as a fair and progressive move, borrowing Hannah McGlade’s term, I still sense institutional racism and discrimination since the rest of Australia has to also vote on a referendum with a “Yes” or “No” to the Voice. I don’t believe it’s the right thing for the indigenous people to have the blessing of the rest of Australians to decide on the matters that concerns them and their future. It’s not logical, and in fact it’s unfair, for other races to be empowered to decide on the fate of these Aboriginal people. Why are these non-Aboriginals voting on the future fate of the Aboriginal groups? It makes no sense at all, maybe it is another systematic way of revoking their rights and silencing them. Could this injustice be the reason that brought the other minorities together to be a collective voice for the Aboriginals? How is it that the Aboriginal people’s fate is left in the hands of the very people who have been oppressing them for hundreds of years?
References
Blakemore, E. (2021, May 4). Aboriginal Australians, facts and information. Culture. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/aboriginal-australians?loggedin=true&rnd=1685756369905
Handley, E., & Cheng, J. (2023, May 30). “we can no longer be ignored”: Why the yes and no campaigns are courting multicultural votes ahead of the voice referendum. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-31/multicultural-views-indigenous-voice-joint-resolution/102304956
Parliament of Australia. (2023, May 19). Constitution alteration (aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023. Home – Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2223a/23bd080#:~:text=The%20purpose%20of%20the%20Constitution,the%20First%20Peoples%20of%20Australia
United Nations. (2023, April 21). First person: Aboriginal Australians suffer from “violent history” and ongoing “institutional racism” | UN news. United Nations. https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/04/1135827