Author Archives: Aaron Joseph Sorge

Classical conditioning

One very interesting psychology subject is classical conditioning. This is a type of learning in which an organism learns to associate  stimuli. There are many classical examples of this. Pavlov had a very interesting experiment in which he would make a dog salivate at the playing of a tone.

I also had a similar experience to classical conditioning with my own dog. Although this time, the conditioning was by accident. I have a yellow lab at home and to this day, she loves to bark at animals on the TV. She for some reason still has not figured out that they are not real. So when the K9 Advantix commercial came out with the cute puppies running around and a catchy jingle, my dog would love to bark at it. She began to see this commercial more and more and still would bark at it every time. It got to the point where she would hear the jingle, and just automatically start barking as soon as she heard this. She didn’t even need to see the actualy commercial she only needed to hear it. There were actually times when she would be in another room when the commercial would come on and she would come running out into the living room to bark at the TV because she knew their would be dogs on it. This is a great example of classical conditioning, even though it was not on purpose. The unconditioned stimulus was the commercial itself with the jingle. The Unconditioned response was her barking at the TV because of the dogs running around. The conditioned stimulus was the jingle itself on the commercial. And the Conditioned response was when she learned to associate the jingle with the commercial, she would then come barking out to the TV even though she had not seen any dog on the TV, she only needed to hear the sound of the jingle now.

 

Memory Construction

Remembering things is a very complex and interesting process. We have 3 types of memory, these being sensory, short-term, and long-term. Then we can try to recall information from these types of memory. Here is where the problem may arise. Do we actually remember or is our mind tricking us into believing that we actually remember a specific event. This is especially prevalent in the early years of development because people really can’t start to remember things until they are around 3 to 4 years old.  Our memory actually tricks us into thinking we remember the event when we were young with something called ‘memory construction’.

One event I believe I can recall from my very young days was when I was in preschool. I believe I was 4 years old at the time and I remember my mom and dad picking me up. I don’t really remember many other things from the day, but I do remember when my parents got me because they had to tell me something when we were leaving. They told me my grandmother had passed away. Now at that age, you don’t really understand very well what that meant, but even to this day I remember being picked up from preschool and being told that she had passed. But do I actually remember this is the real question. Am I actually retrieving a memory from my long-term memory, or is my brain using the process known as memory construction to help me put together this memory?

No matter what you think, it is pretty cool what your brain can do to trick you into thinking you actually remember something. Sometimes, we may actually remember something, and other times it may just be our brain constructing the memory together. Either way though, we can never really tell the difference between the two, so we will always think it is a memory.

Nature vs Nurture

For my blog assignment, I decided I wanted to write about nativism versus empiricism. It has been argued by people for many, many years on whether certain things in people are born in them and genetically wired in them or that people are affected by what they grow up around. While there is evidence that supports both, in my opinion, nativism dominates.

There are a few reasons why I believe that nativism dominates. There is one particular thing that stands out to me most though, and that is athletic ability. I grew up in a small town where sports meant everything. I was huge into basketball in particular. My best friends and I would play all the time, it was our favorite thing to do. We worked hard to have the talent that our team did. While our hardwork could only take us so far, we ended our season to a team much taller and more physically sound than us, with our tallest player being 6’3 and there tallest player being 6’ 11”. While I do believe that hard work in sports can take you to great lengths, it cannot take you all the way to the professional level. I had a very good friend who was a star basketball player. Not only was he talented, but he was the hardest worker I knew. He was always trying to better himself whether it be on the court or with just with the diet he had. He was always looking to get better. The problem was that he was only 5’ 9”, this led to some problems in the basketball world. I do know there are some players that short in the NBA, but they are extreme exceptions. This is why I believe it is almost born into us through nativism to become whatever we may become in the future. In this case, to play professional basketball, you need to be gifted at birth with something in you genetics that allows you to have an outstanding physique needed to play professional basketball. It is not normally something you can just work for, it is something you are born with. This is why I believe people are born with certain gifts and talents and why nativism is more relevant.