To understand social media logic, first we have to understand what social media is. Unlike traditional mass media where the producers and audiences take on strict roles, in which all the content creation is controlled in the hands of producers and audiences job are strictly to consuming the well-prepared content. In social media, it creates a much more interactive platform where every audience has the power to create content at the same time. In fact, social media is mainly powered by the massive amount of user-generated content. Therefore, social media logic is also very much different from mass media logic.
The social media logic is illustrated in four key terms: programmability, popularity, connectivity and datafication. Programmability in mass media is referred to as the continuous flow of media content 24/7 manipulated by the producers to keep audiences hooked. In social media, programmability is defined as how the algorism of a social media platform can influence users’ experiences on consuming and creating information. It might seems like it’s more on the technological side of the social media, but it’s a two way street in which the algorism is affected by human agency. Social media sites have to constantly update their programmings, big or small, to offer users better experiences so that they will stay on the site.
Second is the popularity aspect. Although mass media has been practicing the “popularity” by pushing people with more fame and exposure on to the screen, social media in the early days set their agenda to give every user equal share in their content being seen. However, it has changed over years with algorism filtering out more popular content to put it on top. In most social media platforms, the popularity is determined by likes and followers. “Like” is the currency in social media, the more likes you get the more popular you are, and your content is more likely to be seen by other users. It also sometimes translate into real life financial gain because companies are likely to approach to sponsor their content, and those companies knows that their ad will be much more likely to be seen as well.
Thirdly, connectivity is social media platforms’ ability to connect users with other users and user-generated contents. Unlike mass media where media institutions set their agenda to what people their content is speaking to, social media connectivity are mostly forged by users themselves. Users are choosing what kind of content they would like to browse and what groups they want to connect with. Once users have shown their preferences, again the algorism kicks in and start to recommend contents that are more likely to fit the user’s taste. Such function may seem more convenient to the users, but it also introduces questions of how much of personal data is being analyzed by these companies. It is a similar mechanism to the targeted ads which has already faced a lot of privacy challenges.
Last but not least is the datafication, it is defined by Viktor Mayer-Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier as “the networked platforms to render into data many aspects of the world have never quantified before.” At its essence, every single thing that’s being generated on social media platform is data, from an account name change to a new crazy Trump tweet. With social media growing larger everyday, more and more data is being added onto the already massive data flow daily. The term “raw data” is brought up in the article, which describes that the massive amount of data that is channeling through the network is “raw”. Whether data can be raw or not is a very big and profound question. In my opinion, raw data is very hard to achieve because any alteration or manipulation to the data changes the nature of the data, and as the data channels and stored through the network it’s also being altered simultaneously.
Understanding Social Media Logic – Van Dijck & Poell (1)-1upaksx