A Reflection on “Period. End of Sentence.”

The film “Period. End of Sentence.” illustrates women’s health, promotion, and advocacy by showing how women gather together to overcome female-centric issues and turn something stigmatized into something positive for themselves and their community. At the beginning of the film, it was apparent that women’s health was not a large priority within this community. Women were expected to not discuss their periods and men rarely even know what they were. This is a massive barrier to women’s health, as knowledge and health literacy are essential in detecting health issues including issues related to menstruation and reproduction. Without open conversation about menstruation there is a lack of knowledge on how to deal with periods and how to ensure the safety of young girls. In the film they mentioned that women were not always using clean bundles of cotton material and were sitting in wet material for long periods of time. Both of these practices are unsafe, yet there was no dialogue between females to be able to convey this information. The lack of resources and knowledge surrounding menstruation was a further threat to women’s health as periods often prevented women from attending school. This threatens a woman’s social health and her future. It was also noted that women had to seclude themselves to change their bundles of cotton and that men would sometimes crowd them, placing them in uncomfortable situations that may end in harm.

Luckily, this community received a machine that allowed them to make sanitary pads to use for menstruation. This opened up room for dialogue surrounding periods and how to correctly handle them, which ultimately would improve the communities health literacy. Because women worked making pads for women, it was a women’s health advocacy project through and through. Once they had made enough product to package and sell, they named their product ‘Fly’ saying, “We had our reasons behind the name ‘Fly.’ We have installed this machine for women. So, now we want women to rise and fly.” (Zehtabchi, 2019) I think this was a turning point in the film as it expressed the new attitude that the women were gaining towards their own health. If this were a traditional health advocacy project, this would be an excellent mission statement.

This film illustrates promotion and advocacy because after these women finalized their product, they go into their community to spread awareness. Beyond attempting to market their product, they show pride in their product. The women compare their pads alongside other pads to show that they not only addressed the lack of feminine hygiene products within their community, but also improved the products they did not have access to in the first place. After they educate women in their communities on their products they attempt to make them available in stores and through selling them door-to-door. One of the most beautiful moments in this film is when the stigma of menstruation in a group of females gets broken down. One of the older females asks who wants to buy the products that they have been making and selling and the room stays quiet for a bit. Yet, as soon as one woman expresses interest and feels initial shame, all of the other women in the room join in as well in purchasing the pads. This scene shows that their advocacy was not only effective in providing a necessary product to their community, but it was also effective in starting to break down the stigma surrounding menstruation.

This story shows that periods don’t stop women from achieving their goals. Rather, in this case, periods empowered these women to achieve them. Working in pad production provided a fundamental service to the community and also provided an opportunity for women to work, make their own money, and gain respect. This then led to discussions on feminism within the community which was made possible by women banding together on female issues. It allowed the women to see their own power, potential, and ultimately fulfill further goals down the road using their earnings and self-confidence they gained from making pads.

Works Cited:

Zehtabchi, R. (Director), & Berton, M. (Producer). (2019, February 19). Period. End of Sentence.[Video file]. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrm2pD0qofM

The Media Portrayal of Women in Politics

Women are often portrayed in sexist and racist ways within political platforms. This is largely due to the fact that political platforms have been dominated by white men since the beginning of their existence. Political media shows a refusal to acknowledge that women are now commonplace within politics, and moreover, that they deserve a place in politics. This is apparent in the language on these platforms, in political media, and in news coverage. Such rampant sexism and racism is unacceptable, and political media should change to allow a space for women and women of color.

Figure 1.

Sexism within politics has been a major topic of discussion following Donald Trump’s presidency. Trump was known for making overtly sexist comments and being unapologetic about them. Following a debate, Trump made a comment suggesting that Megyn Kelly was on her period. He said Kelly had “…blood coming out of her eyes…blood coming out of her wherever.” (Cooney, 2017) This comment sparked outrage as referencing a woman’s menstrual cycle is especially inappropriate in politics, as hormones and periods have been used to dismiss women from political spaces and delegitimize their work. The menstrual cycle has even been used to suggest that women should not hold positions of power at all, as the stereotypical view of menstruation is that women have no control over their emotions and could never successfully maintain composure while serving a role such as president. This was used against Hillary Clinton during her run for presidency. (Cooney, 2017)

Televising such harmful comments from men in power is not only harmful to the women they are aimed at, but also to young women who aspire to be leaders. Comments such as those made by Trump may make young girls fearful of their menstrual cycle or may disempower them to follow their dreams because they heard a man say they were unfit for them due to something natural and beyond their control. Comments such as these also reflect an unwillingness to learn about the female body, further showing the dismissal of women and the lack of respect they have been given in political spaces.

Figure 2.

Besides comments about their bodily functions, women in politics are also subject to comments about their appearance in ways that men have not been. There is greater attention to what women in politics wear, how they do their makeup, how they do their hair, and how they present themselves in general as they are expected to look poised and refined. Furthermore, women are subject to the sexual gaze of men and tend to have their appearances sexualized no matter what they are wearing or doing. For example, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez was criticized by Fox News for appearing in an issue of Vanity Fair while wearing expensive outfits. (Rambaran, 2020) The news network decided that what Cortez was wearing was important enough to write an entire article about, and that her outfit choice discredited her voice. Male politicians are not subject to this same gaze, and it would be baffling to see an entire article written about a male congressman’s outfit choice. 

Furthermore, it is important to note that a white female politician may not be criticized for her outfit choices or spending choices in the same way as AOC. To criticize a woman of color on how much her outfit costs is overtly racist, as it makes an assumption that women of color cannot afford such clothes or should not be able to afford such clothes. It sends a message that this news network does not think that AOC is ‘good enough’ to be wearing designer clothes.

While women face much criticism within political media, there are also many instances where women and women of color are celebrated on these platforms. One great example of a woman of color being highlighted in a positive way by political media is the press regarding Stacey Abrams following the election of Joe Biden. An article written by the Washington Post boasts endless positive remarks about Abrams, from her ‘supermodel’ entrance to her courage as a black woman uniting the south with her core values. (Powell, 2020) This piece should serve as a template for how women and women of color are discussed on political platforms- with respect, with praise, and with deserved recognition for their values. If political media can do this for men, they should certainly be able to do so for women.

Cooney, S. (2017, June 29). Mika Brzezinski Tweet: Donald Trump on Women and Blood. Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://time.com/4839415/donald-trump-mika-brzezinski-women-blood/

Figure 2: Mitchell, T. (n.d.). [Photograph found in Vanity Fair, New York]. Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10/becoming-aoc-cover-story-2020 (Originally photographed 2020, October 28)

Figure 1: Olson, S. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/07/trump-says-foxs-megyn-kelly-had-blood-coming-out-of-her-wherever/

Powell, K. (2020, May 14). Stacey Abrams has ascended to political prominence. How has she harnessed so much power in so little time? Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/magazine/2020/05/14/stacey-abrams-political-power/

Rambaran, V. (2020, October 29). AOC appears in Vanity Fair in outfits worth $14,000 to curse Trump out. Retrieved August 31, 2021, from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-vanity-fair-outfits-14000-curse-trump-out