This week, we were asked to reflect on a brief video of Ron Fry and Gervase Bushe. In the video (from April 28, 2012), Dr. Fry and Dr. Bushe reflect on the roles of positivity and provocative generativity in the process of Appreciative Inquiry.
I was admittedly taken by the notions presented by Fry and Bushe. Namely, that positivity in-and-of itself is not a completely sufficient outcome for AI. While positivity feels good, it fails to produce the transformational change that we seek as AI practitioners. And if I’m being honest, I have a few remaining questions regarding the structure and rigor of AI as an enabler of transformational change. I don’t doubt its value, so much as wonder a bit about the process in action. But I was impressed by Dr. Bushe’s notion that provocation is at the heart of AI’s efficacy (even more so than positivity). I was also moved by his recognition of his failings (and learnings therein) in the field.
I have always believed in the power of critical analysis and reflection. We grow and develop more as a result of critical feedback than we do from positive feedback. Don’t get me wrong: I like recognition and a “pat on the back” as much as anyone. But transformational growth often comes from challenge and failure more so than from success. I think this is why their message resonated so strong with me. It might even ground AI as a pragmatic methodology rather than a mere “lofty ambition.” At least with some audiences.