Archive | December 2023

Extra Credit – 2

Response to Question 1:

Throughout and after the pandemic, the use of masks has experienced a significant surge, becoming an integral part of daily life for some. More than ever before, people have adopted the practice of wearing masks as a preventive measure to protect themselves and others from various contagious diseases, including the common cold, the flu, and the notorious COVID-19. What was once an uncommon sight has now seamlessly woven itself into the fabric of societal norms. Even two years post-pandemic, the presence of mask-wearing persists, reflecting a collective consciousness about the importance of public health and safety. The continued occurrence of masks highlights a new societal normalcy, where individuals prioritize not only their well-being but also demonstrate a shared responsibility for the health of their communities. This cultural shift is evident in various aspects of daily life, from commuting on public transportation to shopping for groceries, where the sight of masked faces has become commonplace. The mask, once a symbol of crisis and uncertainty, has transformed into a symbol of prudence and consideration for others. The commonplace that mask-wearing represents is the noticeable manifestation of the value placed on the collective health of society. People have embraced the notion that their actions, such as wearing a mask, can contribute to the greater good by reducing the spread of contagious illnesses. This newborn sense of communal responsibility has fostered a culture where individuals are willing to make small sacrifices for the greater well-being of their fellow citizens. As the years have passed since the onset of the pandemic, the mask has become more than a physical barrier against pathogens; it has evolved into a symbolic shield symbolizing resilience and adaptability. The adaptability of societies worldwide to the ongoing presence of masks reflects humanity’s ability to embrace change for the greater good of public health. The mask, once a temporary necessity, has seamlessly integrated into the daily routines of individuals, reinforcing the collective commitment to safety and protection. The mask has also highlighted the commonplace of protecting one’s health. At the start of the pandemic, many people refused to use a mask and would in turn endanger themselves. As the pandemic became greater more and more people would start wearing them. However, the reason why many wouldn’t wear them was because they didn’t believe that the pandemic was real.  Many institutions would then require them to wear masks in other to enter the establishment. Coming together at the commonplace of protecting one’s health by force or by compliance. The enduring use of masks post-pandemic is a testament to the resilience and adaptability of society in the face of unprecedented challenges. Beyond being a physical defense against diseases, the mask has become a symbol of communal responsibility and a reflection of a society that prioritizes the well-being of its members. The normalization of mask-wearing stands as a long lasting legacy of the pandemic, reminding us that collective actions, no matter how small, can shape a safer and healthier future for all.

Extra Credit – 1

Response on Podcast Does Mandatory Civic Education Increase Voter Turnout?

As I was listening to the podcast, I was intrigued by the mention of the exam that high schoolers needed to take as a graduation requirement. It reminded me of the civics class that as seniors we were required to take. This class revolved around knowing about the US government and the history of our country. I remember that there was a brief mention of voting rights, but it wasn’t a major lesson. I think that an approach like this would be helpful since the podcast mentioned that if we give information on how to vote and how it works then it would lead to increase voter turnout. Although the class should have a complete lesson plan about voting. A positive aspect of the civic education program was to have a focus on providing information on how to vote. Giving valuable insights into the electoral process, from registering to understanding the significance of local and national elections. Additionally, the program would prepare students with resources to delve deeper into the intricacies of voting, ensuring that they had access to a wealth of knowledge beyond the classroom. A program like this would be crucial for high schoolers since most will turn 18 and would need to register to vote. In the podcast they mention the impact of the naturalization-style test that many students need to take, I am compelled to question its effectiveness in increasing voter turnout. While the intention behind the test was positive, aiming to ensure that students understood the fundamentals of civic engagement, its implementation appears to have limited short-term effects on voter participation. I believe to increase voter turnout we must target students in the classroom. This could be installing a program that teaches students about voting, promoting it within the school with flyers, and giving students incentives to complete a class or lesson to learn about voting. Mandatory civic education undoubtedly plays a crucial role in equipping students with the knowledge necessary for informed citizenship. The provision of resources and information on voting is worthy, serving as a valuable foundation for civic engagement. However, the effectiveness of the naturalization-style test in directly increasing voter turnout may be limited, especially when its focus extends beyond the immediate concerns of the electoral process. Many questions on the naturalization test don’t have to do with voting in turn don’t teach students about voting instead the history of the US. This is important but if the focus was to increase voter turnout it is not as effective to have those questions on the test.  As many younger students ages 16 and up approach adulthood and the responsibilities that come with it, they need to become informed about voting and the inner workings of the government.  Either informing them through classes or exams. There is also the possibility of informing through implementing policies that allow all students to get information not just the selected few, increasing the voter turnout in the long term not just the short term.