Personally, I don’t think the world’s too bad. Of course, there are times when the world seems hopeless and full of pain, but there are just as many times when the world is overflowing with joy and blessings. In the end, all things are balanced, making the world a decent place. However, this 99-question survey makes me seem downright miserable, as if I see the world as nothing but bad.
According to the survey, apparently 99% of people see the world as safer, more positive, and more pleasurable than I do. I would argue and say these results are completely wrong. I never believe results from these types of surveys because so many confounding variables are capable of skewing the results. When I took this survey, I was really tired, which perhaps made me lean towards more negative options than I normally would choose. Also, I’m a Christian, so in accordance with my beliefs, I do think the world is full of negativity and suffering, but not in the sense that the survey results are making it seem.
If someone were to see my survey results, they’d think I just hate everything without an ounce of joy in my life. That’s dead wrong. I find joy in life. I love being happy. I see beauty in the world. However, by splitting my beliefs up into just a few primal beliefs, the survey completely ignores all of that. Three categories of 26 primal beliefs aren’t enough to encapsulate the entirety of who I am. With so much variance from person to person, there’s simply no way that an objective survey such as this one can accurately depict someone and what they truly believe.
Overall, I believe surveys and research attempting to categorize and fit people into a certain template take away the value that civic life holds. Individuals’ endless differences are what make up the beauty of civic life. Everyone contributes their own unique perspectives and opinions in civic life, but these surveys and research are hindering that by ineffectively categorizing people.