CAPE School Finanace

Erin: brainstroming sessionAttending: Erin, Bill Hartman, Tim PerryBill, reactions to the first offering? Bill: funding will dry up for school districts in three years; $350 million was removed from the state and supplanted by federal stimulus money; 07-08 to 08-09…

Erin: brainstroming session
Attending: Erin, Bill Hartman, Tim Perry

Bill, reactions to the first offering?
Bill: funding will dry up for school districts in three years; $350 million was removed from the state and supplanted by federal stimulus money; 07-08 to 08-09 is $2 billion short fall, this year another $1 billion short and then the pension hits ’13; numbers are unsustainable-bottom line; future is unknown

how do districts deal with this: 1. expenditures (teachers salaries), again not sustainable; 2. raise taxes (Act 1 – a restriction on how much property taxes can be raised, district by district taking account poor districts, up to 3-4%)

relatively few people understand the situation and that the math doesn’t add up

NCLB is looking at a 9% increase in requirements for reading 11% for math every year to get the toughest learners up since the low-hanging fruit have already been addressed in the past 4 years

this content: presentation
1 session presenting this information
then doing the model 1.75 hours (the model is a separate proprietary solution that is available for consulting outside of this context)
gotomeeting & accuconference were used to provide webinars

bill wants reactions from the audience, something he didn’t get via webinars
bill has recorded in-class presentations and have posted them ANGEL, lecture materials are online; session is use for questions and interaction

3.0 Credit and non-credit available for this program

(What are the reasons LD has shifted away iTunes U)

works best for session 4

session 5 how do you start to deal with the problem?
Bill move these up to the top

there would be “homework” (required for ACT 45) no so much more work as pre-work for the sesion
job-embedded assignments
presentation time will be allotted in the last session

individual or group work optional

CAPE: Leadership and Challenges in School Finance Course

Attending: Erin Garthe, Tim Perry, Caroline SkinnerVia Phone: Ed Donovan, Kent MatsuedaBackground1.5 years ago Superintendents Advisory Board Feedback: we need info on school finances for prof dev!content: finance management and tying $ to academic achievementDr. Hartman created this 3 credit…

Attending: Erin Garthe, Tim Perry, Caroline Skinner
Via Phone: Ed Donovan, Kent Matsueda

Background

  • 1.5 years ago Superintendents Advisory Board Feedback: we need info on school finances for prof dev!
    • content: finance management and tying $ to academic achievement
  • Dr. Hartman created this 3 credit course that has been approved for Act 45
    • initially set for this past Spring ’10 semester
    • 6 real-time sessions, each scheduled for 2 hrs
    • rolled out to 5-6 campuses via Polycom selected for convenience to the learners and Polycom seat capacity
    • scheduled for 8-10 AM during the day, Erin mentioned that it would be likely that participants have to leave the sessions for more pressing matters
  • initially marketing through Penn Link listserv
  • less than 200 hits on the website
  • zero registrations
  • adv board said:
    • weather cancellations was a problem
    • we missed the boat for this cycle, starts again this Fall ’10
    • bitter subject, needed but an “ugly” subject

Future adaptations

  • Caroline: lack of specificity on the content in the past marketing campaign

Still to be determined

  • What are the activities?
  • Are we going with streaming, recording…?
  • Ed: probably didactic, instructor driven interaction
  • Assessments: “job-embedded” assignments with 5-6 deliverables

Protected page related to findings from the meeting: https://our.outreach.psu.edu/content/17662

C&I Leadership Academy

PeopleAttending: Rick & Nancy Eckard (Conference Planner)Lead faculty: Bob Hendrickson rmh6 (Education Policy Studies)TA’s: Zeke Kimball ewk124 & Phil Blackman pcb141; consider succession planning through the end of the programFollow-up Facilitator: Lisa Luttuca (Associate Professor)ScheduleF2F Conference, 1 week, 6/29-7/2, begins…

People

  • Attending: Rick & Nancy Eckard (Conference Planner)
  • Lead faculty: Bob Hendrickson rmh6 (Education Policy Studies)
  • TA’s: Zeke Kimball ewk124 & Phil Blackman pcb141; consider succession planning through the end of the program
  • Follow-up Facilitator: Lisa Luttuca (Associate Professor)

Schedule

  • F2F Conference, 1 week, 6/29-7/2, begins on a Sunday-that evening there will be a keynote
  • 9 months to follow-up with readings and discussions

Background

  • participants are generally associate deans and department heads
  • modeled after a program at Harvard that was designed for higher-level administrators, a more intense and expensive program
  • this program is for 2nd tier administrators of smaller institutions and colleges

Description

  • Program Website: http://www.outreach.psu.edu/programs/academic-leadership/
  • non-credit certificate program
  • program capped at 30 participants
  • required hardware? laptops for everyone?
  • costs: IT support $32/person; ≈$300 for E-Live; $720 for ID support
  • F2F Conference Week
    • Rick: we’d need at least 2 hours for training (probably on the last day in the morning)
    • located at the Nittany Lion Inn, Ball Room AB
      • Rick: connectivity? free wifi? wired connection and projector for the presenters?
    • different presenters for the morning and afternoon sessions
    • Pre-conference: run E-Live tests
  • Follow-up
    • each month will have a focus
    • faculty leader (Lisa) for each month
    • there will likely be guest speakers each month
    • primarily independent work during the month and discussions and debrief
    • ANGEL Group
      • PSU-ID’s will be used
      • some participants will need to be added manually
      • the SOAR team should be able to automatically link the ANGEL Group to their listing in SOAR
    • E-Live Session(s)

Next Steps

  • determine what will be put into ANGEL
  • determine what Bob’s level of preparation is; we’ll need a course outline for each online session; how much time will the participants have to dedicate for prep each month?
  • materials? Library’s eReserves for copyrighted materials/articles; students may need support turning on access for their accounts to link with the Library
  • what are they going to do for 3 hours? will the participants be grouped in the activities?
  • setup E-Live sessions for the entire year; no need for performance release needed
  • will the E-Live sessions be recorded? if yes, then we’ll need separate sessions; if no, then we won’t
  • setup a skeleton in ANGEL based on the tentative schedule from the portal
  • we need to map out at least the first few months

RHS 301 Student having problems Copying&Pasting from Word into MT4

I’ve been trading emails with a student who’s apparently having problems moving content generated in a desktop word processor, I think it is Word, into his MT4 blog. I just made a test and things look good for me. So…

I’ve been trading emails with a student who’s apparently having problems moving content generated in a desktop word processor, I think it is Word, into his MT4 blog. I just made a test and things look good for me. So I’ve asked for his URL and original document. He worked with the Helpdesk after speaking with Linas and suggested that he use WordPad as an intermediary. That apparently helped, but didn’t solve his problems. I won’t be able to offer any additional assistance unless I see his originals.

Anyone else having problems with copying and pasting docs from the desktop into MT4?

Example from this document (Blooms and Question Types.docx):

E-learning and Assessment

Version 4.

 

Reference http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/teaching-academy/Assistance/course/questions.htm

 

The education strategy (March 2004) has highlighted that Bristol University:-

1.    Is a “research intensive” university where the student learning experience is informed by research and is delivered by research active staff.

2.    Wishes to retain its high quality teaching.

3.    Needs to widen access and to look at diverse progression routes into HE.

4.    Needs to expand postgraduate numbers – particularly on taught masters programmes

5.    To retain their highly rated international research output and to deliver high quality teaching, requires that teaching is cost effective.

 

Whilst E-learning has a relevance to all of these points, this paper will focus on point 5 i.e. the requirement for teaching to be cost effective. The contribution of E-learning to assessment is a major area where substantial gains in efficiency can be achieved.

 

Currently staff spend a significant amount of time

1.    setting examinations

2.    ensuring that they match course learning objectives,

3.    liasing with the external examiner

4.    marking

5.    exam related student administration

 

Much of this activity is repeated at least twice per year and sadly the outcome is often only summative rather than formative. Several staff within the university have already adopted CAA (computer aided assessment) as a means of addressing this problem and have found pedagogic as well as efficiency gains. However this approach has not yet become embedded. Reasons for this limited uptake include:-

How to plan for long (3.5 hour) classes

How can you make the best use of 3.5 hour long classes?There are a lot of strategies that will help you successfully pull off a long class. In my opinion, the best way to avoid the doldrums is a solid…

How can you make the best use of 3.5 hour long classes?

There are a lot of strategies that will help you successfully pull off a long class. In my opinion, the best way to avoid the doldrums is a solid syllabus with clear goals and learning objectives. In addition, these are some useful strategies when looking at a particular lesson plan:

  • Vary your pace
  • Rely on a well-thought out structure
  • Vary activities based on learning styles
  • Use interactive activities balanced with lectures
  • Vary types of interaction: Teacher-Student, S-S
  • Use activities that benefit from longer intervals
  • Thoughtfully incorporate online and face-to-face content transitions
  • Make it meaningful, related to learning objectives
  • Have fun

Other useful advice from other instructors:

  • adjustments in policy for that class (food, drink, etc)–many, possibly most, students will have been in class back to back as well
  • It’s always hard, because you’re tired, they’re tired. And they’d rather be watching <insert popular tv program here>.
  • ask them what they want: a 20-minute break around 8 pm or a short break at, say, both 8 and 9, or to start class 10 minutes late and have a short break later on, etc. Then at least they have a say in what works for them.
  • Definitely keep the lecture to the first half of your class, and leave the second half for other activities…. don’t try to lecture for 3 hours. I shook even the lecture up a bit, talking for 15 minutes or so, then playing a short (5-10 minute) video clip, then going back to talking, etc. to keep things changing so they (and myself) don’t fall asleep.
  • Try to do the most difficult task first when they’re fresh.  Break lessons into approximately 30 minutes chunks.  It’s a once-a-week class, but treat it like a twice-a-week class: do whatever you would do for the first day of the week in the first hour-and-a-half and whatever you would do for the second day in the second hour+.
  • And the best thing for these classes, put what needs to be accomplished on the board before starting.  Then the students know what they need to get through before they’re getting out of there….not that that tends to be a problem with older students, but that is one of the things students have said they’ve liked: knowing exactly what needs to be done in the period.
  • My experience was that even though almost all of us had had a full workday in our bones, we were not about to fall asleep–this was doctoral coursework, and we wanted to be there. Discussions were always very lively. However, here are some things that helped:
    1. Ease people into the class. Don’t walk in, say “Good evening,” and start lecturing. Give class members a few minutes to visit.
    2. Keep the room cool but not cold. Warm classrooms made many of us uncomfortable.
    3. Allow drinks.
    4. Allow people to leave the room for bathroom breaks or just to stretch. A lot of classroom chairs are horribly uncomfortable.
    5. Have at least one longer break so that people can get something to eat if the opportunity is available nearby. Otherwise, allow them to bring food.
    6. Be enthusiastic about what you teach. It’ll help keep people going.
    7. Make sure that whatever you have to say is well organized and useful. Confused fumbling, belaboring the same point over and over, and assigning busy work just to keep students for three hours feel like a waste of time. When you’re done, even if it’s 30 minutes early, let people go home.
    8. Be sure to address the readings in class. It is extremely aggravating to slug through 250 pages of text each week and then never discuss any of it in class or use it for assignments.
    9. Keep videos to a minimum. Yes, that’s right. The last thing I want to do after a hard day’s work is drive 90 minutes to class just to watch a movie for two hours that you then spent five minutes discussing (if that). If you use videos, choose clips carefully. For longer programs, consider making them available on Blackboard so that I can watch at my convenience. Otherwise, let me know well ahead of time so that I may rent.
    10. Make your PPT slides available on Blackboard.
    11. Do not get pulled in by irrelevant or inane questions from those students who need lots of attention. Cut off anyone who rambles off topic. Don’t be shy about it. It’ll raise my evaluation of you.
    12. Minimize group work. At the end of the day, many people are tired or irritable, and too much group work easily disintegrates into a gabfest or an argument. Make sure group work has clear objectives and is connected to the competencies for that evening. Set up the groups so that people may be active or quiet based on their level of fatigue without a grade penalty.
  • Give them a break halfway through, and take attendance after the break, even if you wouldn’t normally take attendance. Do not send them home early even once for the first 8 weeks. Allow them to bring coffee or whatever to class. If you show a film or anything, watch for sleepers.
  • I second the idea of chunking. Keep mixing it up so they won’t get bored and can interact with others.
  • Please let them move around a bit. My 3-hour session graduate courses were agony due to my chronic pain issues, and that’s why I refuse to teach them now.
  • I also used to do something “hopping” after the break. An impromptu speech and debate team, a panel of student “experts” answering questions, a “vote with your feet” discussion and so on. Do what you need to do to keep them awake! It’s a challenge. Also, I find that night classes (once a week anyway) are the most difficult in getting students to actually retain information. I ended up doing constant reviews just so they’d stay on course!
  • I don’t take attendance, but I do give quizzes every class.  I’ve been thinking of moving them to after the break in both classes (very tired of the, gee, there’s fewer people here than before the quiz).

    Now I just need to get more creative on the physical activity front.  I agree completely with its importance, just struggle with making it work in this class.

  • I third the part about not letting them go home early at least for the first 1/2 of the term if you can avoid it.

    I had some severe pacing issues the first time I taught a night class and I made the mistake of letting then go early a couple of times.

    BIG MISTAKE. They started requesting it every time until I finally told them to stop it or they would never go home early for the rest of the term.

  • You do have to re-structure what you’re used to doing, but you can actually be much more productive.

    Move into more of a social-cognitive or constructivist approach to your teaching and use in class time for group/team exercises.

    Cut down on your assignments and only have a midterm and a final assignment. Make both of them more in depth. Also have team projects and in class presentation with a significant component of the assessment be peer review.

    As long as the class is an active class the students won’t get bored.

ART H 111: Ancient to Medieval Art

Ask Angela:The instructor is Heather McCune-Bruhn (hcm1).Do you mean ART H 111 “Ancient to Medieval Art”? YesThe schedule mentions 60+6 seats open, is the course really that large? No. The “60” refers to a resident instruction course. This course is…

Ask Angela:

  • The instructor is Heather McCune-Bruhn (hcm1).
  • Do you mean ART H 111 “Ancient to Medieval Art”? Yes
  • The schedule mentions 60+6 seats open, is the course really that large? No. The “60” refers to a resident instruction course. This course is open to a max of 24 students: 12 from CE@UP and 12 from Lewistown. Angela has “6” listed because she doesn’t want the UP-side to fill up entirely.
  • Has she taught for CE@UP before? Is she an adjunct or a faculty at one of our Academic Partners? Heather has not taught for CE@UP before, but has teaching experience with teaching courses at Arts & Architecture. She has an MA and PhD in Art History.
  • Could you get us a copy of Heather’s syllabus and/or detailed course outline? As of 3/3 the instructor was still working on her syllabus.
  • Is she all set with her materials and content? What is the development state of the course? I’m asking because the situation that she has a course designed for F2F delivery ready-to-go, is a different situation than if she’s still designing the syllabus or activities. She may have good contacts and resources from her connections to A&A, but I will verify. Hopefully she doesn’t have to re-create the wheel.
  • Would she need assistance digitizing content for use in her course?
  • You mentioned “2nd six week session,” does that mean this course is a blended learning, accelerated, videoconference delivered course? The course runs TR 6-9:30 PM, 7/1-8/10 in 119 OB. The instructor is concerned about 3.5 hour long lectures.
  • I’ll be a little facetious… is she a “game show host?” What I mean by that is, is she comfortable in front of a camera, is she able to work well “live,” and is she able to engage a remote audience? Angela says she’s comfortable in-front of a camera. Angela will be training her in the new 119 when the remodel is finished in May. Alice has been notified and will apparently assist with the orientation. There is also John here at UP and others at Lewistown that provide operational support evenings and on the weekend 🙂
  • Will Heather be expected to run the equipment on her own? See above… no she won’t.
  • If the course is blended, does that mean her course is using ANGEL as well?
  • What is her familiarity with ANGEL (if she is using it)?
  • Would she be relying on any other technology to deliver her course? Angela doesn’t know, she doesn’t think so.
  • Do you know if she’s worked with an instructional designer before?

Updated 3/11/10

  • Heather is already using welcome letters to orient students to the course and set expectations
  • the textbook has 12 chapters that will be covered in 12 class meetings; she averages 6 lectures/chapter
  • Student-generated presentations of museums and other venues -> based on online resources
  • she uses essay exams and papers w/ bonus points available
  • Google Earth to map locations of art pieces
  • “unknown slide” activity – apply skills on new content in an open forum, builds confidence and exercises higher order skills

CE Faculty Profile

DRAFTLarry Ragan and I met with Kate Miffitt, an ID from Liberal Arts, the other day and he led a conversation that described the complexities surrounding the typical CE instructors. I wanted to try and capture as many of these…

DRAFT

Larry Ragan and I met with Kate Miffitt, an ID from Liberal Arts, the other day and he led a conversation that described the complexities surrounding the typical CE instructors. I wanted to try and capture as many of these attributes as possible. I’m still waiting on a key research document from Larry that is an important source of these factors.

  1. Training – it is not clear when or how is the best way to provide CE faculty with training. Evenings seem to be a good time. Week days, working hours doesn’t work well for most. It’s important to have drinks and snacks budgeted and planned for these events.
    1. All-faculty Summer Event – I’ve spoken to others and we have agreed that the past to events were probably not that effective in the sense that they were primarily talking-heads rather than interactive events. I can say this because I have been apart of the last two years as a presenter or co-presenter. It has been said that if the faculty will take the time out of their busy schedules to meet up at the BJC, then the event should be focused on their needs. They want opportunities to meet with other faculty to work out issues related to their courses.
    2. New Faculty Orientation – I have not personally attended this event
    3. Technology: ANGEL Orientation provided by WC Helpdesk
    4. Weekend College Orientation – This session was run once with the help of Stephanie Edel-Malizia and featured Ike Shibley as a special guest to talk about blended learning.
  2. Material Resources – limited
    1. RI instructors may not receive the same level of resources for courses delivered outside of their own facilities or purview of their academic home
    2. Adjunct instructors are limited from using PSU resources since they may not have PSU ID’s or the time to access them
  3. Support
    1. Technical
    2. Instructional Design – currently only certain blended learning courses are being
  4. Delivery methods
    1. F2F
    2. Blended Learning
    3. Weekend College: Accelerated & Blended Learning
    4. Polycom: Videoconferencing
  5. Academic Partner and CE relationship – greatly varies depending upon the AP

CM2 MAX Portable Interactive Whiteboard System

El just id’d the product I was looking for! Thank you El!I had seen an article about this interesting USB portable projector. It sees an IR wand and uses that signal to allow users to interact with a projected computer…

El just id’d the product I was looking for! Thank you El!

I had seen an article about this interesting USB portable projector. It sees an IR wand and uses that signal to allow users to interact with a projected computer image similar to a SMART board. The big advantage is, you don’t need a special board and you aren’t limited to using a pen to write/interact with your computer content. This technology could be very useful in classrooms in ways the SMART board just couldn’t be.

I’m going to request one from next year’s budget so we can try it out for CE courses. It could be very useful for Dual Enrollment, math, science, and other f2f or blended learning courses.

Unfortunately, I have no idea what the pricing is and there’s only one distributor in the US. I’m waiting to hear back from Jim Cassin about pricing and availability.

ANGEL 7.4 Assessments losing images

When converting a 7.3 quiz to a 7.4 assessment, you will lose any images that were added to any of your questions – except if you save those resources to your own, personal ANGEL space (limited to 10 MB).7.4 assessments…

When converting a 7.3 quiz to a 7.4 assessment, you will lose any images that were added to any of your questions – except if you save those resources to your own, personal ANGEL space (limited to 10 MB).

7.4 assessments create virtual directories serialize specifically for each question for associated resources, like images. You cannot access those virtual directories by any traditional means from within ANGEL as a course editor.

In order to move a picture from a 7.3 quiz to a 7.4 assessment you must:

  1. download all of your images from your quiz
  2. save all of the metadata (image properties, alt tags, links, etc.)
  3. browse to the specific assessment question and re-upload each image and restore it’s properties one-by-one

Kate and I think this might be because of how 7.4 assessments handle the question bank. Questions are now “free to move” between assessments and therefore need individual, serialized, virtual directories to maintain question integrity no matter where the question might appear.

ANGEL Assessment Tool

Does it do everything the Quiz tool does? I would say so.Drop-down list has been dropped but I won’t miss it. It’s basically a differently-formatted multiple choice question.There’s an algorithmic option that might be the same as the Calculated Question…

  1. Does it do everything the Quiz tool does? I would say so.
    1. Drop-down list has been dropped but I won’t miss it. It’s basically a differently-formatted multiple choice question.
    2. There’s an algorithmic option that might be the same as the Calculated Question type under Wizards and Templates.
    3. How can I import questions into an assessment? The option is now called Copy and Paste Questions.
  2. What does it do better than the Quiz tool? What does the Quiz tool do better?
  3. What do we need to know about it? One good resource is the ANGEL Shorts edition dedicated to this topic.
    5 Things About Assessment Tool.pdf
  4. Where can we go with questions?
  5. What do faculty members need to know about the tool?
  6. How does the migration tool work?
  7. Have there been any problems with the tool?
    1. Issue discovered with changing answers in the assessment tool (Tue 9 Feb)

      Information Technology Services (ITS) has identified a problem with the assessment tool in ANGEL.  If a student changes an answer to a question before submitting it, the new answer may not be properly recorded. This problem occurs in two situations:

      1.  When IP address filtering is enabled. This will happen with either Firefox or Internet Explorer, regardless of any other assessment settings.

      2.  Loss of Internet connectivity or application timing out.

      As a result of these situations,  any student who changes his or her mind about the answer to a particular question will find that only the original selection was saved, not the new selection, in the submitted version of the quiz.

      ITS is working is working with ANGEL/Blackboard on a solution to this problem.

      If you have any questions, please contact us at ANGELSupport@psu.edu.

  8. Will the tool be implemented? I just spoke with Ravi, Natalie, and Kate and they gave strong indications that there a some serious issues with the Assessments tool. Ravi said that the tool shouldn’t be implemented because 7.4 does not support quizzes and we would lose them as reference when checking the newly migrated assessments. We all agreed that the new tool is nice (after the major bugs, see 7, have been fixed) when starting from scratch, but it the migration aspect that’s killing the process.